Tweet
The Boy Scouts of America (BSA) and the Black Church are rightly lauded for molding young black men into adult leaders. BSA troops have produced distinguished African American scouts like retired four-star general Colin Powell, six-time NBA champion Michael Jordan, and Heisman Trophy winner Herschel Walker.
African American participation in the Boy Scout movement dates back to 1911, and its impact has not only forced the integration of young black males into the organization, but also continues to address many of the challenges these young males confront today.
With young African American males (particularly those in urban enclaves) at much higher risks for incarceration, gang violence, unemployment, fatherlessness, and substance abuse, the BSA has been a source of constant and consistent strong positive male figures for these young black boys.
Like many BSA troops, African American troops are often strongly affiliated with community black churches. These churches not only hold homophobic views, but also hold a tight-fisted hand on their non gender conforming males.
The BSA’s position on GBTQ scouts is unquestionably discriminatory, and its hesitancy to swiftly remove its ban dishonors the organization’s goal and philosophy, “to prepare young people to make ethical and moral choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the Scout Oath and Law.”
This means that GBTQ black youths cannot catch the lifeline that the BSA provides their straight brethren due to the homophobia of the church and the BSA. It’s no wonder these youths have higher incidents of homelessness.
The BSA’s national office is housed in Texas, the heart of the Bible Belt, and that reflects the religiously conservative influence on the organization’s policies.
Although the BSA is a civic organization that has local chapters in public schools, a large number of them are equally affiliated with religious institutions. Those religious groups have a disproportionate influence on the organization.
Most of these religious institutions interpret and impose both the Scout Oath and Scout Law from their conservative theological perspective and the Black Church is not alone in doing so. The Church of the Latter Day Saints, for example, has a huge influence on the BSA because the church mandates that all male youths join the Boy Scouts.
“With mutual exaltation of God and country and a shared aim of nurturing ‘morally straight’ men with leadership skills and a service ethic, the Mormons and the Boy Scouts seem made for each other, as entwined as a square knot. And in an unusual partnership dating to 1913, the Mormon Church has embraced scouting wholesale, giving it a central role in preparing male youths for their two-year missionary stints and adulthood as lay priests” New York Times reporter Erik Eckholm wrote in his recent article “As Partner, Mormons and Scouts Turn Boys into Men.”
The basis for discrimination against gay scouts and gay scout leaders pivots around two beliefs: the Judeo-Christian tenets about homosexuality and the myth that there is an inherent correlation between male homosexuality and pedophilia. Although these beliefs have been successfully refuted they are strategically upheld to maintain its ban.
The BSA’s 2004 position statement on homosexuality that has not changed states, “We believe that homosexual conduct is inconsistent with the requirement of the Scout oath that a Scout be morally straight and in the Scout law that a Scout be clean in word and deed, and that homosexuals do not provide a desirable role model for Scouts.”
The words “morally straight” and “clean” are what have fueled the BSA’s homophobic stance and consequently have given rise to both its misinterpretation and misuse of the group’s own guidelines.
While “morally straight” and “clean” have everything to so with being a scout, they have nothing to do with a scout’s sexual orientation. The original interpretation of both words are about virtue, readiness, and open mindedness in the context of human service, and a scout’s commitment to teamwork, honesty, respect for others, and community service.
The truth that needs to be told is that the BSA’s is fighting itself, and needs to come out of the closet about its founder. Perhaps that would dispel the dispute about gay scouts.
Scout founder Robert Baden-Powell (1857- 1941) was gay. A number of biographies on Baden-Powell alluded to his homosexuality. Tim Jeal, the author of “The Boy-Man: The Life of Lord Baden-Powell,” wrote, “The available evidence points inexorably to the conclusion that Baden-Powell was a repressed homosexuality.”
Jeal further states that in Baden-Powell’s diaries and correspondences, Baden-Powell wrote frequently about his “enjoyment at watching young men swim naked; enjoy nude men; (and) expressed disdain for female nudity.” Also, Baden-Powell had an “extremely close, decades-long friendship” with Kenneth McLaren, “with whom he served in the British military and always made sure he bunked.”
The Black Church’s silent stance of BSA’s continued ban on gays help strengthen the church’s belief that strong black male leadership is exclusively heterosexual.
However, if both the Black Church and BSA goals are to continue to nurture the talents and gifts of all its young males, then they must ask themselves to what degree does their stance on homophobia hinders their goal?
5 Comments
In addition to the impacts on GBTQ scouts, sponsoring orgs can make it difficult for scouts with openly LGBT parents or role models. When my son was a Cub Scout in a troop sponsored by a conservative church (not a choice I was allowed to contribute to), it didn’t matter that I never tried to become a recognized leader. I was not welcome as a server for pancake suppers or a volunteer on clean-up crews.
I wasn’t prevented from participating in parent/scout activities with other parents, but under specific instructions that I was never to “stand in authority over a child.”
So, the BSA has no problem making some straight scouts second-class members based on orientation of their family members.
The explorer scouts do allow females so lesbians are also affected, but to a much lesser degree. Also, you,we are talking about BSA, other countries scouting organizations do not always have the same limits on GBT and sometimes Ls.
Need to check your logic – you say being gay has nothing to do with paedophelia, then note that Boy Scouts founder was a gay voyeuristic paedophile/lech. Whether paedophile priests are gay or simply bi with more opportunity for boys, havent seen an analysis, but as a non-phobe i’d still be hesitant to give my kids too much private time with the clergy. Would you? Even if you and your child are gay, when’s the minimum age for a sexual encounter with a grown man, consenting or not?
I also take it that you don’t respect conservative churches much, not sure if you like churches at all. Why do you expect them to help you if you disagree with most of what they believe? Start your own org that mixes honor, service, respect and more modern views on everything from gblt to race to society & government. i never expected the Tea Party to give my causes a hand, even if could find 1 or 2 issues for common ground.
What does GBTQ stand for?
“the BSA is a civic organization that has local chapters in public schools, a large number of them are equally affiliated with religious institutions.”
BSA does not have “local chapters”. BSA grants “charters” to religious and civic organizations that wish to operate a pack, troop, crew or post. Charter Organizations “own” their units and must approve every adult volunteer application before it is submitted to the local council. The current proposal under consideration would leave the decision on unit leadership up to the chartering organization.
The largest number of CO’s are the LDS, RC and United Methodist Churches. Non religious organizations such as PTA”s that used to act as CO’s are withdrawing support partly because of the LGBT ban but also because of insurance issues.
There is a substantial but still minority of BSA members that support the proposed change. I suspect that National may adopt the proposed change in spite of the wishes of current membership. But we also must recognize that BSA cannot exist without its charter organizations and cannot force a CO to accept any individual into a leadership position.