This is historic news; the last time a pope to resign was Gregory XII in 1415; “old age” has traditionally meant nothing as popes die in office. Notably, Pope Benedict XVI, the former Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger was the right-hand man to Pope John Paul II, who not only succumbed to advanced age, but was for all intents and purposes senile for the last few years of his reign. As it’s being reported now — via CNN:
Pope Benedict XVI will resign on February 28, his spokesman Father Federico Lombardi told CNN Monday.
The 85-year-old pope is resigning “because of advanced age,” Benedict told the cardinals of the Catholic Church on Monday.
“Strength of mind and body are necessary, strength which in the last few months has deteriorated in me to the extent that I have had to recognize my incapacity to adequately fulfill the ministry entrusted to me,” the pope told the cardinals, according to the Vatican.
Via ABC News, more detail:
Popes are allowed to resign; church law specifies only that the resignation be “freely made and properly manifested.”
Only a handful have done so, however and there’s good reason why it hasn’t become commonplace: Might the existence of two popes — even when one has stepped down — lead to divisions and instability in the church? Might a new resignation precedent lead to pressures on future popes to quit at the slightest hint of infirmity?
Now the Catholic church, which has been shaken by controversy and scandal by its protection of its pedophile priests preying on parishioners around the globe, as well as revelations by the Pope’s butler leaking papers (Paolo Gabriele said he had acted because he saw “evil and corruption everywhere in the Church”), faces some choices. Benedict has ruled with a horrendous obsession on demonizing of the LGBT community since ascending in 2005, while having to pay out hundreds of millions in settlements for these sexual predator situations that he had a hand in covering up.
Benedict published paper after paper about one-man, one-woman marriage, and the need to save the family and the world from homosexuals, and called gay Catholics “disordered” (but still welcoming to worship and are in good graces by remaining chaste).
The number of men and women who have deep-seated homosexual tendencies is not negligible. This inclination, which is objectively disordered, constitutes for most of them a trial. They must be accepted with respect, compassion, and sensitivity. Every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided. These persons are called to fulfill God’s will in their lives and, if they are Christians, to unite to the sacrifice of the Lord’s Cross the difficulties they may encounter from their condition…Homosexual persons are called to chastity. By the virtues of self-mastery that teach them inner freedom, at times by the support of disinterested friendship, by prayer and sacramental grace, they can and should gradually and resolutely approach Christian perfection.
Will the Vatican now move to select a pope with a different world view, or, continue down this dark and demonizing path? It has a choice, but the cardinals in place largely reflect Benedict’s viewpoint. More from ABC:
The move sets the stage for the Vatican to hold a conclave to elect a new pope by mid-March, since the traditional mourning time that would follow the death of a pope doesn’t have to be observed.
…Contenders to be his successor include Cardinal Angelo Scola, archbishop of Milan, Cardinal Christoph Schoenborn, the archbishop of Vienna, and Cardinal Marc Ouellet, the Canadian head of the Vatican’s office for bishops. Longshots include Cardinal Timothy Dolan of New York. Although Dolan is popular and backs the pope’s conservative line, the general thinking is that the Catholic Church doesn’t need a pope from a “superpower.”
Well if they want to avoid continuing scandal, steering clear of Cardinal Timothy Dolan (right, photo by Cy White) would be a good idea. He has played a role in the pedophile coverup scandal while he was in Milwaukee. NYT:
But like bishops before him, the archbishop was also a tough defender of the church’s interests, clergy and bank balances. In Milwaukee, he worked in an unusually public and personal way to limit lawsuits and settlements. He declined to post the names of abusive priests who belonged to religious orders, though some other bishops have done so.
And in one St. Louis case, records show, he swiftly took the side of a priest who then sued his accuser with the archdiocese’s help, though church officials had not made a detailed investigation of the complaint.
Here are documents obtained by the Times showing Dolan’s role as an auxiliary bishop in St. Louis in 2002 “as they dealt with a hesitant accuser and a priest who forcefully asserted his innocence. These documents, submitted in court as part of litigation.” They were provided by David Clohessy, the executive director of Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests.
Irish Central discussed Dolan and these other papal contenders.
The oddsmakers still believe that the next pope is more likely to be African according to Paddy Power, Ireland’s leading bookmaker, who has come out with a list of “papabile,” those considered papal material. Favorite is Cardinal Francis Arinze of Nigeria, who is 15/8 (bet eight to win fifteen), while in second place is Cardinal Peter Turkson of Ghana at 9/4.
That’s two top Africans in the top two spots according to the bookmaker’s odds.
In third place in the odds is Archbishop Angelo Scola of Venice at 7/1 while in fourth place is Cardinal Oscar Rodriguez Maradiago of Honduras at 10/1 while Cardinal Albert Malcolm Ranjith at 33/1 rounds out the top five.
It would be mind-blowing and interesting to watch if a black Pope ascends to power. The church is growing on that continent, and has adopted the socially conservative line of Benedict. However, how would conservative American Catholics and the dwindling European Catholic flock react to this turn of selection? Pop the popcorn…
The Big Q: once he has stepped down, is Benedict then subject to international criminal prosecution for the pedophile priest coverup?
UPDATE: There’s a meaty piece by Adele Stan on Alternet that addresses what the shoe might be.
“Citing age and infirmity as his reason for leaving the papacy, Benedict’s action comes just weeks after he opened his celebrated Twitter account — and less than a month after the decades-old child abuse scandal drew nearer to the pope’s door, with revelations published in the Los Angeles Times earlier this month that Cardinal Roger Mahony, then Archbishop of Los Angeles, sought to evade the law in cases involving the sexual abuse of children by the priests in his charge by sending them to treatment facilities in states that did not require health professionals to report the crimes to authorities
At the time that Mahony was covering up the crimes of his priests, Benedict, then known as Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, led the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, the Vatican office that oversaw such matters.
…For instance, in a 2003 letter to Ratzinger, Mahony says of Father Lynn R. Caffoe that between the priest and one boy, there were 100 ”instances of masturbatory and copulative acts,” according to an account in the Los Angeles Daily News But Mahony never reported Caffoe’s alleged crimes to police, and Ratzinger apparently never instructed him to.
…Although Benedict survived repeated calls for his resignation because of his role in allowing the child-abuse scandal to flourish and his failure to protect children, the cache of documents in the Los Angeles case may turn out to be something of a tipping point.”
***
On a personal note, I wish that the Catholic Church would transform itself with Pope Benedict’s resignation. Too many good Catholics have been hurt, disappointed and demoralized by this leadership and it has hurt their faith.
I’m a non-practicing Episcopalian, but I attended Catholic school from K-6 (much love to Immaculata in Durham), and back in the day (the late 1960s), the church was much more progressive and not condemning in the way it has been under Benedict’s reign. I never heard a peep about gays or abortion, in fact, the nuns actually sang leftist Pete Seeger folk songs in class (!) and my first grade teacher, Sister Judith, left the order to get married during the school year. A very different church, a different time. I certainly didn’t leave Immaculata indoctrinated or full of guilt. As a child I was able to appreciate the rituals and ceremonies of the Church for their beauty, even if not my own.
I’m not optimistic that this ship can be righted since this Pope has elevated Cardinals that share his mindset and world view, but I hope the flock can continue to make their voices heard.




31 Comments


It probably won’t be Arinze, Pam. He’s too old: 80. I met him when I was in the seminary. He’s likable. I was very surprised considering the mean-spirited sound bytes I’d heard from him in the news. Turkson is much more likely.
I’ve met Dolan too, and thought he was a real ass. But the thing about him is that he’s a politician. He says what Rome wants him to say, not because he believes it. However, if he were the pope he could do as he likes without playing to the hierarchy in Rome. With that freedom, he might surprise us and reverse this regressive trend in catholicism. He doesn’t have strong core convictions either way. So, that’s good. I don’t think they’l pick him though.
The best choice in a group of bad choices in Ouellet of Quebec. Conservative, but not as conservative as Benedict. Probably the best we’d get.
Austria’s cardinal schoenbrun would be great, but there’s no chance he’d be elected.
My money is on Turkson, who would be good for economic equality but continue all the other crap we hate.
I agree on Arinze. The conventional wisdom the last time around is that they talked up African cardinals and ones from Latin America (giving the impression that non-white candidates were top prospects), when in fact, Benedict was always the “next in succession” from the get-go. The question is whether they would even consider a pope from the continents where it is fastest growing or cling to European selections?
I think they’re serious about an African successor. The African church has loads of seminarians and priests. They sub at parishes all over America in the summer when american priests go on vacation. A lot of them went to seminaries in America and Europe and are exposed to the world beyond africa. But… they are very conservative on the whole.
Don’t forget that the catholic church put a latino (very right wing Opus Dei Gomez) in charge of the largest diocese in the United States, LA, which has 5 million catholics.
Black or brown faces make the church appear progressive, and Rome loves that. It’s like what the GOP is doing by pushing Marco Rubio to the front. But both Rubio and Gomez are right wing, not progressive at all. It’s all just a superficial progressive appearance that the church is promoting.
We’ll see.
Overall, this resignation is bad as it allows Ratzinger to have too much of a hand in controlling who succeeds him. Already, he’s named 67 of the 120 cardinals who will vote for his successor. And, as the top cardinal under JP2, he had a hand in naming all 120. This man has had way too much influence. I’d argue that he was not one pope but three. He formed the direction (regressive, anti-vatican2)the church took under john paul II, he’s made very regressive moves as pope and he will have great influence in choosing a conservative to succeed him. No one pope has ever controlled so much of the direction of the catholic church. Resigning was a calculated move on his part. It gives him power after his death.
Covering up pedophilia isn’t a hindrance. On the contrary. A promotion is frequently a reward for a good coverup. And Pope Palpatine did so himself. When he ran the Inquisition, he issued orders to not cooperate with worldly investigators and handle things internally instead.
giving up the popehood for lent is a bit extreme. I did Nazi it coming.
The Vatican should throw Cardinal Mohony under the bus and see him in jail for raiding the cemetery fund instead of having him be in “good standing” and able to vote on the next Pope.
Boy oh boy oh boy.
What a surprise.
Yup. As Peterr’s already noted, this isn’t a reaction to the scandals — those won’t go away when he does. It’s simply because he’s tired and he’s also quite sure that his legacy — a legacy of “purifying” the church of modernity — is secure.
The guy is really frail, so I think he’s being truthful about the reasons for his resignation. I truly doubt that he’ll still be around a year from now.
X2
Interesting question with no simple answer. You would have to divide it up to acts he committed before becoming Pope and acts he committed as Pope. Acts during the Papacy would have the color of sovereign immunity and would be difficult to prosecute in absence of a waiver of immunity (such as under a treaty obligation). Acts before he was Pope could be prosecuted if you could obtain jurisdiction, say in the European Court of Human Rights or under the US Alien Tort Claims Act.
However, I doubt that Benedict will ever leave Vatican City ever again and I also think that obtaining jurisdiction there (i.e., service of process) would be next to impossible. Of course, this is my hypothetical take on the matter. I think you could write a dissertation on the subject and I would not be surprised to see more than a few lawsuits come up in the coming weeks and months.
Agreed. I hadn’t seen him in a while. I think it’s magnamous of him and maybe he will set a precedent.
As far as the new pope……it’s never the guy you think. Past two popes have been Polish and German. Kinda like sausage.
Two questions.
Will there be a Final Four?
Will they be televised?
One more question.
Does the smoking chimney thing apply in a papal resignation as part of selecting the next St Pete?
Speaking of the possibility of a the ascension of a black Cardinal, of whatever, from Africa. One just as likely to be as regressive and homophobic as the white variety we’ve seen in Benedict. Now just how dispiriting would that be, regardless of the entertainment value of watching the American prelates heads explode?
Yes — black smoke if there were not sufficient votes to elect a Pope, white when there are enough. It has nothing to do with the death of the Pope, it’s just the way the cardinals signal how the election process goes.
Indeed. And for those curious, they get the black smoke and the white smoke by burning paper treated with different chemicals.
‘too pooped to pope’. (cribbed from seattle times comments)
peas!
Great NEW pope joke:
The two black guys, one a catholic and one a baptist were sittin’ around when one said to the other,”I guess you heard that they’re gonna elect a new pope.”
“No, I dodn;t know that. How do that do that?”
“Well, the cardinals all get together and they take a vote. And they blow black smoke out the chimney until they finally decide on one guy to be pope. Then they make white smoke come out of the chimney and everybody knows there is a new pope.”
” That’e pretty interesting. But I wish they’d let the giants vote on that, I’d sure like to see Wilie Mays win.”
LOL.
BUT HE JUST STARTED TWEETING 2 WEEKS AGO!!!!!
Is it THAT exhausting following Justin Bieber!?!?!?
does a resigned pope continue to speak directly to cod?
peas!
It’s so exciting that he doesn’t want his day job anymore
After reading this and Peterr’s blog and the comments thereto, and watching two talking head panels on the subject (PBS and al-Jazeera), my mind keeps coming back to the point that as an institution the Catholic Church over the years has been one of the most reactionary in human history.
Granted, individual Catholics have produced some great art and music, often in a way largely informed by their religion. Others have been in the vanguard of antiwar movements, also out of religious conviction.
But we are speaking of the Church hierarchy here. This is the outfit that instigated the debacle of the Crusades (using the request for assistance by the Byzantine Empire as an excuse for an all-out, ultimately disastrous war on Islam). Its corruption in matters like the sale of “indulgences” led to the revolt called the Protestant Reformation. Then there was the Inquisition, there was the persecution of Galileo. (To be sure, in more modern times the Church has “forgiven” Galileo, but this position has been accompanied by a revision of what he actually said. In 1980 I went to a history of science seminar where a priest/scholar argued that Galileo’s astronomy was not all that different from the Ptolemaic doctrine accepted in his time.)
In this context the retrenchment into homophobia at the hands of Ratzinger/Benedict that Pam so painstakingly details here is hardly surprising. Marriage equality represents Change, and there is nothing the Church hates and fears more than Change. We can allow a few black Cardinals, but not homosexuality: married priests might come next, and all those concubines the Cardinals have been enjoying will probably demand legitimacy.
So I don’t know who the next Pope will be (though I suspect they will retrench into one of the Italians appointed by the incumbent or recommended by him to his predecessor, among the 120 noted by matt @ 3), but whoever it is, nothing will change.
I was wondering about the possible scandal thing too. The Vatican has always been about politics, not just during the Borgia years so it may not be the obvious. It probably isn’t old age considering that JP 2 was out and about until he was on his death bed. They have doctors and nurses who are capable of keeping him doing his job for a long time after he should retire. He seems too healthy and together. There’s more to this.
interesting that he’ll reportedly enter a cloistered monastery within Vatican City. Inaccessible? Will he take Bernard Law with him?
A Growing Vatican Bank Scandal Threatens Catholic Church Image …
http://www.spiegel.de › English Site › Europe › Catholic Church
Jul 2, 2012 – A new scandal threatens to engulf the Catholic Church and this time the focus is money. … While some would like total transparency, dubious transactions from … meaning he couldn’t, as he had planned, get into a taxi at the Italian …
NOTE: VERY interesting piece from last summer..equally interesting that the term cloistered is used in the body of the article to describe the Vatican bank:)
And this from Business Insider:
[link to http://www.businessinsider.com
Sorry for #28,that did not link correctly.
Pope Benny, who is supposed to observe a vow of poverty and be devoid of vanity, wears custom made oxblood Prada shoes. He has no desire for dropping shoes.
A fish stinks from the head down.
This particular fish has stunk for centuries. Hard to believe that the stink has not pervaded the entire body yet.
Similarly, Enron would not have been just peachy if Lay had stepped down.
I expect NOTHING will change. The Church will continue down the conservative, destructive course it’s on.