“Homosexualize”? My spell checker says no.

Speed kills Janet…

Satanic Trannies are the worst kind! (Spell checker hates that too)

I wonder if they would like to hear from a girl who used to be a Boy Scout? Probably not…

Wonkette has a piece on right-wingers imploring reg’lar folks to watch out for the gays because “Think of the children!” Wonkette ends with:

If only there were some sort of science that had looked into whether or not children in gay homes were actually more likely to be bad-touched. It seems like the kind of thing that would be helpful.

She then links to Facts About Homosexuality and Child Molestation and the not-at-all-surprising comment that:

Members of disliked minority groups are often stereotyped as representing a danger to the majority’s most vulnerable members.

There’s some confusion in the anti-gay camp regarding advertising and message. Some think that they lost at the polls in all four states where marriage was on the ballot in November because they softened their message–moving away from the gays-are-gonna-take-your-children message they used effectively to pass prop 8 to an “our religious freedoms and right of free speech are being taken away.” So, there’ a push for bringing back the tried-and-true gays are after your kids message.
We’ll see if it works. Seems like they are grabbing at anything that can keep an increasingly unpopular stance afloat.
I don’t think it’ll work outside very red states with large evangelical populations.

You’re right — it’s really bad. I guess the money must really be drying up.

As for the content — what content? Same tired old lies.

I ran across a piece this morning noting that, in spite of everything they can do, fewer people believe there is a link between homosexuality and pedophilia.

It’s sort of typical that not only would they be repeating something slanderous and untrue, but something that most people don’t believe to start with.

Clueless? Just a little.