The right wing is not going down without a long painful fight, thanks to the movement’s professional bigots, womb-controllers, religious zealots. Matt K. Lewis, senior contributor for The Daily Caller, seems to think the culture war is over.
In recent months, it has been especially depressing to be a conservative. In the past, one could more easily endure the ranting of liberal commentators by taking solace that — outside of New York City and Washington, D.C. — most of the country was center-right. Thus, whenever an elite liberal commentator said something fringy, one could always console himself by saying (or at least thinking): “I hope you push that idea, because you’ll keep losing elections in real America.”
Today, conservatives have made a shocking discovery: They are the ones in danger of appearing out of touch with middle America.
Democracy, of course, requires individuals who are moral and responsible. Strong families are the cure for much of what ails us. You pick the problem, and stronger families would probably render the solution moot. Consider a recent debate: We can put warning labels on violent games and movies, but that won’t replace mom and dad being involved in their children’s lives and being aware of what they are watching.
Conservatives have largely lost the culture, and it can’t be won back by passing some landmark piece of legislation. Instead, it’s going to be a long, hard slog. The good news is that, though conservatives typically hate the term “reactionary,” most conservative victory is first predicated on liberal overreach.
Well, to turn the prism and look at this a bit differently, what we saw in 2012 and are likely to see in 2013 are more attempts by the fringe right to slow social change they don’t like by throwing up legislative roadblocks and incessant bigoted attacks. Just this week the House GOP killed the Violence Against Women Act.
Back in April, the Senate approvedVAWA reauthorization fairly easily, with a 68 to 31 vote. The bill was co-written by a liberal Democrat (Vermont’s Pat Leahy) and a conservative Republican (Idaho’s Mike Crapo), and seemed on track to be reauthorized without much of a fuss, just as it was in 2000 and 2005.
But House Republicans insisted the bill is too supportive of immigrants, the LGBT community, and Native Americans — and they’d rather let the law expire than approve a slightly expanded proposal. Vice President Biden, who helped write the original law, tried to persuade House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) to keep the law alive, but the efforts didn’t go anywhere.
And so, for the first time since 1994, the Violence Against Women Act is no more.
And as we saw in 2012, the attacks on reproductive freedom at the state level have been horrifically successful.
This past year, 19 states passed 42 different provisions intended to restrict women’s access to abortion services — second only to the record-breaking 92 anti-abortion provisions that were passed in 2011…Arizona topped the list by enacting seven abortion restrictions, including a stringent 20-week abortion ban that currently has the unfortunate distinction of being the harshest law in the nation. Not to be outdone, Kansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, South Dakota and Wisconsin each enacted at least three pieces of anti-abortion legislation to limit their residents’ reproductive rights as well.
The fringe right (the outcast “crazy granny” in the attic that conservatives depend on to flamethrow and marshal the ground forces, usually through god-and-damnation tactics) shows no sign of slowing down; in fact they are doubling down. Take the nearly insane rantings of the influential Donald E. Wildmon of the American Family Association, an organization courted by GOP Clown Car presidential hopefuls last year. He continues the “Christian persecution” meme in this e-blast:
What will religion look like in the year 2060?
Conservative Christians will be treated as second class citizens, much like African Americans were prior to civil rights legislation in the 1960s.
Family as we know it will be drastically changed with the state taking charge of the children beginning at birth.
…Christian broadcasting will be declared illegal based on the separation of church and state. The airwaves belong to the government, therefore they cannot be used for any religious purpose.
We will have, or have had, a Muslim president.
Cities with a name from the Bible such as St. Petersburg, Bethlehem, etc. will be forced to change their name due to separation of church and state.
“[W]e’re getting to the point where tolerance is a bad thing and hate is a good thing. And let me define that: we’re told in, I believe it’s Proverbs 4:13, it says “the fear of the Lord is to hate evil.” Which means that if I’m going to stand for what God stands for, there’s some certain things I have to hate: I have to hate evil, I have to hate murder – well no, you can’t hate, that’s a bad thing … no, hate is a good thing!…So we’ve got to get to the point where tolerance is seen as a sin because we’re tolerating a lot stuff that destroys our families, that destroys our own character and we can’t tolerate that stuff. We have to get back to the point where hate is a virtue, at least certain kinds of hate. The fear of the Lord is to hate evil and we need to have a hatred of things and get off this fence of having no passion about anything. You know, I tolerate anything, I’m not going to have a passion good or bad, I’m not going to hate anything … We just can’t do that and we’ve got to get back to that same type of intolerance, that we’re going to be intolerant of liberalism.
By the way, there are way too many conservative elected officials still going the “Christian persecution” route, flipping it over into an obsessive Islamophobia. Here’s a primer on 5 Islam-bashing Republicans to watch in 2013. My favorite on the list is Texas’s Louie Gohmert. This is one for the ages:
“This Texas Republican has promoted anti-Muslim sentiment too many times before. Gohmert was widely mocked for his August 2010 assertion that Middle Eastern terrorists were plotting new attacks on the U.S. by sending their pregnant wives to this country whose children “could be raised and coddled as future terrorists.” The phrase “terror babies” entered the political lexicon after Gohmert’s outlandish statements. Yet, as Mother Jones noted at the time, there’s not “a morsel of evidence to support Gohmert’s terror baby tale, which the congressman says he learned of from a woman on a plane while en route to the Middle East and from a retired FBI agent.”
The culture wars will not recede until voices like the above are criticized loudly and often by conservatives like Lewis. Silence or trying to pretend those folks aren’t part of their movement is akin to support of the garbage. Scott Wooledge at Daily Kos noted that the right, even in the face of loss of support from most of America (Sean Hannity has lost half of his audience post-election), can’t let go of its delusions.
“I’d certainly like to think that it reflects a permanent dispiriting that would signal a major realigning of the goals and tactics of the Conservative Entertainment Complex™. I’d like to think they’ll wake up and recognize that constantly catering to the basest instincts of the Republican party—however divorced from reality they might be—is not ultimately a good strategy. I’d like to dream of a world where the unmitigated bullshit the Conservative Entertainment Complex™ spews becomes their own undoing when the populous decides to seek out better sources of information. But Conservative Entertainment Complex™ appears to have learned nothing from the election results.”





17 Comments


The religious extremists have always been with us — Massachusetts Bay Colony, anyone? — and always will be. They pop up periodically, just long enough to make a mess of things for the rest of us to clean up, and then slink back into their dark corners until the next time. There’s solace in the fact that we always wind up a little more free, a little more inclusive, and a little more rational, but it’s annoying as hell to have to live through it. The reaction comes not from “liberal overreach,” but from reactionary excess, because Americans are basically decent people who do believe in equality under the law and our other foundational ideals — which the Wildmons and Bartons and Gohmerts despise.
The irony is that they will always play the victim while wailing about how they are against LGBT rights because they are tired of them playing the victim. They (and gun owners) are the most persecuted majority the world has ever seen while people who are actually hurt, killed, and legally discriminated against are just cry babies in their eyes. Talk about being totally out of touch with reality!
@ Mena – “out of touch with reality” – that’s an enormous understatement. In the full piece, Lewis complains about the coarsening of our culture and the breakdown of the family without a hint of irony. Yet he is part of the conservative movement that gave us Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter, Ronald Reagan’s “welfare queens,” Nixon’s “southern strategy” and George HW Bush’s Willie Horton ads. It is the conservative movement that blames crime on single mothers, created the myth of us godless Sodomites working to destroy both the Church and the Family, and has created a series of “others” – Communists, feminists, liberals in general – to attack as explicitly outside American culture. If the culture has become coarser, it’s not because we are actually being honest about the full range of humanity and human experiences, it is due the politics of personal destruction, which has been adopted as strategy point #1 by conservatives.
As for the breakdown of the family, which party was it that gave us the first divorced President? To which party did the governor who redefined “hiking the Appalachian Trail” belong? And which party is it that has paraded a series of known adulterers as viable Presidential candidates (yes, we’ve had both Bill Clinton and John Edwards, but we only knew about the first guy when we actually voted for him, and he’s still on his first marriage)?
The real irony is, it is the Blue states, for all their evil liberalism, where our culture is at its most vital, where economies are booming and where social problems like teen pregnancy and divorce tend to be lower.
If this is the conservative movement losing, I’d hate to see it winning. Both parties agree the federal government must cut spending in a depression, the president believes he can kill whomever he wants, with good cause or not, and each month the rich have more power and influence. Gosh, what a great time for liberalism.
True. Care to name them Mr Gomert?
We know. That’s what we’ve come to expect from the Right. Care to change and actually follow the Gospels in which you claim to believe? For example the Beatitudes?
“Strong families” is a dog-whistle* for this: white European Christian men should head families; women should obey their men, and children should obey their parents–without question; and it’s your patriotic duty** to bear children for the state.
* Actually, you don’t have to be a dog to hear it these days.
** Where have we heard this before? Oh, yes. Italy and Germany in the 1930s, and the Soviet Union after WWII.
It doesn’t matter if there are few Righties or if they aren’t popular, the Dems will cave to them just the same. But don’t worry, the Dems need the Repubs like Rice needs soy sauce. They simply don’t run winning Dems against loser Repubs and they keep a decent balance to play Good Cop , Bad Cop. Like in WA state, no Dem money ever comes out to beat Kathy McMorris who votes Repub lockstep on everything.
The Right lost more than the culture war, its been at war with most of American and has lost its mind. For instance, who is it it that can’t afford stuff and needs to be punished with austerity?
Who is it that can’t afford Social Security or Medicare? The people who actually worked or the relatives of the people who put the automation in place? Food is made toxic to improve profit, cures are suppressed, auto making firms build in obsolescence to keep their profit gigs or stay in the game but helping workers do the same is supposed to be wrong or evil. 300 million people held hostage by this pro-business pro rich people Republican Party. The Koch’s feel they own society and can’t afford Social Security.
Many in the ranks of the rich feel guilty for their non-contribution and and apparent or actual thieving so they attempt to suppress with frauds like 911, to enable suppression like the NDAA riders and warrant-less wiretapping and all the secrecy and lack of transparency. Surely, people aren’t in the mood to forfeit their children’s lives to the murder of increasingly bitter wage slavery so that the rich can continue to wallow in their luxury. The rich are the ones who keep insisting on the phony entitlement crisis always try to use claims necessity to help themselves to people’s livelihoods. People grow tired of the theft of doing all the work and having a non-contributing wealthy parasite class take the gains and claim all the credit and call their trickle down fraud virtue. The Republican Party advocates the peril of the majority to enable the luxury of a minority. How is that different from the worst kind of crime? People don’t have to tolerate the Republican Party’s blatant naked calls for inequity and injustice. They apparently represent the fall of the American people and the country. The party is a like on ongoing hate crime. The same inequity and lack of democracy the party has insisted upon in the work place they are now trying to enforce in society at large, it’s totalitarian.
Enough! We need a income tax code that strips the wealthy of their wealth unless it can be shown that the wealth was gained from activities that contribute to society, no more hiding behind market religionism and other similar bs. No more excuses involving globalism, absolute protectionism would be better.
David Barton begins by making fairly reasonable points about hate not being an entirely bad thing. Sure, okay, hating murder and other sins can be a good thing. Is tolerance always a good thing? No, not if it means tolerating sin.
But then he runs off the rails by suggesting that being in favor of non-traditional families counts as a sin. He clearly realizes he’s conflating ideas because he then goes back and repeats his earlier statement.
But who decides what is a contribution to society and what is a detriment? This is the exact same argument that the preacher is making. Some peoples’ hate is another persons love. The GOP have shown by their policies and actions that they care nothing about deficits, family values, etc etc. What they care about isthe power to decide. Dems are similar, but their worldview more closely matches the one I want to have. A large number of issues now are either/or. You can’t have both and there is nothing in between. The sooner we accept that, the better.
Sometimes I think the better response to anti gay marriage is to use their own goals. Make families strong by letting gays marry. Have unrestricted divorce so that only the very strongest marriages remain. Make marriage even stronger by giving universal healthcare. Less financial strain on marriage. There are a number of very simple ways to strengthen marriage.
But the goal to them isn’t stronger, its exclusiveness and the power to decide.
If they really just want more marriage, then let marriage be merged with partnerships and let anyone marry for any reason.
Ban abortion to protect the child?? How about universal birth control and free healthcare to protect the child. How about protect the living??
Someone’s parent is ALWAYS someone else’s child. But someone’s child is not necessarily going to be a parent.
Why should the rightwingers purge itself of its “extremists” when their chief beneficiaries are Hockacrats who literally require their existence more than anybody else?!? Be they real or Memorex, the DNC needs these sonsabitches worse than the GOP does. Can’t have a snot-locker holding voter-drone enabling and rewarding plurality without ‘em!
The irony is the stupendous fantasy that if all these rightwing bigots disappeared tomorrow, it would herald sweeping progressive brilliance and an unfettered liberal utopia descending upon the great unwashed white, black, and latino underclass masses on its gossamer wings. Bullfuckingshit. The day the great chariot swings low and raptures these motherfuckers up will be the same day we all collective slit our wrists because then the hippie-punching from the DNC would really begin in earnest …
Bring on the apocalypse!
Better to live and let live than rail against people I say.
This response left blank.
I understand the sentiment, but I’d actually turn that largely on its head.
The religious right has already lost, completely and utterly. It is now quite easy for American adults to live a completely secular life. Even within religious communities, the crazies are finding their big fish in a little pond mentality to have shrunk the pond a lot.
I’d argue the remnants left in our secular world of the conservative takeover are largely there because of Democrats, not Republicans. It’s Democrats who have kept racist policies like the drug war going and Democrats who have said stupid things about reproductive healthcare like abortion isn’t a healthcare issue.
Yes and no — they’ve lost, or are losing, on almost every issue, but they will never, ever admit it, because they are doing God’s work. The fact that their god more closely resembles Moloch than Jesus is irrelevant — they know the Truth, and so, by definition, everyone else is wrong.
They’re also making too much money to let go all that easily.
But that’s ignoring the point. Who cares about admitting defeat? What does that mean? I’m not out for some kind of Righteous Judgment and Vengeance against my Enemies. That’s the mindset we’re fighting!
The actual policies that continue to cause inequality and suffering in this country are enabled, and even advanced, by Democrats in DC. That is where the focus of our attention can actually do something to change this country.
Finger pointing and straw manning ‘them’ is neither accurate nor helpful. ‘We’are the problem, the change that has to happen.