In one of the many post-election assessments of how the GOP failed to see the demographic shift as a significant factor this time around, a Reuters piece by Andrea Shalal-Esa brings up an interesting proposition that crossed my mind some time ago — what if the Republicans, a group that thinks an inch deep on real ways of changing to attract new voters as its base ages and dies off, decided the fastest path to bring in votes from Latinos and Asians is to cultivate animus and division against blacks to break up the voter coalition that did them in in 2012?
You know, the old “we’ll let you in The Club of Privilege” tactic, resulting in a pull-up-the-ladder-behind-you effect, leaving blacks behind:
“Michael Omi, a leading scholar on U.S. racial politics at the University of California, Berkeley, said the Republican party faced a crisis in how to adapt to changing demographics, which show blacks, Latinos, Asians and others will eclipse whites as a majority of the U.S. population in three decades, without moving away from its core constituency of white males.
“All of that amounts to a pretty thin veneer,” Omi told over 1,400 teachers, doctors, artists and others at the “Facing Race” conference hosted by the non-profit Applied Research Center. He said it was still unclear if Asian-Americans and Latinos would be increasingly accepted as “honorary whites,” which could align them more closely with the Republican party while perpetuating a black-white divide, or if the country would move toward a new, more multi-faceted view of race.”
It obviously wouldn’t be the first time, as history has shown us, ethnic white minorities (e.g., Irish, Italians) in this country were treated no better than American blacks, but those groups achieved full white status and privilege over time and became part of the dominant culture — along with the benefits accorded by that.
There’s every reason to believe that the playing on the psychology of evolving from minority to majority status (granted by the majority race in power) is a powerful and dangerous inflammatory road to travel politically, but do you really believe that the GOP won’t “go there?” The Republican party has successfully time and again managed to get poor and working-class whites to vote against their own economic self-interest with the pitiful pipe dream that they can all become wealthy like, oh, Mitt Romney — and because certainly, they are obviously not like “those people” — poor blacks. Despite all of the rhetoric about blacks (and other minorities) being the face of “the takers” and benefiting from all of that government largesse, I doubt any of the voters who hold those views would want to wake up tomorrow and be Black and Beautiful.
And so it’s interesting that Michael Omi (and no one else I’ve read so far), has been willing to walk this third rail. Will Latino and Asian voters resist that temptation if approached by the GOP with siren songs of privilege, or see through this attempt to continue an unhealthy fixation on race rather than the policies of the party? Given how ham-handed and unsophisticated that the Republicans have been in their sudden conversion (less than 24 hours after the election) to see the value of the Latino vote, I think they are going to have a hard time convincing reality-based people of color to divide and conquer.
But they will try. And it will be ugly.




20 Comments


When I got started in politics in the ’70s in Des Moines, the south side was heavily Italian and Latino and the two groups got along famously. Within class lines, I don’t think Latinos have been treated differently than other new white immigrant groups in much of the U.S.
But the Republicans overplayed their hand, and it will take at least ten years for them to regain credibility with the groups they were trashing just a few weeks ago. It also doesn’t hurt to remember that the most pro-Republican Latino tribe, the Cubans, are widely disliked by many in the bewilderingly complex world of Latino American politics.
And I’m assuming Obama will somehow bring himself to reduce income inequality. If not, almost every group will be up for grabs if the Republicans start handing out benefits and entitlements like campaign literature.
I don’t see how it is remotely possible for the Republicans to reach out in any meaningful way to a significant number of any minority in the US without alienating ” its core constituency of white males.”
Can someone speculate on how that will play out?
The problem for the GOP is their batshit crazy base, which doesn’t admit it hates non-whites but hates them all the same. Some individuals might hate one group more than the other, but the problem is the minorities are not white.
How does GOP leadership break off that hatred of everything non-white to isolate Blacks?
The only reason the Irish etc. were able to assimilate to the extent they did is that they were white.
My wife is Asian, I’m white – no one asks me where I’m “from” even though I was born in Germany and she was raised in California. Talk to either one of us on the phone and you don’t we’re “other.” See her in person and the bigotry comes out – at least in Orange County, CA.
Spend some time in Santa Ana and then in south Orange County, which where I live is teabag heaven and home of the Saddleback Church, notorious for their support for kill the gays in Uganda. There’s much more animus towards Latinos and Asians than to Blacks down here – probably because Blacks have been pretty well excluded from the OC.
Don’t think the Asians and Latinos don’t know that the teabaggers hate them. I’m not seeing a path to “now we only hate Blacks, you Latinos and Asians are now OK.”
Speaking Spanish or any Asian language is red meat to the batshit insane – how does the GOP leadership change that? They’re being led by the bigoted base, not leading them, which was not the case when it became OK to be white, not just WASP.
If that wasn’t true the GOP would be in control of the Senate today (see Delaware, Missouri, Indiana etc.) and perhaps the White House.
This article could benefit from some solid research about the attitudes of the already very diverse Hispano-American/Latino and Asian-American communities toward race. (Start with the importance of African and Creole culture TO Latino culture, work your way from there.) Lotta different Latino communities out there–Puerto Rican immigrants changing Florida as we speak. Other than throwing out the idea that the Republicans could try to divide those communities from Black people, this article goes nowhere. Meanwhile, you’ll have a hard time convincing anyone that the animating feature of Republicanism isn’t hostility toward the Other in the first place. No way they get out from under that anytime soon.
Beyond that, you’re still looking at the world IN black and white, as if the Dems had some kind of monopoloy on virtue, which is tiresome. The fact that Obama helps move this settler colony beyond white supremacy doesn’t change much; he still presides over a racist construct, bombing brown people in Pakistan and North Africa, militarizing North Africa, giving his seal of approval to Israel’s bombing of brown people in Palestine. Doesn’t brings more justice, freedom, or middle class prosperity. On the contrary. . .
Nicely done. While working in Texass this last year it was evident that old world Spanish bloods were as f-ed ( naive ) as their white counterparts regarding this voting bloc mix. I’d venture the Catholic Church had more sway than the RNC and their 2 show horses. And, who wants to hang their national hopes on that old world nail. Cubans and Conquistadors, not withstanding, the voters who saw Romney/Ryan as the extreme rights’ answer to escaping The Other label come from countries where trust in ” the free market and other hogwash ” has an abysmal and well earned record. Banana Republics and fascist para-military govt.s are not the best places for party building outreach for the likes of the Bain boys. I’ll bet in 2016 the 2nd rule will be updated: ” always triple tap ” ( the zombies ) will replace ” forward “.
Bless ya Mz. Spaulding for being a step ahead of the game, again.
As much as I’m a cynic, jaded, and despise GOP like racist elitism and all it’s stood for in our history . . . I hadn’t gotten to THIS point.
N the minute I read half your diary, I knew I was still selling the hate short.
Of COURSE they will do this. DOH!
I chastise myself for not knowing this in advance, given the evidence set before us all . . . and I thank you for raising the issue, so I and millions of others are NOT surprised when it comes down, and we can ALL rise up and teach them ugly, white patsy faced, red necked bulging purple neck veined haters we the people will no longer stand for this crap.
N then, we’ll all quietly remind them, they are dying. And the young amongst their ranks are diminishing annually, daily. And the truth is winning.
Thanks Mz. Spaulding, I’m now ready for the onslaught. And I stand with you, and we the people, who fucking know better.
Harumph, and bless yer heart, soul and vital organs . . . and in this case, it’s NOT a southern snark, it’s fully heartfelt, ma’am.
*bows*
Obama won’t, his overriding fealty is to corporate fascism, the MIC, and continued deregulation of business and the disemboweling of all safety net programs that are not part of Wall St leveraging.
Yep, between the DEMS and GOP, bennies and entitlements are gonna be a gold standard to seduce voters. N all of it will be lies as they continue to privatize it all.
LeSigh.
The recent election dealt a blow to the value of the Republican brand, so I’m wondering if the big right wing money might try advancing their agenda by backing conservative corporate Democrats, ala Joe Lieberman and Mary Landrieu. In terms of tax policy and de-regulation, they can get most of what they want from those faux Democrats, which is a lot easier than trying to get Republicans elected in the present political climate. Instead of going up against the Democratic Party with its powerful Latino and African-American constituency, the fat cats might calculate they are better off to simply co-opt the Democrats. The Kochs and Adelsons and others of their ilk are mighty pissed, and not inclined to write big checks to Karl Rove again, so I’m betting that they are going to re-think their strategy and sponsor some puppet D’s.
the Blue Dogs, like my Senator, Mary Landrieu, are already owned by the Republicans. this is why they have to go.
what the Republicans need to do is going to be quite interesting. reach out to those they “hate”. and whether the Latinos, Asians, and women will “buy” their BS is another question indeed.
so the Republicans are going to “change their spots.” or all the “hated” others going to sell out for the Right price? that’s what we’ll have to wait and see how this goes down.
but be sure, that this is just the natural result of this election. the Republican can’t hate the “others” and win, so they will do “whatever it takes” to co-opt them. Knowing Republicans, i am sure they will never ever stop doing whatever it takes. yes, it will be quite interesting to see what happens.
does a leopard change it spots? we will see.
The GOP might try to go after young women or even the LGBT folks, but they are definitely going after the Latinos.
Back in 2006, President Bush, for the most part, was with his fellow Republicans when it came to immigration, but he caught my attention when he broke lockstep with this:
Then, in 2010, while the Arizona radicals were busy passing their immigration bill, Bush, this time Jeb, along with Rubio were breaking lockstep when Rubio said:
And now, after the election, several Republicans (Hannity (a neocon throat) and others) are finally beginning to take the same immigration stance as the Bush’s (like we didn’t see that coming). So, if in the next election the Latinos were to follow Rubio, Jeb and P in the same manner as the African-Americans had blindly followed Obama, then it would be safe to say that the Democrats no longer have the edge. Globalization marches on…
Here in Arizona or for what is my affliction with the Sonoran Desert, in 2010, the Republican-led super majority at the state legislature passed HB 2281 and which is the companion piece to SB 1070, prohibits white kids from learning a foreign language while attending our public school system.
And this resistence to HB 2281, will become the political platform for the animosity that white young adults will have toward the white-led Republican Party, for many years to come. Therefore, these white kids will have to overcome the stumbling block that is the “competition of the the sharp elbows” since the GOP is not into “empowering the Individual.”
Jaango
The only reason the Irish etc. were able to assimilate to the extent they did is that they were white.
If you think that the Irish were always viewed as white, you’ve forgotten some blatant examples of history that shows this wasn’t true:
http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2011/01/28/irish-apes-tactics-of-de-humanization/
http://static.thesocietypages.org/socimages/files/2011/01/1.gif
Beyond that, you’re still looking at the world IN black and white, as if the Dems had some kind of monopoloy on virtue, which is tiresome.
No, actually it’s the opposite; I see (and live) in a world of diversity, including my own family tree. The issue is this nation is still living its history of seeing things in black and white. The fact that each successive “white” ethnic group that immigrated to the U.S. has achieved white privilege status first had to endure comparisons to apes, savages…and blacks shows you how polluted the path to privilege is. And that’s by choice of the dominant culture. The legacy of this is the GOP’s Southern Strategy, pitting poor and working class whites against blacks.
I’d probably rate a few other groups can be included this unfortunate fate of outlandish discrimination — Arabs (regardless of faith), those of Muslim faith, and, of course, atheists. It’s ironic that some of Arab descent considered themselves white, yet after 9/11, that privilege was for all intents and purposes erased. Ah, the American racist mindset at work. It’s why the blending and browning of America is so confounding to people fixated on putting people in racial boxes. I find it refreshing that the “state of confusion” is making many uncomfortable.
Nope, didn’t forget. But after a couple of generations it becomes much more difficult to segregate and discriminate, especially if the (white) person leaves the ethnic ghetto and assumes the traits of the larger society. Racial minorities don’t have that option.
With the exception of the very light skinned, the larger society always knew who was Black. Get rid of the last name and the accent and viola, I’m no longer Irish, but a child of the Mayflower. Can’t call out the Paddy wagon on me!
My son’s cousins with one white parent look white and could probably go their entire lives without being asked “where are you from?” He’s a little darker, so the assumption is he’s Mexican (no, not Latino – Mexican!) although the cop that gave him a speeding ticket checked the white box.
Obviously these kids are growing up in a different world, but for the batshit base his cousins with one Black parent will be looked at suspiciously while the ones with one white parent get a pass from the white supremacists.
So I’m still not sure how the GOP manages to get their plan past the base to elect someone who’s either not actually batshit or made to look batshit in the primaries.
GLBT folk were to be the replacement for blacks in the retooled Southern Strategy, but they are rapidly becoming far less scary to most Americans. The Republicans will try to push religiosity instead — depict themselves as the Religious Party and the Democrats as the Dirty Atheist Party, even though the GOP’s guru saint, Ayn Rand, was a staunch atheist herself.
Yes, Italians had to be apes first, too. I know we share common ground, but if your analysis is about Dems and Republicans, you tend to find yourself trapped in that binary, I’m afraid. Maybe I’m wrong, but I don’t see this stacking up as viable new Republican strategy. We’ve just had pretty Black children selling us McDonald’s food death for too long.
They just need to find a token candidate the way the Dems did. Obama pirouetted toward Chicago’s South Side (while really boning up on Friedmanism, where the Ayn Rand/Obama connection is forged) long enough to feel he could lecture Black fathers about responsibility (in bogus Black cadences). But his heart is with the arch-white conservative high church (some say outright racist) T.S. Eliot. Matters of the heart.
They’re all busy innoculating themselves by adopting/buying Guatemalan war orphan refugees of right-wing violence and raising them as right-wing Christians. All you have to do is admit on of THEM to your club, and then they get to be THE GUY. The Dems have got theirs.
Not trapped at all. I don’t see it as a Dem/Rep binary. Having lived for many years in both NYC and NC, by far the most racist environment was NYC, a purported liberal haven. Racism and perceived privilege knows no party boundary, and the racism and assertion of privilege is just as onerous in the progressive movement, particularly because of the insistent denial that they are incapable of being racist, which is laughable. Our entire society is still bathed in racism, classism, sexism and privilege, and the truth is that too many who manage to “ascend” out of oppression (as a group or individually) are perfectly fine with pulling up the ladder behind them.
Some animals are not as eaual as others
Read that somewhere in a book by a man named George Orwell. Apparently the GOP leadership has as well,,,,but drew the wrong lessons