And he sank that 1% battleship AGAIN. Gawd, the country dodged a disaster on election day.
I’m not sure if Mitt Romney’s election post-mortem conference calls with donors were supposed to go like this, but his freestyling redux of his contempt for the 47% “moochers” and “takers” on the government teat was on grand display.
You can only imagine it was his Id, sore and pissed about his failure as a presidential candidate, with a shaky finger on the “launch” button of a heat-seeking missile aimed right at his party for tossing him overboard so quickly after the election. All that talk about outreach to Latinos, that growing demographic demonized all campaign season long by the GOP; the talk of how sh*tty their pro-rape candidates were that sank their chances to pull the wool over the eyes of women, after Mitt stood by Akin and Mourdock, not calling for them to step aside.
Now it was his turn, he had the open phone line to regurgitate his desire to blame all the darkies, the brown folks, students, anyone who benefits from a government program (and I assume tax break — are those who take a mortgage deduction “takers”?) — you know, the “urban” vote that of course was bought off by the President. Mitt’s Id pressed “launch”:
“With regards to the young people, for instance, a forgiveness of college loan interest, was a big gift,” he said. “Free contraceptives were very big with young college-aged women. And then, finally, Obamacare also made a difference for them, because as you know, anybody now 26 years of age and younger was now going to be part of their parents’ plan, and that was a big gift to young people. They turned out in large numbers, a larger share in this election even than in 2008.”
The president’s health care plan, he added, was also a useful tool in mobilizing African-American and Hispanic voters. Though Mr. Romney won the white vote with 59 percent, according to exit polls, minorities coalesced around the president in overwhelming numbers — 93 percent of blacks and 71 percent of Hispanics voted to re-elect Mr. Obama.
“You can imagine for somebody making $25,000 or $30,000 or $35,000 a year, being told you’re now going to get free health care, particularly if you don’t have it, getting free health care worth, what, $10,000 per family, in perpetuity, I mean, this is huge,” he said. “Likewise with Hispanic voters, free health care was a big plus. But in addition with regards to Hispanic voters, the amnesty for children of illegals, the so-called Dream Act kids, was a huge plus for that voting group.”…
The delusion of Mitt Romney is that he refuses to believe the majority of Americans rejected him…the savior of the 1%. And so now the GOP leaders are left in the wake of his missile of #FAIL yet again, covered in ash and climbing out of the rubble to explain why their party and the man who was at the top of the ticket aren’t really out of step with most of the country.
Out trots an embarrassed Bobby Jindal.
Asked about the failed GOP nominee’s reported comments on a conference call with donors earlier Wednesday, the incoming chairman of the Republican Governors Association became visibly agitated.
“No, I think that’s absolutely wrong,” he said at a press conference that opened the RGA’s post-election meeting here. “Two points on that: One, we have got to stop dividing the American voters. We need to go after 100 percent of the votes, not 53 percent. We need to go after every single vote.
“And, secondly, we need to continue to show how our policies help every voter out there achieve the American Dream, which is to be in the middle class, which is to be able to give their children an opportunity to be able to get a great education. … So, I absolutely reject that notion, that description. I think that’s absolutely wrong.”
Of course Jindal and the GOP are just upset that their packaging of the message was crap this time around. The lesson, they gather, is that talk about probing uteri for the presence of fetuses, God-ordained rape babies, and talk of “illegals” will probably not win votes. The failed presidential candidate has a major malfunction — his anti-47% attitudes are so hard-wired that they just launch at any provocation, you know, like a chance to reflect about why his campaign was rejected at the ballot box.
Jindal is the perfect delivery mechanism for a false message of moderation, something Mitt Romney could never be. Alex Pareene at Salon:
Go through the Politico story on its Jindal interview and you’ll see that he is actually not saying anything at all. Jindal is clearly pursuing the same agenda as he was before the election. His point is that this agenda should be branded slightly differently.
This is his prescription: The Republican Party should stop saying stupid things.
“It’s not going to be the last time anyone says something stupid within our party, but it can’t be tolerated within our party. We’ve also had enough of this dumbed-down conservatism. We need to stop being simplistic, we need to trust the intelligence of the American people and we need to stop insulting the intelligence of the voters.”
The “something stupid” he refers to is all those weird comments on rape, which kept being said because all of these candidates were trying to explain their (mainstream Republican) positions on abortion. Bobby Jindal is not saying “let’s moderate our position on abortion,” he is saying “let’s not talk about it so explicitly.” (“On cultural issues, he suggested the party not retreat from its stances opposing abortion rights and gay marriage but rather soften its tone on such matters.” Just talk about opposing gay marriage more politely!)
No, Bobby, the “problem” is that the GOP thinks that they can win by nailing this fantasy 53% of voters time and again, assuming none of them benefit from “free stuff” or know and love someone who does and they don’t see them as “takers.” A message that targets the 1% won’t resonate with most Americans at all, no matter how much they aspire to be part of that 1%. The GOP has relied on this upward mobility/pull yourself up by your bootstraps model of messaging for some time. And to a degree, like all arguments, there is some truth in self-reliance play a role for some who manage to strive and succeed at getting out of the ghetto. But to ask Americans to ignore the vast advantages that the wealthy have — the tax breaks, shelters and other significant advantages they have over Joe Lunchbox that allow them to keep that wealth – is preposterous. George W. Bush’s reign of economic terror removed the illusion that hard work=success as millions lost jobs, homes and a sense of security. The rich remained wealthy while they were rendered homeless, underemployed, and saddled with medical bills that bankrupted their families.
All while the GOP — and Mitt Romney — told Americans in distress that they were lazy and happy to be on unemployment rather than working.
It is nice to see Mitt Romney hit that launch button of #FAIL once again.





32 Comments


Maybe they can trot out Ann today to do an encore. She can really let “you people” know how America hurt her and Mitt’s feelings!
Damn those scorned repubs sure are sore drama queens.
Just imagine what it would have been like to have a president who doesn’t even have a sense of self-preservation.
Sorry, Mitt and Paul and Bobby: your party’s attempts at voter suppression failed, and your message came through loud and clear — that’s why you lost.
Ah yes… more essays about how and why Romney lost.
Nevermind the looming Great Betrayal by the fraudulent Democrats and their gleeful concubines. Nevermind the increasing poverty and inequality spurred on by Obama’s failures and betrayals. Nevermind FEMA’s woeful performance after Sandy and the teflon president’s ability to elude any responsibility. Nevermind the false flag of entitlements being on the brink of bankruptcy raised by the “winners” of our latest exercise in voter fraud. Nevermind Bradley Manning, a GAY man tortured and abused by our “great leader” Barack Obama…
Is this the “hard work” that needs to be done to keep the Democrats from total abnegation of the people who voted for them?
I thought Obama already held the title Perfect Delivery Mechanism for a False Message of Moderation.
Only problem is it really doesn’t work. That “free stuff” you keep hearing about is what keeps many people going in a plutocratic society, like it or not. And if you think some folks don’t recognize that you wish they just weren’t alive, think again.
How much mileage can the Veal Pen get out of Mitt Romney? A lot, it seems.
I suggest that Jindal’s view will make him an outcast in the GOP in 3….2….1….
Don’t stop believing…….this nonsense about republican failure this election cycle. Please nourish this delusion so that your loser status will perpetuate.
You are not the “stupid” party, you are the OFFENSIVE party. Keep it up…..Please!
Yet another tick mark on the “How to recognize a sociopath” check list.
Whatever goes wrong is never his fault?
Is it just me, or is this sour-grapes whining about why they lost bringing out even more hate from the Rethugs? I know I muted all the GOP ads that popped up on cable teevee, so I was tuning them out completely, but I never saw any press accounts saying that GOP candidates accused preznit of promising “free” stuff.
What is this about “free birth control” and “free health care?” Where are those supposed to come from? Do they really believe that’s what the Dems promised? No snark here, I’m completely baffled.
Mitt Romney’s son Tagg has been gathering some of his father’s richest friends into a private-equity fund called Solamere, writes Froma Harrop. It’s a clever instrument for pursuing government subsidies, contracts and tax breaks should Romney win.
http://seattletimes.com/html/opinion/2019582123_harropcolumntaggxml.html
If Jindal is “the perfect delivery mechanism for a false message of moderation,” the Obama was the perfect delivery mechanism for a false message of progressivism.
Between a rock and a sad, sad place here.
Willard who???
Hey Romney, if you had an honest bone is your body you would have said, but then again, the “free stuff” for the poor doesn’t come close to the really free stuff the rich get from the government.
But you don’t.
Mitt Romney is the savior of the 1%?
Growth of Income Inequality Is Worse Under Obama than Bush « naked capitalism
“You people,” “those people” (see the ad with RMoney getting his shoes shined by one of the 47% while the plane sits and waits for him). Geez. It becomes more and more obvious every day that we really dodged a huge bullet on this one.
No, they don’t believe it, but they can persuade the teabaggers that it’s true, and that’s all they care about.
As a protest, just file, but don’t pay your federal income taxes.
Mail your correspondence with the IRS to FDL and I’m sure they’d be delighted to cover such a determined use of civil disobedience.
Thanks. I think I get what they are doing with the accusations post-election, it does look like these are the opening salvos to minimize GOP losses of House seats in the mid-term elections in 2014. So they would do what you said, appeal to their stupidest, most hateful core voters.
But I was also trying to figure out if I missed the “free stuff” code words before November 6? Did any GOP candidate actually claim during the campaign that the Democrats were promising “free stuff” to win votes?
Living in Utard, the conventional wisdom on Romney is that he and his Kolobian brethren and sistren, fasted and prayed so vociferously that Romney was stunned and gobsmacked that he lost to someone with the Mark of Cain. That’s why he had no concession speech ready. It was ordained. Mormon Prophecy foretells a Mormon will ride on a white horse and save the Constitution.
Slap a coat of whitewash on Rafalca and seize your destiny Willard! Not so fast….
I don’t remember any promises of free stuff being mentioned so I am just like you wondering who said what and when.
The closest I come to refreshing my memory along those lines would be the closed meeting which was taped about the 47% wanting more but that was a Republican saying it.
Bless the young man/young woman that taped that meeting that Mittens had where he issued those comments and thanks to Jimmy Carter’s grandson for getting it into the public domain.
Willard was always an adventurer on the Thug side. What did he ever do for the party other than once win Massachusetts. He was so busy fleecing investors and killing companies, he never did any heavy lifting for them, and didn’t come out of a Thug family like Bush did. Now the same can be said of Obama to some degree, but at least he served in the state legislature and in the Senate. I think Willard will fall back into the memory hole where he belongs. Surprised he doesn’t just go there himself. Proud son of a bitch. Getting what he deserves if he wants to stay in the public eye.
yep, that young lady who got in trouble with her down with Obama tweets lives in Turlock which is a long long way from Wall Street, let alone San Francisco. It’s the boondocks.
I know about Bobby Jindal and he is as moderate as Paul Ryan. He panders to the religious right (he even converted to Catholicism for political reasons) and he is a crony capitalist that believes in privatizing as much of government as possible, whether it is useful to do so or not.
mitt’s speech at the NAACP. Another one of his greatest hits:
He and the other drama queens are reciting the O’Reilly show. It’s also good that we didn’t elect a president who believes everything that comes out of Fox. That’s Sarah Palin level intellect, not presidential.
more free stuff reference
gee, I thought Romney lost because he’s a really great guy but never really got a chance to show us. /snark based on campaign worker hearsay BS.
whenever I hear Bobby Jindal this is all I can muster up in my feeble head.
Bobby Jindal’s neighborhood.
People will forget in 2 & 4 years from now. Take a look at the south. Worse educated, worst poverty and part of the 47% but still vote GOP!
“. . . the closed meeting which was taped about the 47% wanting more but that was a Republican saying it.”
That’s the whole point — it was Romney saying it, and Ryan saying it, and it’s been the whole “makers/takers” mantra all along. Obama never offered “free stuff” — it’s just been Republicans claiming he did.
I don’t recall they ever actually said “free stuff,” but if you’re listening to a “conservative,” you’ve got to be able to decipher the code.
Either Rafalca or Ann would work for the purpose.