At least 27.
I didn’t watch the debate in real time; I was jamming in Greensboro at a Journey concert — front row seats. I asked my peeps on Facebook and Twitter if I missed anything interesting about the debate. Folks didn’t hold back.
Of course when I did watch the debate, I was glad that I opted for nourishing my inner fangirl in Greensboro rather than sit through that nonsense. Romney was clearly the more force-of-nature presence when it comes to theatrics; Obama suffered from a lack of attack strategy for the cameras. My problem is that I lost count of how many misleading statements, outright lies and “myths” the former Massachusetts governor emitted. The good news is that the folks at Think Progress kept count; they have 27, as I said above. I’ll share the first three with you:
He spoke for 38 minutes of the 90 minute debate and told at least 27 myths:
1) “[G]et us energy independent, North American energy independent. That creates about 4 million jobs”. Romney’s plan for “energy independence” actually relies heavily on a study that assumes the U.S. continues with fuel efficiency standards set by the Obama administration. For instance, he uses Citigroup research based off the assumption that “‘the United States will continue with strict fuel economy standards that will lower its oil demand.” Since he promises to undo the Obama administration’s new fuel efficiency standards, he would cut oil consumption savings of 2 million barrels per day by 2025.
2) “I don’t have a $5 trillion tax cut. I don’t have a tax cut of a scale that you’re talking about.” A Tax Policy Center analysis of Romney’s proposal for a 20 percent across-the-board tax cut in all federal income tax rates, eliminating the Alternative Minimum Tax, eliminating the estate tax and other tax reductions, would reduce federal revenue $480 billion in 2015. This amounts to $5 trillion over the decade.
3) “My view is that we ought to provide tax relief to people in the middle class. But I’m not going to reduce the share of taxes paid by high-income people.” If Romney hopes to provide tax relief to the middle class, then his $5 trillion tax cut would add to the deficit. There are not enough deductions in the tax code that primarily benefit rich people to make his math work.
I guess the point from the perspective of Team Mittens is to let the man go out and tell the myths, figuring most casual viewers/voters will not watch any post-analysis fact-checking.





21 Comments


re: your last sentence– in my view that most certainly is Willard’s perspective; it occurs to me today as i see some fact checking begin that the fact checking might continue for longer than any bounce Willard might receive; he’s given Obama enough material for etch-a-sketch commercials til election day
And how many lies – which resulted in GOP inspired legislation – did Obama tell in 4 years, never mind the well documented whoppers from the candidate Obama during his initial trojan horse presidential campaign?
Partisanship is so dull, except for the schadenfreude made available by the whiff of desperation emitting from its hypocritical practitioners.
Vote Jill Stein for President.
Vote for Jill Stein? Delusional
Why?
The only question I have after last night is where can I get one of those kids inflatable punch-clowns like the one onstage with Bishop Willard?
Hey, the man with the most money wins.
This is America.
Oh I don’t know.maybe bc she has zero chance of winning.
Romney was acting like a big money making CEO last night, treating Jim Lehrer like a foolish underling he swatted away and Obama like a jr. VP that he’s decided to fire.
He is, indeed, on rude dick. And one asshole exemplar of his class.
Yes he is. I wonder if Obama knew much of what he said was a lie. . If so he had to decide to call him a liar on national tv. Then you have to decide if you can explain it,quickly and make sense.
I think Romney is a liar and a bully. Sour grapes? Maybe, just my opinion.
I really feel so bad for Jim Lehrer. A few years ago, I caught an hour interview with him (by Diane Roehm) on the subject of presidential debates. So I know how absolutely horrible this man feels today. I don’t like to think of anyone suffering like that.
Is this supposed to be a revelation?
Obama should have called Romney on his lies. God knows he doesn’t have a positive plan to help the middle class. Obama’s second term would pick off right where his first is ending.
To those delusional enough to believe they’re his base: “Look, I inherited a disaster. I bailed out Timmy’s banking buddies and fixed things for Larry’s hedge fund friends. Be patient. It will trickle down to you. No, I’m not even recommending a fiscal policy that would reduce unemployment. You have no where else to go. If you don’t get it, you’re f@cking retarded.”
Oh, and Bowles-Simpson, instead of being the great compromise, is now his opening position in negotiations over the next Grand Bargain.
No doubt Romney’s worse. If I lived in a swing state I might fill my nose with Vicks Vapo Rub and vote for him. I don’t have to. My vote for Jill Stein won’t hurt O’s chances and might let Democrats know the Democratic wing of the party is alive.
Lehrer is a millionaire Media Whore with a brand-new, too-tight, face lift.
Lehrer don’t give a flying fuck.
He sold any principles he may have had a long time ago.
(Just Like Oilbomber and RRmoney).
I am also voting for “Sniffles” Stein.
No more LOTE for me.
So it’s okay with you if Obama loses, takes the Senate down with him, and my 23-year old kid loses his health insurance when the Repubs repeal Obamacare?
You’re free to do what you want, but this is not a game of purity for some of us out here…
The Senate has very little chance of being held with or without Obama.
The House doesn’t have much chance of being lost by the Rs.
So it’s only the white house.
And I for one am hoping for the Rs to take all three.
That way, the American people will know who is responsible when they cut our throats.
And we can rid this country of the evil R party once and for all.
Are you going to get some sort of massive raise to offset the spiraling cost of your policy? The chief aim of Obamacare was to leave the rent seekers of the anti-health care cartel in complete control, and was extremely successful to that end. What do you think will happen to the economy when Barry makes his grand bargain and slashes public spending moving more wealth upward? What makes you think Obama himself won’t start cutting out the selling points of Obamacare in his second term? The greatest accomplishment of the first term was getting D-bot voters to accept and defend the corporatist agenda. The only part of a picture of a carrot on a stick that’s real is the stick.
You have the most awesome twitter commentators ever.
I used to agree with you, in the instance of swing-state tight races. Now I’ve drifted toward Chris Hayes’ vision: There is no real difference to matter (except I give more weight to Supreme Court appointments). What matters is heading toward the only real solution: civil disobedience.
And notice how there’s no emphasis on “non-violent”. How long are we going to do “non-violent” without any hint of result? The 1% just does not understand the word “desperation”.
and Ready @16. Wow. You folks must not have adult children on your insurance with health issues. You have no idea what the challenges are.
Sounds like you’re willing to sacrifice my family for your supposed long game.
Good to know who’s got my back.
No one is “selling out your family for your supposed long game”. FYI while I’m not in your situation, I have lifelong friends who have been for 20 years, the difference being their child was already over the 26 year old limit, so that short term solution does them no good. I can definitely sympathize with your situation, and am genuinely happy that this is working out for you in the short term and hope you can resolve your situation in the next few years because I well know whats on the horizon.
That being said, unless you can tell me that Government Option, or Medicare for all would have been a better solution for you, and you can tell me with certainty that funding for Obamacare won’t disappear when Bowles-Simpson is implemented you can take that moral superiority condescending attitude and put it in your ear.