Well, taken literally it would seem to me to mean that they only support families who are long dead and turned to dust. Biblical families would be those mentioned in the bible. Man’s an idiot, so I don’t know what more we could expect of him.

Sorry as long as one of US is denied rights then we all. Mexicans have no friends we need allies I shall speak more to my people about that. mi famila is almost gone am about the last FINE!
ANY who wish to challenge me can we are not no violent liberals we are Mexican! I’m in forest park Illionis.

oh lord…. they buy into this on an evangelical side of the familiy. Brother married his brothers widow. Everyone is kind of creeped out but its in their book so….

I have to think this falls into the category of “Better to remain silent and be thought a fool……..”

At least one Biblical Family Father also pimped his daughter to his friends.

Stoning Disobedient Children by Community Elders (Socialism).

It is written.

Also – Dash their heads on rocks.

Real cool shit in Dan Cathy’s bible.

biblical families.

What a dumb ass.

Pam into Sarah sleep with Pharaoh and on other tribal chief the Lord sent them bad dreams after they fell asleep but does anyone really think they did not get busy before the Lord sent them bad dreams?

also

David (Hebrew: דָּוִד; Dāwīḏ or David) and Jonathan (Hebrew: יְהוֹנָתָן; Yəhōnāṯān or Yehonatan) were heroic figures of the Kingdom of Israel, whose covenant[1] was recorded favourably in the books of Samuel. Jonathan was the son of Saul, king of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, and David was the son of Jesse of Bethlehem and Jonathan’s presumed rival for the crown. David became king. The covenant the two men had formed eventually led to David graciously seating Jonathan’s son Mephibosheth, a cripple, at his own royal table instead of eradicating the former king Saul’s line.[2]
The biblical text does not explicitly depict the nature of the relationship between David and Jonathan. The traditional and mainstream religious interpretation of the relationship has been one of platonic love and an example of homosociality. Some later Medieval and Renaissance literature drew upon the story to underline strong personal friendships between men, some of which involved romantic love and could perhaps be described as romantic friendships. In modern times, some scholars, writers and activists have emphasized what they interpret as elements of homoeroticism

Now it came about when he had finished speaking to Saul, that the soul of Jonathan was knit to the soul of David, and Jonathan loved him as himself. Saul took him that day and did not let him return to his father’s house. Then Jonathan made a covenant with David because he loved him as himself. Jonathan stripped himself of the robe that was on him and gave it to David,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_and_Jonathan

Call Teddy in to confirm but that sounds Gay to me.

Maybe by biblical families we should interpret this as Gays are so important geetically that Aleaxander the Great, Da Vinci etc should be forced to have kids.
Granted this is still not right but it means Gays if we look at the past should kids.

So let me get this right — Dan Cathy supports the definition of marriage as between a man and up to 700 women, give or take the handmaidens.

Ooh, here is Miss Betty Bowers, America’s best Christian, to explain ‘bible’based marriage’. Hilarious!

Laughing so hard i forgot the link, this is it.