
In scanning my social media posts today, the disturbing amount of pollution emitted by the 2012 GOP Clown Car choked up my feed.
I can’t decide which one of these items is more gut-wrenchingly craptastic (or fantastic, depending on your point of view). I can safely say I’ve not seen such a pathetic bunch of pols running for President of the United States in years, maybe ever.
Please pick which one of these items is the most-off-of-the rails and embodies a ride in the Clown Car.
1. Newt Gingrich: Congressional Budget Office Is ‘A Reactionary Socialist Institution’.
According to CNN Money, the Republican contender described the CBO as “a reactionary socialist institution which does not believe in economic growth, does not believe in innovation and does not believe in data that it has not internally generated.”
The agency, which in its own words is “nonpartisan,” is described on its own website as follows:
CBO’s mandate is to provide the Congress with:
-Objective, nonpartisan, and timely analyses to aid in economic and budgetary decisions on the wide array of programs covered by the federal budget and
-The information and estimates required for the Congressional budget process.
Gingrich’s comment drew criticism from various sources. Per CNN Money, “Douglas Holtz-Eakin, a former CBO director and Republican, called the Gingrich allegation ‘ludicrous.’” Stan Collender, whom CNN describes as “a former Capitol Hill aide who worked for the House and Senate Budget Committees,” had some harsh words for Gingrich, saying that the candidate “should know better, and he should be ashamed of himself.” Collender called the CBO “bipartisan” and said they are “the best group of analysts I’ve ever met.”
2. Michele Bachmann Serves Water at GOP Debate. Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) serves water to host Frank Luntz and her rivals at the 11/19 Republican debate in Iowa — the “Thanksgiving Family Forum”.
RT @rightwingwatch: Of course the GOP would make the woman serve the water…
3. Mittens: Romney Backs Away From Plans To Privatize Veterans Health Care.
ROMNEY: I have no proposal of that nature [to privatize the VA]. We had a group of veterans and said, ‘tell me about the quality of your care.’ Some were concerned about the quality of their health care. I said, ‘what kind of options do you have, what do you think about a system that let you go to private as well as VA hospitals?’ The response was mixed, but I don’t have any proposal of that nature. We have a VA system that needs to be improved and I’ve got no plans to change that other than to make it better and to invest more money in providing for our veterans.
“I tasted a beer and tried a cigarette once, as a wayward teenager, and never did it again.”
– Mitt Romney, in a forthcoming People magazine interview.
5. The GOP Is So Insane That Ron Paul Is Their Foreign Policy Voice Of Reason. This is actually less a statement from the Clown Car than about it. PoliticusUSA:
Bob Schieffer pushed Rep Ron Paul to explain the difference between his critique of George W Bush’s foreign policy and it’s possible impact on terrorists and the notion that he was “with the terrorists.” From this moment, we get a moment of pure absurdity wherein Paul mentions the Republican candidates’ lust for bombing Iran, as seen in their last debate on foreign policy. No, the absurdity isn’t Ron Paul; it’s the other Republican candidates.
6. Santorum: God’s Law And Civil Law Must Be That Same. Rick Santorum, speaking at the Thanksgiving Family Forum, says that our civil laws must reflect God’s law … but that is totally different from Sharia.
Now, unlike Islam where the higher law and civil law are the same, in our case, we have civil laws but our civil laws have to comport with the higher law.
Our civil laws have to … and that’s why, with the issue of abortion, as long as abortion is “legal” – at least according to the Supreme Court, “legal” in this country – we will never have rest because that law does not comport with God’s law which says that all life has value, all life is created by [God,] I knew you in the womb.
And as long as there is a discordance between the two, there will be agitation.
7. Bachmann: A Seven-Foot Doctor Told Me Obamacare Requires The IRS To Pre-Approve Medical Treatments.
– “One man stood up, he was over 7-feet tall. He was a physician in the community. And he said, ‘I had a little lady in my office and because of Obamacare, I had to call the IRS and I had to get a number to put on a form before I could see her.’”
– “When I was a little girl…There were people who could not pay [for health care]. I mean they just did not have any money at all. And so the doctor would just write it off. [...] It’s very different today. Now, doctors don’t feel like they can do that…they worry about liability.”
8. Mittens, again: Romney Admits He Destroyed Government Records To Keep Them From Political Opponents.
Last week, a Boston Globe investigation uncovered that former Gov. Mitt Romney’s administration destroyed emails, purchased hard drives, and otherwise obliterated all digital records of his time as governor of Massachusetts. This happened as Romney was leaving the state to campaign for president (the first time), and observers immediately speculated that the systematic destruction was politically motivated to hide embarrassing data.
His excuse??
ROMNEY: Well, I think in government we should follow the law. And there has never been an administration that has provided to the opposition research team, or to the public, electronic communications. So ours would have been the first.
9. Damn. Mittens again! Think Progress: First Romney TV Ad Falsely Presents McCain Campaign Quote As Obama’s.
The Romney campaign’s very first television ad, released this evening, dishonestly presents a 2008 McCain campaign quote as the words of President Obama. The ad features a voice-over of Obama saying “if we keep talking about the economy, we’re going to lose.” Then-candidate Obama indeed said those words, perhaps dozens of times during the closing month of the 2008 campaign. The only problem? Obama was actually quoting the words of a strategist from Sen. John McCain’s campaign.




21 Comments


This could be construed as borrowing (well, stealing) from Tom Tomorrow’s This Modern World…
…but you’d think Santorum’s explication of the difference/non-difference between Sharia–and his conception of American law as (sorta?) divine Christian law and (a little bit?) civil law–would cause sufficient cognitive dissonance to make his head explode.
Alternately, you could think of it as simultaneously embracing and rejecting dualism: on the grounds that both are really the same thing. Frothy Mix, in his next symposium, will reconcile determinism and free will. Don’t miss it.
So at this point, are there ANY likely Republican candidates for President who are NOT up to their eyeballs in scandal or barely cogent enough to remember to breath?
Regarding Santorum…. He is saying that Islamic theocracies are evil because religious law and civil law are the same; while U.S. civil law must be made to adhere to religious law in order to be good. Other than the brand of snake oil, what is the difference?
Does it only have to be R Klowns? They claim to be D’s at TPV but since those clowns support the President who is Bush III so they are not very good D’s. Good Democrats do not slander and spread false propaganda the way TPV does.
Firedoglake is NOTORIOUS! I slept late so someone probably has already noticed the shout out from TPV. I guess TPV is trying to occupy the uber wealthy angry leftists who annoy them so much. Also Glenn Greenwald is becoming wealthy by selling OWS bling.
I can hardly wait to read the comments. But I am betting they are supporting Pepper Spray against Firedoglake and Glenn Greenwald. Of course they would because the President is supporting the crackdown against peaceful dissenters. These troublemakers deserve exposure to chemical weapons because they are Pretend Progressive Angry Leftists.
TPV promises more to come, about the wealthy Firedogs but it keeps getting pushed back due to lack of facts.
Tester.
Boxturtle (yeah, yeah, I know. Tester who?)
If Rep. Bachman had a fuller skirt, she would have been washing their feet with the water. She is so proud to be among them.
That would be the same guy who in 2007 said that Obama had lost his vote for his refusal to shun antigay pastor Donnie McClurkin:
I have screen shots (and so do lots of other people) in case he ever decides to take down this post.
Her hair’s not quite long enough to pull off the Full Magdalen of using it as a towel to dry their feet — though I guess she could allow them to rub their feet on her head.
Why does Rick want to make God cry? As I learned of the common version of the Protestant New Testament God, God gave humans free will so that they could make their own decisions and receives divine grace… or not… their choice. If people are forced to follow “God’s Law” by other human beings because they are claimed as “Man’s Law”, then the human law makers and enforcers are breaking “God’s Law” by taking away the free will that God gave us all.
Rick’s head is not likely to actually explode if he tried to think this through, but his consciousness might.
Now, Pam; let’s not leave out Barack Obama and his very successful effort to protect the BushCo status quo, from the “really shitty candidates” list.
Put it like this, which is worse: Newt Gingrich shreiking “socialism”, or the fact that Obama gave us “healthcare reform” with no public option and no generic drugs to give Lilly and Pfizer a kick in the ass?
Unfortunately…(Or maybe, fortunately…) Romney’s dishonesty about Obama using McCain’s statement has current relevance past that consideration, in that WHOMEVER said it, in WHATEVER context, the truth is that if Obama keeps talking about the economy (and doing so piss-little about it…) he WILL lose.
Of course, it’s only fair to point out that since his political nads are sitting in that mayo jar on Boehner’s desk (where Obama himself put them…) there isn’t a whole hell of a lot that he can do…IF he wanted to do something, which, after three years of reaching out to the assholes, it’s safe to say he doesn’t.
Great list, Pam, thanks for compiling this. What a bunch of sad losers. And Frank Luntz looks like a smarmier, pastier Karl Rove,if such a thing is possible. I really like how he promises Bachmann the first question in order to get her to sit the fuck down; then says, ‘Now, Dr Paul, let’s start with you….”
Liar.
On the democratic “candidates” side, YahooNews just floated this little trial balloon/column by Mark Whittington:
“Could the democrats dump Barack Obama for Hillary?”
http://news.yahoo.com/could-democrats-dump-barack-obama-hillary-clinton-190600861.html
In it, Whittington examines the pros and cons of Obama bailing in favor of Hillary, or of Obama’s dumping Biden as veep, for Hillary.
Of course, Hillary has said several times that she’s not going to run in 2012.
The problem is twofold: A lot of her loyal triangulators still feel that Barack Obama has something that belongs to her…the presidency…
The second problem with discounting Hillary is that the political climate 6 months from now is going to look nothing like it looks today. A lot of chickens from Obama’s cheek-spreading-for-republicans administration came home in the mid-terms; a lot more are zeroing in on the White House roof, as we speak. If his numbers get into the low 30′s (and I believe they will) there’ll be democrats coming out of the woodwork to go after him. That Hillary Clinton won’t be among them, is unbelievable.
For progressives, the question is, do we owe Barack Obama continued support as (to steal OldHippieJan’s wonderful metaphor) he keeps backing up the Titanic and ramming the iceberg over and over, or is he more valuable to us as a political sacrificial goat to show what happens when you run as a progressive and then govern as a country club republican?
Personally, I think that if we slide his tanking of the party, and of a progressive agenda one more time, we will lose any power and clout that we have left. Everytime the centrist assholes crap on us again and then taunt us with “what are you going to do about it?” The obvious answer will be, for the umpteenth time: “nothing.”
I dunno, it didn’t take Pam to tell me that the repub candidates are a bunch of asshats. I knew that a good while back.
I’d just point out that the term “sad loser” shouldn’t be wasted on the likes of Romney, Bachmann, Perry, etc.: I think we should save that for Barack Obama.
Just sayin’…
)
1. Newt thinks that the entire US government is a socialist/communist/atheist cabal bent on under mining Newt. He’s oblivious to his own past actions and I’m quite frankly surprised that he’s here not on a cable show on a Christian broadcast network extolling the virtues of giving Newt all the money in your bank account.
2. That’s what I want to see in a President. The willingness to serve and be someplace behind everyone. To allow themselves to be dismissed as nothing more than a..a.. Remind me what she wants again? Leaders don’t serve water. Leaders drink the water served them. …just, no.
3. Yeah Canada has an American™ brand conservative running the place and he’s privatized their veterans benefits which now include a ‘pay off’ for services rendered. Doesn’t work, they get short changed and they Vets are in trouble up there.
4. ‘Wild Past’??? Yeah, right. The real poop is hidden by $$$.
5. When the craziest person in the room sounds sane…it’s time to find a new room to hang out in. But first will someone lock this room? Don’t want these lunes to escape.
6. Where to start? Well, he will always be reminded by the entry in the dictionary. He should be with Newt on a cable channel church show…maybe some place like uh…a small third world country with copious amounts of grape Kool-Aid.
7. She’s fantasizing again isn’t she?
8. It’s OK for elected officials to destroy government records so we don’t find out how he made his millions either. Let me guess? “Executive Privilege”? I didn’t know ex-governors got that? I know they can get a deal for turning states witness and sometimes immunity…
9. He’s quoting! Who cares who he’s quoting! It means he can R-E-A-D! I don’t know if the rest of the field can.
10. Why oh why hasn’t Saturday Night Live done a spoof of this group as contestants on ‘Survivor’? Yeah, it would be cliché but they wouldn’t have to write anything (this band of fools does the writing for them!) and …well, I know SNL is done by ‘actors’ and out of the clown car I think Ron Paul has the greatest range so far. The rest could be played by wooden planks.
My pick for most mind-numbing…
As it stands now… the 2012 presidential election will be…
Corrupt Democrat vs Corrupt Republican.
Just for clarification, I am not trying to make the Libertarian argument because I think Libertarianism is neither about liberty or anything at all functional.
No government can ever really be run by any god’s will unless that government is actually run directly by that god.
Since it’s preached that humans can never fully comprehend God and thus humility is the mandate as I see it, how would Rick presume to base our government’s legal codes on that which is beyond any human’s ability to actually codify and execute? Never mind all the contradicting or extreme stuff in the Bible…
Obama will have no trouble beating any of these clowns like a drum next November and will likely pull in a Democratic House seeing that Congress has a 9% approval rating.
These fools have gone so far to the right to appeal to their quasi-fascist base that any hope of winning the general election is a pipe dream.
The Republicans and their media whores are doing their best to ignore and neutralize RON PAUL However, I think the REPUBLICANS CAN in fact WIN presidential election next year if they nominate Ron Paul as their candidate. The simple reason is Obama is a corrupt whore of banksters and most people are fed up with this spineless bum. Ron Paul has a lot of support among independents, young people and those who tag along with democrats because there is no other option. Ron Paul can stand at his own in general election and can kick around Obama like a dry dog crap in pretty much every issue, except in basketball. If Ron Paul keeps Joe Huntsman as Vice President or Secretary of State that will eliminate all the brainless trash running in primary (Romney, Bachmann, Perry, Cain, Santorum, Newt). They both can also get rid of nasty cancer called Israel although so called supporters of Israel will try to demolish both of them before they can even take the office.
I can predict anything except the future-Goldwyn…Hilarity goes to World Bank, Biden goes to State and BoHica “selects” …Huntsman for Veep..it’s all Bi…partisan and stuff/.
Ron Paul is a right-wing social reactionary, opponent of the 14th Amendment, anti-immigrant, anti-union, anti-worker, anti-job-safety, anti-woman (uterus-nationalizer), pro-theocracy, anti-environment, market-fundamentalist racist-enabler. The few decent positions he’s taken were mostly for entirely the wrong reasons.