When I saw the headline over at Facing South, I had no idea that the nativist batsh*ttery has run off the rails into complete batsh*ttery.
The brains down in Louisiana have decided to throw a tantrum over the fact that the U.S. census attempts to count all people in the country, regardless of immigration status.
This week, the state of Louisiana filed a lawsuit which challenges the Census’ long-standing policy of counting all residents — citizens and non-citizens — and using those results to divide up seats in the U.S. Congress.
The lawsuit, which has broad implications for the political role of immigrants, comes after Louisiana lost a Congressional seat following the 2010 Census count. Thanks to the massive displacement after Hurricane Katrina — the city of New Orleans lost 30% of its population between 2000 and 2010 — Louisiana’s delegation fell from seven seats to six.
This makes no sense on any level other than Louisiana’s government likes showing its bigoted @ss to the American public. After all, the whole point of the Census is to find out changes in population, determine number of members of Congress the state will have, and a host of well, things Louisiana taxpayers would benefit from with an accurate count of human beings living in the state.
Apparently these little facts escape the state.
Louisiana Attorney General Buddy Caldwell innocently says that “Louisiana’s complaint simply asks the court to require the federal government to re-calculate the 2010 apportionment of U.S. House of Representatives seats based on legal residents.”
If the Supreme Court ruled in Louisiana’s favor, the fallout would be anything but simple. Aside from forcing 17 states to scrap their political maps on the eve of the 2012 elections, the law would fundamentally change how the Census works and immigrants are recognized in the country.
The U.S. Constitution originally said the Census should involve “counting the whole number of free persons,” which the 14th Amendment changed to “counting the whole number of persons,” including non-citizens.
Changing that mandate would be felt at every level of government and the economy. States and localities, which provide services like police, fire and medical treatment to undocumented residents, depend on billions in federal aid based on whole-person counts. Undocumented residents also paid $11.2 billion in taxes in 2010.
Would Louisiana like to send back taxes to those undocumented residents of the state, since they don’t count as “people”?
Read the rest and try to keep your jaw up off of the floor.




13 Comments


Well. obviously only fetuses are persons, entitled to rights and dignity as human beings. Once birth occurs, all bets are off. Post-born as opposed to pre-born children have no right to education, housing, medical care or even nutrition, except of course for vegetables such as pizza. Once they reach adulthood, they have no right to vote, no right to be protected from harassment at the polls, and still no right to health care. And if they are members of minorities they have no reasonable right to any semblance of equal treatment under law.
The only “persons” the right wing (which includes broad segments of the Democratic party) is interested in protecting are, by any sane standard, clearly not persons at all in any viable sense. God bless Amerika!
The census has always counted non citizens.
The census counted slaves, and they were non-citizens.
Beginning in 1810, the census also counted native americans, who were also not citizens.
Except if they are from illegal moms we should drive them across the border/s
Michelle Bachmann is Queen of the Pod People and seeding her Spawn where the Soil is fertile for them.
( Ref Bachmann’s opposition to the Federal Census )
I’m curious – since the Supremes consider corporations to be persons, are corporations counted in the census? And what state are they counted in if they have offices in multiple states? Perhaps some enterprising progressive lawyer should bring a suit against the Census Bureau and force the High Holies to confront their own idiocy viz-a-viz corporate personhood and Citizens United.
Oh no. Not again.
Next problem, please. . .
I wonder when the immigration scolds will see some gold in having people count, but who cannot actually vote (against them), in their own district, but who also glean gov’t subsidy dollars for all who live there?
The only way this approach could work out to the benefit of Louisiana in number of seats in Congress would be if Louisiana has a substantially smaller percentage of its population (as compared to, say for instance, Texas) who are undocumented.
I live about ten minutes from Louisiana, and if the Attorney General in Baton Rouge thinks that is a fact, he is either blind or delusional, or both.
He needs an Occupy Baton Rouge to wake him up. Oh! and BTW it is about seventy degrees today in Baton Rouge. On the other hand, while the Oakland PD throws “flash-bangs” the Baton Rouge PD might throw real hand grenades.
What ever happened to that corporation that filed for election to Congress?
Hahahahaha, flashback. Murray Hill, Inc. The first corporate candidate for Congress. I don’t know what happened, but here’s their campaign commercial, a classic to be sure:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HHRKkXtxDRA
It is the GOP crazies in the state. Jindal is a rabid right winger and would like nothing more than to send all the $$ back to Washington on “principle”. He is angling for a higher office. The most ascenine thing I have seen him do is consolidate mental healh services for children to the northshore of Lake Pontchartrain his old congressional district. It is also a Republican area and a rich area. He removed all mental health for children an hour away from New Orleans. So now if a poor family in New Orleans has an out of control teen who is in danger of harming the public, the only way they get help is to go 1 hour away from their family. Hold on if this guy gets elected to higher office.
Money he has given away:
Jindal rejected money for unemployed people.
http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2009/02/20/36301/jindal-unemployed/
Stimulus money:
http://www.nola.com/news/index.ssf/2009/02/jindal_rejects_32_million_in_s.html
Another great example of the absurdity of “corporate personhood”
Hi. You sound as though you live there, so I’ll assume you know more about the state and local politics than I do, but don’t you think that’s it’s worth mentioning that (so far as I know) he only rejected funding that would have required changes in State law?
He did accept federal dollars for transportation projects and and the $25/week increase in UI benefits, right?
Corporations are people, immigrants aren’t.