Ron Hill’s site Republicans 4 Freedom‘s slogan is “Advocates For The Rational Wing of the Republican Party.” And that he is. Hill wrote for conservative CNN commentator David Frum’s web site, and has advocated for repeal of “DADT” and for marijuana legalization. He wrote this in response to Mike Signorile’s Advocate commentary, “Lessons Learned,” about GOProud, the Tea Party and the grip of the fundamentalists on the Republican party. This piece is cross-posted with permission.
The Combined Federal Campaign (CFC) is the largest workplace giving program in the world, and if you’re a federal civilian employee or member of the military, you can give to certified hate groups through it.
You can even arrange to make donations on government time. Federal employees are given time off from their usual duties (and paid by the taxpayers) to attend meetings on organizing the local CFC campaign and also take time during the work week to encourage and assist their fellow employees in giving through the CFC.
In essence, your tax dollars help make the CFC possible, and when someone gives to a hate group like the American Family Association or the Family Research Council, government employees will help make it possible to deduct the donation from federal employees paychecks and send it to the respective organization of hateful bigots.
Your tax dollars hard at work.
When I contacted the CFC, Ms. Mary Capule of the U. S. Office of Personnel Management (which is responsible for managing the CFC), replied:
“An organization which meets the requirements of the regulations may participate in the CFC regardless of its political views or expressive message…by law, the CFC is a limited public forum and OPM can restrict participation without offending the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. However, OPM’s ability to restrain participation is limited to minimizing disruption to the federal workplace, ensuring the success of the fund-raising effort, or avoiding the appearance of political favoritism without regard to the viewpoint of excluded groups. An organization’s viewpoint or position on controversial issues does not, in and of itself, support exclusion from the CFC. See Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund, 473 U.S. 788 (1985).
Does this mean the OPM would allow the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan or the Aryan Nations to raise funds through the CFC, with the help of government employees? One would think that inclusion on the list of certified hate groups would exclude an organization from the CFC. Would a pro-pedophile group be able to raise funds through the CFC? I would hope not. Some organizations are so morally reprehensible to civilized societies they should not be allowed to participate in the CFC; and the AFA and the FRC are certified hate groups just like the KKK and the Aryan Nations. What are they doing in the CFC? (See CFC’s “Charity Eligibility & Participation” page)
It’s important to remember why the American Family Association (CFC charity#12037), and the Family Research Council (CFC charity# 10523), are considered hate groups.




6 Comments


A review of the eligibility requirements indicates that 501C3 (tax-exempt) status is the main requirement of eligibility to participate in this program. As long as FRC and AFA are current in their 990′s, they are eligible. It’s more an indictment of IRS code than anything else. The only political requirement for tax-exempts is that they not endorse candidates, but it’s a pretty loose interpretation of that requirement that seems to prevail.
However, be careful what you ask for: Many prominent LGBT advocacy organizations are 501C3′s also. Some 501C3′s (on both sides of the issues) set up separate PAC’s that are not tax-exempt to get around this requirement.
Phil2 is correct. These groups are probably just as disgusted that pro-gay organizations are part of the CFC. As long as they are valid 501(c)3s, there’s really nothing we can (or should) do about this. They have a right to exist, as much as we may wish they didn’t.
As a military retiree, yes we as military members are quite aware of those groups that back or are backed by the KKK, the Aryan Nation, the American Socialist Party (also known as the American Nazi Party) and more.
They’re all represented in there and us senior’s try our best to tell the junior’s about them and to enter just those organizations that they support and NOT to just put money in the general fund which is distributed to everyone equally.
There are also GLBT positive organizations in the CFC and oganizations that do not benefit either haters or GLBT as well. Really every 501C organization in the US can apply to be listed in both the national and local booklets.
I wish that there was a way to ‘ban’ those organizations that are hate groups but I don’t think thats going to happen simply because they hate… One way to get an organization off the listing is if the charity’s administrative costs goes above a certian percentage of money’s taken in. It used to be ok for a ‘charity’ to have 99.99% of all money taken to go to admin costs. I don’t know what the cut off is now, or even if its still in effect.
This is where Outserve could help the GLB military community.
Is there really such thing as a “certified hate group?” Certified by whom? Since the CFC is a government list, in order to run afoul of its proceedures, an organization would have to be declared a hate group by the government. Has the federal government declared the AFA or FRC hate groups? The SPLC, as great as they are, are a private organization. Their declarations are meaningless as far as the law is concerned.
Imagine how much I enjoyed that fact that, while I was in the Navy, I was able to take time off from work and use federal resources to donate to the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network every year. I’m an irony aficionado, and that one tickled me every time.
CFC lets just about anybody join the campaign. That is, IMO, a good thing. Let’s not politicize charity, or it will turn back on us.
I’m a little bit of a tax nerd (I’m studying for a degree in accounting) so I’m really glad to see this article. To me it seems insane that hate groups and groups that promote human rights abuses are eligible for 501 status under the Internal Revenue Code, and I’ve been a bit surprised that groups like HRC haven’t ever really pushed for changing this.
For some perspective, Congress has already put similar measures into the tax code. If your private club decides to adopt an “aryans-only” membership rule, it would lose its tax-exempt status under IRC § 501(i). If your organization supports terrorism, you lose your tax exempt status under IRC § 501(p). So there’s absolutely a precedent if Congress decided to say, “You know what? If your organization is devoted to killing gay people in Uganda, or saying that gay people are all child rapists, the federal government isn’t gonna subsidize that kind of crap.”
I mean seriously? Where’s the campaign for this change?