
That headline is about as polite as I could make it. My cousin in New York was a bit more candid on my Facebook page:
A couple of weeks ago I made a [Facebook] comment on a friend’s post, equating Cain to Steppin Fetchit. I was told it was out of line to call him that. Every story I see about Cain proves that I was right in line.
A NYT piece, “Behind Cain’s Humor, a Question of Seriousness,” pretty delicately addresses one of the major issues I have with Cain’s approach to his burgeoning white constituency. While people may dismiss Mr. Cain’s candidacy, there’s more going on politically than meets the eye. Mr. Godfather Pizza is hardly part of the working class, but the down-home show he puts on in public, to be charitable, is offensive (my emphasis):
[W]hile his casual style of racially inflected humor works to ingratiate him with mostly white audiences at campaign rallies, it has angered some black critics, who believe he uses age-old stereotypes.
He has no qualms, for instance, about playing off black clichés: should he become president, his Secret Service codename should be “Cornbread,” he wrote in his memoir, “This is Herman Cain! My Journey to the White House.” Mr. Cain’s traveling aide, Nathan Naidu, already refers to him as Cornbread on the internal campaign schedule. (Why? Mr. Cain says he just loves cornbread.)
Those kinds of comments have drawn criticism from the likes of academics like Cornel West and entertainers like Harry Belafonte, who called Mr. Cain “a bad apple.”
Of particular concern, some say, is how he seems to make a parody of black vernacular and culture.
“It makes the hair on my neck stand up,” said Ulli K. Ryder, a visiting scholar at the Center for the Study of Race and Ethnicity in America at Brown University. “The larger issue that a lot of people have, and I certainly have, is that he uses a certain kind of minstrelsy to play to white audiences. Referencing negative stereotypes in order to get heard to a white audience in the 21st century is really a problem.”
I’m waiting for the fried chicken, watermelon references and a tap-dance performance by Mr. Cain. I need not remind my gentle readers that our country still has a serious problem with race, particularly when it comes to discussing it openly and honestly.
Take “shucky ducky.”
“It’s a nonsensical thing, down-home Southern black vernacular,” Ms. Ryder said. “It’s coded as a black vernacular and it’s uneducated black vernacular, so I find it really interesting that he would reference that, seeing as he is not that.”
Exactly — Cain’s “Non-threatening, down-home Negro” act is to make socially conservative white voters feel more comfortable voting for him, I get it – everyone does, but says little about it. The fact that in the 2011 GOP a black man has to pander in a way that harkens back to “the good old days” of slavery, sharecropping and Jim Crow is sad.
What’s even more appalling (or hilarious, based on your POV) is Cain doesn’t think the President is “authentically black” either, saying he’s “never been a part of the black experience in America.” However, in terms of appropriating a notion of “black culture” (as if it is monolithic), Obama isn’t off the hook either. When he puts on his faux pastor persona in front of black church groups and the Congressional Black Caucus, trying to speechify, it’s equally offensive.
Perhaps there is progress in the the GOP, since Georgia native Cain said the other day “I like my guns and Bible. Ain’t gonna give ‘em up!” A black man in 2011 can own and use a gun. In related Cain news, it’s nice to see that he likes rubbing shoulders with stone-cold bigots:
It was great meeting with Sheriff Joe Arpaio today in Arizona!
Given his joke about the electrified fence on the Mexico border, this is no surprise. When Cain went on Piers Morgan’s show, he alluded to a weird, quasi-pro take on abortion rights (that won’t sit well with his target audience), and said this about homosexuality.
Morgan and Cain also had a spirited exchange about homosexuality in which Cain said, “I think it’s a sin because of my biblical beliefs,” and said he believed sexual orientation is a choice. Incredulous, Morgan asked, “You genuinely believe millions of Americans wake up in their late teens, normally, and go, ‘You know what? I quite fancy being a homosexual?’ You don’t believe that, do you?”
“Piers,” Cain responded, “you haven’t given me any evidence to consider otherwise.”
I’m pretty sure that this view is in alignment with some of The GOP Base, but Cain’s retro view isn’t held by most of America at this point. Bonus points for clinging to that ridiculous POV.
But back to race. I’ll never understand Herman Cain and his relationship to the GOP establishment; like former puppet Michael Steele, they don’t see (or don’t care) how rancid race-based politics in the Republican party has become. It’s been quite bold since the election of Barack Obama. My long view is that we do need more minorities (and LGBTs) in the GOP because without decent representation, there’s no incentive for the GOP to woo those demographics, which are currently beholden to the Democratic Party. That said, the Republican leadership has made its bed with the fundamentalists and nativist know-nothings, making Cain and other black Republicans curious cases that border on self-loathing.
Does Mr. Cain not have a problem with what is going on in South Carolina as its Voter ID law hitting black precincts hard? There’s no tap dancing around this:
[N]early half the voters who cast ballots at a historically black college in Columbia lack state-issued photo identification and could face problems voting in next year’s presidential election, according to the analysis of precinct-level data provided by the state Election Commission.
The U.S. Justice Department has been reviewing the law for months under the federal Voting Rights Act. South Carolina’s photo identification law requires people to show a South Carolina driver’s license or identification card, a military ID or passport when they vote. Without those forms of identification, they can still cast a provisional ballot or vote absentee.
The analysis shows that among the state’s 2,134 precincts there are 10 precincts where nearly all of the law’s affect falls on nonwhite voters who don’t have a state-issued driver’s license or ID card, a total of 1,977 voters.
…State Democratic Party Chairman Dick Harpootlian said numbers show how bad the law is.“This is electoral genocide,” Harpootlian said. “This is disenfranchising huge groups of people who don’t have the money to go get an ID card.”
The response from South Carolina Republicans? Take Wesley Donehue, Political Strategist for the South Carolina Senate Republican Caucus, who said “Nice! @jimdavenport_ap proves EXACTLY why we need Voter ID in SC.http://bit.ly/opHq0l.”

As South Carolina is a critical state in the GOP primary trail, surely Herman Cain needs to be asked about Voter ID and its impact on poor people of color, particularly since he brings up his own early life in poverty on the campaign trail. Will the mainstream media do more than laugh and dismiss the Cain Minstrel Show antics and challenge him on issues like this?




42 Comments


If Herman Cain believes you can pray away the gay, I have a challenge for him:
Hit the lockerroom showers and sauna with some of those who claim to be “cured”.
His memoir is subtitled “My Journey to the White House”? Good grief.
correct, and here’s exactly what IS going on;
romney is too damn electable and the other candidates have self destructed, romney is trouncing them, they NEED obama in the frigging white house cuz a republican elected as a democrat does the puppet master’s bidding FAR easier then a republican elected as a republican
thus, the second cain showed any competence at all they had him on the TEEvee far more then any other candidate, they promote the HELL out of him HOPING he wins the nomination
cain is NOT electable as a republican, they would far rather not vote then vote a minority, they WOULD vote for romney even though he’s a mormon because obama after all IS a minority
le puppet masters do NOT want a republican running as a republican winning, they will get HALF done
THAT is what’s going on behind the scenes and I predicted this even BEFORE cain became a consideration
Herman Cain is the contemporary Kingfish, who forever tried to con Amos and Andy into one of his get-rich-quick schemes. In Cain’s version it’s get-richer-quicker.
“Cornbread”? Maybe this guy thinks he’s ex-pro basketball player Cedric Maxwell. Though I doubt it.
no republican could have re-issued bush’s redistribution of middle class assets, (marketed as the bush tax cuts though now they are the obama tax cuts)
no republican without a fight could have gotten a mandate into a health bill that provided no public option
no republican without a fight could possibly hope attack social security as if it contributes to the deficit
no republican without a fight could have extended bush’s tarp
no republican without a fight could have assasinated american citizens without even preferring charges
no republican could have initiated even more of the obsurd “trickle down” economic policies then reagan himself
the list really goes on
obama has been recruited by the puppet masters to run as a democrat and legislate like a corporatist, they would have far too much trouble doing it if he ran as a republican
I wish the media would report more on Cain’s ties to the Koch Brothers.
they will when the time comes, that time will be once he is the republican candidate
I could care less about Cain’s tactics or hook that he uses to snag the terminally uninformed. Frankly, I would get a kick out of Cain being the nominee just to see Pat Buchannan and all the other racists heads explode. Unless (and it’s doubtful) someone else enters the race, it will likely be Romney and hopefully he will perpertually stick his foot in his mouth all the way to election day. Also, the more that is learned about Mormonism if he is the nominee, the more difficult it will become for him. Right now, not many Americans know about all the secret Mormon ceramonies and far fetched beliefs. When women voters discover that Mormon wives are basically Stepford wives, Romney will loose a lot of women. The media is enjoying Cain for entertainment value and ratings, but they will orchestrate his fall if he gets close to the nomination.
“they NEED obama in the frigging white house cuz a republican elected as a democrat does the puppet master’s bidding FAR easier then a republican elected as a republican”
Huh??? Reagan and both Bushes seemed to have done a great job for the oligarchy running as Repubs. The push back from the Left against them was ineffectual. Reagan napped for eight years through the onset of alzeimer’s as the working class was systematically being dismantled.
Cain is shameless in his pandering to whites. And he doesn’t believe a word he says. And when the Rs vote, it’s not going to be for Cain.
guiltybystandern obama has done even more damage then they have, yes obama can now be catagorized as worse then bush
redistribution of middle class assets, marketed as tax cuts for the wealthy, check and then some
war, check and then some
war crimes, check and then some
trickle down economy, check and then some
etcetera etcetera etcetera
obama is the very worst thing we can have, AND he gets to do these things with the repukes CLAIMING, “see?…liberal politics don’t work”
YOU can believe he’s doing a better job then a republican but the only thing he’s doing differently is getting democrats support
And with an exclamation point after his own name.
I said it yesterday……Hermie doesn’t KNOW he’s black.
Rick Perry called him “brother” at last night’s debate, so I’m not sure how much more authentically black Cain is supposed to be. Rick Perry oughta know.
Shameless? You’re not even close! If you want “shameless” compare what Obama campaigned on to his record in office. THAT is shameless.
I agree but at least Obama didn’t pretend to be white – he just pretended all the rest of the stuff.
And Obama, what does he know?
Herman’s 15 minutes of fame are coming to a close.
What I have always been intrigued by, and it’s never commented on TV, is the singular black face you will see in a crowd behind a GOP candidate, whether it’s Bachmann or Palin four years ago, or Christine O’Donnell. It’s never 2, 3,4 or 5 black faces posing behind the candidate, only one that is strategically placed for the TV camera. I think the GOP has an active Rent a Negro program where they give $20 to some unsuspecting fool off the street to be used as a photo opp. It’s manifestly self evident and cynical.
“Cain doesn’t think the President is “authentically black” either, saying he’s “never been a part of the black experience in America.””
These statements by Cain put the lie to his suggestion that he is not playing on stereotypes, racial objectification or “just loves cornbread.”
And re Arpaio and an “electrified fence” begs the question that if Cain insists he is “part of the black experience in America,” does that experience involve internalizing white racism?
Perhaps comparing Cain to Steppin Fetchit is too dated. Uncle Ruckus seems a more relevant comparison.
I saw someone with a “Herman Cain/Uncle Ruckus 2012″ sign in the Occupy Wall St. Labor Solidarity March:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NkfuLHkh2lU
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncle_Ruckus
FYI…if your looking for somebody to defend Obama and his administration, that ain’t gonne be me.
Perhaps there is progress in the the GOP, since Georgia native Cain said the other day “I like my guns and Bible. Ain’t gonna give ‘em up!” A black man in 2011 can own and use a gun.
Senators Bruce and Revels were progress for the Republican party. Unfortunately, the party backslid by the end of the 19th century.
As for Black gun ownership, there’s some evidence that the Republican Party supported that in the beginning. The 1856 Republican Party Platform http://www.ushistory.org/gop/convention_1856republicanplatform.htm is often noted, but if it’s conclusive, I’m missing it. There is more, if not all of it is strong, evidence that it was a significant issue for their party during and after the war; the strongest is from §14 of the Freedmen’s Bureau Act of 1866: http://oll.libertyfund.org/?option=com_staticxt&staticfile=show.php%3Ftitle=2282&chapter=216251&layout=html&Itemid=27 the right . . . to have full and equal benefit of all lawsand proceedings concerning personal liberty, personal security, and the acquisition, enjoyment, and disposition of estate, real and personal, including the constitutional right to bear arms, shall be secured to and enjoyed by all the citizens . . . without respect to race or color, or previ-ous condition of slavery.. Agreeing in 2011 with one of their earliest platforms isn’t progress to me. It just demonstrates how sick their party has become.
Question for white fundamentalists, nativists, and right wing conservatives of other stripes: If you are innocent of racism, as you repeatedly insist in public ad nauseam, explain why Cain needs to pander to you in this way?
LMAO! I noticed that too. They also truck in a bunch for the convention.
They ARE a resourceful bunch.
That’s UNBELIEVABLE………you found the 1856 Republican platform on the internet??????? Who PUT it there???? And how????????
That’s a rhetorical question, right????
Eh? For me, Cain’s just a convenient *distraction* in the ongoing Kabuki Show. It gives the corporatist media shills something to cackle about to distract their gullible rube audience from other important issues, such as OWS, who’s really ripping them off, etc etc.
You point out some singularly unimpressive things going on with Cain. It is unfortunate to witness someone selling himself out like this, for sure. At the end of the day, though, they ALL sell themselves out in one way or another.
I happen not to be an AA, so the pain of witnessing this kind of behavior is perhaps less so for me. It’s clear that Cain is deliberately pandering to a white racist audience. Not very pleasant to witness, I must confess. My feeling? Cain’s time in the spotlight is limited. Guess he’d better be collecting all the buck$$$ he can from his wealthy backer$$$ bc he ain’t going to the WH. I can guarantee it.
Cain is using campaign donations to buy his own books. Is that legal?
If I may be serious for a moment. What do YOU thknk about hime as VP??
I think it’s clever.
Let’s all be real. If the GOP would put Palin on the ticlket to garner the women’s vote, wouldn’t they put Cain on to garner the pizza vote?
I’m not at all a fan of Obama, and after the targeted killing of an American citizen I won’t be voting for him. However, I think that this posting is wrong when it says “Obama isn’t off the hook either. When he puts on his faux pastor persona in front of black church groups and the Congressional Black Caucus, trying to speechify, it’s equally offensive.” Have you forgotten that Obama spent many years in Jeremiah Wright’s church? He learned that style by participating in it every week for a decade or more.
What do I think of Cain as VP? Not much. About as good a “choice” as Palin.
At the end of the day, though, what difference does it make? The PTB will decide who “wins” the “vote count,” and that person will go to the WH.
At this stage, given the insane idiocy of the idiots allegedly “running” on the so-called “R” ticket, I’d have to guess that Obama stands an excellent chance of “winning” in 2012. From the POV of the 1%, what’s not to like with Obama? He’s the guy that the 1% hired to do their bidding, and Obama’s done well for the 1%.
And so: on it goes….
@newcarguy -
you found the 1856 Republican platform on the internet??????? Who PUT it there???? And how????????
If you click on the link, you’d find out the answer to the first, but in case you don’t:
Independence Hall Association
Google on “1856 Republican Party Platform” – it was the first hit for me.
As to why, the mention of Blacks and guns triggered a memory of reading a relatively recent pro-gun-ownership Supreme Court opinion, which referred to that, among other things. I looked for links to substantiate the claims, and cherry-picked the top two pieces of evidence that I could find (some pieces I couldn’t find quickly; others had what appeared to me to be extremely weak evidence).
You mean as opposed to Obama’s shameless tap dancing for rich and powerful white men such as generals, CEO’s, and bankers?
No. I’m interested to hear one of those folks take a stab at answering that conundrum.
Anybody . . . ?
Cain wants to be the House N***** instead of the field hand. It’s much cozier in the Big House with the Massa than down in the shack.
He was doing research on how to build cred with and con the Black voters, not exercising his faith.
No, they will gain a lot of conservative men who want to be in positions of control. It’s entire the nature of it.
Herman Cain: shameless tap dancing for conservative white voters:
MR. GREGORY: A couple more. Same-sex marriage. Would you seek a constitutional ban for same-sex marriage?
MR. CAIN: I wouldn’t seek a constitutional ban for same-sex marriage, but I am pro-traditional marriage.
MR. GREGORY: But you would let the states make up their own mind as they’re doing now?
MR. CAIN: They would make up their own minds, yes. Meet the Press – 10 16 2011
Cain is a bigot who favors a states’ rights approach.
———————
Barak Obama: shameless tap dancing for religious anti-gay voters irrespective of nation of origin, skin color, etc. “Proposition 8, a state constitutional amendment on the 2008 California general-election ballot that would eliminate the right of same-sex couples to marry… “I think it’s unnecessary. I believe marriage is between a man and a woman. MTV November 1st, 2008
Obama’ like Cain, is a bigot who favors a states’ rights approach.
————————–
Rick Perry Herman Cain: shameless tap dancing for conservative white voters:
MR. GREGORY: A couple more. Same-sex marriage. Would you seek a constitutional ban for same-sex marriage?
MR. CAIN: I wouldn’t seek a constitutional ban for same-sex marriage, but I am pro-traditional marriage.
MR. GREGORY: But you would let the states make up their own mind as they’re doing now?
MR. CAIN: They would make up their own minds, yes. Meet the Press – 10 16 2011
Cain is a bigot who favors a states’ rights approach.
———————
Barak Obama: shameless tap dancing for religious anti-gay voters irrespective of nation of origin, skin color, etc. “Proposition 8, a state constitutional amendment on the 2008 California general-election ballot that would eliminate the right of same-sex couples to marry… “I think it’s unnecessary. I believe marriage is between a man and a woman. MTV November 1st, 2008
Obama’ like Cain, is a bigot who favors a states’ rights approach.
————————–
Rick Perry shameless tap dancing for racist, conservative white voters: Perry. like Cain and Obama, is a bigot who supports a federal ban on same sex marriage while he contradictorily, wants a states’ rights solution. shameless tap dancing for racist, conservative white voters: Perry. like Cain and Obama, is a bigot who supports a federal ban on same sex marriage while he contradictorily, wants a states’ rights solution.
I’m sorry…I find the comparison between what Cain is doing to what Obama does with black audiences to be down right ignorant and somewhat offensive.
Cain is reveling in stereotypes and pandering to the ignorance of his audience.
Obama is not doing anything of the sort. Ask any black American that spends most of their time in white environments if we change our speech pattenrs when we get around our own and the answer is usually YES. Most politicians understand that you change your speech patterns depending on your audience…its called code switching and most folks do it every day without thinking about it…especially minorities.
Obama’s change of voice is about familiarity and common connection. Its one black person talking to another in ways that builds bonds. When you see Obama in a black church or in black environments, you are seeing a man who cut his teeth on the South Side of Chicago, has a black wife who is from a middle class urban environment, and feels a shared since of community with the people to whom he is speaking. More importantly, Obama does not diminish himself or who his status as an intelligent, successful, black man when he code switches. If anything he copies the vocal patterns of other well respected black men within the black community. He does not try to be “street” or “hood”…and used to actually mock Michael Steele for his laughable efforts at doing so.
Cain is doing the exact opposite. He, like Michael Steele before him is acting out and playing a clown. He is neither being his authentic self nor relaying a sense of shared community. He is consciously putting on an act. One that, on the one hand, feeds into his ignorant audience’s negative feelings about blacks, while at the same time putting them at ease because he’s not “uppity” and knows his place. He is talking to people with which he has no natural connection and who would be naturally suspicious or an articulate, well educated and worst of all ambitious and successful black man. So he dumbs himself down to make himself acceptable. He’s like the pretty, smart, blonde girl that pretends to be an airhead so that the dumb jocks and vapid friends will like her and pick her to be prom queen.