Peter Sprigg, a spokesman for the Family Research Council, recently made the following statement on a radio show:
People are afraid of the homosexual activists and they’re particularly afraid of this character assassination that comes in the form of the word ‘hate.’ Nobody wants to be accused of participating in ‘hate’ and so throwing that word ‘hate’ around becomes a trump card even when nothing that we have done can reasonably be called ‘hate.’ On the contrary, everything we do is motivated by love for the people who are hurt by this lifestyle.
Bear in mind that this is the same man who said that he wants to deport gays and lesbians out of the United States and also wants to pass laws designed to put gays and lesbians in jail.
Right Wing Watch (who provided the transcript and video of Sprigg making his comments) also pointed out several other ways Sprigg has demonstrated his “love” of the gay community:
- Lobbied to make it harder for students to join Gay-Straight Alliances because “homosexuality is harmful to society.”
- Argued that gays and lesbians shouldn’t be judges because a gay judge can’t “be held up as a role model.”
- Linked homosexuality to pedophilia even when scientists rejected their correlation.
- Opposed allowing same-sex partners or their adopted children from collecting their deceased partner or parent’s Social Security benefits.
Now Sprigg has said and done all of these things because he claims that homosexuality is a “dangerous” lifestyle.
This, of course is a lie, but Sprigg’s role in furthering this lie needs more examination.
Sprigg, you see, has personally published misleading studies about the gay community
If one took a look at many of these studies (which I have on many occasion and the links are below), you would find a disturbing pattern of a distorting legitimate studies and research and an intentional omission of crucial portions of these studies which would serve destroy Sprigg’s thesis of the supposed “dangers of homosexuality.”
Sprigg has committed these offenses in studies and papers such as
Getting It Straight: What the Research Shows About Homosexuality ,
The Top Ten Harms of Same Sex Marriage,
Federal Report Confirms ‘Nuclear Family’ Best for Children’s Health
His piece, The Top Ten Myths about Homosexuality demonstrates a specific example of Sprigg’s sleight-of-hand behavior. Amongst other egregious errors, Sprigg takes pro-gay health information totally out of context. Check out this passage by Sprigg:
Even the pro-homosexual Gay & Lesbian Medical Association (GLMA) acknowledges:
• “Gay men use substances at a higher rate than the general population . . .”
• “Depression and anxiety appear to affect gay men at a higher rate . . . .”
• “ . . . [G]ay men have higher rates of alcohol dependence and abuse . . . .”
• “ . . . [G]ay men use tobacco at much higher rates than straight men . . . .”
• “Problems with body image are more common among gay men . . . and gay men are much more likely to experience an eating disorder . . . .”The GLMA also confirms that:
• “ . . . [L]esbians may use tobacco and smoking products more often than heterosexual women use them.”
• “Alcohol use and abuse may be higher among lesbians.”
• “ . . . [L]esbians may use illicit drugs more often than heterosexual women.”Homosexual activists generally attempt to explain these problems as results of “homophobic discrimination.” However, there is a serious problem with that theory—there is no empirical evidence that such psychological problems are greater in areas where disapproval of homosexuality is more intense.
Now compare what Sprigg said as opposed to what GMLA actually:
Sprigg:
“Depression and anxiety appear to affect gay men at a higher rate . . . .”
Depression and anxiety appear to affect gay men at a higher rate than in the general population. The likelihood of depression or anxiety may be greater, and the problem may be more severe for those men who remain in the closet or who do not have adequate social supports. Adolescents and young adults may be at particularly high risk of suicide because of these concerns.
Sprigg:
“ . . . [L]esbians may use illicit drugs more often than heterosexual women.
Research indicates that lesbians may use illicit drugs more often than heterosexual women. This may be due to added stressors in lesbian lives from discrimination. Lesbians need support from each other and from health care providers to find healthy releases, quality recreation, stress reduction, and coping techniques.
I hear that Sprigg is also a minister, so he should have a better idea than most about lying in God’s name and bearing false witness.
And if he truly loved the gay community, he would apologize to us for both offenses.




7 Comments


Hmmm, being gay is a “lifestyle”, as if we choose it? So what does that make being straight called? Don’t tell me, “normal”? When did straights get to choose their orientation I wonder?
These are all phoney “christians”. Jesus Christ NEVER judged or condemned anyone, not that I’m a believer.
If anything, religion is a lifestyle, a choice. Nobody comes into this world religious, nobody.
I have to admire your endurance and fortitude. Sprigg, et al., are such appalling excuses for human beings (at least, based on their public utterances) that I can’t stomach too much of them.
Yes, of course Sprigg is a liar, because he has no other “argument” to use. Without the lies, he’d have to go out and get a real job, and in today’s market, that might not be too easy for him.
I doubt he’d be able to find a job in a good economy given his total lack of skills outside of hating gay people.
Maybe his mindset was what Rep. Duncan Hunter had in mind when he proposed this bill “to protect straight troops’ rights” to repeat this prattle, post-DADT repeal.
http://www.navytimes.com/news/2011/08/military-hunter-dont-ask-dont-tell-083011w/
Judging by the scoffing in the comments section, even the Navy Times’ readership finds this a bit much. FYI.
Peter Sprigg will say anything, especially if it’s inflammatory, as long as it causes fear and distress among his listeners, on both sides of the standoff. It’s what pays his rent. To his followers, he’s their fearless defender against “the homosexual agenda”. Anything we say or do to confront him just proves that we’re awful, angry, confrontational bullies who need to be countered, by him, of course, send a donation today to allow him to do just that. It doesn’t matter if what we say is reasoned, honest, or rational.
There is no reason, or logic in his religious mind. His religion is based on myths involving unicorns, snakes that talk, and a guy who lives in the sky, and sends a copy of himself to earth to be tortured to death in order to repay a debt to himself on behalf of those who won’t be born until thousands of years later. Just try to talk logic with someone who believes something like that! Would you buy a used car from someone who would believe such a thing? Could you trust that guy to be honest?
And let’s just lay it right on the table. I am not being intentionally offensive to those who believe and are welcoming and accepting of LGBT citizens…..but….. hell isn’t in the old testament. It’s not until Jesus arrives that he consigns those who don’t follow him to “eternal fire”. Yahweh directs the jews to commit genocide, infanticide, slavery, child sacrifice and child genital mutilation. The bible is such a horrible, blood soaked document. It’s very hard to see how love is in there at all. I’m darn sure that whatever evil bullshit Peter Sprigg gets up to, he can find a biblical passage to support it. And yup, according to him, it’s all love. That is how he defines love. I sure wouldn’t want to be his child. Can you imagine?
It’s important to remember that none of the four gospels were written for at least fifty years after the life of Christ. It’s entirely possible that the concept of hell was not put forth by Jesus himself but was added later by one of his followers, someone whose love was as strong as Spriggs and as equally blind.
It’s not just today’s believers who cherry pick particular portions of the bible that they prefer to elevate above others. The entire Bible was assembled in much the same way. It was pieced together to shore up established doctrines and to turn those who disagreed into heretics.
Homosexuality is no more a sin than being left-handed. Both are minority orientations determined in utero by factors beyond the control of the individual and both have a long history of misunderstanding and persecution by the Christian church.
Even our modern use of the term sodomy is based on ignorance of the Bible. Ezekiel 16:49 (NIV) “‘Now this was the sin of your sister Sodom: She and her daughters were arrogant, overfed and unconcerned; they did not help the poor and needy.’” That sounds more like the average republican than the average homosexual.
I try to hold my tongue in most situations when it comes to faith-based ignorance. But when it encroaches on my Constitutional rights, my equality under the law or when the intent is the use of tax funds to further that ignorance; I will call the mythologians on their BS. Ignorance cherished in private can be ignored, bring it into the public square and it’s fair game for exposure and ridicule.