We welcome author, political strategist, civil rights activist and public affairs advisor David Mixner to our new digs at FDL, and he shares his wisdom on the possible future at the Human Rights Campaign as Joe Solmonese’s tenure with the org will soon come to a close. David blogs at Live From Hell’s Kitchen.
With a breaking story by Pam Spaulding, the Human Rights Campaign Fund has officially announced that its CEO of seven years, Joe Solmonese is not going to renew his contract at the end of March next year. Solmonese has had to navigate some of the most difficult and turbulent years of the organization’s history.
With his departure now comes an extraordinary opportunity to make HRC a powerful and effective force into the 21st Century. The organization must not only do a ‘search’ for a new CEO but really must also take time to decide its goals for the next decade. Instead of finding a ‘qualified candidate’ for the job, it is time for a visionary job description that will lead us to the right candidate.
The world for the LGBT community has radically changed over the last decade and it is clear that at times HRC has had some difficult transitions with the rapidly changing movement. With the selection of their next candidates they have the opportunity to redefine the organization’s mission, a new vision for the community and new priorities given the new challenges the LGBT community faces over the next decade.
HRC was an important part of the coalition in the New York marriage equality success. Their ads, outreach and willingness to be part of a grander coalition were impressive. The success of this effort in many ways is a good model for them in the future. The new HRC should have the ability to generate great response in a short period of time, blitz legislatures with tons of email, elicit powerful local elected officials to head the coalition, raise millions from major donors for initiative efforts and give important up front money well into the hundreds of thousands – not just $100,000.
Most of all it is essential, without cutting off access, to take a tougher stance with our friends and allies who might want to operate at a slower pace for political reasons. We need to gently remind them that freedom should never take a back seat to politics.
The Board of HRC has an obligation to take this next selection of their new CEO very seriously. The process should be open, visionary and inclusive. Most important, the job description must be futuristic and not just finding someone comfortable within the confines of the Beltway.
We all owe deep thanks to Joe for his years of work for the LGBT community. It has not been an easy time to head the organization and he has worked incredibly hard. We wish him farewell and god speed.




16 Comments


Excellent! I hope the board of HRC will take Mixner’s comments to heart, and not settle for more of the same, which has so badly alienated so much of the community.
so true. When I learned about HRC executive compensation amounts being so high and their refusal to confront Obama, similar to other “progressive” organizations, I would not support HRC any longer. Let’s see if HRC can become an independent, progressive action-oriented organization that we will be glad to support!
Besides the push for marriage equality, what are the other issues you would like to see HRC take a tougher stance on with their friends and allies?
I’m so glad to have you and your team join FDL. Do you plan to be here to host the posts that get front-lined? (I mean for the most part, I do realize that you are probably a very busy person.)
Learning as I go….
I’d love to see Keith Boykin get the job. He’s smart, savvy, and mediagenic, but I can’t imagine those rich old assimilationist white folks offering him the post. And there’s no shortage of other activists who’d be terrific in the job. Think they’ll give it to Dan Choi? Or Pam Spaulding? Or even Dan Savage (his position on trans people, if nothing else, would be a good fit)? The more I think about it, the more I think they’ll go for Ken Mehlman. Or worse. Santa will be giving the LGBT community a great big lump of coal this year.
Keith Boykin would actually be perfect for the job…but would he take it?
But…I actually COULD imagine the HRC board asking Boykin. Other than the color of his skin, Boykin has everything that they could possibly want and then some.
Moreso than Joe Solomnese, it seems to me.
And they need to make equality their priority, not protecting Obama or the democratic party.
I hope this means that they will also take a look at their operating costs. I stopped giving when they built their own Washington monument. Like so many groups that I once respected, they became primarily advocates for their own comfort.
My suggestion for the Human Rights Campaign and its possbile future leader; to actually be about International Human Rights. To actively support worldwide universal healthcare, support worldwide universal education. Move beyond childish notions of nationality and nation states. Work more closely with environmental groups and equal justice groups. Support an international standard of living for all. Deny corporations the ability to seek out cheap and exploitative working conditions. Sexual orientation is just one aspect of the Human Experience.
In response to your last paragraph: we ALL owe deep thanks to Joe? Excuse me–I’m a Transman & I don’t owe Joe shit. He went out of his way to lie to us & then threw us under the bus. Did you not know this?
Are you talking about the HRC corporate HQ building near Dupont Circle (photo of exterior, some interior photos [take a spin!])?
HRC needs to divest itself of that marble mausoleum — it is a symbol of everything wrong with their access-above-all mentality. Rent office space in Adams Morgan or U Street.
Get back to basics, at least as much as they can inside the Beltway.
Thanks for this post, David, there’s lots to think about here. Not agreeing with everything you’ve written, but I appreciate the thought-provoking nature of it.
Keith Boykin is a good speaker, has impeccable academic and political credentials, and seems unlikely to be hired at HRC. His service to a Democratic president is likely to be a sticker for some people at HRC. Boykin’s blackness ought to be a political plus, but who knows if the HRC will see it that way.
Yeah, if I were among those who were considering Boykin, his service to a democratic president would be something that Boykin would get grilled about.
I would question whether he is more loyal to the “LGBT community” (and…perhaps from the standpoint of healing relationships with the T in LGBT, Boykin might not be a bad start) or to the Democratic Party.
The fish rots from the head and the clock is running on this Veal Pen outfit.
I think it should be a trans person. It’s just been reported that Chaz Bono will be on the next season of DWTS so trans visibility will be on the rise.
The HRC’s as well as the greater LGB community’s history of discounting the T in LGBT is well known. It is based on fear and echos the general populations fear and ignorance of trans people. It’s past time that we work to bring the trials and tribulations of trans folk to the attention of those who still tremble at the thought of “men in dresses”.
Does this comment in reaction to the Chaz Bono announcement sound familiar?
“…when I heard that Chaz Bono was going to be on, I was sick. Not that I have anything personally again her/him, I just don’t want that lifestyle choice continually flaunted in the media…”
(http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/08/31/idUS375149978920110831)
We need to bring Trans Pride up to the level of Gay Pride so that not only will they not be thrown under the bus, but can move from the back of the LGBT bus to the front with the rest of us.
I think putting a talented and articulate trans person the the helm of the HRC would be the best way to ensure that our trans brothers and sisters have a meaningful place at the table. I have no names to put forth, but I’m sure there’s at least a dozen worthy candidates within the community.
The question is will the powers that be within the HRC step up to the challenge.
The HRC is much like the Tory Party in Lord Salisbury’s time; the leadership loaded with landed aristocracy(in this case monied A gays) far removed from the criticial social issues of the day, buffered by wealth, with an inborn elitism that they know better than we do, with the occasional radical thrown in to keep them moving at least a bit forward.
With that kind of board make up, it is as reasonable to suppose that the HRC will push harder as it is to believe that Reverend Pat Robertson will hold a special sunday to perform same-sex marriages.
Add this to a US President with nearly the same political views as Prime Minister David Cameron….