Last Saturday, Charlotte held its Pride event and it was very successful.
Of course, like so many gay pride events, it did have its protestors. An area minister, Michael Brown, sought to interrupt the event with something he called “God Has A Better Way,” in which he and a large number of folks wearing red t-shirts infiltrate the pride event, try to preach to the folks there, and generally attempt to disrupt the festivities.
The attendees at Charlotte Pride have learned to take Brown and his nonsense in stride, not allowing his nonsense to interrupt their day of fun and self-awareness.
Needless to say, Brown had some very pointed comments about this year’s Charlotte Pride which he published in the American Family Association’s One News Now.
Did I say pointed? I meant to say hilarious. The title of the piece, When Drag Queens Lead the Way gives you a clue as to what direction Brown is headed:
. . . At the Wells Fargo Plaza, drag queens lip-synced to pop music for a cheering crowd. One in a hot pink wig and matching knee-high boots danced to Katy Perry’s ‘California Girls.’” Say what?
How many other community groups feature prominent performances by drag queens at their events? Can you imagine crowds at an Hispanic Pride event, or Black Pride event, or Asian Pride event — just to name a few — being entertained by men wearing dresses (or less), hot pink wigs, and matching knee-high boots? And this is part of the LGBT’s strategy “to promote acceptance”? How telling. And how telling that, unmentioned by the Observer, there was a large truck stationed next to the festival offering “Free HIV Testing.” Yes, just another typical community event.
. . . It is also a bit disconcerting to watch young men greet each other with exclamations of “Hey girl!” before exchanging pecks on the cheek. (Does your average child find it confusing to hear men call each other “girls”?). There were also other men who were, quite sadly, all too conspicuous. They walked around Pride Charlotte in various stages of their sex-change journey, with long hair, female breasts, and undeniably male features — and all this at an event designed to “promote acceptance” in the wider Charlotte community.
To say the least, I am disappointed with two things. I was unable to attend Charlotte Pride and that’s a shame because it sounds like they had a very good time.
Secondly, I am uninspired by Brown’s prose. In the immortal words of songstress Peggy Lee – “is that all there is?” If it were “Porno Pete” LaBarbera talking, he would have at least added something sexual.
What’s wrong with drag queens wearing hot pink wigs and matching thigh high boots? The important thing is that they match. Can’t have a drag queen who doesn’t know about color coordination. And what’s wrong with lip-synching to Katy Perry? We don’t all do Judy Garland impressions (although between me and you, I do a mean Nina Simone).
And while we are on the subject, Charlotte Pride lasted for several hours. I know that there were speeches and other entertainment besides the very talented drag queens. It’s interesting that Brown focuses so much of his animus on them.
Also to answer Brown’s question, SC Black Pride had quite a few number of drag queens performing this year and they were all good.
Lastly that comment about young men greeting each other with exclamations of “Hey Girl” before kissing each other on the cheeks simply cannot be true. He forgot to mention that after we kiss each other on the cheek, we finger snap in Z-formations.
Now those with common sense, after reading Brown’s very vapid interpretation of the events at Charlotte Pride, would simply laugh themselves silly. Brown is obviously attempting – rather pitifully – to claim that the Charlotte Gay Pride event – and by extension – the lgbtq community- are somehow dangers to America and especially children.
He packs his piece with almost every anti-gay stereotype imaginable. Even his snark about HIV testing (which is a very good idea to have at any public event) was a backhanded way to infer about the supposed promiscuity of the gay community. I’m surprised he didn’t try to push some nonsense about “recruitment.” Or is he saving that for next year?
But Brown’s piece has its defenders.
Recently, One News Now – in an effort to drum up more hits to the site – has allowed readers to post comments after articles which would then be filtered to Facebook. Some readers of Brown’s piece have expressed shock over the supposed absolute chaos and calamity started by people dancing to folks imitating Katy Perry and gay men greeting their friends. Naturally their comments also question the lgbtq identity in general.
And then there are others, like myself, who are being, what I like to call, the ambassadors of common sense and asking “why is this even a big deal” or “If Brown doesn’t like gay pride so much, then why did he go?”
It’s a fun discussion. Read it or even better – give your opinions of Brown’s piece. In a respectful manner of course.




8 Comments


I dunnow….
Does your average child not find it confusing to hear men (and women) tell them lysergic tales of talking snakes, burning bushes, people being created from parts of other people’s bodies, people living to be 900 and other people rising from the dead?
he is just upset that he couldn’t be free as a person and in drag.. all that energy he use to fight who he truly is,, all that internal fighting can make one go nuts…
If more “community events” across the spectrum had free HIV testing, the world would be a better place.
CPAC, for instance.
CPAC could use before-and-after HIV testing, I’m sure…as well as PCP testing.
It seems to from the tone of his writing that the Reverend enjoyed the drag queens somewhat (even if they were officially off-putting), was confused by gay men calling wach other “girl” but was most horrified by the transitioning trans women.
“. . . men, who were, quite sadly, all too conspicuous.”
Right off the bat, he makes the common cissexist assumption that trans women are men. Trans women are not men, were never really men, and are *different* not just from birth, but from the genetic coding and developmental path from persons properly classified as male.
“. . . walked around in various stages of their sex-change journey . . . ”
Transition is not a “sex change” though it is a journey. It involves a correction, not a change. It involves steps that can include a hormonal triggering of the appropriate pubescent developments for the individual, to the extent that they are possible (since in most cases, the individual underwent pubescent development along the wrong sexed lines the first time around – and the things that did develop the first time don’t go away by themselves). It can involve various kinds of other treatments, including electrolysis and some surgeries. All of this it to bring the body into closer harmony with the way the brain developed.
“. . . long hair, female breasts and undeniably male feature – ”
My. my. my. The reverend is even more confused by trans people. I wonder what he would make of a woman with polycystic ovarian syndrome, who may have large hands, a deep voice, and beard growth.
I wonder if the Reverend has ever considered reading his Bible, where he can find three related passages, that deal with “eunuchs” (a biblical term that can be properly understood to include some gay people, trans people, and visibly intersex people) – Isaiah 56, Matthew 19:12, and Acts 8.
I wonder if the Reverend has ever contemplated the relevance of Gen. 1:27 “image and likeness of God” as “male *and* female” and how that relates to the Tetragrammaton YHWH, which if read backward in Hebrew is rendered as words that translate as He/She (and just as “Moses” means “Son of” in Egyptian, and you have to read that backward to get Ha-Shem (A hebrew term usually used as a substitute for YHWH – so Moses is a “Son of God” – it’s okay to arch eyebrows). And then we see in the second GEnesis story how the original Adam is indeed, male-and-female before God splits him into a Male (Adam) and Female (Eve).
In Isaiah 56, it’s the Eunuchs who are given a special place in God’s House that is better than children. Is it because we, who partake in having the bbrain development associated with one sex and a genital development associated with the other, are actually extra special to God?
So, who is this Reverend, who looks at my people through clouded cissexist eyes, mischaracterizes us as being less than who we really are?
Maybe he is like Pharaoh from the RCL first reading the other week from Exodus, who was so ready to believe the lie of the Hebrew midwives that Hebrew Women are “hay’yot” (i.e., “like animals.”) (Yes, I know, the translations gloss over the Hebrew, and call them “vigorous” – but the translators didn’t get the nuance.) The Pharaoh did not know Joseph – and saw the Hebrews as strangers in the midst of the Egyptians, and he feared them because they were different – so does this Reverend fear us who are different, especiallt the trans women.
He might think guys calling each other “girl” a little odd. He may have enjoyed the performances of the drag queens, but they do make believe and are less threatening. It’s the trans women who wig him outthe most – and I guess it is the trans community that he is called upon to embrace, as Francis was called upon to embrace the lepers – because if he doesn’t, he may find that he cannot himself be saved. (Reverend Brown, if you somehow get to read this, please read and meditiate on Mat. 25:31-46 – and then wonder who, for you, are really “the least of God’s people” – and if your heart is not hardened, and your eyes can see, and your ears can hear, maybe you can change your tune in midstream.)
Anyway, I have written all this before, in one form or another, in other contexts.
Note: I followed Alvin’s links to the discussion on the “Perspectives” page (a broken link to one news now, but you’d think they’d intentionally break the link), and I discovered there that Dr. Brown is a Jewish indiviual “who accepts Jesus.” (Possibly involved with Jews for Jesus, but I can’t tell. So I modified my comments there (and they appeared on *my* facebook page in the modified form) to be a little more relevant to him, if he actually were to look at the comments.
Thanks Alvin, for keeping us up on the antics of the holy bullies . . .
I’m shocked, shocked to find there were gay people at the gay pride parade.
“…all this at an event designed to “promote acceptance” in the wider Charlotte community.”
Is it really? I always thought that Pride parades and festivals were primarily for us. They are a day for us to have fun, be ourselves, have fun, learn about various organizations in the community, and have fun.