The Freedom To Marry: What’s Next After New York?
By Evan Wolfson, Freedom to Marry
New York is not the first state to have its legislature end the exclusion of lesbian and gay couples from marriage, but this time is different.
With Friday’s vote for families and fairness, the number of Americans living in states with the freedom to marry more than doubled, from 16 million to 35 million.
New York’s embrace of the freedom to marry marks the first time that a Republican-led chamber of a legislature — in this case the state senate — voted to advance a bill to end marriage discrimination, and Republican senators provided the winning margin.
And New York’s legislature becomes the first to pass a marriage bill without taking a detour through the temporary way-station of a civil union or domestic partnership. New York heeded the lesson of Vermont and other states that first experimented with civil unions, and embraced the full freedom to marry after concluding that these half-measures don’t fully protect families or fulfill the constitutional command of equality.
Fifteen years ago, only 27 percent of Americans approved of ending discrimination in marriage. But as gays and lesbians have talked with family and friends about why marriage matters, hearts have opened and minds have changed. Today, that number has literally doubled. According to a recent Washington Post poll, and confirmed by five other national polls, more than 52 percent of the public supports the freedom to marry for same-sex couples.
Hitting a majority for marriage was a big milestone in this American journey of inclusion and fairness, but having New York end marriage discrimination is a turning point for the country. The world watches New York, and, as New Yorkers say, if we can make it here, we’ll make it anywhere — but only if the ever-expanding community of people who support the freedom to marry do the work to bring it home nationwide.
What will that look like?We will secure the freedom to marry in more states. American history teaches that human rights and social justice movements must make gains at the state level, with some states serving as engines to tug the conversation and country forward. In every state (and every country) that has ended the denial of marriage to same-sex couples, support for the freedom to marry has only increased. People see with their own eyes that gays and lesbians in their state who get married share the hope and joy of other couples, and the heartfelt desire to make and strengthen a lifelong commitment to the person they love.
With each state win, we will inspire other states to follow. Republican support — from Ken Mehlman, the former chair of the Republican National Committee, to Barbara Bush, the daughter of President George W. Bush — was critical to passing the law through New York’s Republican-controlled state senate. Democratic Governor Andrew Cuomo was the indispensable champion of the marriage bill, speaking often of the need for New York to live up to history and once again lead the way for the nation. New York’s bipartisan triumph for the freedom to marry signals a major shift in the national political calculus for both parties and points the way to more victories.
We will continue to grow the number of Americans who support the freedom to marry. Not only is there now majority support for ending discrimination in marriage, but the freedom to marry is riding a demographic wave. Roughly 60 percent of millennials — voters under 30, who represent the largest generation ever — overwhelmingly support marriage rights for loving, committed same-sex couples. Their support ranges across virtually every demographic, including Republicans and even evangelicals. Elected officials looking to the future, let alone history, see voters — Democratic, independent, and increasingly, Republican — who want them to stand for the freedom to marry.
And we will tackle and end federal marriage discrimination. Under the so-called “Defense of Marriage Act” stampeded through Congress in 1996 — before gay couples could marry anywhere in the world –tens of thousands of legally married couples are denied the 1138-plus federal protection and responsibilities triggered by marriage, including Social Security, immigration rights and fair tax treatment.
With court challenges mounting, the Department of Justice concluding that DOMA is indefensible under the Constitution, and the Respect for Marriage Act now pending in Congress to repeal DOMA, history’s gaze now falls on our leaders in Washington, D.C. (where couples can legally marry, thanks to a legislative vote last year) to do their part in securing the freedom to marry.
President Obama has stated that his views on marriage are “evolving,” and that “gay couples deserve the same legal rights as every other couple in this country.” He has much to gain, and very little to lose, by joining the national majority for marriage and standing with the millennials, Democrats and independents who favor the freedom to marry, and the Republicans who have begun to speak with more clarity than he has. It’s time now for the president, like all of us in New York celebrating our new statute of liberty, to say, “I do support the freedom to marry.”
EVAN WOLFSON (@evanwolfson on Twitter) is the President of Freedom to Marry (@freedomtomarry), the campaign to win marriage nationwide, and author of Why Marriage Matters: America, Equality, and Gay People’s Right to Marry.




The Freedom To Marry: What’s Next After New York?
32 Comments


NEXThere’s some next links
https://www.facebook.com/Respe…
https://www.facebook.com/pages…
http://www.repealdoma.com/peti…
I want to note the pollingThe popularity of marriage equality in New York extends beyond ethnic lines. majorities of whites, Latinos, and blacks favor marriage equality.
Scroll down to question #19 here.
I’ll tell you what’s nextGay and lesbian New Yorkers need to get off their happy asses and push for the passage of GLENDA so trans people will have employment protection. Marriage equality does affect trans people, but if you’re unemployed and homeless, then you don’t give a damn about getting married. You nabbed the big prize, so how about helping your trans brothers and sisters for once? Don’t be another Massachusetts.
Next should be two things actuallyFirst, because our debt is long overdued and it is time for us to pay it, GENDA.
Secondly, We need to defend marriage rights in New Hampshire, which may lose them to the Teabagging hordes
If you’re going to derail the diary, at least tell us how should we help, MonicaWe’re told by certain trans commenters here on PHB that Empire State Pride Agenda is to be suspected of selling out the trans. Some other trans commenters disagree. I have no way of knowing the truth of the situation. Do you? What organization can we get behind to accomplish the passage of GENDA?
Suggestion: drop the “for once”. It’s crap and only serves to push away those you’re asking to do work for you. Can you name a state-level T anti-discrimination law that was passed without non-trans LGB help? Yes, non-trans LGBs can and should do more, but to imply we do nothing is, as I said, pure crap.
“First, because our debt is long overdued and it is time for us to pay it, GENDA.”
Could you please clarify what you mean by this confusingly worded statement?
Some thoughts…New Mexico, which protects trans rights, does not allow same-sex marriage, but recognizes those performed elsewhere.
New Jersey, my current state, which protects trans rights, has civil unions but not same-sex marriage. We recently failed to pass it, but we hate constantly being upstaged by New York.
Rhode Island, which protects trans rights, also does not allow same-sex marriage.
Hawaii, Minnesota, Washington, and ILLINOIS (large population state!) which all protect trans rights, have laws banning same-sex marriage. Hawaii and Illinois allow civil unions.
See a pattern here? None of these states will require a conflict between trans rights and same-sex marriage. IL and NJ are obviously the two most influential states on the list. I’d recommend starting there. Getting the states on this list more than doubles the number of states covered by marriage equality, and you can count on full support from the trans community, too.
Actually…New Mexico doesn’t recognize out-of-state SSM. By state law they should, as acknowledged by the state’s attorney general earlier this year, but it doesn’t yet. As my HR department has taken an uncouth delight in reminding me.
Interesting analysis!I hadn’t ever thought of it that way. You could also add CA and OR to the states with full trans protections but no marriage equality. The CA situation seems destined to be handled by the courts, but OR is gearing up to go to the ballot to revoke their anti-marriage amendment since their supreme court won’t touch the question, and their legislature is prohibited from repealing an amendment passed by ballot initiative.
But I think you’re right about IL and NJ being great candidates. Especially NJ, which is a powerhouse state and also has years of experience with problematic civil unions. Does NJ have a voter-generated referendum or ballot initiate system? If not, it would seem a great state to take the next step in.
SONDA was passed almost a decade ago in NYA non-inclusive bill protection gays and lesbians. There are a lot of people miffed that instead of getting trans people the same rights that LGB enjoy, everyone seemed to be focused like a laser on legalizing gay marriage. Now that they are talking about putting their resources into DOMA you kinda have to scratch your head.
NJ may still be a bit raw.After the recent failure of the marriage equality bill to pass (January 2010), especially with that tight-fisted bastard Christie in the Governor’s Mansion. NJ will not allow NY to occupy the limelight forever, though, and elections are only a few months away. Right now, we have solid Democratic majorities in both houses (Senate 24-16, Assembly 47-33), but both the Senate and Assembly have elections this year. NJ is a pretty bog standard urban/rural split, despite the fact that it’s the only state in the country to have every one of its counties designated “urban”. The Philadelphia metro, New York metro, and Atlantic City areas are solidly Democratic, everything else is Republican.
Christie has vowed to veto any marriage equality bill, and isn’t up for re-election until 2013 (his term ends January 2014). We would need 2/3rds majority in both houses to override, so a strict party line won’t do it. We couldn’t get more than 20 Ayes in the Senate last year with a similar party breakdown, but the game has changed with NY now.
The legislature can introduce am amendment by 3/5ths vote of each house, or by majority vote in two consecutive years. It must then be approved by referendum. Otherwise, there is no ballot initiative mechanism.
Trenton/Princeton area is also DemThe Democratic areas pretty much follow Amtrak’s Northeast Corridor from Trenton to New York City, plus, as I said the Philly suburbs and the AC area.
California, Oregon, Nevada, ColoradoThe constitutionality of Prop 8 will be decided in the courts, this fall.
Oregon and Nevada have constitutions which ban same-sex marriage, although they allow civil unions. Add Colorado to that list. The constitutional question makes those much harder nuts to crack than Washington, which only has a statutory ban. All four of those states do protect trans rights, however.
Facts Re Empire State Pride AgendaWhen SONDA was up for vote in 2002 as a gay-only antidiscrimination law, Senator Tom Duane (the only “out” gay legislator in the NY Senate) advanced an amendment which would have added protections for trans people and stated that he could not in good conscience endorse SONDA without trans inclusion. Empire State Pride Agenda vehemently opposed this amendment and angrily denounced Duane for his stand, claiming that trans inclusion was a “poison pill” provision intended to sabotage SONDA.
As I understand it,there’s a different ED now at ESPA. What about the board? Are they the same people with the same attitudes, or has there been meaningful change there? It’s been 9 years since the events you describe. Has that been time enough for evolution in ESPA?
My question still remains: If you’re ruling our ESPA, what organization can we get behind to accomplish the passage of GENDA?
I’m not making any accusations.You brought up ESPA, so I figured I’d share what I knew about it.
fair enough!
Speaking of Chris ChristieThe bastard was on MTP and said “He’s no fan of gay marriage.”
http://www.rawstory.com/rawrep…
“I am not a fan of same sex marriage, it’s not something I support,” Christie told NBC’s David Gregory. “I believe marriage should be between one man and one woman. That’s my view and that will be the view of our state because I wouldn’t sign a bill like the one that was in New York.”
He’s such a failure as governor,that moldy talking points is all he’s got. He’s not going to get reelected unless the Dems do something really really stupid.
Clearly the next legislative goal for NY is GENDAI hope we can get the GOP Senate to pass it next session. I am afraid.
The other activist goals is to correct the drastic state and New York City budget cuts to HIV and Youth Homeless services. These cuts must be fought, even though the budget has been passed. Lives are at stake.
RE: Oregon — a recent poll from PPP included a relationship recognition question.
http://publicpolicypolling.blo…
PPP is a firm that is including a state-level relationship recognition question in many of their polls. Most here are probably already aware. Just thought this recent poll from Oregon was relevant to the discussion here.
VermontOn the other hand, Vermont, which led the way with the first civil unions, protects trans rights — something that was accomplished BEFORE the legalization of marriage supplanted civil unions.
Which is why…I’m seriously considering a move to Vermont. As well as marriage equality and trans rights, it’s one of only three states that allows firearms purchases and carry without a permit. Add to that great skiing and other outdoor activities, great artisanal foods (the maple, the cheese, the chocolates!), and the ability to have a boat on Lake Champlain and still get to the ocean two different ways, and I find it very hard to resist. Of course, there’s the money thing…which I don’t have, so I guess I’m stuck where I am for awhile…meh. Philly is my best compromise for now.
SONDA and ESPAIt is true that when SONDA was passed, The transgender community was thrown under the bus by ESPA. The director at the time later apologized for that – and apologized often. The EDs that have come along after that have been working hard to finish making GENDA a law. GENDA has passed several times in the Assembly and it has been the Senate that has been the hold. Now that marriage is a done deal, GENDA is front and center. Is ESPA “perfect” – no but they listen and change. ESPA learned their lesson and is not the problem. There is a group supported by the ESPA, the GENDA coalition, working to move the bill forward (and help keep ESPA on track).
Rochester member of the GENDA coalition.
Unfortunately, we’re stuck with him until 2014, at least.The sad fact is, the other option was Jon Corzine, who, while he has a great record for supporting LGBT rights, fails in so many other areas that he couldn’t muster enough support among his own party base to overcome the Republicans push to elect Christie. NJ is a solidly blue state, yet displays at times a danger of becoming a swing state.
NJ practically ranks second to California in its liberalism, if you look at the laws and jurisprudence. We’re going to get marriage equality here, it’s just a matter of time.
This is the state, remember, where the Court of Appeals ruled that they couldn’t see how, when the legislature passed a non-trans inclusive Law Against Discrimination, they could have possibly meant not to include gender identity and expression, where the law made discrimination on the basis of sex illegal. Two years or so later, we had the actual law with the explicitly defined terms in place.
Christie is much like GWB. He’s a huge gas bag, and he’s pissing a lot of people off, but I’m not sure if he’ll have pissed off enough people by 2013 to lose the election.
WE were toldThat GEDA was “front and center” how many times by ESPA? Why was there a total lack of communication about GENDA right after it his the Senate?
I’m sick of “are they (is it) perfect, no, but…” used when trans people are frustrated with the groups that assert that they are representing trans people and then really… not so much (it seems). We heard it the MD, in MA… “is the bill perfect, no.. is MassEquality perfect, no… it’s like our expectations for things are so so we aren’t even trying for “not as bad as it could be”.
“working hard to finish making GENDA a law. – except this year when there weren’t even useful responses to direct questions about ENDA after it went to the Senate.
I’m glad you are comfortable working with ESPA, since you live in NY it more important that you are than I am. But, for me, they did the dirty in 2002 – this was the chance to show they weren’t doing it again – they failed. I see no reason to trust ESPA… unless they can explain the silence around GENDA.
Not perfect is not good enough.If the organization is not interested in supporting equal rights FOR ALL, I am not interested in supporting the organization.
More precisely……we don’t demand perfect results, or perfectly worded principles. We do demand “perfect” trans inclusion rather than colonializing tokenism.
So what organization in NY makes the cut?If passage of GENDA is the priority for the next legislative session, who’s going to make it happen? Who should we non-trans LGBs be taking direction from and giving volunteer time and money to?
The GENDA CoalitionCan you tell us more about The GENDA Coalition? All I can find about it on Google is that it’s unincorporated. Who is on its board, what are its member organizations and how does it function? Does it accept contributions and organize volunteers?
I’m asking these questions because as you can see there are a number of trans activists who reject ESPA but have nothing else to suggest in its place.
What it all boils down to is non-trans LGB people like me being brow beaten because GENDA hadn’t passed yet, but then being told that there is no organization in NY worthy of the task. So people like me are put in an impossible situation of being asked to do work but not to work with the only organizations out there.
What’s the answer?
Good questionsThese are fantastic questions and ones I’ve been trying to get for the past few months on an issue totally unrelated to GENDA.
Really?Because I vaguely remember GENDA was clearly the goal in the amorphous future after SONDA. Later given clearer dates as goals and then less clearly set as the goal. But I could totally be wrong and GENDA has been clearly the goal since, like, forever.