crossposted on Holy Bullies and Headless Monsters
Brian Brown of the National Organization for Marriage claims that his organization wants a respectful discussion as to the merits of being against marriage equality.
However based on the actions of NOM – and the organizations it is partnering with in New York and Minnesota – one can't help but to question the veracity of Brown's statement.
So far:
- NOM has put out a misleading commercial in New York touting a claim that the organization knows is discredited.
- The organization has also blanketed the state with flyers designed to imply that gays want to use marriage equality to corrupt the innocence of children.
- Brown himself, during a rally, made the erroneous claim that Massachusetts kindergartners are being taught that their parents are bigots if said parents favor opposite-sex marriage.
And these awful missives of inaccuracy and misdirection aren't confined solely to NOM. The organizations NOM is partnering with to fight marriage equality are also guilty of several dubious actionsAnd these awful missives of inaccuracy and misdirection aren't confined solely to NOM. The organizations NOM is partnering with to fight marriage equality are also guilty of several dubious actions.
In Minnesota, the Minnesota Family Council spread inaccurate information via its site that gays engage in pedophilia, bestiality, and the consuming of urine and feces. It also cited the work of discredited physician Paul Cameron. Since this discovery became public, the Minnesota Family Council has scrubbed these references from its site, however, you can still view the information and save it from here. To top it off, even though the items were removed, the head of the Minnesota Family Council, Tom Pritchard, actually defended the material:
Prichard defends the postings as getting “into the nature of homosexuality and homosexual behavior,” but says that won’t be the focus of his group’s efforts to pass the constitutional ban.
“The focus of this campaign is the nature and purpose of marriage — not a referendum of homosexuality per se, or its lifestyle activities and behaviors,” he says. “I would see that as a separate issue.”
And it gets more interesting in New York.
A group aiding NOM in that state, The Family Research Foundation, is encouraging supporters to write letters to the editor demonizing lgbts. And the organization has the gall to provide prospective writers with several form letters, meaning that all they have to do is sign their name. You can view the letters here. One letter is below:
The letter implies that the lgbt orientation is as dangerous as cigarette smoking. This theory was originally espoused by the discredited researcher Paul Cameron, the very man whose material the Minnesota Family Council scrubbed from its page.
Some folks may read this post and get frustrated. They may say things like “whatever NOM and its allies are doing, it's working because they are winning” or “we are losing because we aren't fighting fire with fire.”
But I disagree with both points. Sometimes exposing a lie to sunlight is the best thing you can do. Whatever battles NOM have won are transitory at best and, when it's all said and done, will not be remembered when marriage equality becomes legal.
What will be remembered are the lies, the hypocrisy, the blatant inaccuracies committed in the name of God by NOM and its partners.
And hopefully those who follow our footsteps will take that behavior as a lesson of what not to do when claiming to work for morality.
Hat tip to Goodasyou.org




13 Comments



ProblemWe are not exposing the lies to sunlight. We are offering sappy, warm and fuzzy crap. When will we see spots that do expose the lies? WE all know but the public does not.
DittoThere is a lamentable tendency among those in a position to refute the lies to avoid calling people like Brian Brown “liars,” even when that is demonstrable fact. Until we start hitting back just as hard as they are hitting us, we’re going to lose to their scare campaigns.
Hit them back, only harderIts about time gay activist groups started hitting them back, but with much more impunity than they hit us with. We can be civilized in our discussion with them but we shouldn’t be politically correct, offend them if we must and that can be done without foul language. One of the drawbacks is we don’t have someone who can really represent us who has the intellectual capacity to blow them out of the water and debunk their lies as well as an expert on the history of marriage who isn’t a homophobe. There is no rational argument to ban us from civil marriage, none. Procreation is one of the red herrings NOM uses and its lame. If they claim the purpose of marriage is procreation, then they’ll have to support a ban on heterosexuals marrying who choose not to or cannot procreate, including women beyond child-bearing years.
you are…100% correct. The warm and fuzzy campaigns have not worked, over and over and over again.
If we do not start talking about bigotry, rleigion, and children in forceful, clear terms, we cwill continue to lose. If we do not direct a part of our campaigns at gay people, encouraging them to come out and discuss marriage equality iwth our friends and families, we will lose.
As simple as that.
NOM IS a modern Christian oranization. Consider the dramatic swing in opinion polls toward same sex marriage. It seems that the more NOM and others use hate speech, more and more people are turned off their message. Reasonable people today often know an LBGT person, lies like these don’t fly with them. All it does is paint NOM and the churches that support them as bigots. Consider also that at the same time, church membership is plummeting and probably for the same reason. NOM and the others have tainted the Christian faith to the point that Christianity and intolerance are synonymous. In that way, NOM’s missives are indeed, VERY Christian.
Agree that NOM is acting in line with christian doctrineNOM and Maggie’s minions may not be following Christ or the bible, but they are acting in accord with current christian doctrine. It is not about “God so loved the world”. It’s all about fear and control, and these fear-mongering commercials are exactly what most of the evangelical churches believe and preach.
AgreeSo true. BTW, I really am ticked at NOM’s Gallagher for another reason… Tainting the good first name “Maggie.”
One tacticBack in the day when the last civil rights struggle was over skin color, there were two camps: the warm and fuzzy, non-violent campaign by Dr. King; and the in-your-face, tell it like it is campaign of Malcolm X and the Black Panthers. Both were of the same cloth — equality — but went at it different ways.
King’s campaign was largely was rural: quiet, but effective, because the discipline was there. Malcolm’s and the Panthers were urban: gritty, spoke truth to power, and refused to back down.
This is why groups like ACT-UP and Queer Nation were successful in getting the message out with their zaps and actions, because they were urban in their message. However, groups like HRC has been to an extent ineffectual with their national campaign, because their focus is purely political and have become part of the establishment, rather than remain outside it. Get Equal is today’s version of ACT-UP and are getting more results than HRC has ever dreamed.
However…. we need to realize that just like Malcolm and Martin, the TLBG groups need to work together to advance our goal of equality. We’re too easily marginalized, which makes the oppressors happy, because the more we fight amongst ourselves, the less the bigots and the haters have to work.
We need to stop worrying about personal glory and personal achievement. The goal is equality for everyone based on gender identity/expression and sexual orientation!
We need to remind straight folk that they can face such discrimination, too!
Ten CommandmentsI have made this suggestion several other places, but I will make it again here. Let’s confront these people in public and ask them whether or not, according to the Ten Commandments, God has an opinion about bearing false witness against one’s neighbor.
Some branches of ChristianityDon’t adhere to the Ten Commandments
Most modern Evagelicals, from my understanding, are of a dispensationalist theology, which views these laws as archaic and/or non-applicable to them. Note that dispensationalist theology is heavily coo-related with belief in the (future) Rapture. Sample article: https://secure.wikimedia.org/w…
And they don’t interpret the Ten the same way, either.Just consider how many different interpretations the various Christian groups will come up with for the commandment against taking the Name in vain.
InterestingHow they can claim to be able to ignore certain tenets, but then at the same time try to force everyone to strictly follow them all!
That’s not only called hypocrisy, but is also duplicating the actions of the Pharisees, whom their Big Guy vociferously condemned.
Blunt and to the POINTI am sick of the way orgs. that say they are working for us are not. The crap the anti-gay hate groups are putting out there is sick and we are doing nothing but sappy old ladys?
I decided to make 60sec. spots exposing the lies. They are the kind of things I would like to see next their s*#t.
I am Lincolns Wet Paint at http://bjlincoln.blogspot.com and youtube at lincolnswetpaint
Thank you Pam for all your hard work and making sure the T gets a voice. I love your style.