Ron Hill bills his site Republicans 4 Freedom as “Advocates For The Rational Wing of the Republican Party.” And that he is. Hill wrote for conservative CNN commentator David Frum’s web site, and has advocated for repeal of “DADT” and for marijuana legalization. He wrote this in response to Mike Signorile’s Advocate commentary, “Lessons Learned,” about GOProud, the Tea Party and the grip of the fundamentalists on the Republican party.
Gay Republicans and Democrats: Time to Work TogetherBy Ron Hill
I must admit to surprise when one gay activist on the left contacted me to report that he would not work with me or support my blog because I’m a Republican. I think this is short-sided.
I find that the American people – Democrat or Republican – all want the same thing for our country: Peace, prosperity, low crime, good jobs, and freedom.
I also find that most Americans – Democrat and Republican – tend to be well-meaning, hard-working, decent folk.
I suspect the majority of people in both major parties agree on where we want our leaders to take us; we just disagree on how to get there. Democrats believe more government will reduce unemployment and lead to more security for our citizens; while Republicans believe less government and lower taxes will lead to greater prosperity and security for our citizens.
It doesn’t have to be an issue of one side always being right and another always being wrong.
Yes, there are extremists in both parties, and the 24 hour news cycle only seems to amplify the nuts on the far right and on the far left. But the truth is, we don’t have to demonize and hate one another (which is, apparently, the job of Peter LaBarbera, Tony Perkins, and Bryan Fischer).
The rest of us can, and should, be civil to one another. We can disagree without being disagreeable. When gay Democrats and gay Republicans refuse to work together in areas where we have common ground – like supporting equal treatment under the law for all Americans – it only hurts the cause of equality.
For the sake of the next generation of gay and lesbian Americans; Republican and Democratic activists and bloggers need to work together and support each another in those places where we agree. We can agree to disagree – and fight for our side with everything we’ve got – when it comes to taxes, spending, the proper role of government, and free markets. But when it comes to equal treatment under the law and fighting discrimination, we should stand united.
Working together we can accomplish more that we can by engaging in mere partisan bickering.
I am grateful to Democrats and Republicans who have helped make America a freer place – some current Republicans include the Log Cabin Republicans, who successfully challenged “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”, which helped pressure Congress into repealing the law; and Ted Olson, who helped the cause of marriage equality by lending his strong conservative credentials and prestige. GOProud may be controversial, but they would not have even been possible in the GOP 15 years ago. As gay Republicans and gay equality continue to gain increased acceptance within the GOP – which appears inevitable given changing demographics, we can expect to see more conservative gay voices.
We Democrats and Republicans may not always agree – but there is little to gain from criticizing others in the struggle for greater equality and acceptance, while there is much potential for gain if we stop criticizing one another and start working together on those areas where we do agree.
I will work with anyone – Libertarian, Republican, Democrat, green, Log Cabin or GOProud – to advance freedom in America for all of our citizens. To do otherwise is foolhardy. I hope my fellow activist and bloggers on the left can see the wisdom in this approach.
And like I said, we can always fight like alley cats over other issues – and then have a beer together when the vote is over with like civilized Americans.
Comment by Pam: I’ve always believed (and blogged here) that we need a strong out gay presence in the GOP in order to achieve full equality, a presence that would challenge the religious fundamentalist base full out. We see that happening outside the party structure from the Log Cabin Republicans from the legal perspective regarding DADT, along with the work of Ted Olsen pairing with David Boies on marriage equality. The focus has been on why LGBT equality is a constitutional issue — a conservative principle about freedom from government intervention.
That’s the challenge for an organization like GOProud — it’s hard to take a stand against marriage equality on that basis and still call the group conservative. Is it possible to work within the party as it stands now, or is success going to come from taking legal actions outside the party that actually represent constitutional conservative values?
The right answer would be both, but the back of the right wing evangelicals needs to be broken. The party hasn’t figured out how to replace that fundie voter base, so it continues to cleave to these retro social values. That’s a FAIL as a long term plan for party growth, and they know it (just look at the ridiculous alienation of the Latino vote by the party).




18 Comments


That’s not at all possible, PamThe GOP hates us and will do anything in its power to destroy us. The succes of the LGBT rights movement has redenred the Closet non-operational, but the system it supports is still intact in Republican circles. Log Cabinettes aare living in a fool’s paradise if they think that straight Republicans willingness to talk with the means anything outside of a desire totake their money. Even those Gay Republicans intenten on being Super KAPOS — ie. GOProud — are despised byt those to whom they pay such slavish fealty.
Seriously?If the “rational wing” of the Republican Party ever takes responsibility and drives the haters out, then maybe we can talk. Till then, they should be ashamed of their Party’s stands on womens rights, GLBT rights, &, oh heck, let’s just say human rights in general. I don’t work with people who hate me and want me to die. My right to exist is non-negotiable. Period.
Never the Twain shall meet!“while Republicans believe less government and lower taxes will lead to greater prosperity and security for our citizens.”
You Republican’s magical belief that lower taxes and less government is why the two sides will NEVER come together.
Taxes have gotten lower and lower since Eisenhower and the large corporations have learned how to avoid taxes altogether (see Enron!), and how well has that worked out for us? And while Repubs talk about less government all the time, the Federal government actually ballooned in size during little Bushie’s reign. How well did that work out for us?
When Republicans stop lying and pigs learn to fly the two sides will come together.
I hate to mention this sad fact too, but all the major Republican presidential candidates continue to crap on you poor gay Republicans after promising to focus on jobs and NOT social issues
“Yes there are extremist in both parties”More false equivalence bullshit. Notice that he only named right wing extremists. He can’t name left wing extremists that get any validation from media or candidates, because they don’t exist. We can point to right wing violence, from the murder of Dr.Tiller, to police assassinated by right wing extremists, to people in church assassinated by a right wing extremist who only wished that he could kill all liberals, and the list goes on. Republicon candidates even advocate violence by talking about second amendment remedies, and watering the tree of liberty with blood.
The Republicon politicians and their media machine, from Fox PAC to right wing hate radio, do not share that view. To them, poor people and union workers are parasites that hate America. The Republicons do not believe in economic freedom, their policies are geared towards funneling all wealth to the top. They have been very successful in doing that the past 30 years.
FranklyAfter the past two years especially, anyone who identifies as a Repugnican is either too damn stupid to vote or a would be fascist who hates the idea that anyone should help anyone else or that that the promises/contracts of Social Security and Medicare (we freakin’ paid into those systems in good faith) are to be jettisoned at the drop of a hat rather than have those few who managed to steal almost all the wealth of this country actually pay even a comparable amount of taxes as the working poor.
Work with them? I’m looking forward to the revolution where they get what is coming to them. As far as I am concerned you have to be a sociopath to be a rethugican today.
Oh, they “focus on jobs” –It’s just that they never mention during the campaigns that the only jobs they’re going to focus on are their own and those of their rich constituents. For the rest of us it’s more reality-denial and Reaganomics — strategies which work quite well towards their actual purposes while selling enough people on the non-functional supposed purposes that they can keep getting elected.
So even if the GOP started bringing in gay-friendly corporate shill assholes…why should we be inclined to support them?
What does ‘work together’ mean ?If it means supporting equality legislation, I see no evidence that Dems oppose such legislation even if it is sponsored by a Repub.
On the other hand if it means, as I suspect, supporting a Repub for office just because they claim to be pro-equality, that is a bridge too far.
The Repub party is controlled by it’s religious fanatic contingent, and the parties battshittery is not confined to opposition to gays – it includes anti-abortion fanaticism, science denialism and the promotion of christianity by the government.
So in a post where you’re claiming to promote cooperation between Democrats and Republicans..
you REPEATEDLY use the pejorative, Republican cutesy, “Democrat” to refer to the party and the people who belong to it.
Just one of numerous examples:
I also find that most Americans – Democrat and Republican – tend to be well-meaning, hard-working, decent folk.
The word, in that context is DEMOCRATIC!
“I also find that most Americans – DEMOCRATIC and Republican…”
Quick lesson.
It’s NOT the Democrat Party. It’s the Democratic Party.
ONE member of the Democratic Party = Democrat
TWO OR MORE members of the Democratic Party = Democrats
“MOST people” is plural so you can either say “Most people…Democrats and Republicans…” or “Most people…Democratic and Republican…”
If you’re going to claim to offer the olive branch and play the victim for not being liked by Democrats you might want to start by checking why you’re using the offensive word play that your fellow anti-gay and anti-liberal Republicans do.
I have adoptedRepublicon. Similar to when Bill Maher said “I’ll stop calling them Teabaggers when they stop calling it Obamacare”, I’ll stop using Republicon when they stop using Democrat when they know it should be Democratic.
Thanks for typing this, so I don’t have to.The second I read that line about “extremists in both parties,” I knew I was in for another heaping load of false equivalency bullshit. The truth of the matter is that we have lots of very, very dangerous extremists on the right, and no real “left” to speak of at all.
So I wish people would stop trying to peddle this crap. The only way we can have an honest discussion about politics in this country is when we abandon this tired tradmed meme that “both sides do it” and “the truth is somewhere in the middle.” The current GOP is a collection of stark raving racist, sexist, homophobic lunatics. There is nothing on the left that even begins to approach the kind of wingnut insanity we see on the right. Period.
You may now return to your regularly scheduled programming.
Silly Ron,GOP conservatives consider “small govermnent” to mean one that stops interfering with good upstanding American businesses such as Haliburton, Enron and BP so that they can focus on making America prosper without all those pesky regulations about workplace safety, minimum wages and oversight, and instead dedicates itself to telling people what they aren’t allowed to do in the privacy of their own homes or with their own bodies.
If Mr. Hill is sincere with this outreach attempt, then he’s a gullible fool. If he isn’t, he’s a Judas goat.
Forgot to add:“Working together” in GOP-speak means “Do what we want in the name of goodwill, and don’t expect us to return the favor.”
Uh, history lession please?You’re forgetting about Theodore Kaczynski, who was a very liberal extremist. Or how about the first emergence of the KKK, which was led by Dems who attacked and intimidated white and black Repubs.
You’re a Lesbian RepublicanQuit trying to fucking derail the discussion. Those “Democrats” are today's Republicans, moron. But then again this coming from someone who believes Black Americans should be thankful because it Republicans who granted their freedom.
What?I’m not derailing anything. The comment I replied to was stating that there were no liberal extremists. There are, I was providing examples. And I’m not a republican, I just don’t agree with you.
Southern Dixiecrats from the days of which you speak, who are still alive today, TO A MAN/WOMAN, are Republicans today.I come from a family of former Dixiecrats in Mississippi and I can assure you that your comment is ignorant to the extreme.
Dixiecrats weren’t liberal in ANY way and moved en mass to the Republican Party in the early eighties. Comparing them, or associating them, with modern Democrats is uninformed and offensive.
You of course are exactly rightAnd even if the Dixiecrats had been liberal, the fact that Ugly had to go back over 50 years for an example shows the bankruptcy of the argument.
What’s the proof?What’s the proof that Kaczynski is/was a liberal? And even if you have any, which I most sincerely doubt, it’s rather telling that you have to dredge up someone who is likely certifiably insane to bolster your BS claim of “liberal extremism.”
Oh, and as for the Dixiecrats. They were conservatives. That was, like, you know, the point.