This is Bill Humphrey, and he’s the statewide director for Delaware Right to Marry Political Action Committee. He’s got a little problem, really, just a little one. And I know we at the Blend and in the Netroots can help him out.
This has been Cross-Posted to the Daily Kos. Please Rec if you can.First, here’s a special note to Pam’s House Blend from Bill:
We at Delaware Right to Marry are grateful for the chance to address readers of Pam’s House Blend directly today. If you read the “About” page by Pam, she cites “the right to marry” as one of the issues that led her to start the site in the first place. It’s an interesting choice of words: the right to marry. A lot of people don’t think marriage is a right. Having grown up in Massachusetts during the transition to marriage equality, I firmly believe that it is a right (as you can tell by our organization’s name), and it’s one of the reasons I started the organization last year here in Delaware, where I now live.
In April 2009, Nate Silver estimated that Delaware voters would be ready to accept marriage equality by 2011 if it were put to a vote. However, unlike in many states, there is no ballot initiative process (which is a good thing since people should not be able to vote on other people’s rights), nor is there an equal rights clause in the state’s constitution to allow for a court ruling in favor of marriage equality, as in Massachusetts or Iowa. So in Delaware we have to go the legislative route. That means appealing to legislators, by showing them that marriage equality is right and (we hope) popular. That’s where you come in.
A note to the transgender community: We are very supportive of promoting transgender rights in the state of Delaware, and members of our staff are heavily involved in other projects for transgender individuals outside our organization. For example, our assistant director is currently leading a project for gender-neutral housing options for students living on campus at the University of Delaware.
While, our organization right now is solely single-issue (marriage equality for same-sex couples), there are other organizations in the state with a broader policy agenda for LGBT people, and my assumption is that they are working to add transgender protections at some point in the near future. However, I can’t speak for those organizations, and we did not exist when the previous nondiscrimination legislation, which some of you may know about, came up for debate. I am personally supportive of transgender rights and in the future, it may be something we add to our mission.
See, Bill’s working to get marriage equality onto Delaware’s legislative agenda this session. And if it gets off the ground, its got a good chance of passing. The problem is, it’s been a long time since anyone checked in with good people of Delaware about how they feel about LGBT issues. And it seems, these issues are on an upswing, so there’s good reason to believe when the news comes back it’ll be good. And as he said, king of polling, Nate Silver agrees.
But, polls don’t conduct themselves. So, Bill needs just $2,250 dollars to pay Public Policy Polling to conduct a poll on Delaware residents’ attitudes about marriage equality.
Big Money
I know, it’s gauche to ask for money. I personally believe I was made for better things. But the reality is the anti-gay hate industry is rich. Very rich. And they are powerful, and have the ears of some powerful folks. Just one group, National Organization for Marriage (NOM), is estimated in 2009 to have collected $3,000,000, including a single donation of $1,400,000 from Catholic Church affiliated Knights of Columbus. And they sunk millions into a variety of races around the country. In this last cycle they spent half a million dollars to go after those judges in Iowa.
NOM also sunk half a million dollars going after Governor Lynch in New Hampshire for signing a marriage equality bill. They didn’t get their prize. (Yay!) But they’re not backing down. They’re gearing up to spend at least $100k in Rhode Island.
They have lots of money. Fortunately, we have the arc of a just universe on our side. And, we also have facts. But Bill and his group just need the money to mine for those facts.
Little Money
When Bill’s request came to me I was struck by its quaintness. $2,250 is not much, it’s pretty obtainable. I mean, I’m used to reading these budgets of six digits. So, I figure, if everyone donated just $10 (the cost of a movie ticket!), we’d only need 225 nationwide to chip in. (Of course, if you give more, that’s great!) And we can help Bill and Right to Marry lay the a solid groundwork for a nice victory in Delaware. Let’s go to it.
Now, think carefully. And remember, the extremists in Delaware must be pretty dispirited that their teabagger Queen Christine O’Donnell got Royally trounced in the last election. They lost their chance to make masturbation illegal. I imagine the left scoring a marriage equality victory in 2011 would be a real kick in the pants, wouldn’t it? And wouldn’t that just be a shame?
Transcript for the video impaired.
Hi. My name is Bill Humphrey, and I’m the statewide director for Delaware Right to Marry Political Action Committee.
We are leading the effort to pass legislation this year for civil marriage equality in the state of Delaware. Our bill is modeled upon the 2009 New Hampshire marriage equality law and contains clear protections for unhindered freedom of religion. We believe we have a very strong draft law, which we hope to have introduced soon. [Read the proposal outline here.]
Today, I’m here with a pretty simple request. There hasn’t been a poll done in the state of Delaware on any LGBT issues for several years. We think that opinions have shifted significantly just in the last few years, and we’re ready to put that to the test. However, in order to do that, we still need about two thousand dollars for our poll by Public Policy Polling. We’re an all-volunteer organization, and we are absolutely counting on small-dollar donations from the netroots to help pay for the poll.
We also should note that we have to get this poll done in the next several weeks in order to be able to move our effort legislative ahead this year because the legislative session in Delaware is fairly short. Right now we also have a pro-LGBT Democratic governor, a Democratic supermajority in the House, and a Democratic Senate majority. We don’t know how long that situation might last, and we don’t want to fight this out in an election year either. That makes this period extremely critical.
Donations of any amount – big or small – are deeply appreciated.
If you would prefer to just write a check, there’s a link below with information on how to do that. Otherwise, you can just use the ActBlue link below to donate securely and instantly.
Thanks again for your support. It really makes a difference.
| Donate on our ActBlue page to help pay for the poll: |
|
Thanks for watching, and reading. Two prior diaries by Bill:
• Why Does Marriage Equality Matter to You • Help Us Bring Marriage Equality to Delaware
• You can follow the news of this story at Delaware Right To Marry’s Facebook page.
Special Note: Please welcome Bill to the Blend, he’s posting under the handle, Delaware Right To Marry and will be taking questions at 11:00 am EST on Wednesday.





24 Comments


Thanks!Thank you for all your help in spreading this request.
Sincerely,
Bill Humphrey, Statewide Director
(on behalf of all of us at Delaware Right to Marry)
I say this with great respect to Bill Humphrey……but I say it nonetheless.
I cannot in good conscience support an effort to bring same-sex marriage to a state that is the only state in the nation to specifically permit discrimination against its transgender citizens by statute, by specifically excluding us from the protections of its anti-discrimination law.
Frankly, history has taught us repeatedly that once marriage rights are won in a given state, the major organizations disband and their activists and funding sources disappear, heading toward the next marriage battle, just as we have recently witnessed in both Massachusetts and Connecticut.
Indeed, I am forced to wonder about the credibility of any civil rights organization that places their own right to marry above that of other citizens to earn a living, not be thrown out of their homes and be able to access government and social services for being who they are.
Sorry, Mr. Humphrey, but we don’t accept this kind of logic from the Human Rights Campaign and their ilk and it doesn’t sound any better or more credible coming from you.
As one of the authors of the pieceI totally understand where you’re coming from. We failed to pass a gender identity non-discrimination bill in New York last year and it was truly shameful.
But I am personally committed to moving both NY’s GENDA bill and Marriage Equality Bill in the coming year.
I totally understand your viewpoint and your frustration…I really do. And I think we need to hold our major orgs more accountable in this area.
In the recent lame duck session of Congress, all 42 Republican senators sent a letter to Harry Reid saying that unless their Bush-era tax cuts were passed, they would filibuster all other legislation. I would guess that most of us who read the Blend didn’t think very highly of this tactic.
With all due respect to you, it seems like your position is remarkably similar to this. If you don’t get your transgender anti-discrimination law, you won’t support other issues.
We all make decisions on which organizations and issues we can support and which we won’t. And unless we are fabulously wealthy, we can’t support many of the things we may favor. But the battle for equality has to be fought on many fronts by many people, and all wins are good wins.
It’s fine for you to decline to support this effort, but please don’t knock them down.
Contributed andYou are welcome.
I just donated.I don’t live anywhere close to Delaware, but I remember how grateful I was when money came in from out of state to support the Prop 107 fight in Arizona in 2008.
I was wondering about the chances of marriage equality succeeding in Delaware by the legislative method. Democrats hold a 14-7 majority in their Senate and a 26-15 majority in their House, and their Governor is a Democrat. Granted, not all Democrats support marriage equality and a few Republicans do, but these seem like pretty good odds.
I am looking forward to the daywhen I can marry my wife in my home state. A Rehoboth Beach wedding (or maybe Lewes or Old New Castle) would be wonderful! Dyke Branch Road in Dover might work too…
BTW Rebecca, Delaware is not the only state with a specific anti-trans law on the books. Tennessee (where I currently live) specifically prohibits birth certificate changes for transgender people born here. If the legislature knew we weren’t specifically excluded from the non-discrimination law, they would quickly “remedy” that. Thank {insert deity of your choice} that I was born in Delaware, which has one of the best birth certificate change laws/policies in the nation and a rational majority.
We think so too.You are certainly right about not all Dems being on board, but now is the best possible moment, in our view. The legislative method is the only method available to us, so we’re giving it our best shot.
And thanks for your donation.
Think how many beach weddings there will be.Ka-ching. This should be a no-brainer economically, aside from every other reason.
I couldn’t donate even if I wanted toI live in New York where it’s still legal to discriminate against trans people in all areas of public life. That fact has contributed greatly to my being unemployed for 2 years as of last Sunday, tyvm not, Ruben Diaz.
But, do you know what I’m planning to do on February 2nd? I’m planning to leave my house at 3:00am to drive to Buffalo to catch a bus with Marriage Equality New York so I can go to Albany to speak with my elected representatives about marriage equality. I do so because the lack of same sex marriage rights affects me – I have to out myself as being trans to prove the validity of my relationship by showing my marriage certificate with my old name on it. Thus I have to expose myself to unfair and harmful but still legal discrimination since NY has continued to give trans rights short shrift.
It’s not a direct connection though, and not one that affects large numbers of trans people. I will go to Albany because marriage equality is important and because I’m one of the few who will remind their legislators about their responsibility to the trans community, a responsibility to pass a law that is vital. Being able to marry your same sex partner is poor compensation if you can’t find a job to help support them. Delaware, take a lesson, do the right thing.
Thanks for going to AlbanyIt’s important to remember there are many ways we intersect and many ways to contribute that are non-monetary. The non-monetary ways are often the most effective. Putting a real face on the problem to our leaders can be very effective. They can at times be sadly unaware.
RE: I say this with great respect to Bill Humphrey…I’ve been challenged, in the past, for my desire to see proper pronoun usage “instead of” fighting against rape. But I can support survivors at the same time as I seek just language. Likewise, supporting marriage equality and fighting discrimination against trans people aren’t mutually exclusive.
Legalizing same-sex marriage in Delaware will benefit the heterosexual trans community as well as the cis LGB community; although Delaware allows residents to change the name and sex on their birth certificates, it does so only if they have undergone SRS, which, as I’m sure you are aware, is not an option for many– most, even– members of the trans community. Thus, many heterosexual trans people who want to marry cis people cannot do so until same-sex marriage is legalized. It may be a small step, as you said, for a population that is not legally protected from discrimination, but at least it’s a step in the right direction.
It’s true that organizations like the HRC have abandoned states after winning same-sex marriage. But as a young LGBTQ rights activist in Massachusetts, I appreciate the roads that they have paved. Less than a decade ago, “trans” wasn’t even in most people’s vocabulary in Massachusetts; now, we have a thriving trans activist community, and the Trans Day of Remembrance vigil in Boston this year was attended by at least 100 people (just my estimate, though there were probably many more). The Boston Alliance of Gay and Lesbian Youth changed its name to the Boston Alliance of Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender Youth not long ago (although they are still usually referred to as BAGLY). The achievements of the lesbian, gay, and bisexual community don’t set the trans community back.
Delaware must absolutely come to terms with its transphobic legislation. It must strive to overcome its discriminatory policies. It must work towards a society in which all its citizens are equal. But that doesn’t mean it’s okay to deny two people from getting married simply on the basis of their sex. Disbanding Delaware Right to Marry won’t do a thing for trans rights. But supporting it can.
Let me be clear……I am not opposed to same-sex marriage, I am opposed to the effort to achieve it being prioritized over the effort to achieve the far more basic civil of others to work and live free of discrimination. The reason I oppose it is because once same-sex marriage is won the big-money activists will blow out of there and transgender people living in Delaware will be quickly forgotten just as we have been in other states where same sex marriage has been won first.
We’ve heard this “We’ll come back for you later.” BS many times before, and we already know how the end of that story turns out.
Spin it any way you want but the reality is just that helping to win same-sex marriage first in given state is helping to ensure that transgender people will continue to be denied basic civil rights in that state for decades to come.
History has taught us well. When push comes to shove, these people simply cannot be trusted to stand up for the rest of us once their own battle is won.
Thank you to those who donated.We met our goal today finally, with your help. We really appreciate that.
RE: Let me be clear…A 20-year-old college student is not a “big money activist.” There’s “grassroots,” and there’s grassroots. This is the real kind.
I have yet to see a case in which a defeat of same-sex marriage has been a victory for the trans community.
And you know what? It doesn’t matter if this particular organization supports trans rights, because we don’t need this particular organization for activism. If you’re a DE resident and want to start a trans rights movement there, shoot me an email (it’s the one attached to this account). I may have zero connections in Delaware, but I can still play a big role. I’ll help you network with MA people, I will write, I’ll organize, and when we have garnered the popular support we need, we’ll work on our own legislation (which will be all the easier after same sex marriage has passed and the world hasn’t ended). That doesn’t mean I’m going to stop fighting tooth and nail for gay, lesbian, and bisexual rights, too.
I still feel that you’re pitting two issues against each other that aren’t in opposition.
But I’ll show my cards. This is personal to me. I’ve gotten 2 AM emails from Bill asking me to help him articulate pro-trans arguments in response to transphobic attacks. I’ve had long discussions with him about how to get gender neutral housing at his school. Just as he’s throwing himself into marriage equality as a straight man, just as he’s fought for racial equality as a white man, I know from experience that despite being cis he will continue to be just as much an ally to the trans community as ever.
I guess it’s stupid to post an internet testimonial, since you don’t know me, so for all you know I could be just as bad or single-issue as you think Delaware Right to Marry is. But I’ve poured my heart and soul into these issues, I really have. And I’ve had my share of betrayals by groups that claim intersectionality and diversity (you should read my journal). Bill is good people.
Hang on a second……I never accused anyone of transphobia. What I do accuse same-sex marriage advocates who seek to place their own issue above the right of others to work and live free of discrimination of is tunnelvision and selfishness.
These people know perfectly well that once marriage is won their deep-pocket funders will move on to the next marriage battle, their organization will deflate financially to near-uselessness or dissolve entirely, and transpeople will be left unprotected as the martini drinkers move on to their next self-serving campaign.
We know that’s the way it will happen because that’s the way it always happens when same-sex marriage gets passed first. Name me a state that passed transgender rights AFTER marriage was won. Having trouble coming up with one? There’s a good reason for that.
The truth that speaking out against passing marriage rights before everyone’s right to live and work free of discrimination is simply self-preservation for transgender people because history has taught us repeatedly that if we wait until afterward there won’t be anyone left who’s willing to fight for us and our rights except ourselves.
Tell me more pleaseOf the 5 states (and DC) where marriage has been won, which one(s) don’t protect trans people in their anti-discrimination laws?
There’s a convenient chart of this data somewhere, but I’m not laying my hands on it. I think it may show that a couple of the New England states who were the first to advance relationship recognition did that after passing the very oldest anti-discrimination laws, none of which included trans folks (MA and NY come to mind).
So I’m less sure that this often-stated causal connection (once marriage equality is won, they don’t come back for trans people) is causal at all. Not saying that wasn’t the order of events, just that I’m not convinced one caused the other.
More important, though, is that your repeated suggestions that there is big money to be had for marriage equality are out of touch with the facts herel.
This grassroots org is asking us for money because they don’t have any. I’m assuming that they went to the deep pocket donors first, and were told to do their best because there is no money available.
All our organizations are broke, too–so if you plan to object to any appeals for any cause other than your own highest priority, you’re going to have a lot of objecting to do, because the requests for small money are going to have to keep coming.
We don’t have “deep-pocket funders.”The largest donation we have yet received is $250.00. We are the antithesis of the organizations you’re describing, and we are the anti-establishment. But, we are also single-issue. Our members are not, but our organization is.
Last time GENDA went for a vote… what else was suddenly pushed to the from of the line there in NYS? Didn’t the “marriage equality” people sabotage the GENDA vote (which had a very reasonable chance of success) by pushing a vote on “marriage equality” at the EXACT SAME TIME?
Why should a trans person support “marriage equality” legislation in a state that allows gay and lesbian people to fire/evict/refuse services to a trans person for being trans. Why provide tax breaks and social credibility to relationships when the bare means to accessing survival are denied – because a couple decades ago gay men and lesbians intentionally removed trans protection from a law that was passed using trans-specific unemployment statistics.
Really, why would anyone with any sense of history support something that has routinely sapped our time, energy, and resources for ZERO benefit.
Don’t know if you’ll see thisbut I thought I’d respond.
The marriage equality vote was in Dec of 2009. The GENDA vote in June 2010. I, as a New Yorker, have heard many post-mortem assesments of what went wrong on each, but never have I heard the vote order being mentioned as a problem.
The fact that our orgs and advocates continued to push for the GENDA vote six months after marriage equality failed belies the narrative that marriage crowds out the trans fight.
At the end of the day, GENDA fell to Senator Ruben Diaz, who blocked it in committee. I worked hard last cycle to take Diaz out (we failed). We can work around him on marriage equality this session. Not so sure about that in GENDA. We’ll see how committee assignments shake out.
I don’t really have a good answer for this question. If you don’t wish to engage, I can not fault you anymore than your non-engagement on other issues, like anti-war movement or women’s reproductive choice.
But I’d point out, that same logic can be turned around: as a cisgendered male why I should continue to work for the GENDA bill in 2011?
sorry for the late reply“But I’d point out, that same logic can be turned around: as a cisgendered male why I should continue to work for the GENDA bill in 2011?”
Well there is the uncomfortable bit about the SONDA passing in part because trans homeless and unemployment as well as under employment statistics were used. I wonder what the result of any non-inclusive ENDA (or hate crime law for that matter before the Shepperd/Byrd law was passed) would be if the GLB had to use only cis GLB numbers and examples.
“The fact that our orgs and advocates continued to push for the GENDA vote six months after marriage equality failed belies the narrative that marriage crowds out the trans fight. ”
Really? Name one place where trans inclusive anything has been passed after the GLB gets job protections and/or marriage rights. WI is still waiting on job protections, what, over 30 years now? MA both job and marriage protections for the GLB and a rather poorly funded GENDA (wonder where all the funding went?).
I’d like to believe that the cis GLB is willing to engage trans issues in good faith, since trans folks have been more that willing to work on GLB issues. At this point, all I have is wishes and promises but no results or firm statements.
I’m seeing this alot
Considering how rarely marriage rights have been obtained and how rarely job protections are passed, it seems this idea has taken hold base on a very tiny sample size.
I can empathize with the anxiety that it stems from. But it seems like this has taken on a life of it’s own.
But it’s not like things are going so very great for LGBs.
CA, DC, RI, VT & WACalifornia, District of Columbia, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington all have come back to pass gender identity non-discrimination legislation some time after sexual orientation legislation. You owe it to yourself and to do a little research before drawing conclusions about cis LGBs as a class.
Yeah on average 14.5 years passBetween allowing GLBs to fire openly trans people and telling them they can’t. What I’m saying is once the marriage issue gets all fixed up it seems the job is done there.
There is the nagging issue of NH an MA.
Want to talk to Canadian trans people about what happened after marriage?
I’ll be completely honest, I’m tired of defending my position within this “community” to many cis GLBs. I’m tired of every time a trans issue comes to the front a vocal segment of the gay and lesbian population takes point on shooting down support. I’m tired of talk of inclusion when that really means “We need to borrow your unemployed and murdered to make a better point.” I’m beyond tired of having to explain this history every time the issue comes up (that’s not happening here, just to e clear).
Tired of the gays getting theirs even if it costs the trans.