The Obama DOJ gets its wish. MetroWeekly‘s Chris Geidner’s on the case:
A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has issued a temporary stay of U.S. District Judge Virginia Phillips’s Oct. 12 order in Log Cabin Republicans v. United States halting all enforcement of the military’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy.
After DADT had been halted from enforcement for nearly 200 hours, the Ninth Circuit order legally makes DADT enforceable again for the time being.
In a brief order, Judges O’Scannlain, Trott and W. Fletcher wrote:
This court has received appellant’s emergency motion to stay the district court’s October 12, 2010 order pending appeal. The order is stayed temporarily in order to provide this court with an opportunity to consider fully the issues presented.
Appellee may file an opposition to the motion for a stay pending appeal by October 25, 2010. To expedite consideration of the motion, no reply shall be filed.
What this does NOT stop is the current guidance stated by the DOD to abide by the terms of the injunction until told to not to. Wait and see…
Reactions below the fold.
Log Cabin Republicans:
“Today the President Obama and his attorneys have prolonged the injustice that is ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ at the expense of the constitutional rights of gay and lesbian servicemembers,” said R. Clarke Cooper, Executive Director of Log Cabin Republicans. “For over eight days the armed forces have not only survived but thrived without the burden of this failed policy. It is disappointing the Obama administration has forced the military into a see-saw of ‘on-again, off-again’ enforcement of a law which remains an unnecessary distraction for military commanders and their subordinates.”“While we are disappointed with the court’s ruling granting a temporary administrative stay, we view the decision as nothing more than a minor setback,” said Dan Woods, White & Case partner who is representing Log Cabin Republicans in Log Cabin Republicans v. United States of America. ”We didn’t come this far to quit now, and we expect that once the Ninth Circuit has received and considered full briefing on the government’s application for a stay, it will deny that application, and the district court’s injunction, which it entered after hearing all the evidence in the case, will remain in place until the appeal is finally decided.”
The Palm Center:
In a filing to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals today, government lawyers reiterated unsubstantiated assertions that last week’s suspension of “don’t ask, don’t tell” is harming the military. According to government lawyers, “implementing an immediate change to this longstanding statutory policy without providing proper training and guidance would be disruptive to military commanders and to servicemembers as they carry out their mission and military responsibilities, especially in active combat.” Defense Secretary Robert Gates first articulated this claim when he said last week that the suspension of the ban would “have enormous consequences for our troops.”Palm Center scholars respectfully request that the Pentagon document any evidence of any negative consequence that has resulted from the past 200 hours during which gays and lesbians have been allowed to serve openly.
Aaron Belkin, Director of the Palm Center:
“The RAND Corporation found seventeen years ago that the best path to allowing open gay service would be to swiftly end the policy and make a clear statement to all branches of the military. The more the courts and politicians treat ending ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ as a vast upheaval of existing policy requiring months of preparation, the further they deviate from the course that has been shown to be best for our service members.”
HRC Statement on 9th Circuit Stay of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” Decision:
“The revival of the ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ law is a sad day for all Americans who want the best and brightest service members defending our country. Today’s decision only furthers our resolve to send this law to the dustbin of history and also draws a spotlight on the administration to make good on their pledge to end these discharges that damage our national security.”
Servicemembers United:
“While we are obviously disappointed that the injunction was temporarily stayed, we hope that the Ninth Circuit will recognize the inherent contradiction in the government’s arguments for a longer stay in light of eight full days of non-enforcement with no ‘enormous consequences,’” said Alexander Nicholson, Executive Director of Servicemembers United and the sole named veteran plaintiff in the case along with the Log Cabin Republicans. “An objective look at the evidence before the court clearly indicates that ending ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ would not harm military readiness, but would rather enhance it.”
SLDN:
Statement by Army veteran and SLDN Executive Director Aubrey Sarvis:“This interim temporary stay means that ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ is once again on the books, and is likely to be enforced by the Defense Department. Gay and lesbian service members deserve better treatment than they are getting with this ruling. We now must look to the Senate next month in the lame duck session to bring about the swift certainty needed here and to repeal this unjust law that serves no useful purpose.”
ACLU:
James Esseks, Director of the American Civil Liberties Union Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Project:“We are disappointed that the appeals court has allowed this unconstitutional and discriminatory policy to continue for even one more day, despite the district court’s order to stop enforcement. ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ has compromised the effectiveness of our military for far too long. We urge the DOJ to drop its efforts to appeal, and to let stand Judge Phillips’ order banning the policy.”
GetEqual:
“This temporary stay, sought by President Obama’s Department of Justice, brings the military’s discriminatory ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ law back from the dead. It is a travesty that after numerous attempts, President Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder will go down in history as the Administration that breathed life back into ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.’ The lives and careers of openly gay and lesbian servicemembers are now back in the crosshairs of our government and a renewed commitment to discrimination falls squarely in the hands of this White House.”




36 Comments


Democrats 10. GLBTs 0.
Ooh I do love a good cliffhanger!!Not really, not when my civil rights are being decided by the self-appointed “adults” (Congress) for “juvenile” me (gays). I’m so tired of we TBLGs being infantalized by the government and electorate. Ya know?
Something doesn’t add up hereFirst of all…the DOJ has cited that the military is not ready because they need training and guidance and that takes time and effort. If the Obama administration was really intent on repealing the policy…shouldn’t they have started the training and guidance a long time ago. I mean…the House passed the resolution back in May and Obama campaigned on it years before that. I am just really curious to know how Obama expects Congress to repeal this policy considering it has already failed to pass in the Senate and the Democrats are about to lose the House, Senate, or both. Both Obama and top Democrats have repeatedly said that this policy will end on his watch and I don’t believe that it will happen. We are going to hear the old…I’m sorry, we tried game again…and they will put the blame on something or someone else.
It couldn’t be clearerthat Obama views our community’s rights as a ping-pong ball in a vast game he’s playing with…um…er…um…God? It’s hard to know who else he’s looking out for. It sure as hell ain’t us–or the constitution.
Obama said DADT was a threat to National Security.So, since Obama has re-instated DADT, I must conclude, therefore, that Obama himself is a threat to National Security.
He swore in his oath of office to uphold National Security, and by his own parameters, he has now abrogated that oath and should immediately removed from office by impeachment for that high crime.
Obama lost my vote forever today.I’ll watch President Palin get inaugurated from Europe.
I think it’s obvious…I think it’s obvious by now that Obama has no intention whatsoever of repealing DADT or DOMA, and probably never did. The fact that he promised to address these-and the myriad other issues affecting the LGBT community-during his campaign indicates that he was simply lying to us in order to get our support, our money and our votes.
Fool me once, Mr. President, shame on you. Fool me twice? Not gonna happen. Remember that when you wake up on 11/7/2012, out of a job, and can’t figure out WHY.
Obama sz one thing, his DOJ says another. This crap is driving me crazy…who do I believe his friggin DOJ or him? Voting for my cat in 2012 if this fuckery continues.
Democrats are the zeros.
Mine Tooand I was a “fierce advocate” for him in 2008. After the DOMA brief I started saying I was gonna vote for the Repug in 2012 just to prove a point to the stupid Dems and people were jumping all over me – but what is the difference, really? They’re both anti-gay and anti-Constitution.
To me, now a days, the constitution is just another fucking piece of meaningless paper. Might as well wipe my ass with it – at least then it will be of some value.
So Dan Choi is out of a job again? This is gonnalook bad on his resume…
We have to keep on them….Don't let the BIGOTS in the Military win this one. From Herb Hamsher today… DADT Emperor Has No Clothes!
and ultimately:
and REMEMBER:
He did TRUMAN fired (reassigned?) the CHIEF OF THE ARMY…because he refused to segregate the Army. If we had an adult President he could too.
no, actually.the way i read the report, doors are still open to gay recruits at least until a permanent stay is issued if one is issued. the earliest that would happen is oct 25th. if a permanent stay is issued then presumably enlistments would stop again.
Golden oldie from the campaign trail…
I hope he’s proud of himselfObama now owns DADT. It was dead……he brought it back.
You underestimate him.Barack Obama will not be seriously disappointed if he wakes up on November 7, 2012, without a job.
He will be richly compensated for the rest of his life for his yeoman service to the financial industry, the arms industry, and the oil industry.
DADT 2010: Obama’s DISCRIMINATION law!Our president is a homophobe. Actions speak louder than words. He has BETRAYED GLBT Americans. He will get his karma. Bad karma.
Can we say 1 term President?
Democrats will pay next month!Yup, Obama has pretty much killed any chances of his party winning election. Can we say STUPID?
Money doesn’t buy happiness!Once you sell your soul to the devil, there’s no going back.
KARMA will come back to haunt. It always does!
I want to further addthat it is total BS that the Obama DOJ has to appeal DOMA or DADT. They are not legally required to do so whatsoever. Case in point…back in 1996, Clinton and his DOJ refused to appeal a law in court kicking HIV+ people out of the military. Clinton said the law was unconstitutional and that it discriminates and violates the equal protection clause of the constitution.
Obama may choose to appeal…and he obviously has…but he can also tell the appellate court that he agrees with the lower courts reasoning and decision….that the law is unconstitutional and should not be enforced (so far…we have not heard him say one word about it) The DOJ is only compelled to defend laws that have reasonable arguments regarding the constitutionality of them. So…in effect…by appealing the lower courts ruling…the DOJ is indicating that at least some part of DADT is constitutional. Even after the federal judge has said it was unconstitutional on two issues.
Exactly. The most serious blow to the income of workers in this period was Obama’s vicious attack on the UAW. The wage and benefit concessions he forced on the UAW will reverberate throughout the economy because the UAWs auto contracts are the model for other industries. It was a green light for a national offensive against workers and unions. GM and Chrysler were forced into bankruptcy and Obama demanded tens of thousands of layoffs and huge wage cuts before he’d push for loans to bailout the looter class’s auto assets.
The Obama administrations decisive role in increasing profits by cutting wages is highlighted by its assault on the UAW and by the Democrats absolute refusal to invest trillions in job growth to green the economy and infrastructure.
Obama’s goal, and the goal of managers and owners is permanent large scale unemployment , a situation that could be easily remedied by taking back the handouts to the rich and using them to green the US economy. The formula is simplicity itself – high unemployment equals low wages.
That reactionary formula – permanent long term unemployment to encourage deep wage cuts – is the reason that corporate profits are increasing during the current Depression. Companies, for their part are hoarding cash and refusing to hire. Read the Wall Street Journal analysis of second-quarter 2010 corporate profits, reported in Propelling the Profit Comeback: Retooling, Downsizing.” Monday, October 18th, 2010.
The same combination of handouts to the rich and wage cuts for working people produced riots in Greece(*) and now in France, which is experiencing a repeat of Mai 1968. Those events will be repeated here in one form or another as the shock of mass unemployment, homelessness and the pauperization of workers is replaced by rage.
(*)This video features the world famous anti-cop pro-strike canine RIOT DOG.
And thanks for the correction. I’ve been saying November 4th for a while and you date is right.
Rage against whom?
But rage against whom?
I doubt Americans as a group will ever be able to identify those who caused them to become paupers. They will eagerly believe, as they have for at least the last fifty years and in total violation of the most elementary common sense, that all of their problems are caused by those who have no power at all over them. On the other hand, their psychic identification with their abusers is complete.
Americans will take out their rage on whomever the rich tell them to take it out on.
Agreed, donalThey ae trying to re-create the years of the Robber Barons, the Gilded age, unfettered capitalism leading to catastrophically wild rises and falls with the rich concentrating wealth and the remainder living in Mulberry Street style slums
and then there will finally be a Haymarket riot and a Homestead strike, and the new Coal and Iron Police, now called Xe but formerly Blackwater, will do the ownwers bidding and fire upon the protesters.
Won’t happenNot when Obama’s own picks for Army Secretary and Commandant of the Marine Corps both oppose repeal of DADT and have said that in the event the ban is lifted they support segregation.
Obama is a bigot. That’s the only explanation left.
Obama did the right thing…This is of course the correct action for the government to take.
Let the legislative process run its course.
The proper way for DADT to end is for Congress to repeal the law. Until it has been repeal it should continue to be enforced. Its really as simple as that.
Some folks will just have to learn how to keep their personal lives to themselves.
OK, I think I get the legal reasoning on both sidesAnd I think that I understand both points of view as far as defending the poilicy is concerned.
Ultimately, I’m not fooled by Obama’s pretty words.
It’s one thing to defend the law, it’s quite another to defend the policy and the rhetoric around this and Obama is doing all three.
And obviously, it seems as if the Obama Adminsitration has done nothing as far as preparation for the dismantling of DADT.
I don’t care what what Obama or Eric Holder or what Valerie Jarrett say or what their intention is.
I care about what they do.
And given the lack of transparency on any positive actions that the Obama Administration has made on positive news (but we sure hear the Administration bigots loudly, don’t we?) I have no reason to believe anything that these people say.
Get outta town!Are u nuts?
How in the world is Congress going to repeal the law? The Senate already voted and couldn’t repeal it and the Dems. are about to lose the House, Senate, or both in the next election. They are certainly not going to bring it up again right before the election. The House resolution that passed states that the repeal to go into effect 60 days after the report from the U.S. Dept. of Defense that is due December 1st. This also can only happen once the president and top military leaders certify the report. So…even if they certify it (I have serious doubts as to whether they will), that would put it at sometime in February…already after the new members of Congress have been sworn in. So…I don’t know why Gibbs, Obama and other top Democrats keep repeatedly saying that DADT is gone by the end of the year because I just don’t see it happening at all.
As we proceed into a political period marked by four unwinnable wars and long Depression…that kind of unwarranted pessimism is, to put it mildly, clearly not based on historic precedents.
In the revolutionary war the rage was directed at the rich and the collaborators. Tarring and feathering is a horrible punishment for being on the wrong side.
In the second revolutionary war the rage of freedmen, and Northern farmers and workers was directed at slavers and their servants in the army of treason, who were crushed.
In the many upsurges of the trade union movement rage was directed against management and the rich.
When things fall apart people start looking for answers in earnest. Fascism is one answer but only for a small minority. Socialism is the other answer. LGBT folks will have to be part of that answer to succeed.
At some point, Maura, this is going to turn into a perfect storm. In Europe, France and Greece are just the beginning. Today the Tories announced vast cuts in social spending. Britain Plans Deepest Cuts to Spending in 60 Years. In Spain socialist unions are preparing for a general strike.
Within a few years the consequences of these savage austerity measures will create large scale social unrest in much of the EU and in North America. When the crisis resolves itself in a global struggle between unions and owners all bets are off. If those nations succumb to a deeper depression because of austerity that’ll deepen the global crises and then the same question will be posed in China. China is the schwerpunkt, the fulcrum of the global struggle of working people. China will either repudiate Maoism and move left or we’ll suffer a huge defeat.
‘Some folks will just have to learn how to keep their personal lives to themselves.’Isn’t that a line from Pat Buchanan’s “Das Kulturkreig”.
I’d rather say ‘Deserve to lose’. They know exactly what they’re doing, stabbing us in the back over and over and over. On November 2nd 2010 and November 6th 2012 vote left, write in your favorite pet (1) or, barring important referenda, just stay home with the one third to one half of the electorate not duped by the idiocy of lesser evilism.
(1) I’m writing in RIOT DOG , the very definition of coolness.
Historic precedent
I believe Germany in the 1930s provides a precedent in which people chose fascism over socialism.
When people in the U.S. look for answers, they take those that are provided to them. They would rather not have to dig. Fascism is the answer that is being provided to them.
Further, when people in the U.S. look for answers, they take those that appeal to the prejudices they already have. Fascism is the answer that does that, too.
We could balance the budgets of the UK and hereby stopping the supercarrier programmes in both countries, each aircraft carrier cost more than the social services budgets of either nation.
Think of the money that we could save with a non-interventionalist policy where we are not building to fight without our allies?
Off course, the next step is de-licensing LGBT professionalswhich de Mint has made clear. DADT is no longer merely about fairness, it is a line in the sand between us and what the Right actually wants to do to us.
As a licensed professional(Bar exams) I would prefer not having my standing stripped away
But of course, Geek, you are somehow immune to even that threat.
Wait for the step beyond that, where the government and other contractors decline to do business with firms wih LGBT employees on the grounds that they are seurity risks or health insurers refuse to cover firms with LGBT employees.
It’s not just this issue, Geek, it’s the next few steps after if we lose
That’s silly. You have no understaning of US history or German history.
When the class struggle heats usp people don’t chose fascism. In German it was imposed by Hindenburgs ‘constitutional’ coup d’etat followed by the Enabling Act, a real coup d’etat and terrorism.
You don’t have a clue about how working people will react. There are plently of precedents for rage against the system producing a large layer of hardened left workers.
It doesn’t matter how the rich and the middle class reacts. They’re usually the enemy. We expect them to turn right and they are. It only matters how working people and unions, the heavy infantry of social change react.
Your pessimissism is an excuse of inaction.