So when did the Washington Post partner with WorldNetDaily? I must be confused, because how is it possible that a mainstream national newspaper could run an op-ed in its Religion section about homosexuality by a man who bases his arguments on junk science by Paul Cameron?
Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council, under the WaPo “On Faith” banner headed up by Jon Meacham and Sally Quinn, penned “Christian compassion requires the truth about harms of homosexuality.” In essence, he says it is the LGBT civil rights movement that causes these gay teens to take their lives.
Reading the following may cause you to want to hurl.
[H]omosexual activist groups like GLSEN (the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network) are exploiting these tragedies to push their agenda of demanding not only tolerance of homosexual individuals, but active affirmation of homosexual conduct and their efforts to redefine the family.
There is an abundance of evidence that homosexuals experience higher rates of mental health problems in general, including depression. However, there is no empirical evidence to link this with society’s general disapproval of homosexual conduct. In fact, evidence from the Netherlands would seem to suggest the opposite, because even in that most “gay-friendly” country on earth, research has shown homosexuals to have much higher mental health problems.
Within the homosexual population, such mental health problems are higher among those who “come out of the closet” at an earlier age. Yet GLSEN’s approach is to encourage teens to “come out” when younger and younger–thus likely exacerbating the very problem they claim they want to solve.
Some homosexuals may recognize intuitively that their same-sex attractions are abnormal–yet they have been told by the homosexual movement, and their allies in the media and the educational establishment, that they are “born gay” and can never change. This–and not society’s disapproval–may create a sense of despair that can lead to suicide.
Jim Burroway destroys the “facts” Perkins is attempting to foist on readers and puts the studies he refers to into context.
I guess Perkins doesn’t actually intend for people to click on those hyperlinks. Apparently, he intended them for decoration, the same way FRC people regularly sprinkle their publications with footnotes to make them look more scholarly. But I would invite you to go ahead and click on the first one, which points to a 2002 article from the Monitor On Psychology, the American Psychological Association’s official magazine. Among the studies discussed in that article was one by Susan Cochran (“Emerging issues in research on lesbians’ and gay men’s mental health: Does sexual orientation really matter?” American Psychologist, 56, no. 11 (Nov 2001): 931-947). Her study did find elevated levels of psychological distress among gay people. However,
For one thing, she says, “these are certainly not levels of morbidity consistent with models that say homosexuality is inherently pathological.” For another, the data simply don’t prove either pro- or anti-gay arguments on the subject, whether it’s that the inherent biology of homosexuality causes mental illness or that social stigma provokes mental illness in LGB people, she says.Cochran also predicted that her study would, no doubt, be misused by anti-gay people like Perkins “to falsely promulgate the argument that gay people are by nature mentally ill.” She was right.
Over at Americablog, John recounts the epic FAIL of the research Tony’s “facts” are drawn from. A tidbit:
Paul Cameron is an infamous anti-gay propagandist whose one-man statistical chop shop, the Family Research Institute, churns out hate literature masquerading as legitimate science. Cameron dresses up his “studies” with copious footnotes, graphs and charts, and then pays to publish them in certain journals. Cameron’s work has been rejected by both the American Psychological Association and the American Sociological Association, yet his ludicrous statistics are frequently referenced in sermons, news broadcasts, politicians’ speeches and even court decisions.
FRI has been designated a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center. This information has been out there for ages, and surely Meacham and Quinn know how to use TEH GOOGLE to see whether the WaPo’s reputation (such that it is) wants to be seen providing outlet for opinion — or flat-out fometing hate and disinformation in the name of “balance.”
At MetroWeekly, Chris Geidner had this to say:
What Perkins is writing — and the Post is publishing — is that he believes homosexuals should “intuitively” see same-sex attractions as “abnormal” — and yet he sees no connection to be drawn between his statements and the despair that leads LGBT teens to suicidal thoughts and believes no blame is to be placed on him for the bullying borne of such attitudes.Both the Post and Perkins should be embarrassed.



[H]omosexual activist groups like GLSEN (the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network) are exploiting these tragedies to push their agenda of demanding not only tolerance of homosexual individuals, but active affirmation of homosexual conduct and their efforts to redefine the family.
10 Comments



What a jerkWe only have ourselves to blame–just like all of those women who were just asking to be raped. Right.
From reading the responses to Perkins’s junk, I am filled with hopeI enjoyed reading the responses to Perkins’s lies simply because they do more than simply call him a bigot. They refute him as well as point out how he intentionally omitted information from the sources he cited.
We need more responses like this on a wider scale.
I’ve looked and looked…in the Bible, and just can’t find the ‘shit on the graves of children’ passage. It sounds definitely Old Testament.
quack, quack, quack went the trolleyAh, the old “Dutch study” got recycled, yet again, in this screed in the WaPo. Worth revisiting Box Turtle Bulletin’s collection of libel debunking to see what’s what on this ghost from the 1980s.
http://www.boxturtlebulletin.c…
For that matter, worth reviewing BTB’s collection of recurring libels. They keep going back to the same poisoned well, so it’s worth a general review.
http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/
(see “featured reports,” right hand column)
And I supposethe next time they cover a story about race, they’ll have some Grand Wizard from the Klan pen a guest editorial “for balance.” And the next time Judaism is a topic of discussion, they’ll invite a Holocaust denier to weigh in. And when geography comes up we’ll hear from the Flat Earth Society.
Journalism in this country is completely off the rails. And I don’t mean just TV journalism, which more and more resembles the Weekly World News. Even supposedly respectable print media like WaPo and NYT are in thrall to the lunatic notion that every viewpoint is a legitimate subject for discussion and deserves equal weight in their coverage.
If they ran Perkins’ filth in the name of “balance,” then they should also have pointed out that his organization is a certified hate group—for balance.
One can only pray for TonyHe makes all Christians look like retarded assholes.
All it takes is enough national spotlight and this guy is going to implode everything his organization stood for.
All they need now is for another poster boy to be exposed and poof goes the pudding. Tony has no authority, or pastoral decree, so I am wondering how he became such a national ‘authority’ on civil and religious matters besides circle jerking high ranking Republicans?
How the hell did this guy end up in Anti-terrorism? By his resume he is nothing more than a stooge for the Republican party. In fact, he is a direct link to anti-gay legislation and policy making within the party and the government as a whole.
Oh, and someone that is savvy with Wikipedia should expand and clarify
—–
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T…
Views on gay civil rights
Perkins June 3, 2010 “Washington Update” email described the gay civil rights movement as “a movement dedicated to destroying marriage, free speech, public health, religious liberty, and (after the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” repeal) national security
My response to TP and the WAPO staffDear Mr. Perkins,
Your brainwashed ideas promulgated by an idolization of your brand of chrisitanity are disgusting, illogical, and highly refutable. You take your statistics out of context ala Paul Cameron style and spin your dusty 4000 year old truths to fit your personally distorted worldview. When you get deprogrammed, come back and tell us some more truths.
Dear Mr. Meacham and Ms. Quinn,
I suppose the next thing you will do is publish a piece by the Grand Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan on race relations, right?
Contact the ombudsmanAs many people on different blogs already have, I would recommend contacting the WaPo’s ombudsman, Andrew Alexander, at ombudsman@washpost.com.
I’ve already sent him an email, and if he gets enough complaints, then the Post will probably think twice about publishing bullshit by the likes of Perkins in the future.
The WaPo’s excuseWas that they had let Dan Savage write about “It Gets Better”. Gotta be fair and balanced and all that.
The 1st 3 bullet points……of that 8 year-old APA article to which Tony “Psycho” Perkins links states, and I quote:
*Several studies suggest that gay men, lesbians and bisexuals appear to have higher rates of some mental disorders compared with heterosexuals, although not to the level of a serious pathology. Discrimination may help fuel these higher rates.
*A study found lesbians reported equally strong levels of mental health as their heterosexual sisters and higher self-esteem.
* A new study of gay and lesbian youth finds that they are only slightly more likely than heterosexual youth to attempt suicide, refuting previous research that suggested much higher rates.
Talk about a classic case of cherry-picking.