I sh*t you not.
If you want to get an idea of what the WaPo thought the “balance” that the homophobic, fact-free op-ed screed of Tony Perkins was supposed to offset, take a look at this exchange GLAAD had with the WaPo on Twitter (courtesy of GLAAD’s Richard Ferraro):
Please see exchange below between glaad/WaPo on Twitter today. They point to a live chat with It Gets Better as justification for the Perkins op-ed.GLAAD’s initial tweet:
The @WashingtonPost Gives Platform to Anti-Gay Activist http://bit.ly/crX6q5 #LGBT #gayWashington Post reply:
Hi @glaad, we’re working to cover both sides. Earlier, we hosted Dan Savage of It Gets Better in a live chat. http://wapo.st/aA8SXXGLAAD’s reply:
@WashingtonPost There are not “both sides” to this issue. Teen suicide isn’t a debate-it’s a tragedy. http://bit.ly/crX6q5 #LGBT
Is this what American mainstream journalism has come to? Jon Meacham and Sally Quinn, for the paper’s “On Faith” column, didn’t even bother to Google Tony Perkins or check his sources.
You know, the Tony Perkins who “couldn’t recall” hanging out with/speaking to the Council of Conservative Citizens (photo), declared a hate group by the SPLC. Apparently he passes muster even though Perkins procured the mailing list of former Ku Klux Klan Grand Wizard David Duke.

Four years ago, Perkins addressed the Louisiana chapter of the Council of Conservative Citizens (CCC), America’s premier white supremacist organization, the successor to the White Citizens Councils, which battled integration in the South. In 1996 Perkins paid former Ku Klux Klan Grand Wizard David Duke $82,500 for his mailing list. At the time, Perkins was the campaign manager for a right-wing Republican candidate for the US Senate in Louisiana. The Federal Election Commission fined the campaign Perkins ran $3,000 for attempting to hide the money paid to Duke.…Six years later, in 2002, Perkins embarked on a campaign to avenge his mentor’s defeat by running for the US Senate himself. But Perkins was dogged with questions about his involvement with David Duke. Perkins issued a flat denial that he had ever had anything to do with Duke, and he denounced him for good measure. Unfortunately, Perkins’s signature was on the document authorizing the purchase of Duke’s list. Perkins’s dalliance with the racist Council of Conservative Citizens in the run-up to his campaign also illuminates the seamy underside of his political associations.
You can contact the Washington Post “On Faith” editors here: onfaith@washingtonpost.com
See:
* WaPo gives Tony Perkins space to spew homobigotry and junk science




11 Comments


OmbudsmanJust an FYI…I called earlier today to the Ombudsman and he was very kind and told me that his position is not covered by this because this was an opinion piece and that I was to direct my discontent to onfaith@washingtonpost.com He was not exactly happy that he was on the receiving end of all of our phone calls, who do we call?
More false equivalence from the MSMI quit reading the WaPo about a decade ago anyway…
Do they offer an “other side says” for their weather forecasts too?
Also: Way to take some initiative and inspire confidence in your postition, ombuds!
so, the WaPo positionis that as long as you call it “opinion” you can lie and distort facts even those that the WaPo could have easily checked?
It’s all well and good that they allow someone to voice an opinion. But, don’t they have an obligation to their readers to point out the complete distortion of the facts used to base the opinion on?
guess not
The next time they have an economics report…I demand that they let me or someone with a similar political viewpoint respond from a socialist perspective. I may not be an economist, but I’m at least as qualified to talk about economics as Perkins is to talk about human sexuality. (Hey, at least I’m not terrified of the very possibility that economics might exist!)
All they’d have to point outis that FRC has been listed as a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center. Concealing that fact gives the lie to their claim that they’re after balance.
Next…“Thanks, Rabbi Weis. And now for a rebuttal, we have the spokesman of the American Nazi Party”
“Thanks. And now we go to the KKK for an opposing view point”
It’s one thing to do this when reporting about events for example. But no other group of people would be treated like this.
Let’s drop the Washington Post a note:
letters@washpost.com, national@washpost.com
http://projects.washingtonpost…
http://projects.washingtonpost…
http://projects.washingtonpost…
http://projects.washingtonpost…
Here
onfaith@washingtonpost.com, letters@washpost.com, national@washpost.com
http://projects.washingtonpost…
http://projects.washingtonpost…
http://projects.washingtonpost…
http://projects.washingtonpost…
Thanksfor the life of me, I could not find any staff listing or contact information.
Guess they don’t ever want to hear from anybody.
Waiting on my work load to show up, I can now unload on these folks.
So apparently the other sideof “It Gets Better” is “Tony Perkins Makes It Worse”?
Or, more generally, the other side of hope and humanity is … Tony Perkins?
I can’t say that I disagree, I’m just a little surprised to see it expressed so plainly.