Marriage comes with many benefits. Even for LGBT Americans fortunate enough to work for employers that recognize and cover their same-gender husbands and wives, the cost can be onerous. LGBT Americans are denied the opportunity to pay for such benefits pre-tax. This means the cost of such benefits can add tens of thousands of dollars to an LGBT American’s bottom line of taxable income. New York Times is reporting internet mega-corps Google is taking a major step toward addressing that inequity.
On Thursday, Google is going to begin covering a cost that gay and lesbian employees must pay when their partners receive domestic partner health benefits, largely to compensate them for an extra tax that heterosexual married couples do not pay. The increase will be retroactive to the beginning of the year.
More after the fold (right, Google employees participate in Gay Pride in Dublin, Irleand).
“It’s a fairly cutting edge thing to do,” said Todd A. Solomon, a partner in the employee benefits department of McDermott Will & Emery, a law firm in Chicago, and author of “Domestic Partner Benefits: An Employer’s Guide.”
The article, sourcing Human Rights Campaign, lists Cisco, Kimpton Hotels and the Gates Foundation as among the handful of other companies that have preceded Google on this move.
This article specifies these benefits will apply only to same-gender couples, as opposite gender couples have the option to marry. They would then receive the same benefit from the Federal Government, not at Google’s expense. There are 700 members of Google’s gay employee group (which is not reserved for only gay employees, and may also represent straight allies).
And let’s hear it for gay employee’s groups. Can we presume some inequities are a matter of inertia? LGBT employees speaking up can affect real change:
The company began to look at the disparity after a gay employee pointed it out, said Laszlo Bock, Google’s vice president for people operations (also known as human resources). Google, by the way, says its benefits team seriously considers any suggestions on how to expand its coverage.
“We said, ‘You’re right, that doesn’t seem fair,’ so we looked into it,” Mr. Bock said. “From that initial suggestion, we said, let’s take a look at all the benefits we offer and see if we are being truly fair across the board.” As a result, the company also decided to make a few other changes that would help gay employees, including eliminating a one-year waiting period before qualifying for infertility benefits and including domestic partners in its family leave policy.
It’s nice to see the company’s participation in our Gay Pride Events represents more than just a branding and marketing opportunity for them. Far from just a chance for them to plead to our community to give them our money, it represent a very real commitment–measurable in monetary terms–to making the lives of their LGBT employees lives easier and more equitable. Bravo!
More on Google’s commitment to workplace diversity and what programs they offer can be found here. Here’s a nice article about Google’s participation in Gay Pride events in San Francisco (where they claim to have had 300 in attendance) and across the nation. An official Google blog entry is here and a Picasa album is here.

Above, Google’s gay employees group participates in San Francisco Pride Sunday.



15 Comments



Good for them!I would love to see the companies that do this keep records and be willing to include them in future legal and social discussions regarding how lack of marriage equality directly affects us.
It will add some actual dollar values to refute some of the “they don’t need marriage, they can just do some simple legal paperwork and be equal.”
Just think…Every time Molly Gallagher, Tony Perkins, Bam Bam, and the whole rightwing Hee Haw gang use Google, or whose websites are visited via Google…they just helped shore up marriage inequality!
Just wait…they’ll now try to create their own search engine called Godgle.
I love it.You just know that there will be a handful of heterosexuals bitching and complaining about how unfair this is.
That helpsUsed to be a 100% positive post
I rarely speak up here, but..thanks for the great laugh
Godgle!!!
Don’t laugh..…at Lurleen. Didn’t they already invent Conservapedia?
Most of the executives where I work believe Wikipedia is a Communist plot.
I know the hopes of preventing a neo-Nazi takeover of the U.S. are few and remote, but one small hope we could fantasize about is that the derangement of these people renders them so divorced from reality and practical knowledge, they won’t be able to accomplish anything.
What About Trans Medical Coverage?
I wonder whether Google covers transition-related medical care. I was looking for the information online, but maybe I didn’t try hard enough. Does anyone know? Doctor visits, therapy, hormone replacement, and various surgeries aren’t “elective,” but absolutely medically necessary for many, and I’m hoping that a company as financially successful as Google would cover them.
If this becomes a trend it could add real pressureon the Federal Government to address the inequities. If top companies feel pressure to follow suit to attract top talent, think of what that means. Google is essentially subsidizing the Federal Government’s policy of discriminating against our community, they are paying some employees thousands more to level it out.
But that added payroll is an expense they could take off their books if the Feds agreed to allow our community to pay for these benefits out of our pre-tax dollars. A change that would require SOME sort of recognition, and for every LGBT American.
Meaning CORPORATE America might have a dog inthe fight, our dog.
A good thing but…I don’t want to say for a moment that it isn’t great to see a company as giant as Google supporting our community in this way, it is.
However, I just want to make it clear that it isn’t like they invented this idea. My ex-husband worked for a company based in VT with offices in VT & NH four years ago and they did the same thing for us when he set me up as a domestic partner on the company health plan, and later when we were able to get married.
We didn’t have to ask or anything. He added me to his health plan as his partner and the next pay check their was a bit extra money added in to offset the tax break that we weren’t getting that straight couples were. He had to ask HR to find out what it was even about.
Already happenedI saw this originally on Gizmodo yesterday, and there were a few straight guys complaining about gay people getting paid more. They were quickly shot down by other commenters.
Gay tax = $3500 salary cut (for me)A few months ago at my new job I calculated the federal tax burden of adding domestic partner benefits. It was equivalent to a $3500 salary cut.
http://wakingupnow.com/blog/go…
And of course the reich-winger will take this out of context.http://michellemalkin.com/2010…
Michelle Malkin mistook it as “gay being paid more than straights”. That’s a big spin right there. The real idea is to make the GLBT payroll as equal to the straight payroll.
Google “ignorance” and these people would be the result.Also, if you google “leather daddy”, Peter LaBarbera’s name will show up.
Photo BucketYou guys should host your own images so that you don’t get giant “bandwidth exceeded” messages plastered on your blog posts.
Amazon S3 has some awesome data storage & transfer plans