As usual, guest writer Irene Monroe takes a provocative approach to the phenomenon of the film Precious that has been little discussed. Join in the discussion.
Black Motherhood Lost at the Oscars
By Rev. Irene Monroe.The historical legacy of the devaluation and demonization of black motherhood was both applauded and rewarded at this year’s Oscars. And the point was clearly illustrated with Mo’Nique, capturing the gold statue for best supporting actress in the movie “Precious,” based on the novel Push by Sapphire, as a ghetto welfare mom who demeans and demoralizes her child every chance she can.
Mo’Nique’s role juxtaposed to Sandra Bullock’s, who captures her Oscar as best actress in the movie “The Blind Side,” offers the hand of human kindness to a poor black child in need of parenting.
But the images African- American parenting have historically been viewed through a prism of gendered and racial stereotypes. And the image of Mo’Nique as the “bad black mother” and Sandra Bullock as” good white mother” is nothing new.
The images of the “bad black mother” have not only been used for entertainment purposes but also used for legislating welfare policy reforms.
For example, in Ronald Reagan’s era (1981- 1989), black motherhood was constantly under siege. These moms were depicted as Cadillac-driving ” welfare queens,” who had little to no ambition to work, wanted money for drugs, and wanted to continue, due to their uncontrolled sexuality, to have illegitimate babies in order to remain on welfare.
More below the fold.
Reagan told a fallacious story about a African American mother from Chicago’s South Side who was arrested for welfare fraud that subsequently not only shaped public perception of black mothers but it also shaped welfare reform:“She has eighty names, thirty addresses, twelve Social Security cards and is collecting veteran’s benefits on four non-existing deceased husbands. And she is collecting Social Security on her cards. She’s got Medicaid, getting food stamps, and she is collecting welfare under each of her names.”
The story of Precious takes place in 1983. And while the book shapes the character Precious and that of her mother Mary within both the economic an cultural context of the Reagan era, the movie “Precious” does not. And this one-dimensional depiction of Mary conveniently reinscribes black mothers’ fear that haunts us daily – that we’re never good enough.
The feeling that we as mothers are never good enough was thrown in our faces also in Daniel Moynihan’s 1965 report “The Negro Family: The Case For National Action.” This report – also known as the Moynihan Report- states that the cause of the destruction of the Black nuclear family structure were women, giving rise to the myth of “the Black Matriarch.” The myth proposes that African-American women are complicit with white patriarchal society in the emasculation of African-American men by becoming heads of households and primary jobholders.
Lee Daniels, the director of “Precious,” has a knack for portraying monstrous black mothers on the silver screen. Halle Berry won the Academy Award for Best Actress in 2001 for her role as bad mother in Daniels’ “Monster’s Ball.”
In this “post-racial” Obama era, the subject of race and the politics of black representation in films are constrained by neither political correctness nor moral consciousness. But Daniels would argue that the moral conscious of his “Precious” is evident by the film’s crossover appeal, but also by the universality of its message- the suffering and damage of child molestation at the hand of parents.
While Daniels’ film shocked and awed moviegoers across the country, many African American sisters, like Precious, didn’t find the film as liberating and cathartic as intended.
For many of these sisters- as with a lot of African American women- we saw not ourselves, but rather a modern-day version of an old racist stereotype.
Some African American woman told me they saw the character Precious as our culture’s new “Hottentot Venus.” Hottetot Venus was Saartjie “Sarah” Baartman from South Africa, who was forced to reveal her huge buttocks and labia to curious Europeans in a traveling human circus show. The Hottentot Venushas become the iconic image for portraying black female bodies as subhuman, and this image is still very much part and parcel of our culture’s social discourse.
“Portraying African-American women as stereotypical mammies, matriarchs, welfare recipients, and hot mommas has been essential to the political economy of domination fostering Black women’s oppression, ” sociologist Patricia Hill Collins writes in Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment.
“Precious” is no doubt an important film. But when the artistic portrayal of the characters and people Daniels is trying to bring to life in a new way reinscribes century-old stereotypes, Daniels – albeit with good intentions – has caused harm.
And if Daniels won’t take my advice on this, then he should just pause for a moment and go and ask his momma.




Black Motherhood Lost at the Oscars
6 Comments


ThanksThanks so much for this challenging and thought provoking piece. I think you’ve put your finger on something here. I was feeling uneasy about the Bullock/Mo’Nique wins, and you might well have explained to me why. I remember when Diane Carroll starred in a series called “Julia.” She had to be the PERFECT mother in order to make it on TV. In fact, they made her a widow both to elicit sympathy but also to strip her of any sexuality. Decades later we have an Oscar-winning character that is the complete reverse, although they are both single (one from death of the spouse and the other whose spouse had left her). Isn’t this also a stereotype? We’ll have made progress when we start seeing nuanced, complex characters that are fully human. That is to say, characters who are not all good nor all bad, but a combination of the two, like most people.
interestingI think you make a point worth considering, but did you watch the Katie Couric interview with Sapphire? Sapphire herself addresses this very topic. It was a great interview and you should watch it if you haven’t, I think you would really appreciate it.
As for Bullock’s win…It should have gone to Streep. I know, Streep is the most ass-kissed actor in Hollywood, besides maybe Clooney, but she was the one who deserved it. Sorry Sandy!
Very well doneThanks for a very thoughtful piece, Irene. This is great.
Thanks, luc76985Thank you so much for pointing us to that interview. Sapphire gave a really wonderful interview. I admire how enthusiastic and non-showbiz she is.
I’ve loved Push for years and have bought several copies after some of my former students never returned the book when I loaned it to them. While I take Irene Monroe’s point about the uncomfortable juxtaposition with the Sandra Bullock movie, I don’t think that’s Push’s or Precious’ fault. No doubt many white audiences are taking the wrong message from the movie; for example, Barbara Bush praised it, and you know praise from her can’t be for a good reason. But those audiences would take the wrong message regardless of what was actually on screen.
Precious is generally a very good adaptation of the novel, but it gets one thing wrong that really bothers me. In the book, Ms. Rain is a dark-skinned woman with natural hairy. In the movie, she’s very light-skinned, with relaxed hair. This has the unfortunate result that in the movie, all the people who are good to Precious tend to be lighter, and the ones who are horrible to her tend to be darker.
typoArrgh, “natural hair.” And please ignore that I finished two consecutive sentences with the word “interview.”
reconsideringThis is an old article but I wanted to eat some of my words. I said I thought Streep should have won…and yeah, she was phenomenal…but I hadn’t watched Precious when I said that. I saw it a few days ago, and Gaborey (sp?) Sidibe deserved that award. In fact, I saw Hurt Locker, fell asleep on Hurt Locker, and don’t understand how it won Best Director and Picture of the Year or whatever the big award is in comparison to Precious.
I know its all trivial at this point but whatever.
And you’re right about the juxtaposition between Bullock’s movie and Precious. Uncomfortable is a good word for it.
Anyhow that’s all! I guess they were all good movies though.