Is it me or has the world gotten even more hyperparanoid and confused about sexual orientation and gender expression? In what is both an absurd and incomprehensible decision, GLAAD reports that Stars on Ice sponsors are so concerned about the flamboyance of Olympic ice skater Johnny Weir (or is it his costumes?), that they don’t want him on the tour.
When was the last time male figure skaters and BUTCH coexisted in your mind? Why does it matter anyway? Are Dick and Jane going to be gender confused after a 90-minute ice show? I think these people have lost their minds.
GLAAD has learned from a source that wishes to remain anonymous that sponsors of the Stars on Ice Tour, which include Smuckers and IMG Entertainment, have refused to allow 3-time US National Champion and 2-time Olympian Johnny Weir to participate because they claim that he is “not family friendly.”To say that Weir is “not family friendly” would be a clear jab at his perceived sexual orientation. Weir is extremely involved with his family. He is putting his younger brother through college, and supports the family financially because his father’s disability prohibits him from working. Weir’s dedication to his family can be clearly documented in the Sundance series, Be Good Johnny Weir, which follows him and his family and friends through his life and career as a championship skater.
Weir’s performance and costume style is sometimes considered flashier than those of other skaters, leading to questions about his perceived sexual orientation. While Weir has not officially announced his sexual orientation, he has garnered a significant amount of LGBT fans. He remains one of the most outspoken skaters today, and won an online poll asking fans “Who would you like to see guest star on Stars on Ice?”
Well that last point shows that the only paranoia exists in the minds of the sponsors. I’m not sure which aspect of Weir set off these alarms — is it the ornate and creative costumes? Over the years, the costumes of male figure skaters have become more free and flamboyant, regardless of the athlete’s real or perceived sexual orientation.
For instance I remember when the incredibly talented Rudy Galindo, the 1987 World Junior Champion and the 1996 U.S. National Champion — and was one of the first figure skaters that I recall coming out of the closet. Take a look at him from this short program at the ’96 Worlds. I remember his flamboyance and oh-so-gey velvet costume were considered radical.
Now how tame was that? That costume (or his known homosexuality at the time) didn’t stop Galindo from continuing to compete, and to go on to a professional skating career, including a 10-year stint with the Tom Collins’ Champions on Ice show.
Now look at Johnny Weir’s short program at the NHK Trophy last year.
All I’m saying is that it’s all relative, and with a broader acceptance and comfort with self-expression along the gender norm lines within the sport, these sponsors and Stars on Ice need to get a flipping grip.



9 Comments





Hope GLAAD stays on this… but of course.They have SOOOOOOO many parties and GALA's coming up. They are probably too busy.
Sex and skatingDid anyone see the promo ads for the ice dancing in Vancouver? Couples draped all over each other, sultry looks, and clear sexual tension (even if it was all part of the performance). I really didn’t want my first-grader seeing that, no matter the gender of the participants.
Of course, they were opposite-sex couples, so no one complained.
Maybe Stars on Ice will follow the Mississippi high school and just cancel the entire show….
IllegalIf the story is true, Stars on Ice just broke employment discrimination laws in about half the country.
Please sign the petition to call out this sponsor on this bigoted stance!Pam, I just found your blog, and I LOVE it! Thank you for picking up the Johnny Weir story.
For all who agree that this is beyond ridiculous (and who would prefer that conservative corporate fat cats NOT make your choices FOR you), PLEASE SIGN THIS PETITION in support of Johnny Weir: http://www.gopetition.com/peti…
The goal is 10,000 signatures by Monday, 03/15/2010!
For more of the back story on this bit of idiocracy, please go here: http://misfitmimes.blogspot.com/
Entries re: the petition include:
Stars on Ice Minus Johnny Weir Adds Up to One Big ClusterSmuck
Pimp That Petition Out, Baby!
Petition Update: Power to the People!
Be sure to read the comments under “Petition Update” for additional info on how we got here.
Thank you!
Weir sounds very family friendly to me
Sounds like Weir is somebody who should be considered as a all American hero to me.
Is what they did actually illegal?I’m not sure that it is. Aside from the fact that discrimination based on orientation is still not illegal nationally, in this instance, would that count anyway.
Did he apply and was denied the job or was this an invitation only affair?
I just checked…And the show is produced by IMG, a company based in NYC. They may be in violation of NYC law (though I don’t think that NY State has an inclusive employment discrimination law on the books yet).
Exactly, GeekIf IMG were based in Illinois, this would be illegal, as gender expression is covered in our state ENDA. GENDA still has to make it through the New York state Senate.
And of course, this illustrates the importance of the T in the ENDA bill that’s moving veeeeeeery slowly through Congress.
Yep
That’s exactly it, and what REALLY gets me is that the homophobic motive is SO TRANSPARENT. I mean, what else could they possibly intend with the term “not family-friendly” in this setting? Does Weir twirl around the ice with his booty exposed, or give the finger to the judges as the capstone of his routine, or even so much as skate to music that might annoy a cultural conservative? Not the last time I checked…