If you surf over to HRC Back Story, you can see videos from today’s press conference on the Hill featuring lawmakers and service members, including U.S. Marine Corps Veteran Eric Alva) US Army Veteran Kayla Williams; and US Army Veteran, HRC DADT Repeal Advocate Jarrod Chlapowski, and HRC’s Joe Solmonese. Here is Rep. Patrick Murphy (D-PA).
U.S. Rep. Patrick Murphy (D-PA), alongside lesbian, gay and straight veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, held a press conference today in coordination with a swell of average Americans fighting for repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” (DADT). The event is timed with HRC’s annual spring Lobby Day where more than 300 members and supporters are expected to participate.
“One of the worst things that you can hear when you are lobbying is that ‘no one in my district is gay and no one in my district wants me to vote for this.’ We know that’s not true of any district but we have to prove it,” said Human Rights Campaign President Joe Solmonese, while speaking to more than 300 average American’s demanding repeal today on the Hill. ”We come with the most powerful message of all: I am your constituent, and your constituents, like the rest of America, have had enough of ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.’”
This week, U.S. Senator Joseph Lieberman (I-CT) introduced the Military Readiness Enhancement Act of 2010 in the U.S. Senate. The bill would repeal the military’s DADT law, which prohibits lesbians and gays from serving openly in the U.S. Armed Forces. Rep. Patrick Murphy, an Iraq War veteran and a former paratrooper in the U.S. Army’s elite 82nd Airborne Division, is the lead sponsor of similar legislation in the U.S House of Representatives….HRC is also asking members and supporters to sign up and to join the growing network of supporters to repeal DADT. To learn more visit: www.hrc.org/RepealDADT.
Today also happens to be HRC’s Virtual Lobby Day, a way to make a difference even if you’re not marching up to meet with your legislators on Capitol Hill.
· First, go to our special action page where you can email your elected officials.
· Follow-up with a phone call. The Capitol switchboard is 202-224-3121. Tell them where you live, and they’ll connect you to any of your lawmakers’ offices. Tell your lawmakers that you’re calling to urge Congress to repeal “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” this year.
· RSVP to the event on Facebook and invite your friends.
· Use Twitter to spread the word. Our volunteer lobbyists will be tweeting from the Capitol using the #DADT hashtag. Once you take action, tweet about the experience and join the conversation.
· Learn more at www.hrc.org/RepealDADT
UPDATE: Today and tomorrow HRC’s board meets. With the increasing cloud of doom of backtracking we’re hearing (and what Kerry Eleveld is reporting), I hope the board is arming themselves with information to say we need a hard push on the President and members of Congress to make Joe Solmonese’s promise at the HRC Carolinas dinner to be realized. As things stand now, it will take more than you calls to Congress to intercede to repeal in 2010.
DADT Review First, Repeal Later?As the House Armed Services Subcommittee on Military Personnel questioned the three witnesses responsible for conducting a yearlong review on repeal of “don’t ask, don’t tell,” one thing became perfectly clear: The Pentagon favors completing the review before Congress acts legislatively.
“I would think that members of Congress would like to be informed by our work,” said Gen. Carter Ham, cochair of the three-member working group appointed by Secretary of Defense Robert Gates to study implementation. “I think it’s very important that we understand the impacts of repeal before it occurs.”
Ham appeared alongside Jeh Johnson, Department of Defense general counsel and fellow cochair, and Clifford Stanley, a retired Army general and Defense undersecretary for personnel and readiness.
Rep. Patrick Murphy of Pennsylvania, chief sponsor of the House’s repeal bill, sought to clarify the goal of the working group.
“It’s not to discuss if we’re going to repeal ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ – the discussion today is how the services will implement repeal to ensure there’s no disruption of our forces,” Murphy said.
It sounds like we’re in serious trouble on DADT.



17 Comments





Hooray Hooray but….
First, Hooray for Cong. Murphy, et al., and I second Pam’s urgent appeal that everyone contact your Senators and Representatives, and reiterate that the message to them must not just be “vote for repeal” but “vote for repeal before Nov. 2nd!”
But too many supporters of DADT repeal this year are still in denial about Gates, who has not TRULY abandoned his years’ long position standing in the doorway of repeal, merely shifted his methodology. Thus, WE, are perpetuating the SELF-INFLICTED wound of not having unequivocally DENOUNCED on February 2nd his call for a study BEFORE repeal.
When are we going to stop being hypnotized and disarmed by pretty words alone? When are we going to stop exhibiting a childish gratitude for anything anyone says “nice” about us like phony repeat PHONY repeal “supporter” Secretary of Defense of DADT Gates did. The initial and ongoing focus should not be on his bait ["Of course, I PERSONALLY support repeal."] but on his switch ["But Congress must NOT touch it until after our 'study' which, trusssssssssst me, only accidentally won't be done until after midterms."].
By the comments yesterday of Gates’ personal paid robotic shill, Geoff Morell, and of Gates’ hand-picked lead of The Study Jeh Johnson [proving you don't have to be a "Bush Holdover" to be a homophobic jackass], as well as the anti-immediate repeal testimony from the other Chiefs of Staff last week, it’s clear the Gateswaffe is going to escalate their assault on repeal or a freeze before they can try to kill both by running out the clock to midterms and the swearing in of all the expected Repugs.
I seem to be the only person on the planet who remembers [including HIM] that Johnson was the guy Gates supposedly tasked EIGHT MONTHS ago with determining whether Gates had discretion re third party outings ["Operation Humane"], and who supposedly [and TOTALLY wrongly] told him “No,” and yet YESTERDAY Johnson testified [we assume not under oath] to the House that he was STILL working on that question, and expected to have an answer in a couple of weeks.
Anyone who doesn’t get that this history of Gates-centered self-contradictions [which remind one of Morell declaring last year that there were NO repeal discussions going on, and then, a few days later, claiming there WERE discussions going on...which now, we know, to have been untrue in any meaningful way] and the idea that it takes an attorney 8 & 1/2 months to find the answer to a question a 12-yr. old with a dial up connection to Google could find in ten minutes proves why we cannot surrender AN INCH to them, they are a part of the problem and not the solution.
MAKE NO MISTAKE: Gates is NOT suddenly on “our side.” He may claim to be carrying out Obama’s orders but are we to believe that Obama’s orders are to stall repeal until repeal is legislatively impossible?
No, despite some good-hearted gays who WANT to believe otherwise, Mr. Gates is more like a respectable Antigay Mafia front, and, that mafia itself, as comments by Repug Reps demonstrated yesterday, have drawn up their dishonest STOP REPEAL talking points, and can be expected to eventually have their own press conference with right wing loon Elaine Donnelly in a red, white, and blue cheerleader outfit and pom poms.
Cheshire Cat Gates won’t be there, grinning again, of course, but he is the source that continues to empower the overt obstructionists and fence sitters: the phony excuse, entirely recycled from 1993, that the sky will fall if out gays are allowed to serve, so they must spend months, years, figuring out some way to prop up the sky.
Repeal this year stands NO chance unless everyone STOPS acting as if they need the Pentagon’s PERMISSION to repeal before The Study and the attack on the very rationale of The Study is escalated and universally joined by ALL gay orgs!
——-
A more direct link to videos from today:
http://www.hrcbackstory.org/20…
In addition to lobbying the Housewe should lobby the Senate as well.
It is my understand that their version of the bill will NOT delay the repeal for a study, and instead the study and end of discharges would coincide. My hope is that this version is the version the house and senate would ultimately come together on in conference.
For those across the country:
http://www.couragecampaign.org…
For those in NC, lets ask Senator Hagan, who said she supports repealing DADT to cosponsor that upcoming Senate bill:
Give a call: 202-224-6342
Send a message: http://hagan.senate.gov/contact/
She sits on the Senate Armed Services Committee so her cosponsorship would go a long ways, not to mention having a southern senator willing to cosponsor it. Public Policy Polling polled NC citizens last month, and 67% of democrats and 59% of independents support repealing DADT. We CAN get Kay on board, but we have to keep making the calls, and sending the messages.
Oh hell no, We aren’t in trouble with dadt the Pentagon, the congress and the administration are!This is total shell game the more I look at it. The congress wants to pass it to the administration who wants t give it to the pentagon who then wants to study it and pass it back to congress so they can wait around and see how the election will turn out before they pass it back to the administration for further leadership information… It’s all bullcrap!
And while I applaud the efforts of HRC to focus the community on getting at their congress people any fool can see its not going to fly because they will just find some way to defer either to the pentagon or to the administration. I say we go where the action is and lobby the committee doing the study directly. get in their face and make them produce weekly if not daily reports on their progress for the public as well as Congress and the media. Let the department of defense get a real taste of watchdog oversight directly from the community on everything until they get to dadt. Then let the administration see ho they deal with that close scrutiny. I doubt the Pentagon will take it well. regardless of what we do we need to find ways to concentrate our effectiveness not spread it out so that this three ring circus of obstructionism can put us off until December where they are not promises us anything but to produce a report they neither have to act on or implement. screw dadt!
Unfortunately…
…it seems to be unclear exactly when discharges would actually STOP under either bill.
My initial interpretation of the House bill was that they would stop after six months from enactment during which time the Pentagon would be allowed to change their regulations, etc.
That was somewhat reinforced by comments yesterday by current main sponsor Cong. Patrick Murphy during the House hearing.
But the overall language of the House bill is similar to the Senate bill [except the Senate bill allows far longer for the Pentagon's study/implementation games which DC Agenda and SLDN seem to be interpeting would PRECEDE discharges ending], yet, The Advocate is still quoting Lieberman directly as saying,
“On the date of enactment, the discharges would have to stop.”
I guess we’ll have to wait for clarification of “enactment,” but we should INSIST that it mean that discharges will stop the MOMENT the President signs whatever bill involving repeal.
Let the Pentagon keep crossing its t’s and dotting its i’s until the proverbial cows come home, but STOP THE DISCHARGES!
It’s sickeningThe new fundraising tactic — donate to the DNC like good sheeple and maybe you’ll get repeal in 2011. Who didn’t see it coming?
Shut down the gayTM!
Thank GoodnessWe have a “Fierce Champion” on our side here. We do, he’s said so. I’m sure he’ll take a leadership role here, any day now, he’s just waiting for the right moment, according to HRC’s secret plan. Joe Solomese’s said so, and would he lie to us?
DADT Debate & Trans CommunityCould someone please explain to me in detail as to why the transgender community hasn’t been included in the DADT debate in some way shape or form? PHB’s Autumn Sandeen gave me a partial explanation via Twitter earlier which I’ve linked below, however it doesn’t explain why the LGBT media is soo willing to follow the lead of the LGBT organizations and throw Trans-people under the bus over this issue. Simply talking about stuff never hurts.
http://twitter.com/Autumn_Sand…
Are transpeople just too controversial, or is there a smattering of Transphobia openly creeping into LGBT organisations and the media again?
Not “included…in some way shaper or form”…
…is an exaggeration. There are many members of the transgender community,including some veterans for whom DADT was improperly used to discriminate against them, some veterans who escaped its claws, and some non-vets as determined to help end DADT as anyone else.
MEMBERS OF TAVA PLACE A WREATH AT THE TOMB OF THE UNKNOWN SOLDIER IN 2004
However, “officially” DADT has nothing to do with discrimination against transgender servicemembers [unless they also identify as "gay"], so trying to include a discussion of abuses of T servicemembers would only confuse the issue. A 2008 study published by Transgender American Veterans Association [TAVA] and the Palm Center found:
http://www.tavausa.org/Survey_…
Such abuses, in most instances, are the result of the ignorance of members of the military confusing “being gay” with “being transgender” [again, except in the instance of the transgender person also identifying as "gay"]. In a few cases, it is a commander understanding the difference but exploiting the ignorance or indifference of others to use DADT to get rid of a transgender servicemember.
But, as indicated by the survey, while repeal of DADT would eliminate one of the weapons military transphobics use to oppress transgender servicemembers, it would not simultaenously remove the policies against their service based on the faulty “disease model.”
That is a different battle we must fight to end.
Not so………How would it confuse the issue though, Michael? The issues are extremely similar, even though the regulations themselves are different. As far as I can see, there’s no reason why the LGBT movement can’t take on both issues at once, particularly since as you have just shown, a lot of the necessary studies have already been conducted. HRC’s Diversity Director Allyson Robinson has even commented on that particular study, stating that she was appalled by how TG-Vets are being treated. Look at how the Transgender community is being treated by HRC now… however I don’t think that Allyson would be willing to admit that right now. >_>
http://www.hrcbackstory.org/20…
Autumn Sandeen also commented on the TAVA White Paper. The last bit of the quote below should be a gentle reminder to some people….
http://www.pamshouseblend.com/…
As for the “exaggeration”, you’ve taken my words out of context. My point was that the transgender community has been excluded from the debate over the Military’s LGBT Policies in general, not that DADT hasn’t had an impact on some TG-Vets. There’s no reason as to why this topic can’t be talked about at the same time and in conjunction with DADT. Different battles sure, though both issues are equally important. If Gays, Lesbians and Bisexuals leave the Transgender community behind on this, then it will set a dangerous precedent, where LGB’s will feel that they can throw TG peeps under the bus on any issue. HRC nearly got away with that the last time that ENDA was brought up, and to be honest, theres more than a few trans-peeps who are getting sick to death of being used as throw-away political tools by some of these organisations and parts of the LGBT movement.
“why this topic can’t be talked about at the same time and in conjunction with DADT”?
…because it would be strategically STUPID! She might feel differently, but there is nothing in your quote from Autumn that proves she does.
Please save the facile “thrown under the bus” metaphor for instances when it rationally applies.
But, of course, you’re entitled to disagree.
But Aravosis said “our calls don’t matter.”Today, John Aravosis said:
“DADT repeal is in trouble. And all the phone-banks to Congress won’t amount to a hill of beans if the President isn’t on board. And he isn’t.”
Maybe we should be calling the White House? I’ve heard they actually have a “call counter,” and caller ID – most Senators don’t. They just use pads of paper. But, if our calls don’t really matter, let’s just call Obama or Michelle, because until they are on board, our calls don’t register. Can they transfer calls from the White House to the Senate? That would be a clever way to get this Law passed. Wait, what about conference calls? Brilliant.
I read on another Blog that Sen. Robert Byrd has demanded 15 million calls before he changes his mind and he didn’t need the President “on board.”
In 2010 everyone knows that phone calls and emails are what determine Politicians positions on issues.
Send. Send. Send. Redial. Redial. Redial.
Just keep dialing.Come on Michael. With all this writing you could be dialing. We need ENOUGH calls to change a few minds. The average Senator needs 20 million calls. Make your 100,000 calls and THEN write your analysis. Please, our equality is waiting.
Shouldn’t you be making calls??Last I heard we had collectively only made 105,000 calls.
Everyone knows that each vote in the US Senate requires 10 million calls or emails. While you are arguing, we are falling behind. Way behind.
Redial. Redial. Redial.
Is that all you’ve got?Explain how it would be stupid then, Michael. Come on, I dare you.
How is making it so that the VA can’t discriminate against Transgender vets “Strategically Stupid”?
What makes Transgender people so controversial that we’d sink any legislation, simply by having our voice heard, even if we aren’t in any leglislation? Come on, I want to hear what you’ve got to say.
Also the “Thrown under the bus” quote is valid. Have you heard ANY STATEMENT by anyone on how LGBT Organizations plan on getting rid of military and VA discrimination against Trans-folk? I certainly haven’t. All I’ve gotten when I’ve asked them questions is abuse.
FlamingAndrewW, you’ve amply made your point about lobbying. Repetition of essentially the same comment repeatedly and in response to the same commenter in the same diary amounts to flaming and/or trolling. Please refresh your memory of the Terms of Service you agreed to when you created your account at Pam’s House Blend.
Aravosis considers Lobbying “Political Masturbation”From John Aravosis, AmericaBLOG.com today:
Remarkably, John is now admitting that lobbying in ineffective. When I made that observation on his website I was blocked. Just two weeks ago John was adamant that “lobbying was very effective.” Did he change or did somebody LOBBY him?
In the comments after this was posted, John actually said:
“I think, some of us would rather fix HRC than destroy it.”
But John, you must know HRC is a lobbying organization. You want to FIX something that “doesn’t work.” You’ve outdone yourself, again.
Link:http://gay.americablog.com/2010/03/political-masturbation-wont-get-dadt.html
QuoteWhen I was in the military they gave me a medal for killing two men and a discharge for loving one. ~Epitaph of Leonard P. Matlovich, 1988