(NOTE: We’re keeping this post up top for a while, new servings of the Blend are below…)
The election of Barack Obama to serve our country as President of the United States was due in great measure to his promise to effect change in Washington. He told voters that he would stop the political logjams and use his bully pulpit to work with and demand that Congress act on issues that lay dormant or actively opposed during Republican rule. And that list was long – health care, the environment, the military actions abroad, civil rights and liberties…
And there were specific promises made to the LGBT community about the importance of acting on many of the issues we discuss here on the Blend — ENDA, DADT repeal, DOMA, UAFA, etc.
Don’t Ask Don’t Tell needs to be repealed in 2010
Since his inauguration, a concerted White House effort to back-burner pressing Congress to repeal Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. Actually, the President talked a great game about doing it in speeches, including the State of the Union, and at dinners to our community leaders, suggesting an urgency to allow gays and lesbians to no longer remain closeted and serve in the military. This was underscored by the fact that the ranks of qualified, experienced service members are being stretched thinner with each day due to our commitments at home and abroad.

The role of HRC in pressing the WH
The largest LBGT organization in the country, the Human Rights Campaign — with nearly a million members, according to president and executive director Joe Solmonese — is seen by the White House, Congress, and the mainstream media as the community’s official representative inside the Beltway. HRC had the ear of the White House — attending strategy meetings on LGBT policy, and appeared numerous times at public social and political events, such as the signing of the hate crimes bill.
While many in the LGBT community have criticized HRC on many occasions (including yours truly), the motivation, at least on my part, I cannot speak for others, is that its position and responsibility is so critical now that we have an administration that has made promises –and dodged action.
Why now?
If DADT is not repealed in 2010, you’re not going to see it happen in this administration’s first term. Between retirements, deaths, and poor leadership, Democratic control of Congress is in jeopardy this year. When Scott Brown won the “Ted Kennedy” seat in Massachusetts, you saw a distinct panic and desire to move to the middle, a signal that hot button issues (read: civil rights for LGBTs) were going to be submerged, deemed too controversial. The administration cannot guarantee there will be a second term either.
Repealing DADT is not controversial with the public — polls have been strongly in favor of repeal for some time now with Colin Powell and Dick Cheney of all people calling for repeal. There is no reason for timidity in calling for accountability now that Secretary of Defense Gates and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Mullen have called for this policy to end.
Tax-paying LGBTs have pulled out their wallets for the Human Rights Campaign for years, waiting for the day their investment would result in action once a gay-friendly administration and Congress were finally in place. Now is the time time to act. We need the full force of HRC flexing its political muscle to call for the President to publicly press for repeal of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell.
If we have “White House officials” floating that it could take years before repeal, then we know there is not leadership going on at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. But we do know that repeal of DADT could be included in the Defense Budget he sends to Congress soon if pressed to do so.
What can you do?
This is a call for you to tell HRC that it’s time to use its role and reach in an assertive, public manner as other organizations — such as the AFL-CIO — have had to do to move its issues onto the priority list of this White House.
HRC Front Desk: (202) 628-4160
TTY: (202) 216-1572
Toll-Free: (800) 777-4723
HRC Web site comment page.
General membership email at HRC: membership@hrc.org
Blog about it, share this action item widely on Facebook or Twitter.
And by blog swarming this issue including linking to blogs that are also participating, you show that the LGBT and ally community mean business. The polls, support from the military and the momentum is in our favor to act now. Let HRC, the President and Congress — and the media — know with this action that we know the political clock is ticking.
Here is the list of sponsors of the DADT blog swarm, linking to their posts on this topic:
Joe Sudbay and John Aravosis, AMERICAblog
Pam Spaulding, Pam’s House Blend
Michelangelo Signorile, Sirius OutQ & the Gist
Markos Moulitsas, Daily Kos
Andy Towle, Towleroad
Joe Jervis, Joe.My.God
Bil Browning, The Bilerico Project
Taylor Marsh, TaylorMarsh.com
Dan Savage, Slog
***
UPDATE: An interesting and not unexpected response from an HRC affiliate (not claiming to speak for the national office), that Americablog posted about.
It’s exactly as we said, HRC seems genetically incapable of ever challenging President Obama on anything. They simply parrot the Obama line – the President is supposedly powerless, you know, to influence legislation – and think that what’s best for Barack Obama is best for gay America. Well, sometimes it’s not. Sometimes you actually have to challenge the President. Sometime you have to recognize that the President of the United States of America actually has some political capital at his disposal – especially on an issue involving the military when he’s the commander in chief.HRC today, via one of its local affiliates, responded to today’s DADT blog swarm, launched by top blogs in the gay and non-gay blogosphere, by yet again defending the President and deflecting the blame to Congress for the inaction on ‘Don’t Ask Don’t Tell.’
Here’s what Equality Beach (the political blog for HRC Orange County/Long Beach/Palm Spring) said:
In a coordinated campaign launched by AMERICAblog, Pam’s House Blend, Towleroad, DailyKos, Joe.My.God, Bilerico, Dan Savage, and others, several LGBT blogs are calling on their readers to call HRC and demand that HRC call on the President to act on DADT. I guess the reasoning is they do not feel HRC is doing enough to push the issues, particularly with DADT. HRC is not Congress or the President, we cannot write legislation, sign bills, or anything else. We lobby with people power and money.While I disagree with this specific approach, calling your member of Congress and Senators and the White House would be a better use of your time.
No one said that you shouldn’t contact your representatives. The point of the blogswarm is to activate the organization paid to lobby those very elected officials in person, as well as the White House. And look at, to date, the lack of leadership on DADT repeal we’ve seen from the President, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi. Again, John:
Was HRC in a coma last year? Did they not witness the melt down on health care reform that occurred because the White House refused to lead on a key campaign promise, but instead sat back and “waited for congress” to act?Yes, by all means, do what HRC says and call Congress. Congress does need to pass the DADT repeal, and they do need to feel pressure. But I worked in the Senate, for five years, and I can tell you as a fact that Congress won’t touch the repeal until the President tells them what he wants. This is what Joe Sudbay and I are being told when we call offices on Capitol Hill. No one knows what the President wants. Does he want DADT repealed this year, next year, during the next administration (if there is one)? No one knows, because the President likes to issue vague statements of support for repeal, then disappear into the background when people ask him “when?”
We’ve all learned all too well, and painfully, that when the President doesn’t lead, Congress doesn’t follow. HRC should stop treating Barack Obama as their boyfriend, and start treating him as a politician who isn’t keeping his promises.




33 Comments


I hesitate yet feel compelled to askWhile DADT is important and a big issue for gay and lesbian people, where the hell was the blog swarm for ENDA? Why is it that the GLB community wants to neglect an issue that is so vital for so many people? Is it because one of the most vocal online advocates for ENDA is transsexual? Is it because the elite within the community are really that uncaring about it? If they are so secure and all, why are they pushing DADT which doesn’t promote the same kind of economic benefits as same sex marriage?
I am increasingly disgusted by the consistent pushing of vital civil rights issues into 2nd place while the big story (and donations) generating issues are pushed roughshod over the damaged lives of people who are routinely discriminated against with results that often impact their ability to survive, let alone live comfortably.
I hesitated writing this because I know it’ll generate a shitstorm of criticism about how trans people are trying to hijack gay and lesbian concerns but I feel compelled to remind people: There are members of our community, our brothers and sisters, who are sinking into abject poverty, if they aren’t there already, and the despair that goes with it. ENDA will help them. Why can’t this community get their priorities straight?
It’s about timing, not priorityThe fabulous Mara Keisling of NCTE said it best at Creating Change – every success of the LGBT community increases the possibility of the next success. LGBT wins are accretive, and we don’t have to compete with each other. Winning on DADT makes it easier to get ENDA. Winning on ENDA makes it easier to get UAFA. Repealing DOMA makes it easier to repeal DADT.
The bald truth is that we are at a tipping point on DADT, and we have a brief window of opportunity – maybe 4 weeks, more or less – where we can have maximum effect on this issue.
It’s not about which is a priority – it’s about tactical opportunity: pushing for greatest impact at the moment when we can influence events, with a frankly dysfunctional government.
Make the call, peopleHRC is one of our community’s assets. Those millions of dollars they have to play with come out of our pockets. They need to know that they are accountable to us. It is important that you pick up the phone today and remind them of that.
I just made my phone call and it was quite a nice experience.
My recommendation is, that when you call, start off with a short qualification, such as “I have been out for X number of years and have been supporting gay organizations for all that time”, or “I took part in the March on Washington,” or whatever. If you have done, or are doing something to help the gay community, mention it at the beginning of call.
You don’t have to go into great detail about what you want HRC to do about DADT. They have been getting these calls all day. Just let them know that you, too, expect them to take action.
Here is how my call went:
We all have a vested interest in this, and we are all qualified to make our wishes known. Maybe your name isn’t yet listed in the history books, (That, and $2.50 will get you a cup of coffee), but you all have a qualifier, even if it is “I’m a lesbian and I’m mad as hell”. Use it. Make the call.
Why?What is the big deal about DADT? Especially when we will still be seen as (at best) second class Citizens,
Doesn’t that put us in the same situation as African-Americans post WWII – able to fight for our country – but not accepted as equal upon our return?
Do folks think it will spark a “new” civil rights movement?
Granted I’m too old to serve, but why fight for a place that does not see you as close to equal? A place where people are (once again) speaking about making our very existence illegal.
Is it that DADT looks like a “win”? Do the armed forces need bodies that badly?
I do not understand what the huge fuss is all about. In fact, I would think we should REFUSE to serve as long as we are not seen as equal Citizens.
ENDA is still a lose. Expanded marriage rights are a lose. Hate crimes laws are under attack by our “Christian” leaders. Even anti-bullying laws can’t get passed.
So, kids can still be beaten by peers for who they are. We can still be denied HOSPITAL VISITATION. We still will have to bear unfair tax burdens if we have anything when a partner dies, etc., etc., etc. — but, the “pressing issue” is DADT?
Is someone kidding here? Is this an attempt by our GCL (Gay Corporate Leaders) to justify their existence?
Do we really want to give the message that we are willing to take part in wars of aggression?
Is the love of uniforms that great?
I called, but I have my doubts what good it will do.My suspicion: Every man, woman and child in the United States could call, and Solmonese would be too busy dusting off his tux for the next White House reception to listen to any of the messages.
I’m not sure whyyou define the bloggers behind this as “Gay Corporate Leaders.” They are no such thing. This is an attempt to coerce our real GCLs, i.e HRC, to do something.
DADT is the last vestige of active (as opposed to passive, as in DOMA) government discrimination against gay people. That is more than reason enough to want to see an end to it. And the signs all indicate that ending it is doable. Get it?
I hardly think you need to remind Pam and the other bloggers about the need for ENDA, DOMA repeal and the rest. We are all, all of us, only too keenly aware of them. The simple fact is that of all the things we want, DADT repeal is the most immediately achievable. Would you really rather see this horrible discriminatory program continue? Is that what you’re saying?
I agree that ENDA is more important for more people….But people can speak up for themselves for it. Most will not get fired,….and most are not facing mines and bullets everyday when they go to work!
LOL!Actually I was going to say Joe Solmonese would give his goofy smile like he did when Maggie was slandering gay people in front of him.
And then he’d ask: “are there any high-profile celebrities involved?”/”NO? Forget it.”.
For those who say, why not ENDA…The reason is the groundwork is in place to do DADT now, whereas we don’t know there’s support to pass ENDA yet.
I personally feel ENDA is the most important piece of legislation that will help the most LGBTs, but DADT repeal is THISCLOSE to a done deal if we push to make it happen — the POTUS mentioned it in his SOTU, so it’s time to put up or shut up, and the org primed to do this is HRC. It needs to get off of its duff and use its ca$h to push this.
CalledBut I’d rather see an organized campaign to bombard Senators with calls to demand they take up DADT repeal this year.
Is any Senator not already with us going to be influenced by what HRC wants?
HRC is paid to do the lobbying on the HillThat’s what the organization’s main function is, so they should let us, the LGBT community know, what action to take based on HRC’s plan to move DADT repeal to passage in 2010. And getting the President into the bully pulpit is a strong motivator to actually pass legislation. Without leadership, you get chaos and inaction.
How True – Long Line of DiscriminationBeginning formally after WWII, when gays and lesbians were officially barred from government service or from any company that handled sensitive information. The military is the last vestige of that bigotry now that general government jobs are opened to us, and even sensitive positions with groups like the CIA are open to out LGBT people.
More importantly, the symbolism of repealing DADT cannot be underemphasized. While ENDA would have wide impact, it would be far less visible than repealing DADT, because ENDA attacks a bigotry that is far more hidden. The American people have a strong sense of fairness, which is why even conservatives support DADT repeal in much higher numbers than any other aspect of the LGBT civil rights movement.
Hello straw man!The primary of HRC as a lobbying force (whether you, I, or others like it or not) at the federal level is not in dispute.
The efficacy, direction, and tactics are in dispute.
I didn’tI don’t define bloggers as GCL – it’s HRC, etc.
That still does not address my complaint about how strong the anti DADT activism is.
I understand it is seen as the last “active” form of discrimination – but, it’s not.
Not allowing marriage is “active”. Not allowing hospital visitation is “active”. Getting beaten on the way home from a night out is “active”. Being shot in the back of the head, in school, at 15, also seems “active”to me. Being discriminated against on a daily basis is “active” – isn’t it?
Being a part of our newly professional military caste does not seem to be all that important when it comes to LGBT rights.
Heck, there are all sorts of closeted gay members of our armed forces right now. Do you really think any Lt. Colonels or above will come out? Don’t you think they will still see it as ending their career?
So, we can join, perhaps even be drafted (when more and more bodies are needed). How will that help more than a very small minority of young gay folks? Will the message you have to be tough, butch, rough, to be worth anything be further impressed on young gay men and women? Ib that really what you want?
I remember in the summerin June when all of us were screaming about not only the inaction, but the appointment of homophobes by this administration, whe all too evident waffling on DOMA, and ‘God is in the mix.’
The President fobbed us off with the famous “Rental Truck Equality Memorandum, a gala signing event with Joe Solmonese present.
The reason that Congress and the President prefer to deal with the HRC as oppsed to other LGBT organisations is that it is inherently conservative and can be overawed and overwhelmed with a White House audience.
Your economic analysis is full of holes…
While ending DADT won’t “promote the same kind of economic benefits as same sex marriage,” neither would passing ENDA.
But ending Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell the Truth WOULD address the very same issue you and I want to by passing ENDA: saving people’s jobs.
Surely you didn’t mean to suggest that a civilian who loses his/her job for simply being LGBT is more deserving of protection, or suffers more, than a fired LGBT servicemember.
It’s a very rare Trust Fund Baby, gay or nongay, that enters the military. Many gays, just like many nongays, enter the military because it is their best [or ONLY] path to reliable economic survival, or economic progress [as long as they successfully hide or repress their natural selves].
Anthony Woods, one of the few former gay servicmembers of color to come out publicly, was raised by a single mother. Sometimes she couldn’t even afford medical insurance for her child, and her jobs didn’t pay her enough to allow her to save for his college.
But Anthony got appointed to West Point which meant his education was paid for. And later the Army gave him a $35,000 scholarship to Harvard under their student program. He already had a job offer to teach at West Point afterward. But when he came out, not only was he discharged, not only did he lose that WP job, but he was forced to come up with a way to pay back that $35,000…all SIMPLY BECAUSE HE IS GAY.
Now Anthony isn’t one of those starving. He found a civilian job working for a nonprofit. And in addition to a great injustice, if Victor Fehrenbach’s discharge is finalized before he finishes the roughly one-year of service left to reach his “20-years” he loses the $43,000 A YEAR in retirement benefits he would otherwise get. I imagine he’ll survive, too, but he’ll have to start from scratch and airlines are laying off not hiring pilots.
But plenty of other gays, particuarly because most are discharged within the first few years of being in the military before they’ve saved much or learned a marketable skill, ARE severely economically impacted by being “FIRED” just like civilian gay and trans people.
And when they go to apply for a civilian job, they either have to lie about ever being in the military or risk a prospective employer asking to see their discharge papers which will clearly state they were “fired” for being gay.
And if that employer is one who would not hire a gay person who’d never been in the military, they ain’t gonna hire a gay vet either.
In short, DADT is NOT just an abstract issue of equality any more than ENDA is. Vulnerability to being fired or not “hired” in the first place simply for being gay is identical in both. [The numbers that ENDA would benefit are likely higher but that wasn't a part of your argument.]
Finally, while technically DADT doesn’t apply to trans servicemembers, we know that it is misused as a way to get rid of identified trans servicemembers. Getting rid of DADT won’t eliminate the military’s transphobia but it would give them one less weapon to use against Ts, as well as, I’m convinced, lead eventually to the opening up of dialogue to end military opposition to trans servicemembers generally as well as the public’s greater openness to marriage equality AND attention to ENDA [even though, for a long time, more of the public has supported the goals of ENDA [minus T] than ending DADT].
This is not “push[ing] roughshod” over other LGBT issues but hopefully the final push to end legal discrimination against gays by the country’s biggest employer. It is simply the iron that is hot. And because of the huge identification the average American has with the military, overturning DADT could open their minds to every other contentious issue.
Illustration by Scott. G. Brooks http://metroweekly.com/feature/?ak=4850
Your comments are so lacking in facts and logic…
one doesn’t know where to begin. Ya want an economic case that would benefit LGBTS for fighting to end DADT? See my reponse to Emelye above. [I include Ts because DADT has been used as an excuse to discharge them, too, by dishonest commanders who made the case that they're actually "gay."]
But here’s the short version: DADT is not just a symbolic evil. This isn’t just about the gays who might want to enlist … ALMOST ALWAYS FOR ECONOMIC REASONS …but for those already in…ALMOST ALWAYS FOR ECONOMIC REASONS.
Who comes out and who doesn’t post DADT is irrelevant. It’s about giving them the right to, protection when they do, protection if they’re discovered, financial benefits and dignity for their partners, not having to carry a piece of paper that effectively says, “Fired For Being A Fag” around when they look for a civilian job, ad infinitum
And, please name five people who are claiming that this “is seen as the last ‘active’ form of discrimination.”
Over and over, the straw argument is made that we can only fight for X or Y. Nonsense. While ending DADT is the issue I spend the most amount of time on, I have also given money to/worked for the fight for marriage equality, the Matthew Shepard Foundation, the Trevor Project, multiple AIDS groups, etc.
Finally, your apparent PERSONAL objections to anyone being in the military, to concepts of “butch,” do not give you the right to deny opportunities to those who disagree with you. Gay paternalism is no better than straight paternalism.
Are you familiar with the expression: “Lead, follow, or get out of the way”?
Human Rights generic termI wonder how many lawmakers in Washington really know that HRC is an LGBT equal rights organization. McCain didn’t know what LGBT meant.
To most, Human rights means the third world whether it is helping tsunami/earthquake victims or Islamic stoning and circumcision of young women in Africa. When Sec. of State Clinton mentions “human rights” we queers think she is talking about us. She isn’t.
Yep. This is the SAME HRC thatendorsed Joe Lieberman after the Democratic Primary election.
Worthless preening suck-ups.
Yes, ACTIVE discriminationTime was when our government, at all levels, actively singled out gay people for punishment in all kinds of ways. From mass sodomy law stings (there are individual cases on record in which scores of gay people were rounded up and arrested), to routine bar raids (cf. “Stonewall”) to the thousands of people whose lives and careers were ruined during the “lavender menace” period in the 40s and 50s, government entities routinely actively targeted members of the gay community for arbitrary punishment.
Don’t Ask Don’t Tell is the last vestige of that horrible period (i.e. most of American history) in which the government actively hunted down gay people for punishment. That is why so much of the right wing clings to it so lovingly. And it is why it must end. It’s very sad that you can’t recognize that when most of America, including most of straight America, does.
DADT Lobby Day Friday March 19thPlease come to DC and join me in our efforts to lobby Congress to repeal DADT!!!! This is the most significant lobby day for the LGBT community RIGHT NOW!!!! Please, if you can’t come to DC, call and write your Congressional Reps. and Senators.
Since the military’s top brass came out in favor of ending DADT last week, the fight for repeal has kicked into high gear. The spotlight is now on the U.S. Senate to act – and we need to do our part to make that happen.
On Friday, March 19, SLDN will host its 8th Annual Lobby Day in Washington, D.C. Once again, we will be storming Capitol Hill to push for repeal. Now, more than ever, we need to keep up the pressure on our legislators to end DADT this year.
Sign up for SLDN’s 8th Annual Lobby Day:
http://www.sldn.org/LobbyDay2010
It is our responsibility to speak up and challenge the growing voices of opposition in the Senate. Recently, Col. Terrel S. Preston, USAF (Ret) did just that in a letter to Sen. John McCain.
“You have often said you would listen to military leaders if they decided it was time to repeal ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.’ Now the nation’s top military leaders — Gen. Colin Powell, Joint Chief Chairman Adm. Michael Mullen and Defense Secretary Robert Gates — support repealing this discriminatory law. I urge you to live up to your words — and to the integrity of the office you hold — and end ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.’”
Your Senators need to hear from you, your friends, neighbors, colleagues – everyone. Meeting face-to-face will make the greatest impact in getting them to vote for repeal legislation this year. Your voice can make the difference.
Join us on Friday, March 19:
http://www.sldn.org/LobbyDay2010
2010 is the best year for repeal. With your continued support, we can take advantage of this historic opportunity and finally get rid of DADT.
That’s why YOU need to call John and educate him.
Sorry, Q…
I read several comments too quickly and misremembered the context and source.
Probably influenced by the hysterical piss fits of another about how lobbying never works, I thought “tsk tsk” [sic] had claimed this was not real “action.”
My error. [Alzheimer's ain't for sissies.]
Don’t underestimate the power of the individualTwo days after the DADT hearing I paid a visit to Senator McCaskill’s office. You may recall she was the Senator who brought up the challenge of ‘surveying a population, or ‘asking’ questions to those who can’t ‘tell’. Mullen and Gates were stumped and said the military hadn’t looked into that issue yet. But they had. In 2005 the military commissioned a study titled; ‘analyzing questions that cannot be asked of responents who cannot respond.’ I spent a half hour with the senators legislative correspondent. We have to provide our lawmakers the education and tools to help our community.
Senator McCaskill’s office received 480 letters in less than two days in response to her position on DADT repeal. Thankfully most of them were positive. And they are encouraged to continue to push for repeal.
For those that believe letters and calls don’t make a difference, you do so at all of our peril. Please this is a historical moment. Be a part of it. Call, write, visit you lawmakers!!!
my follow-up messageAfter reading the “response” email from HRC, I sent a second email message to them:
Stop begging the HRC.They give money to the Democrats, and get nothing in return. Whether in practice or in effect, they are simply a fundraising arm for a party that isn’t willing to grant us the equality the Constitution promises us.
Once it becomes clear that “the HRC is just a Democratic fundraising body”, the rest follows pretty quickly.
I am done, so very very done.
DONE
PSIf you want to let OTHER folks know how bad the HRC has been, start hitting them on mainstream social networking sites such as Facebook, here: http://www.facebook.com/group….
“Lead, follow, or get out of the way”I guess I’ll get out of the way.
It’s clear you don’t quite understand what I meant about “butch”. too bad. I think our current hyper-macho society is bad for straight and gay, male and female, butch or not.
It just seems the LGBT movement has now adopted “butch” as the only “correct”, acceptable, role for men or women.
I’d rather see more educational opportunities, greater job opportunities available for straight and gay kids. We drafted people because it was difficult to fill the needs of the military. Now, we make it near impossible for young people to get decent jobs – so, they join the military for economic reasons.
Does that sound like the U.S.A.? Is this the new form of “citizen soldier”?
Fine, work for the end of DADT. I certainly won’t object – but, isn’t there a better way? Aren’t there better goals to fight for?
How militaristic have we become?
HRC is worthless…And the ONLY way we will be able to FORCE Joe and company to do their jobs is to withdraw the donations. I did that, and boy-I’m glad I did. More money to organizations that actually DO SOMETHING, like Lambda Legal and the ACLU.
HRC’s agenda and my conflicted feelingsI feel torn because I recently donated to HRC because it was on an “alternative guest registry” for two close friends. My partner and I wanted to make a donation on the newlywed’s behalf to another non-profit but also wanted to respect the couple’s wishes.
Still doesn’t change our minds about the privileged, majority agenda of HRC. Blogged about it here:
http://rsiasoco.wordpress.com/…
Everyone should push for the end of Clinton’s rabidly bigoted DADT law. And for all the other garbage he inflicted on the American people like DOMA, the current recession wannabe depression (caused by the Democrats support of Republican initiatives like NAFTA, deregulation, the wars and passing out trillions to the looter class to make up for their losses).
Our reasons for opposing DADT are not the same as those of the Bush-Clinton-Bush-Obama war crowd or those who shill for enlistment and the war. The White House and Pentagon worry about the escalation of on-duty suicides in Iraq and Afghanistan, the huge rise of physical and PTSD causalities and the rise in deaths. At the same time they’re petrified of reinstituting a draft. Obama’s escalating in Afghanistan and Pakistan and holding Iran hostage for their oil. Stop loss is no solution so they need fresh meat for the grinder.
Nor do Obama and the Pentagon brass give a damn about the violence, bigoted loss of benefits and internal strife imposed on our brothers and sisters by Clintons ugly law. At his State of the Union message Obama said he wanted us as fresh meat for the grinder to protect Texaco’s oil piracy, although like all politicians, Obama lied and called it ‘service’.
The LGBT movements should be very clear that we oppose Clinton’s bigoted DADT and enlistment in support of Obama’s occupations, escalations and his rabid menacing of Iran. The vast majority of us who oppose DADT do it for the right reasons including most of the commenter’s here. Those who shill for enlistment and who promote the lie that this is anything but a genocidal war of piracy are on the wrong side. They’re Republicans in drag just like those who supported Barney Frank when he gutted ENDA in 2007.
HRCs lobbying is as fruitless as ever. Two things contributed to Obama’s call to end DADT, and neither was reomtely affected by lobbyists. The first is their need for fresh meat for the grinder and the second is the cover he was given when 200,000 showed up in DC at the NEM last fall. Lobbying had nothing to do woth it.
The blog swarm is a good tactic but perhaps not when addressed to the lobbyist ninnies and self-appointed ‘leaders’ at HRC. They replied to the swarm with a comforting but empty statement that “There is a clear path to repeal, and that’s the one we’re on.” The Pentagon says repeal is “probably years away”. The White House is probably as far out on the limb as they’ll get and Congress is the usual domain of bigots and those who pander to them.
A few points: * I wondered why the community’s elite was pushing so hard for DADT becuase it “doesn’t” enhance economic advancement.
* Because most of the country is still not covered by effective gay, lesbian, bi and trans inclusive nondiscrimination law, speaking out for ENDA can very well end up causing someone to be outed and/or fired. If they have a job at all, that is.
* I thought it went without saying that ENDA would affect a much larger portion of the community than DADT. My apologies for not being blatantly obvious.
* I asked where the blogstorm for ENDA “was” since it was the hot subject a few months ago (or should have been if the community were really committed to it). I’m not advocating against fighting for DADT. I just think it’s poor prioritizing to push it this hard when so many more vital issues are still unresolved.
* The HRC do absolutely not represent the interests of the entire community. The president mentioned DADT most likely because he was lobbied to do so. If the vaunted power of the HRC is really so great, then their push for ENDA, had it occurred, could very well have put it into the SOTU address instead of or alongside DADT. Let’s not forget that the HRC has been documented as previously having lobbied against the gender variant part of our community and they have done little to prove they wouldn’t do it again if they could get away with it. ENDA isn’t a big story so they don’t push as hard as they do for the headline grabbing and money generating issues like marriage rights and DADT. They are an organization whose purpose for existing has shifted from serving their community to surviving and maintaining their position even if that interferes with their original purpose. Pushing them to lobby for something that they should already have been pushing seems an exercise in futility to me.
I can’t remember who said, “All politics is local” and I have to agree. I find it very frustrating to see everything I’ve worked for in the past 30 years slowly disappearing because I haven’t found a job in 14 months while the people in DC are talking about DADT. But personal politics aside, an effective ENDA is very much more able to promote our other issues as well. If people are not afraid of being fired then they will be much more willing to publicly come out and stand up for their rights, including marriage and DADT. Why can’t people see this?