No matter how I look at this issue, I cannot escape being troubled by the fact that we have in place a policy which forces young men and women to lie about who they are in order to defend their fellow citizens. For me personally, it comes down to integrity — theirs as individuals and ours as an institution.
Adm. Mike Mullen in testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee, Feb. 2, 2010
Admiral Mullen’s words were so powerful because they were so undeniably true. The multitude of federal, state and local anti-LGBT laws in place not only prevent lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender Americans from actualizing our full citizenship, they strip us of personal integrity by forcing us to lie about ourselves and our families. Joe Mirabella has written an excellent diary exploring how the Defense of Marriage Act has forced him to deny his relationship with his spouse and lie on his tax forms.
Dear Uncle Sam,I just wanted to let you know that I finished my tax return and e-filed it. You should be aware that I lied on my return.
My online tax preparation software asked me if I was single, married, married filing separately, or head of household. I pondered my choices for a few minutes and wondered, should I tell the truth and face the wrath of the IRS, or should I lie?
How many ways have you been forced to lie because of the anti-LGBT animus encoded in our laws? I discuss one of my pet “must lie” peeves below the fold.
The customs declaration form. Hate it. Or rather, I hate how it forces me to lie. I first mentioned this in Autumn’s diary where she mentioned how difficult it could be for her to answer census questions fully and accurately.
Every time you re-enter the United States, you must fill in this little blue form. Question 3 asks, Number of Family Members traveling with you. If I answer with the correct number of “one” (myself and my spouse), I am lying in the eyes of the federal government which doesn’t recognize our legally-enacted marriage or our Washington State Registered Domestic Partnership because of the “Defense” of Marriage Act. But If I answer “zero”, I am lying because we are indeed both lawfully married as well as registered domestic partners.
This may sound like hand-wringing over semantics until you realize that I have a spouse who is not an American citizen. Even though she has permanent resident status, any border person can refuse her entry for absolutely no reason whatsoever. If she was denied entry, as has happened to a law-abiding cousin of ours, I would have no right to be informed as to her whereabouts or condition, and no way to insure her safety and fair treatment. So, being forced to lie on a federal form no matter how I answer is quite an unsettling experience as well as being an insult to my integrity.



20 Comments





Your situation is all the more reason for passage of the . . .Uniting American Families Act (UAFA) (H.R.1024 (Nadler+119)/ S.424 (Leahy+23)) or the better Reuniting Families Act (the UAFA itself is Title II of this more inclusive bill) (H.R.2709 (Honda+79) (no Senate equivalent yet).
And I understand the necessity of not being entirely honest on the customs formUnless your spouse is a lawful premanent resident already, the feds would use your acknowledged marriage or domestic partnership as proof that your spouse has an intention to overstay.
Any official documentWhether it’s filling out tax forms, forms at a doctor’s officer, or any legal/official document that asks your marital status, I have to lie, since I am legally married in Canada. But that doesn’t count here. Sometimes I get angry and defiantly list myself as married and add a parenthetical “in Canada,” which is kind of degrading. Sometimes I’ll just check off “married” and list my spouse as my spouse. But it’s a constant confrontation with the second class citizenship. How much more wonderful to enter Canada and say, “We’re married” or answer tot he question, “Where are you going?” say “To celebrate our anniversary in —- On my last trip back from Canad when the border guard asked what we were doing traveling together, I said,m “We live together” and was about to say “We’re married,” but his complicit smile and half-wink told me he got it…..
Noncitizen spousesI’ve known people with noncitizen heterosexual spouses, who have had bureaucratic tangles with immigration officials that could result in the spouse being in a Kafkaesque limbo; that problem isn’t unique to same-sex spouses. However, I gather the “hetero” kind do get greater rights for the citizen spouse in his/her attempts to navigate this bureaucracy.
It’s called heterosexual privilegeAnd it affords straight, unmarried couples far greater respect in their lives than we as queer people will ever receive in ours.
It’s Nice To Be Straight
We have all the legal paperwork downAnd not one doctor fucks with us. We disarm them with our POA form before they even ask. I even stayed overnight with my partner in the hospital after she had surgery. No questions asked. Fuck them. I put down domestic partner on every single goddamn form. My partner just says “wife” everywhere. Now, when I go to the doctors affiliated with the same hospital, I’m already in the computer system==and they have domestic partner down. I don’t particularly care for “wife” as it reminds me of heterosexuality. I like partner or spouse. But that’s just my preference.
Wills and everything elseIt made me laugh years ago when my married brother recommended I make a will. “Done that,” I said. And then talked about living will and POA, neither of which had ever crossed his mind……
“forces young men and women to lie about who they are”I’ve always been of the view that someone who currently enlists is by definition a deceiver and a practiced liar (and DADT rewards for that characteristic). You will find that every time one of them comes out (e.g. Dan Choi), the first thing they cite is their inability to keep lying.
not at all.enlistees are not asked whether they’re gay or straight. nice that you have such a high opinion of gays who would serve the country though.
If you lie and file as a married couplethat’s a felony under DOMA and brave Mr. Mueller of Chicago went to Federal prison for it. He is the only one that felt really passionate. I am paying my taxes and ending the protest. Fuck LGBT civil disobedience. Activism has turned into forming a non profit business model and raising funds only to lose. That is not activism just whining.
SNLVia Raw Story, someone playing Ollie North on SNL asked:
Well, maybe it’s time for……Stonewall II: THE WRECKONING. :-D
1 million strong for gay marriageThe numbers keep doubling–join the FB group:
http://www.facebook.com/#!/pag…
TaxesMy wife and I file as “married filing separately”. For state and federal taxes. I won’t lie for them, if they offered a “we don’t recognize your marriage” box, we’d check it.
But they’ll owe us money if they audit us. We’ve done the taxes both ways every year and we’re paying more as a married couple. But that’s what we are.
I always hate the married/aingle tickboxes….As many of you have, I have had issues with these status boxes and the reactions from my choice in selecting an option.
It would have been interesting to have had a couple of witnesses in the recent prop 8 trial speak about this. Seems like one more nail in the coffin. (I followed the trial and if they did speak of it, I missed it.)
that’s married/single…..…wishing there was a short-time edit button for those of us who are poor proofreaders!
Trudy and I are filing this year as marriedWe got a New York marriage license on the “minor technicality” of my birth certificate not being amended.
Perhaps based on our names, I anticipate the possibility that the IRS might make a DAM (Defense Against MArriage)mistake and object to our filing jointly, but I don’t think we can be successfully persecuted, err, prosecuted. I would be happy to self-represent.
It was tough enough having to get a court order to force the NYC Bureau of Vital Records to cough up a copy of my birth certificate, just to get the marriage license, and to have the application for a marriage license rejected by the idiot City Clerk in White Plains before it was granted by the New York City Clerk in Manhattan(after a three hour wait for the NYC Clerk’s counsel to get a second opinion).
It was annoying having to explain to the medical insurer that we are actually legally married.
It will be annoying in the future in a lot of circumstances, but that’s what happens when we happen to be different than what people expect. The IRS is just going to have to get used to it, or else.
Some IRS agents are not awareI had one ask why didn’t I file jointly since I was married in California. I said, “ever hear of DOMA?” Good for you challenging discrimination.
My most recent Customs experienceWe were coming off a cruise ship and the Customs agent mentioned that my in-laws, my husband and I could have just gone together as a single party with a single declaration.
Then again, at the same port, an unmarried (but self-declared engaged) heterosexual couple was allowed through jointly as well.
Another time, at the Canadian border, the agent was having issues with an unemployed man driving alone going several hundred miles through Canada to get to another state (I had to go around the Great Lakes and wanted to visit a friend in Canada on the way). He finally let me go after a cursory inspection of my trunk and confirming, “So he is supporting you.”
I’m all for acts of civil disobedience, but getting fined/detained by DHS or the IRS isn’t useful or beneficial to the cause. Civil disobedience is about garnering publicity and you have to know exactly what you’re doing.
I’m increasingly getting the impression that the bureaucrats see the rules as insane and are quietly relaxing enforcement. All the same, I prefer to avoid the fines and paperwork.
I got detained once by US Border guards for being unemployedand for having stamps from some eastern African countries in my passport. I had been traveling alone in Canada for several weeks, sightseeing. I fail to see the suspicious nature of my then-situation, but it did teach me to never offer any more information to border guards than necessary. At the time, I could have just used my drivers license and not the passport. Silly me for thinking openness and honesty was the best policy.