Wow. Virginia’s Loudoun County Board of Supervisors has an apparent “wiener” on the board by the name of Eugene Delgaudio (R-Sterling). Equality Loudoun‘s Mandated by conscience and constitution gave us this video:
In his 20-minute screed against a motion by Supervisor Stevens Miller’s motion to add sexual orientation and gender identity to the county government’s employment nondiscrimination policy,
Sterling Supervisor Delgaudio repeatedly used epithets like men in dresses, freaks fruity and bizarre to refer to lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people. For transgender people, he also used the term “it.” From the Loudoun Times editorial ‘It’ is a shame, Supervisor Delgaudio:
During remarks in the meeting room of the Board of Supervisors, Delgaudio used the pejorative terms “fruity,” “bizarre” and “freaky” to describe the proposal on sexual orientation for Loudoun citizens.The word “fruity” belongs on a candy wrapper, not attached to a person.
Further, instead of using the personal pronouns of “him” or “her” during his remarks, Delgaudio preferred to use the term “it” to describe people who might be protected by the new county guidelines.
This was sustained and unrestrained demagoguery targeting human beings.
Beyond that:
Delgaudio saw fit to drive the bigotry home — literally — by sending a mass e-mail to residences across his district that went on to restate the same offensive terms, such as “cross dressing freaks,” and railing against how the county might now “have to treat ‘it’ the same as a normal person.”
Sterling Supervisor Delgaudio kinda-sorta apologized — kinda-sorta — for using the epithet “it” in his commentary referring to trans people, while repeating all of the other pejoratives:
>
As Equality Loudoun stated in their piece When an apology is another attack:
As of early last week, Mr. Delgaudio was confirming that yes, he did refer to a hypothetical person as “it,” and that this was “hyperbole.”…[O]n the evening of January 17, Mr. Delgaudio issued a hasty email revision with the parenthetical “this will make my intent clear.” Not a retraction, not an apology, but a revision, claiming to have said something other than what he actually said.
In his comments during this morning’s board meeting, he repeated that claim, “correcting” his statement to read “..which means if a man dressed as woman wants a job, you have to treat
‘it’the hiring of this man the same asa normal persona man who wears normal clothing.”
Again, were back to Julia Serano’s Skirt Chasers: Why the Media Depicts the Trans Revolution in Lipstick and Heels as to why the religious right and media focus always seems to be targeting trans women as deceptive or pathetic.
Yesterday, the Washington Post picked up on the story in their piece, entitled Loudoun Supervisor Delgaudio rebuked for anti-gay remarks
At a Jan. 6 meeting, supervisors voted to expand Loudoun’s nondiscrimination policy to prohibit bias on the basis of sexual orientation in hiring by the county. Delgaudio fought the change in the meeting, saying he was especially offended by language in the measure that sought protection for transgendered people. In the debate, he called the board’s attempt to protect transgendered people “freaky” and “bizarre.” In a subsequent newsletter to supporters, Delgaudio wrote that “if a man dressed as a woman wants a job, you have to treat ‘it’ the same as a normal person.”Those comments drew a sharp rebuke from the Loudoun Times-Mirror on Jan. 13. In an editorial, the paper scolded the supervisor for “sustained and unrestrained demagoguery targeting human beings.” The paper called for an apology and went on to say it cringed “with embarrassment for the image of Loudoun” that the supervisor was projecting.
At the board meeting last week, other supervisors joined the criticism.
…Delgaudio responded, reading a revised statement with the word “it” taken out. He continued: “With apologies to real-life Tootsies” and “to all their defenders who are calling me all sorts of names and, like Mr. Burton, are saying I should apologize.” …
David Weintraub, president of the LGBT civil rights group Equality Loudoun, was quoted in the Washington Post as saying this regarding the Sterling Superviosor and his public statements:
“That said transgendered people are not human. There is a tendency for people around him to roll their eyes and say, ‘There he goes.’ There is a possibility that this sort of performance is contrived or deliberate. I think he is losing control of himself. It’s hard to tell.”
Delgaudio countered in an interview with the Washington Post that he was in full control of his actions:
“I do everything I do on purpose.”
So he purposely meant to call trans people like my trans peers and me “it” and “men in dresses”, and he purposely meant to call LGBT people like my LGBT peers and me freaks fruity and bizarre. Well, that’s just Super!
*Sigh*
Want to send the Sterling Supervisor a message? His contact email is eugene.delgaudio@loudoun.gov. If you decide to email him though, please remember not to use four-letter language in communicating your thoughts. As much as that may help you vent your frustration, using four-letter language would no doubt confirm to him his opinion that lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people aren’t truly human is a correct opinion.




15 Comments


We’ll see a lot more of this from local officials thanks to the Supreme Court decisionAllowing corporations to buy elections is going to have a very significant effect on local governance, where just a small amount of corporate money can make a big difference in local elections. Now that corporations can buy local elections I expect to see a rapid increase in the number of corrupt loons running our counties and cities. Nice.
Thanks, AutumnThis guy is not worth corresponding with, believe me. Normal reasoning and demonstrating our humanity will have no effect on him – he’ll only take it as evidence that he is “under attack” as a “Christian.”
Yes, he meant to do this, very much so. He makes his living running a kind of sole proprietorship advocacy group called “Public Advocate of the US,” funded entirely by donations solicited by lurid, fear-mongering fundraising letters. The activity of this “group” of 1 is pretty much restricted to the writing and sending of these letters (example here: http://www.equalityloudoun.org… and street theater stunts on Capitol Hill (such as the “Man-Donkey Wedding”). He has been bragging about making “thousands of dollars” from this latest act. He’s a sociopath.
What is different about this – which I don’t think he realized was going to happen – is that people recognize the qualitative difference between his usual repugnant name-calling, and referring to someone as “it,” outright stating that some people are less than human. People got that, and the blowback is just beginning.
-David from Loudoun
Four letter wordsHow about the word “sick.” This guy is sicker than the people he name calls.
I wouldn’t normally do this……but I wonder how Delgaudio would react if he had been referred to as a “dago,” “goomba,” “guinea” or “wop”?
Just wondering.
Corporations are PeopleBut Trans are not
interesting…
What really scares me is…my ancestors came from Loudon County over 200 years ago and that I may be sharing genes with this guy. But of course any genes look much better when paired with some high-heeled boots. LOL
Not to worry.... he’s not from Loudoun. He doesn’t even live in Loudoun – but that’s another story.
Blowback always counts. =)Seriously, He may want to see this as being persecuted for being Christian, but reminding him over and over again that trans people are human beings — deserving better than being called the pejorative “it” — may have impact on his staff, or county workers who are noting the amount of mail he’s getting.
Being human impacts others.
And hey, to quote from Romans 12: 14-21:
Being human to someone who doesn’t behave humanly to you is pretty darn Biblical in scope, and is probably something that the Sterling Supervisor — or at least his staff — could be made to appreciate. =)
OMG, I used to live thereI grew up in Loudoun County from the age of 6 to 23. He is one of the Republicans that, when the sheriff retired, tried to have an out of county republican person voted in as sheriff and the county residents handed him and his party a failure by electing in the Deputy Sheriff who was an independent. The locals voted for the sheriff because he grew up in the county, knew the people, knew the crime problems in the county, and was working for the people, not the politicians.
Sterling residents have always been strange. Sterling was the first growth community in Loudoun County, and is still the prime growth area due to its closeness to Reston, Herndon, and Washington DC and Dulles Airport.
Don’t get me wrong, much of Loudoun County was quad-polar, the old farmer families that were related to one another, the old rich horse families with their noses stuck up in the air, the rich congressmens families, which would and could associate with the rich horse families, and finally the newcomer middle class. Sterling introduced the growth business newcomers/CEOs only interested in growth and the associated money.
No changeCoporations bought elections long before the SC decision. All that decision did is say “you can do away with all those silly PACs and give it directly.”
Delgaudio is a well-known homophobeDelgaudio seems to be literally afraid that you can catch “the gay” like people can catch the flu and rather ostentatiously home-schools his children. He is actually from Brooklyn and has periodically shown up in public (see back issues of the Washington Post) with periodic anti-gay, anti-transgender and anti-tax stunts. His brother was convicted on charges relating to child pornography. Getting Delgaudio out of office (any office) would be “change we can all believe in.”
Of course the homophobe doesn’t want an ordnance saying he can’t enact his phobia!My understanding of the ordnance in question was that it only applied to the hiring and firing practices of the County itself, not of businesses or private people within the county. Wherefore all this “men in dresses in the ladies room at McDonalds” crap? Maybe an MtF would be found in the ladies room at the courthouse. Mabye an FtM might be found in the men’s room at the DMV. These are government buildings and places of government operation. It’s natural to expect that a person of other than hyper-stereotypical gender expression might be hired to perform government functions in government buildings and it’s to be expected that while on the job, they would use the restrooms.
But this would not apply to the hiring and firing decisions of local businesses, which would still be free to discriminate in the self-same way that Mr. DelGaudio seems to want to leave the door open for the government of which he is a part to discriminate.
And what was the point of the breatheless claims that with the ordnance in question they would have to begin asking people who they go home to? Do you WANT to know who County employees go home to? No? THEN DON’T BOTHER TO ASK! In point of fact, as mentioned during the debate, it’s presently illegal to ask prospective or current employees regarding their race, sex, religion, etc. Why? THOSE ARE PROTECTED! When sexual orientation and gender identity are protected, YOU WON’T BE ABLE TO ASK ABOUT THEM EITHER! In fact, if you WANT to delve into the sexual orientation and gender identity of employees prospective and current, then that would be a motivation to vote down Mr. Miller’s ordnance.
Unbelievable.
Another good Reason For Northern VA LGBT to move to MD
Let’s verbally beat up freaks!It’s fun!
It costs nothing.
It excited the rabid base
You are rightof course. I may need a break.