H/t Blue Jersey for providing Steven Goldstein’s (Garden State Equality) response. This isn’t over. The 14-20 vote against marriage equality isn’t the final word on the issue. We’re going back to court.
With today’s vote in the state Senate, the New Jersey legislature defaulted on its constitutional obligation to provide same-sex couples in New Jersey equal protection, as unanimously mandated by the New Jersey Supreme Court in 2006. That’s why we at Garden State Equality are here with our partner Lambda Legal, which has an extraordinary track record of advancing LGBT civil rights in the courts.Now our organizations will announce major news. Our side is going back to court to win marriage equality.
Continued after the fold.
We’ll hear from Lambda Legal in a moment. Let’s be clear about what this news means. We are not waiting out the term of any new Administration to bring equality to same-sex couples in our state.In 2006, the New Jersey Supreme Court told the legislature it could enact marriage or another structure that provides the equal protection of marriage. But the civil union law failed to do that. Too often, civil union couples too often cannot visit loved ones in hospitals, make medical decisions for their partners or receive equal health benefits from employers. Hospitals and employers have treated civil union couples differently because they’ve been labeled differently. Children have been treated differently at school because their families are labeled differently.
In recent months, including today and at the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing in December, New Jersey legislators publicly recognized these failures. They publicly acknowledged that the civil union law has not provided equal protection. That’s important. New Jersey legislators themselves said it. Our opponents in the legislature said it.
In other words, though we didn’t achieve our final victory today, we’re better positioned than we were a few months ago to win marriage equality. So if you’re wondering how we feel, it’s complicated. On the one hand, we resent, more than you can imagine, remaining second-class citizens a bit longer. On the other hand, the ball has moved forward. The public record for the courts is mighty, and we’re closer than ever to winning.
In 2006, New Jersey enacted an experiment called civil union. In 2010, New Jersey has a mountain of proof that the experiment has failed.
Now let’s talk about what happened politically.
Things didn’t go our way in the legislature because of one factor: Governor Corzine lost reelection.
After his win in November, Governor-elect Christie persuaded a number of legislators to reverse their support of the bill. Before the election, nearly every neutral observer in New Jersey thought marriage equality was certain to become law in lame duck. It became the zeitgeist in Trenton, with good reason. In contrast to today’s outcome, before the election we had votes to spare in the Senate, including from a number of Republicans.
But the election changed everything and our national opponents changed nothing. They didn’t do much or spend much in New Jersey. As you saw from our thousands of members at the State House these past few weeks who symbolized the massiveness of our campaign, we overwhelmed our opponents on every front – but one. Our opponents had the Governor-elect on their side, and that’s all they needed to have. It’s ironic given that marriage equality wasn’t even an issue in the election, and that the candidates who favored marriage equality together won a majority.
All this said, we extend to Governor-elect Christie an outstretched hand. He will be the Governor of all of us. We ask him to continue the tradition of his Republican predecessors, Christie Whitman and Tom Kean, who always kept an open door to the LGBT community. And though we differ with the Governor-elect on marriage equality, we also seek to explore with him and his Administration the issues on which we may have agreement and can work together.
No political party should write off any constituency. And no party should take any constituency for granted either. Our fundamental right to equality should never have been left to sudden death overtime by the party to which the LGBT community and our allies have been unstintingly loyal and have given so much.
To be clear, we will continue to support those who support us. Over the past five-and-a-half years, the separate Garden State Equality political committee has provided thousands of campaign volunteers and raised hundreds of thousands of dollars for supportive candidates through contributions to the organization, or through contributions from individuals directly to candidates.
Of course, when we exceed politicians’ expectations in ways they like, we never hear, you’re going too far, your fervor is too much. That double standard, which other minority communities have heard in their own fights for equality, hurts deeply. And it hurts everyone who stands for equality, including supporters in the majority.
Now there will be a sustained response not only from the LGBT community, but also from straight progressive voters who have been our equal partners. Marriage equality stopped being just a gay issue long ago.
To those who let us all down, here’s our policy: Don’t ask, don’t expect. You can’t take progressives’ money and volunteers with one hand, slap us in the face with the other, and then act astonished when we declare our independence. The marketplace of democracy runs along a two-way street.
Members and friends, today was not an outcome lost, but rather a juncture in an otherwise glorious road to justice. Since Garden State Equality’s founding in 2004, New Jersey has enacted 210 LGBT civil rights laws at the state, county and local levels, a national record. We have 64,000 members – LGBT and straight alike – who have improved the lives of millions. A watchdog organization, eQualityGiving.com, just ranked New Jersey #1 in America for LGBT rights, tied with three other states, and we haven’t even won marriage equality yet.
But we will soon. Cesar Chavez said it best. You cannot uneducate the person who has learned to read. You cannot humiliate the people who feel pride. You cannot oppress the people who are not afraid anymore. We have seen the future, and the future is ours.
Before I introduce our colleagues from Lambda Legal, some thanks are in order. Thank you to all our Senate sponsors, including prime sponsors Loretta Weinberg and Raymond Lesniak. We appreciate Loretta and Raymond beyond measure for their indefatigable leadership, and extend to them our love. We thank Senators Bill Baroni and Nia Gill – unwavering voices for justice at our committee hearing. We thank all our Assembly sponsors, including prime sponsors Reed Gusciora, Valerie Vainieri Huttle, John McKeon and Mila Jasey. We thank our Governor Corzine and Speaker Roberts for their support. And let me say this about Governor Dick Codey: He’s been an extraordinary champion of equality who kept his word about a Senate vote. Every progressive in New Jersey should view Governor Codey as a hero.
MassEquality’s Executive Director, Scott D. Gortikov (via email):
Today, the New Jersey Senate voted 20-14 against the marriage equality bill that MassEquality, in partnership with Garden State Equality, worked hard to pass. It might seem heartbreaking how the hard work in New Jersey fell short, but there is much hope to be gained from this well-fought battle.Garden State Equality overcame incredible odds in the legislature to have today’s vote. This shows marriage equality is not an issue that can be ignored in the Garden State or anywhere in America. Even our opponents admit that the LGBT movement continues to make a powerful statement with our formidable grassroots effort.
MassEquality is proud of the work we accomplished with our brothers and sisters in New Jersey. Making over 4,200 calls to key districts and providing a seasoned political operative on the ground, MassEquality was there every step of the way. We do not consider the vote today a loss but rather a tremendous opportunity to continue the fight with more knowledge, power, and gravitas than ever before.
We are thankful for your help and support in this continued effort for full equality under the law.
New Jersey Senate Rejects Marriage Bill for Same-Sex CouplesThe loss underscores that civil unions are not the equivalent of marriage
1/7/2010
WASHINGTON – The Human Rights Campaign, the nation’s largest lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender civil rights organization, today expressed disappointment with the New Jersey State Senate for its failure to pass legislation recognizing marriage equality for same-sex couples. The senate voted 14-20 against the bill. The bill had passed out of the Judiciary Committee by a 7 to 6 vote this past December.
“Today’s vote by the New Jersey Senate perpetuates a system of inequality in the Garden State,” said Human Rights Campaign President Joe Solmonese. ”Failing to provide loving, committed couples access to marriage leaves them separate and unequal – civil unions are not the same as marriage.”
“HRC provided tremendous help here on the ground, working with our staff and volunteers to push for marriage equality,” said Steven Goldstein, CEO of Garden State Equality. “While we’re disappointed by today’s vote, we’re thankful for the continued support of the Human Rights Campaign. This is not the end of the line. We will continue working towards marriage equality through lobbying, legal challenges, and citizen outreach. Every opportunity to highlight the inequalities experienced by same-sex couples brings us closer to our goal.”
At this time, five states recognize marriage for same-sex couples under state law: Massachusetts, Connecticut, Iowa, Vermont, and New Hampshire. Five states-California, New Jersey, Oregon, Washington, and Nevada-plus Washington, D.C. provide same-sex couples with access to the state level benefits and responsibilities of marriage, through either civil unions or domestic partnerships.
Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Rhode Island and Wisconsin provide same-sex couples with limited rights and benefits. New York and Washington, D.C. recognize marriages of same-sex couples validly entered into outside of the jurisdiction.
California recognized marriage by same-sex couples between June and November of 2008, before voters approved Proposition 8, which purports to amend the state constitution to prohibit marriage equality. Couples married during that window remain married under California law, but all other same-sex couples can only receive a domestic partnership within the state. The state will recognize out of state same-sex marriages that occurred before November 5, 2008 as marriages and those that occurred on or after November 5, 2008 as domestic partnerships. The Proposition 8 vote has been challenged in federal court; a decision is not expected any time soon.
Same-sex couples do not receive federal rights and benefits in any state. For an electronic map showing where marriage equality stands in the states, please visit: www.HRC.org/State_Laws.
Task Force responds to New Jersey marriage equality vote
January 07, 2010Vows to keep fighting until fundamental freedom is attained
WASHINGTON, Jan. 7 – The National Gay and Lesbian Task Force responded to the New Jersey Senate’s failure today to pass a bill allowing same-sex couples to marry.
Statement by Rea Carey, Executive Director
National Gay and Lesbian Task Force
“The New Jersey Legislature has let down the state and the nation by failing to uphold the promise of equality and the state Constitution’s demand that same-sex couples be treated equally. Denying this fundamental freedom to the people of New Jersey – loving, committed same-sex couples and their families – doesn’t protect anyone. This action by the Legislature simply places more families in harm’s way and makes them more vulnerable to discrimination and hardship.“There is ample proof that New Jersey’s civil unions law fails to provide equal protection. We will never settle for second-class status for our community. We will continue fighting until full equality is attained, and this includes marriage.
“The tide is turning nationwide in favor of marriage equality, and we are confident that New Jersey will join the growing number of states that already extend marriage equality to same-sex couples. In New Jersey, and all across the nation, same-sex couples and their families are sharing their stories and their lives with others in a conversation that is transforming our country. That doesn’t end today. If anything, it inspires and compels us to press forward.
“We thank the senators who voted for equality today. We stand with Garden State Equality and thank it for its tremendous leadership and dogged organizing for equality in New Jersey. And we stand with Lambda Legal as it goes back to court to win this fundamental freedom.”
The Task Force’s work in New Jersey
The Task Force Action Fund has been working to secure marriage equality in New Jersey. This includes:Committing three organizers to work full-time on the ground with Garden State Equality for the final two months of its advocacy campaign.
Giving $10,000 to Garden State Equality to hire additional field staff; dedicating organizers to work on the ground in New Jersey in November and December; and providing ongoing technical assistance to Garden State Equality’s field team to help implement its field plan.
Developing and co-leading a training with Garden State Equality staff to equip New Jersey volunteers with the skills to recruit volunteers and raise money to support the fight for marriage equality.
Bringing a team of New Jersey field leaders to the Task Force’s Maine LGBT Power Summit in April 2009.
Dedicating organizing fellows to work on the ground in New Jersey, and committing communications staff to spearhead earned media efforts in mid-December.
To learn more about the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, follow us on Twitter: @TheTaskForce.




38 Comments


This is OUR headlineWAIT til you read the G*D DAMN haters gleefully shoving salt in another fresh wound. Cue Maggie G*D DAMN GALLAGHER, and Perkins, and Catholic Bishops, and the silent snickers of MOTHERF*CKING Mormon elders,,(safely off camera of course.)
You know whatI’m not as upset as I thought I would be.
I feel like the movement and its straight allies are more mobilized than ever here in NJ, and are clearly not going out peacefully. This issue certainly did not end today. Energy is high.
I think it’s going to work out.
I mean no disrespect at Blue Jersey or LurleenThose folks who worked their hearts out…but you can understand the flash of anger as well as anyone…(I suspect.)
I know what you mean.I’m not in NJ, but it is clear that what you say is true, and the legal strategy looks sound from this non-lawyer’s pov.
Sure.Just be sure to aim your torch of rage at the right people, don’t throw out the baby with the bath water, etc etc. Although, the bath water might extinguish the torch of rage…. hmmm….
100 yearsIs the time it took the women’s suffrage movement to convince America that women were not too feeble-minded to be entrusted to vote. There were many disappointments and defeats on the way.
We’ll get there. New Jerseyans just didn’t get there today.
I had the same reaction to our NY lossI hadn’t seen the NY gay community that fired up since ACT-UP days. Complacency is a problem, loss can wake people up.
Task Force reactionTheir press release here:
TimelineI really want some more details about them suing the court.
Are they going straight to the New Jersey Supreme Court?(I would assume so.)
If so, how long could it take for them to issue a ruling?
If we don’t know, how long until we DO know the details of this?
Since we’re going back to courtwhat are the requirments to change NJ’s constitution?
Does it need changing?My understanding was the Supreme Court had ruled gays deserved equal protection, and recommended a legislative remedy. The remedy was Civil Unions. And civil unions have been studied, and found to be very lacking. So, the remedy still needs to be delivered. Which is why this vote took place.
It seems it’s sort of a revisiting… Going back to the Court and saying, “Well, our remedy failed.” And opponents will argue it didn’t. But empirical evidence is clear, it has.
So the question before the Courts will really be, “How far are you guys will to go to stand by your original ruling?”
At least, that’s my poor memory, laymen’s interpretation of where the issue stands. Feel free to correct me anyone.
and depends on who’s babybut am I bitter?
HuffPo and Conservative hate sites probably won’t be the place to visitThe same old posters who make every LGBT thread at HuffPo a hatefest, love to gloat at our loses.
Oye, more waiting………………………….(and waiting)……………………………….
FEDERAL EQUALITY – A Timeline for the U.S.
Ages 18-29 – Hopefully within your lifetime.
Ages 30-49 – Honestly?…It’s a toss up.
Ages 50-70 – I wouldn’t count on it.
Ages 70+ – You will certainly die before you see it
I do wonder how the balance will shift between those who are willing to wait for due civil rights and work within the very systems that oppress us (systems that appear broken anyway), and those who want to work outside of this system and/or even refuse to participate at all in government. This can span the “crazy” anarchist who lives off the land in the mountains (yep, even some of them are gay!) to the 18+ teen who wonders why she should even bother registering to vote when the same bullshit keeps coming out of the federal and state government.
“when the same bullshit keeps coming out of the federal and state government”the same bullshit doesn’t keep coming out of state government. Did you not notice that marriage laws passed in 3 states in 2009 (NH, VT, ME)? One of them required a veto override and got it. Also, two legislatures passed full DPs (NV, WA), and in your own state of WA voters ratified the “everything but marriage” law. And this is just the marriage/DP stuff. Other advances were made in trans rights, etc.
Certainly an 18+ first-voter shouldn’t vote for just any jerk, but there are definitely legislators and governors out there who do live up to their oaths to protect the constitution.
Have you forgotten the governor-elect’s threat?If we’re going to do this judicially, we’re going to have to fight to keep it.
Article IX
At least couples have civil unions in JerseyFor some protections. We have absolutely NOTHING here in NY. Domestic partnerships in NYC that give you, like, four protections. It’s outrageous, but maybe we should start focusing on civil unions, just to give the gays and lesbians SOMETHING in states that have nothing.
So even with Christie screechingan amendment doesn’t seem too likely.
New York also hasfull recognition of all marriages, gay and straight, so long as they are legal in the jurisdiction where they were performed.
My feelings to all of those activists working on marriageWe’ll gather again, my sisters and brothers…and we will win…
We are not done…we’ll meet again
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v…
I thought that NY recognizes marriageslegally performed in another state and provides those couples with the benefits of marriage. So, can’t a couple from NY just go to Massachusettes or Canada (for instance) and get married legally there and then get the benefits in NY?
you are correct
from Catholic News Agency 1 hour agoNew Jersey Senate defeats gay ‘marriage’ bill
“Four states currently allow homosexual “marriage” while another 30 have constitutional amendments protecting traditional marriage.
It is unlikely that the bill will be brought up again soon”
http://www.catholicnewsagency….
Baptist Press
“New Jersey Senate hands ‘gay marriage’ another defeat in the Northeast
Posted on Jan 7, 2010 | by Michael Foust
“TRENTON, N.J. (BP)–Homosexual groups suffered their third straight major setback in the Northeast Thursday when the New Jersey Senate easily defeated a bill that would have legalized “gay marriage,” 20-14. ”
http://www.bpnews.net/BPnews.a…
Life Site News
“New Jersey Senate Kills Gay “Marriage” Bill”
“Prior to the vote, Regina Griggs, director of Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays and Gays (PFOX), criticized the comparison of homosexuality to racial issues.
“Contrary to Bond’s statement equating skin color with homosexual behavior, major scientific studies and mental health associations have stated homosexuality is not innate,” said Griggs in a statement. ”No replicated scientific study has found a gay gene, gay DNA, or gay center of the brain.
“Sexual orientation is a matter of self-affirmation and public declaration. Many African-Americans have come out of homosexuality, proving sexual orientation can change, but skin color does not.”
New Jersey Governor Jon Corzine, who had promised to sign the legislation, will be replaced by Republican Governor-elect Chris Christie on January 19. Christie has vowed to veto same-sex “marriage” legislation.
Rabbi Noson Leiter of Torah Jews for Morality hailed the defeat of the bill he called a “threat to religious liberty.”
“This is a tremendous Divine salvation from an existential threat of unprecedented magnitude,” Leiter told LifeSiteNews.com (LSN) minutes after the vote. ”We are thankful to the Almighty for allowing us to participate in this.” Leiter said his group, a leading orthodox Jewish advocacy organization, helped mobilized “thousands, if not tens of thousands” of Jews across New Jersey to oppose the bill. ”
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ld…
Yes from other statesBut not for the citizens of the state itself. It makes absolutely no sense that gay marriage was rejected here and we have out of state marriages recognized here.
Probably not in my lifetime, though.
How they votedHere’s how state Seantors voted today on the measure to allow same-sex marriage in New Jersey. The bill failed to pass.
YES (14)
Sen. Jim Whelan (D-Atlantic)
Sen. Bob Smith (D-Middlesex)
Sen. Barbara Buono (D-Middlesex),
Sen. Raymond J. Lesniak (D-Union), co-sponsor
Senate President Richard Codey (D-Essex)
Sen. Teresa M. Ruiz (D-Essex)
Sen. Sandra B. Cunningham (D-Hudson)
Sen. Brian P. Stack (D-Hudson)
Sen. Nia H. Gill (D-Essex)
Sen. Loretta Weinberg (D-Bergen), co-sponsor
Sen. Robert M. Gordon (D-Bergen)
Sen. Nicholas P. Scutari (D-Union)
Sen. Joseph F.Vitale (D-Middlesex)
Sen. Bill Baroni (R-Mercer)
NO (20)
Sen. Jeff Van Drew (D-Cape May)
Sen. Ronald L. Rice (D- Essex)
Sen. John A. Girgenti (D-Passaic
Sen. Nicholas Sacco (D-Hudson) .
Sen. Fred H. Madden (D-Gloucester)
Sen. Shirley K. Turner (D-Mercer)
Sen. Robert W. Singer (R-Ocean)
Sen. Joseph Pennacchio (R-Morris)
Sen. Christopher Bateman, (R-Somerset)
Sen. Tom Kean Jr. (R -Union)
Sen. Jennifer Beck (R-Monmouth )
Sen. Joseph M. Kyrillos (R-Monmouth)
Sen. Gerald Cardinale (R-Bergen)
Sen. Michael Doherty (R-Hunterdon)
Sen. Kevin J. O’Toole (R-Essex)
Sen. Philip E. Haines (R-Burlington)
Sen. Christopher J. Connors (R-Ocean)
Sen. Anthony R. Bucco (R-Morris)
Sen. Steven V. Oroho (R-Sussex)
Sen. Sean T. Kean (R-Monmouth)
ABSTENTIONS (3)
Sen. Paul A. Sarlo (D-Bergen)
Sen. Stephen M. Sweeney (D-Gloucester)
Sen. James Beach (D-Camden)
DID NOT ATTEND SESSION (2)
Sen. Diane B. Allen (R-Burlington)
Sen. Andrew Ciesla (R-Ocean)
http://www.nj.com/news/index.s…
NINE Democrats abstained or voted NO…..thanks for NOTHING
video and photos from NJ today http://www.nj.com/politics/ind…
agree 100%it’s crazy.
Michael Doherty and the Bigoted New Jersey Senators Who Want to Keep Marriage Discrimination Legalfrom queerty
http://www.queerty.com/michael…
“. Somehow today, you’re crazy if you want the people of New Jersey to decide this issue like they have in 37 other states. [My constituents] are upset about being disenfranchised [about deciding major issues]. … They feel disenfranchised once again today. … This is about letting the residents of New Jersey decide a major re-definition that has been recognized for thousands and thousands of years. (Applause)”
Homobigots…The gay rights movement had a great legislative run this season with three states and DC. That doesn’t include the handful of states that legalized everything but marriage and a federal hate crimes law. However, if states like New York and New Jersey do not want to compromise on marriage equality, they should go back to the courts. The best part is, compromising would have led to religious exemptions like New Hampshire and Vermont have, the courts do not legislate that right for religious people like California and Connecticut did. When the New Jersey Supreme Court (who ruled UNANIMOUSLY in 2006 that LGBTs deserve the same rights and benefits as heteros) overturns the existing marriage ban, we can laugh at these people back at them.
Also Prop 8 will be decided at the end of this month by a federal judge. If that gets overturned, forty million dollars would be wasted by the homobigots for nothing. We can always laugh at them for that. Homobigots have shown that they do not want to compromise and will continue to feel better for themselves at the misery they put on LGBTs. The hate built up by the homobigots will not go away, even if their children or brothers and sisters were gay. Sorry, the best way to deal with this for now is through the courts and time. The legislative method has been used up except in Rhode Island and Washington, time for some real action at the federal level.
Well, at least our “fierce advocate” helped…When are we going to see that Obama is our enemy? If he isn’t part of the solution, he is part of the problem.
What would the vote have been if he had used the ‘bully pulpit’ to encourage people to vote for marriage equality?
Sorry to digress into minutia, but my anger and disappointment with Obama never stops.
Don’t forget California passed it twice….They got vetoed by the governor, but the California legislature passed marriage equality twice, and the Court supported the constitutionality of it.
Things aren’t changing fast enough, but they are changing.
The other thing to remember is that not too long ago, the idea of ANY legal recognition for gay couples was weird and nearly unthinkable. Now civil unions are seen as the moderate compromise position, and the people claiming that we should get nothing at all are seen as a wingnut minority.
We’ll get some kind (probably limited, and certainly tied to the states) of federal recognition sooner than you think. Full equality, some time later, and it will be a generation or two before the “why was this even an issue” is the overwhelming majority.
Out of state means where performed, not where residingA New Yorker can go elsewhere for marriage and come home to state recognition of it. It sucks that you can’t do it where you live, but you can still get married and have it recognized back home. Most states do not have a residency requirement to get married.
So the citizens of New York can contract a legally recognized marriage. And the more of you who do, the more weight there is that you are being discriminated against at home for no good reason. If society doesn’t crumble with imported marriages, it won’t crumble with local ones.
Enemy is far too strong.That’s not at all helpful language.
Yes, he absolutely needs to be called on his lack of promised “fierce advocacy.”
Yes, he cannot claim to be any kind of friend to the community.
But he is certainly not taking an active role in rolling back or reducing our rights.
He’s a huge disappointment, that doesn’t make him the bad guy.
It’s still bullshit……Waiting 20-30 years is bullshit.
Having society VOTE on our rights is TOTAL BULLSHIT; yet we play along as if that’s OK.
It’s not as if I am unaware of our “advances”, but I still think we fight like victims who play by the bully’s rules. No heterosexual with ANY dignity would fight so passively to protect their child and spouse from the serious harm and trauma that results when family rights are denied (and continue paying taxes as if everything is OK), yet we’ve become accustomed to this begging.
One’s perspective can change radically when one’s own child is taken away due to unconstitutional legal hatred. Suddenly “waiting” is NOT an option.
Well, since the community will not take any radical stepsthat would make opposing our rights costly for our enemies in terms of public image, convienience or disruptions, then I have to say that as I approach retrement in the next ten years, seeing as most of my work is in europe, I will likely relocate back to either the Canarias or to Madrid….I could become the old crone profesora that my mentor was
I am not dying as a second class citizen with my “life companion” referenced in my obit, thank you