another reason I’m an atheistThe freakin’ pastors are preachin’ about not looking at porn when after the service is over, he’s sneaking into his office looking at it.
::sighs::

Utah is the BIGGEST consumer of PORN, them Mormons are out of control

Wow, you’re right.I googled “utah porn” and got this

Welcome to Utah, online porn capital of the USA
For most of my life I have lived in the cauldrons of sin – first New York, then California. These Bluer than Blue states are the source of most of our society’s ills, or so we are constantly told.
When it comes to online smut, though, it appears I’ve been living in the wrong places. Thanks to Harvard researcher Ben Edelman, we now know the most avid consumers of Internet pornography live in the heartland – the “real America,” I believe someone once called it.
Edelman, a lawyer-geek who made his bones hunting down spyware and adware firms, has published a report titled “Red Light States: Who Buys Online Adult Entertainment?” [PDF] in the ponderous sounding Journal of Economic Perspectives.
For his report Edelman analyzed subscriber data from an unnamed “top 10 seller of online adult entertainment,” broken down by ZIP codes, demographic data, and the speeds of users’ Internet connections.
One key finding: The biggest consumers of online adult entertainment live in the great state of Utah. An average of 5.47 people per 1000 broadband subscribers pay for porn in Orrin Hatch’s home state. (Utah also leads in porn consumption among the general population and dial-up users, in case you’re wondering.)
It must have been all those Osmonds Gone Wild videos that sent them over the edge.
Close behind Utah with just over five porn subscribers per thousand is Sarah Palin’s Alaska. California and New York, on the other hand, average between 2.4 and 2.9 subscriptions per 1000 broadband users, smack dab in the middle of the pack. Overall, eight of Edelman’s top 10 porn-consuming states voted for McCain last fall, while six of the least smut-crazed states went for Obama.
It appears the Red states are also the Red Light states.
Notes Edelman:

Subscriptions are slightly more prevalent in states that have enacted conservative legislation on sexuality. …. subscriptions are also more prevalent in states where surveys indicate conservative positions on religion, gender roles, and sexuality. In states where more people agree that “Even today miracles are performed by the power of God” and “I never doubt the existence of God,” there are more subscriptions to this service. Subscriptions are also more prevalent in states where more people agree that “I have old-fashioned values about family and marriage” and “AIDS might be God’s punishment for immoral sexual behavior.”

Here’s another fascinating tidbit:

… adult escort sites are more popular in “blue” states that voted for Gore in 2004, while visitors from the “red” states that voted for Bush in 2004 are more likely to visit wife-swapping sites, adult webcams, and sites about voyeurism.

Thus explaining the whole Eliot Spitzer fiasco last March.
Edelman adds that as education and income go up, so does porn consumption. Younger people also tend to get more of their naughty bits over the Net. But that doesn’t explain why Florida is in his top 10 and California isn’t.
It also doesn’t address why the strongest proponents of anti-porn laws tend to live in the states where online smut is most popular. You could argue Red staters oppose adult content so vocally because they know the problem intimately — first hand, so to speak. You could speculate people who live in these states use online porn more because traditional venues like adult bookstores and peep shows are harder to find. You might even stake a claim Blue staters are more likely to get their porn through illegal means such as file swapping networks. (I’m a little dubious about that last one.)
As they say in academic circles, more research is needed.

See the original post for other links.

Or pulling an underage kid back there to provide itAs we all know, those who preach the loudest are the ones most ashamed of it within their own selves.

People the MOST sexually repressed are the KINKIEST

First posting!Well everyone, this is my first post on Pam’s House Blend.  This made me think of the funniest Firefox at on ever.

“Christian Anti-Porn will filter links and alert the user if any porn websites are clicked. This will not completely block but rather display Bible verse with the crucified Jesus Christ and to remind every Christian that he is going to crucify Jesus Christ again if he proceeds to such websites.
This add-on is not an ultimate filter for porn. God is the ultimate filter and only He can guard you and give you enough grace to overcome sin. Hence, pray to Jesus Christ who died for our sins.”

Check it out here…yes it really exists.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-…

welcome aggiegermanboiLiked your post, the idea of Jesus filtering their porn gave me a good laugh
maybe the Utah Mormons can use this image
  http://ldstalk.files.wordpress…

Disciples Gone Wild

God and pornHow do we know God doesn’t like porn. He sent his only begotten son to be tortured and killed to forgive our sins. What’s up with that? He’s omnipotent. Wouldn’t a simple “I forgive” have sufficed.

One misused statistic in this…“Edelman adds that as education and income go up, so does porn consumption.”
But he only reviews paid internet sites, if the rest of the article is accurate. So it looks like the conclusion is that as income goes up, people pay for stuff.
I don’t think the slam at Marriott is valid. They are doing what I approve of – making a voluntary service available to their customers. They are neither requiring participation nor denying it. I’d feel the same way if they had a special kosher menu for Orthodox guests.
I know the that Mormon hierarchy was deeply involved in Prop 8, but I would need to know if the Marriott people were. I won’t paint all Mormons with the same brush.
Even if they participated in Prop 8, offering pay-per-view porn is still the right thing.

Not Surprisingvisitors from the “red” states that voted for Bush in 2004 are more likely to visit wife-swapping sites, adult webcams, and sites about voyeurism.
Not to mention conservative men in red states are most likely to be hunting down black men on the internet.
For sexual pleasure.
It’s called “cuckolding” (similar to wife-swapping), and it’s hilarious to see conservative men hating on particular people by day and viewing them as sexual objects by night.

Give them a few days…And it’ll all be our fault.
“Honey, I’m having an affair because two men want to get married.”
“Baby, I was looking at porn. I got so freaked out about gay marriage that the Devil got me and I just couldn’t resist the temptation.”
And the faithful will buy it.
The more ridiculous the stories become, the more the fundies will believe it.  

White Mormons have more DOWN LOW behavior than any Black communityThey had back in the late 70′s 12 gay bars, (Minneapolis and St Paul had 6 or 7 gay bars at that time.) HALF the men in those Salt Lake City bars were married to women, and all of them called themselves BISEXUAL.

According to THEIR Garden of Eden storyAdam created BOTH male and female in the creator’s image and naked without shame. If that was the creator’s template nudity doesn’t seem to be a problem for the creator, neither does a fluid gender expression.