Anyone have more info on this or planning to attend? From an Empire State Pride Agenda email:
This Wednesday, December 16 at the LGBT Center in New York City, Governor David Paterson will announce a major policy affecting transgender civil rights in New York. The Pride Agenda has been working on this issue since Governor Spitzer was elected and has continued to work on it with Governor Paterson. Please join us for this important event if you are able.What: Governor Paterson to announce major policy on transgender rights
Where: LGBT Community Center, 208 West 13th St. (Manhattan)
When: This Wednesday, December 16 at 10:30 AM (doors open at 10:00 AM)
Having our community and our allies show up in large numbers for this significant moment is the best way we can thank Governor Paterson for his work moving LGBT equality forward. We hope to see you there!
If you can join the Pride Agenda at this event, please RSVP to Matt Brunner at mbrunner@prideagenda.org or (212) 627-0305.
From Transgender Legal Defense & Education Fund:
We’ve got a special treat for all of our friends in the New York City area. And we’re pretty sure that the rest of you will like it, too. On Wednesday, December 16, New York State Governor David A. Paterson will join us to make a major policy announcement affecting the lives of transgender New Yorkers. And you’re invited to be there to hear it first! The Governor’s office has asked us not to reveal what he will announce, but I can tell you that you’ll definitely want to be there to hear it for yourself on Wednesday morning.



26 Comments





This is what a fierce advocate looks like!
I won’t be one to quickly judgeGov Paterson ignored New York’s gender variant community despite pleas to pay attention to the lack of civil rights protection based on gender expression/identity in order to promote the same sex marriage law. I have no idea what he can do as an executive that will make up for that in my mind.
I don’t expect very much at all. A few crumbs maybe.
what do you mean?are you really comparing him to obama? should he stay home and not be seen with transfolk? i’m guessing the fact of this event means that the legislation is certifiably dead, but that doesn’t mean he might not be able to do something via executive order like he did for marriage recognition.
as for others who are still saying the gender bill was sacrificed for the marriage bill, i’d like some evidence presented rather than just pointless divisiveness. the real enemy are the haters and the weak-willed legislators they sway. you know, the people who actually have the responsibility of voting on legislation.
different states, different rates.i’ll never forget, as a kid in the 70s, laughing at the blindness of people who considered my state of michigan a backwater, and california some sort of progressive haven. michigan had a helmet law, california had motorcyclist brains smeared on their freeways. michigan had a bottle law, california had windrows of trash decorating the brain-smeared roads, etc. yet michigan was then and remains a less-than ideal place to live as an lgbt person, whereas california has always been better if imperfect.
why do different states manage the changes they do at the time they do and others not? i’m sure it does have something to do with effective leadership in the relevant advocacy organizations, but the best leadership in the world can’t force a body of voters or legislators to do something they’re not ready to do. i can’t tell you why PA has laws or executive orders that NY doesn’t yet, but i do think it is short-sighted to lay all the blame at one door. i don’t blame you or anyone for feeling fed up with the situation, but i also am no convinced the rancor is fairly placed. still waiting for evidence.
Interesting thing about New YorkDoes Buffalo have more t-protections than NYC?
I found another one of these charts…
And of course,,,Illinois doen’t have any relationship recognition but we do have some of the most t-inclusive GLBT laws…
of course i cut you slack for feeling like that.infinite slack, in fact. i feel the same way when i go “home” to the great hate state of michigan. what i’m not cutting slack on is assigning blame for the situation without evidence to back it up.
what’s the story on the cu law?do you think it was introduced sacrificially just to get the conversation started, or does it have real potential for passage this session? and, when does the legislative session end there in illinois?
If this comment becomes a ‘Dewey Defeats Truman,’ then so be itBut what exactly can he announce – and do unilaterally – that matters one bit?
Answer: Nothing.
An anti-discrimination executive order? Well, unless New York gives its executive orders significantly more weight than most states, then it won’t be worth the paper its printed on.
An administrative order regarding birth certificates? Only as good as the first court that judges its validity.
So what’s he gonna do – say that GENDA is really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really going to be a priority – not the top priority of course, but a priority – of his if he gets re-elected?
I await Wednesday – but I am not holding my breath.
Kathleen, Matt Forman is no longer at ESPA.And clearly, he’s reformed where protections for transfolk are concerned. I appreciate the link, but that letter talks about New York’s 2002 legislative session, not the current one. I still don’t see any evidence that ESPA dumped one bill in favor for another in this session. Maybe they did, but then again maybe they didn’t.
i’m not making any accusationstherefore the burden of proof isn’t on me.
What I meanI and many other people asked Gov Paterson to place GENDA on the special session agenda. We were ignored. ESPA obviously abandoned GENDA as an issue after June so it’s very plain that they weren’t part of those making the request. (Interestingly, they’ve now started talking about GENDA again. In an email soliciting donations!)
It’s really unfair to ask for smoking guns here – New York State politics is rife with back room deals and surreptitious back scratching (it’s one of the reasons why the NY legislature is so screwed up) so it’s impossible to know unless one of the few participants comes out to tell people what really went on, a possibility which is about as likely as Daddy Dobson riding at the head of a Pride Parade.
All we can do is look at the effects and then come up with the most probable series of events to explain them. I’ve done that in more than one place in this blog so I won’t repeat it except to say, that since what happened in 2002 I think it’s ESPA and the state government that have to show they are true allies rather than any member of the trans community having to give them, once again (ad infinitum) the benefit of the doubt.
Myth on the HoofApparently it was my first prediction:
Why exactly was Zakerria Bellamy mentioned in this?
Will this exectutive order provide any recourse whatsoever for someone applying for work with the state of New York who receives a phone call such as that received by Bellamy? And for that matter will this exectutive order provide any real recourse (read: a private right of action or even an enforceable administrative remedy) even for trans people who may have already managed to secure employment from the state?
you’re asking me to prove a negativeand we all know that that is impossible.
I agree that the legislature and ESPA need to show their stuff.My problem is that I’ve seen damaging and unfair claims of “you gays don’t care” (or in the case of gay legislation, “you a-gays don’t care about we real gays”) in places where I do know that everyone is doing everything they can to make progress happen. So, when I’m looking in on events in other states that I have little information on, I’m not going to automatically believe such claims. Your comment does help in at least starting to mention what people did or didn’t do at specific times in the recent legislative session. I know nobody can provide “the memo”, because that only happens in movies (and the Mormon church!), but it should be possible to build a record of circumstantial evidence.
I think it’s great they mentioned Bellamy.He case is a great example of what transfolk face. Remember, this press release wasn’t written for people “in the know”, it is written for general consumption. Probably a lot of regular people heard about it, so it’s good to link it to what NY transfolk are facing.
Your other questions are great – I hope you’ll call teh NY AG’s office and get answers and report back.
Scoreboard
Wisconsin scoreboard.
Massachusetts scoreboard.
Connecticut scoreboard.
New Hampshire scoreboard.
Hawaii scoreboard.
Nevada scoreboard.
Maryland scoreboard.
New York scoreboard.
Delaware scoreboard.
I don’t know the details of those statesand just like for NY, you’re not providing any. Again, it’s just he said-she said. I’m sure in some cases you’re right, but I’m also sure that in some cases you may be wrong.
“I don’t know the details of those states and just like for NY, you’re not providing any”I provided those states’ histories.
In each, I am legally unequal to non-trans GLBs and there is no legitimate (read: not taking a back seat to gay marriage) effort to rectify that reality.
did i miss a link?i just see a list of states, but no link to information showing how gays, not legislators, threw the trans under the bus.
Really.I’m preparing to be underwhelmed myself.
Ok, here’s a link to the list of statesnow whether gays threw them under the bus, I don’t know.
http://www.thetaskforce.org/re…
oops!actually the chart titled “Scope of Laws”"” under this link gives a good overview…
yeah, that’s the easy part.what seems impossible is backing up blanket accusations with evidence. i know that gays have chosen to favor their pwn legislation above transfolk at certain times. however, i reject the blanket statement that everywhere there is a protection for gays but not one for trans, that gays are to blame. i reject blind attacks on the unity of our community, when it is legislators who should be taken to task for being weak and afraid or just plain bigoted.
I reject that meme too.I mean, sans the evidence, that is a bling attack. It seems sometimes as if the gays are the cause of all the problems of the trans community. Granted some activists may be, but the blind attacks on the community are a bit much.
i hope they update that soon.maybe they’re waiting for the year to end. at the least, washington state and the city of Tallahassee have added laws anti-discrimination and/or hates crimes laws.
I’m just back from the press conference and proclamation-signingPragmatically, I am happy to take what I can get at the moment, and at the moment, that is the executiove order bannning anti-trans discrimination in state employment.
Today, the Governor did expressly call for GENDA to be passed “in January, February, or March” of 2010. Clearly, he is signaling that he does not expect us to be waiting for the budget to get through first.
It is not as bad as you think, Emelye. I can’t blame ESPA for riding whichever bill happens to be in play. And since media attention was on marriage, the politicians responded to that.
GENDA was going to be on the Senate calendar the very week that the Senate imploded in June. I have been calling for the Governor to have included GENDA in the list of necessary bills for the special session.
I realize in retrospect, since the marriage bill actually got fewer votes than expected in the special session, that it is possible that all the votes we needed for GENDA might not have materialized in the special session because of intangible factors outside our control (for example, resentment against the governor by some members ofthe senate).
When the legislature goes into regular session, we’ll see what happens. But January, February, or March are our targets!