Please, please let Little Ricky run…I’ve got a nice big back catalog here on this moralizer. Max Blumenthal at The Daily Beast has a report on Santorum’s 2012 rumblings.
Having already delivered speeches to conservative groups in the key GOP primary states of Michigan and Iowa, and with plans to speak at a fundraiser for a Republican gubernatorial candidate in South Carolina on December 8, former Senator Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania appears to be testing the waters for a 2012 Republican presidential primary bid.…[friend and political adviser, Deal] Hudson, who has advised President George W. Bush and Republican presidential nominee Senator John McCain on Catholic issues, and who maintains close ties to leaders of the evangelical right, told me Santorum has become preoccupied with issues of national security. “He believes that Obama is weak on the Muslim threat and he is convinced that it’s going to turn around and bite him badly,” Hudson said.
While Santorum’s recent speeches and editorials are filled with warnings about the danger of Iran and the sinister motives of Muslims, his two terms in the Senate were defined by his activism on culture-war issues like abortion. In 2001, Santorum attempted and failed to slip an amendment into the No Child Left Behind bill that would have required public schools to teach “intelligent design” and familiarize students with criticism of the theory of evolution. Four years later, he became the only senator to travel to Florida and position himself by the bedside of the clinically brain-dead Terri Schiavo. In vowing to block efforts to remove Schiavo’s feeding tube, he compared her to “someone with the condition of cerebral palsy.”
Let the games begin. Please, Santorum, we need the GOP Clown car to be as full of fringe riders as possible. After all, he holds an extremist view that will certainly make a primary with Huck and Palin quite an extraordinary matter.
Santorum complemented his activism with an almost unremitting stream of extreme statements. In an interview with the AP, for example, he compared homosexuality to “man-on-dog” sex, prompting the female reporter to plead, “I’m freaking out here!” In 2005, as he geared up for his reelection campaign, Santorum blamed the Catholic church’s sexual-abuse scandal on the “academic, political, and cultural liberalism” of Boston. Comments like these, along with the denunciations of feminism and single motherhood that riddle the pages of his book-length culture-war manifesto, It Takes a Family, may call into question Santorum’s viability in a general election.
Ya think?! Oh, set your TVs to record the inane bigot eruptions. You know they are coming. I simply can’t wait for the debates with these flat-earthers when the moderator asks if they believe the earth is 5,000 years old and man walked with the dinosaurs.
Related:
* Little Ricky joins 2M4M: ‘gay marriage is a grassfire’ that will spread unless DOMA is preserved
* Teh Stoopid of Santorum — it burns
* Little Ricky does his man-on-dog bark in op-ed on same-sex marriage
* Santorum frothing over ‘Islamo-fascists’ at Yale




31 Comments


“Criticisms of evolution”There are no criticisms of evolution, other than religious people freaking out because it contradicts the creation myth they learned in Sunday school when they were four years old.
I wonder if Little Ricky would teach students about the “criticisms” of the theory of gravity.
that dog won’t hunt… and I still think he looks like the Mouth of Sauron.
What is going to bite Obama Is his lack of leadership on the issues he ran on. He has been weak on Health Care, LGBT issues and cleaning up the criminals from the Bush years. Obama tried to win over the religious right (AKA Birthers and Tea Baggers) and said Fuck You to his base. He wasted his political capital trying to make friends instead of leading.
2010 will set new record low voter turnout because the ‘Change’ we needed didn’t happen as Obama was AWOL.
Palin/Santorum 2012,,,RUN BABY RUN! It will at least keep Obama in the White House which would be better than a GOPer. But not by much.
look for the definition of santorumtook like forever to rid ourselves in Pa. of this a-hole.
Well primary debates should be interestingly entertaining this season at least
What worries me …… is the prospect of the progressives being demoralized and demobilized in 2010 just as you say and seeing several congressional seats go to people straight out of Frothy’s mold as a result.
Look at what just happened here in VA. The Democrats ran Criegh Deeds, who is hardly a champion for progressive causes, against Bob McDonnell. Deeds pointed fingers at McDonnell’s thesis, full of lunatic invective against single mothers, working women, and queers, and McDonnell’s track record in the general assembly, full of culture war ranting. McDonnell claimed to be a moderate, knowing full well that the right-wing base knows who he is and what he stands for. The result was that, in a state that had elected Barack Obama a year ago, the progressives stayed home and Bob McDonnell won handily.
I am very worried that if the Democrats in Congress do not get off their asses and knock out a few home runs on progressive issues, the batshit wing of the Republican party is going to take several seats in 2010 and maybe even the Presidency in 2012.
sidebar: another Clown Car candidate in the news todayIt seems that during Sarah Palin’s tour, to tout her new book “Going Ragu”, someone at the Mall of America (!) was arrested for throwing a tomato.
http://wcco.com/politics/palin…
Apparently no one saw this as a free exercise of religion. The tomato, of course, was the emissary that preceded the Sauce from which arose the Flying Spaghetti Monster. (Whereas this book tour was more about Half-Baked Alaska).
We now return you to “Man on Dog,” in progress.
In the name of the Pasta, and the Sauce, and the Holy Meatball, amen.
Lest we forget….
1. The unfairly maligned Teresa Heinz Kerry once described Santorum as, “Forrest Gump with an attitude.”
2. Your ornery old queen uncle was right: “shit floats.”
Proving this is what has happened to Santorum’s former gay….read that again…G-A-Y communications director and “trusted friend and confidante to me and my family” Robert Traynham…whom Santorum had known was gay for 8 years when he was attacking LGBT equality and equating gay sex with “man-on-dog sex.” A friend quoted Traynham describing Santorum as
and, according to Mike Rogers, said
Traynham has floated to a high profile position as a TV host for the influential Roll Call news agency on Comcast.
According to Wikipedia, he is also, “a lecturer at George Washington University, teaching political strategy and communication…[and] a political analyst for National Public Radio and a columnist for the Philadelphia Tribune.”
Of course, when Traynham was outed by Mike Rogers in 2005, Santorum [as well as other gay Repugs] protested that it was a violation of Traynham’s privacy even though Santorum had previously decladed the “rightt to privacy doesn’t exist, in my opinion, in the United States Constitution.”
If Gump er Santorum runs, will former porch faggot Traynham return to the plantation?
Well, if progressinves choose to see everythingin one zero terms of either supporting Democrat, or being childish and refusing to support anyone else, then they deserve getting someone from the batshit wing of the Republicans into the Presidency.
What a joke… A walking, talking, 24/7 joke!I guess this is the only thing saving Democrats now. They keep hemming and hawing and frustrating the base, but the Rethuglicans have shifted so far to the right and embraced lunatic @ssholes like Ricky Boy that they keep shooting themselves in the foot. And maybe if more Democrats stop trying to be “Santorum-lite”, they can actually capitalize on teh stupid of the GOoP.
Santorum (sexual neologism)
Lest anyone forget.
And if we persist in supporting Democrats solely because they are not RepublicansWe deserve getting someone from the “I’m in office now so fuck you” wing of the Democratics into the Presidency. And the House. And the Senate. And in governorships. And in state legislatures.
Because, hey, at least they are not Republicans.
Yes. THIS!
Actually, there ARE problems with evolutionary theory.To take one pointed example, no one has ever proposed a model for the process by which non-nucleated cells could have evolved into nucleated ones. But the problems that exist with evolutionary theory are scientific problems, to be resolved with reason, logic and the scientific method, and all true scientists acknowledge them. All of those are beyond the grasp of Santorum and the other troglodytes; all they know is what the “good book” says. (I once asked a fundamentalist about Leviticus’ claim that insects have four legs. He responded that all the four-legged ones must have died in Noah’s flood.)
At least this meanshe’s given up his plans to run for governor here in PA next year. I’m breathing a sigh of relief, but a guarded one.
Oh, hell to the no, QScribe
That’s funny.
I actually don’t have a problem with a discussion of religion in the public square. Unlike the fundies, I don’t allow for religious privilege to take ahold in the public square. Religious beliefs are subject to scrutiny as if they were any other idea. This is a good illustration.
I always voteEven though I’m disappointed (understatement of the decade) by what we’re (not) seeing from Obama on down, I will never “stay home” on election day.
Being able to vote is a right and privilege that none of us should take for granted. Just because I’m mad at the Democraps, and I won’t vote for a Rethuglican, it doesn’t mean I won’t vote.
These days, the two parties seem to be more similar than dissimilar. The two-party system we’ve allowed ourselves to be ruled by needs some competition.
I think everyone who is dissatisfied by the leadership (or lack thereof) needs to start learning about the parties and candidates that best fit their views.
Now, I know that people will tell me that I’m encouraging people to “throw away” their vote or that this will allow the Rethuglicans to take back control. Well, again, these parties are more similar than dissimilar, and even if Rethuglicans win back the majority, at least I know where I stand with them.
That is all. I’m stepping off the soapbox.
OT…but maybe not…Speaking of ignorant “crackas”Rushbo talking about the “black frame of mind” and saying that Tiger Woods shouldn’t be around those white wimmins..
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/…
One of my favorite moments http://media.washingtonpost.co…
A blubbering frothy anal leakage Santorum, (after Jesse Helm’s and Jerry Falwell’s deaths.)
even the thought of those moments makes me feel like dancing
Bowie and Jagger “Dancin’ In The Streets”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v…
Tranyham who would work for Santorum who compared us to Dog-FuckersAlthough shtooping Tranyham while he wags his TAIL does make fido look more appealing.
What I love…I love Little Ricky’s neon pink tie! OMG can you be any more of a flamer than that???
Not even a contestIts gonna be Palin unless she decides not to run. He supported Specter for a long time and has a few more minor sins under his belt. The real reason they will go for Palin though is the fact that he is more articulate and intelligent (not hard) and they resent that.
still hope there’s a little santorum on the GOP ticketSarah Palin, I’ve always maintained, will be the subject of a splendid Broadway musical, on the lines of “Evita.” She gets a show-stopping number in the convention sequence, “Don’t Cry For Me, Alaska,” but Ricky should have an aria of his own, a keynote address taken from P.D.Q. Bach, “Wachet Arf!” (Sleeping Dogs Awake!).
trannyham?excuse me?
I hate to tell repigs what their best chances areI still think for moderates Pawlenty makes sense and for batsh*t crazy fundie teabagger types Thune.
They never blew a campaign, they never QUIT, they are reasonably photogenic, they didn’t let loose a cop killer,(that we know of.) A woman on either of their tickets would be a benefit, (that isn’t Sarah, Michelle Bachman or Virginia Foxx.)
The first thing that comes to mindwhen little Ricky is mentioned:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/…
And this just creeps me out.
Yes, and when I refuse to vote for a Democrat because they are spineless, I will watch as a republican goes into office. And the Democrat can wonder why he lost, and I will gladly tell him.
I can tell you this, there is no way in HELL I will vote to re-elect Obama, IMHO he doesn’t deserve my vote.
Of course, models have been proposed …… just none accepted until now.
When Ricky Loses Againdo we also have to watch his ugly kids (with their dolls creepily wearing matching clothes) fake-crying and flipping the bird off at the camera?
I don’t say this often, but what a hideous family! Keep them out of the White House for that reason alone! LOL
Writing in “None of the above” is a vote n/t
PDQ Bach is a good choice, but I see Santorum as more of a Mozart kind of guySpecifically, the song “Leck mich im Arsch” which seems quite appropriate for a man whose name has come to be associated with sloppy anal sex.