Today is “Stop Taser Torture” Blogging For Justice Day,” organized by the Stop Taser Torture Blog:
Many police departments are using tasers to torture even nonviolent people who are often those who are incoherent, hallucinating, wheelchair bound, suicidal, unarmed, deaf, handcuffed, blind, pregnant, students, or just didnt move fast enough for an officers liking. Taser torture in America is continuously growing not only in volume, but in the level of how liberally, unwarrantedly, and excessively tasering is being used across the U.S and many other countries. In America, some police departments are even now torturing 10 year old children.
Our goal is to unite the world’s bloggers in posting about the same issue on the same day – Taser Torture in America, Canada and throughout the world.

As you all know, I frequently blog about the rollback of civil liberties, specifically when it comes to police brutality and the misuse of the Taser, an electroshock device designed as a non-lethal alternative to using a firearm. A Taser delivers 50,000 volts into its target, causing strong involuntary muscle contractions. While there is no doubt that Taser International's controversial device has resulted in calls for a ban on the use of it, the fact is we're talking about a tool, training, and misuse. It takes a human being with badge to shoot one of these things off at a suspect (um, well not anymore, but we'll get to that later).
Police officers, who put their lives on the line every day protecting and serving communities around the country, are now dealing with a host of thugs bad apples in their midst who seemingly have: 1) lost the capacity to communicate effectively with agitated unarmed people to defuse tense situations; 2) fail to understand the concept of the Taser as the last resort before using a gun; 3) an inability to judge a life-threatening situation from an annoying one; and 4) so few interpersonal skills and patience that they see the Taser as a weapon to make a person submit to their will or instantly comply as a time-saving measure. Unfortunately, the Taser has been deployed in instances that have resulted in a subject expiring, or as Electrocuted While Black refers to it, "pre-trial, extra-judicial electrocutions and executions."
The abuse of this device is disproportionately deployed against minorities (surprised, no?). In Houston, an audit found incredible statistics:
Black officers are less likely to use Tasers, but black suspects are more likely to be jolted with the weapons, according to the first city audit of Taser use by Houston Police officers, KPRC Local 2 reported.
…The audit of 2.8 million calls to police from January 2000 to June 30, 2007, found black suspects make up 66.9 percent of all people zapped with the device, despite making up 46 percent of the total incidents and comprising 24.7 percent of the Houston population.
…The report spells out that most officers have only used their Taser one time, but one officer has used his on 13 people, another used it on 12 people. Two officers had shocked nine people each, and four officers had eight Taser incidents each.
From "Tightening Taser Deployment Standards" at the non-partisan Roosevelt Institution:
• Over 7,000 law enforcement employ more than 140,000 Tasers in the United States
• In a 6-year period, Amnesty International reports over 290 deaths from police Taser usage in the USA and Canada
• Use-of-force policies provide guidance for police officers to follow during specific scenarios
• Two Department of Homeland divisions rejected its use altogether.Questionable Taser usage on suspects, such as non-violent or previously restrained suspects, damages community perception of law enforcement personnel. Shocking and provocative videos circulate at rapid speed on Youtube depicting questionable Taser usage and are seen not just by members of a single community, but are viewed by millions around the world.
In April a group of black bloggers called for a federal investigation and hearings on the misuse and abuse of the device.
We call on our Congress to speak out and organize public hearings on the systemic human rights violations occurring with Federal funding against black, Latino, Native American and other Americans.
While there continues to be considerable media and congressional attention to torture in Guantanamo, there is comparatively little attention to the mounting evidence of human rights violations in the streets of America by a number of police departments across America, including torture and killings of black children, women and men through-out the United States through the use and abuse of Tasers.
…We believe most Americans would favor Congressional hearings as to whether our own U.S. police, policing policies and actions violate Federal and International laws prohibiting human rights violators. Evidence of widespread police abuse of tasers is more than enough to warrant our concern and justify a congressional inquiry.
One has to walk away from that thinking that a few of those officers are, to be charitable, electro-trigger happy against minorities. The natural follow up question is what, aside from bias, motivated those officers to Taser first more often than their colleagues and what training might have reduced those numbers.
Honestly, from the numerous Taser abuse stories I monitor each month, the buckwild brutes with badges seem to leave no demographic untouched. Witness these incidents:
* In Manassas, Virginia, a 55-year-old Bible study teacher and a mother were Tased three times in rapid succession, on his own property wher
e a child's baptism party was being held, seen by a yard full of children and family members. The police were called because of a noise complaint. Video.
More below the fold.
* Mobile, Alabama: cops Tase and pepper spray deaf and mentally disabled man who was in a Dollar General bathroom for too long. A spokesman for the Mobile Police Department said the officers' actions were justified because the man was armed with a potential weapon – an umbrella. Video.
A 72-year-old great-grandmother dares officer to Tase her; he takes her up on it. Again, a cop is caught using a Taser not in the place of a gun, but as a device to ensure compliance from a belligerent person who is not a threat to the Austin law enforcement officer. Video.
* In the I'm not sh*tting you category of police state brutality, an Idaho police officer sodomizes a suspect with a Taser, and gets off with only disciplinary action. Audio.
A Boise, Idaho, police officer who pushed a Taser inside a man’s buttocks and threatened to “Taser his balls” violated use-of-force policy, but didn’t break the law, an ombudsman has found.
* How about this — Oregon: Tasered while cycling. A Portland, Oregon cop sent 50K volts into the body of a bicyclist because he didn't have a light on the front of his bike.
* And our neighbors to the north are not immune from the sadism — 82-year old heart patient Tased in hospital bed. Three Royal Canadian Mounted Police officers apparently couldn't subdue an elderly patient.
* A 56-year-old wheelchair-bound black woman died after being tasered 10 times. "My aunt was basically tortured like an animal or something." said Delafield's nephew, Ryan. Transcript of audio recording.
* In Vermont, Lawrence Fairbrother, 56, was tased in the back by state troopers while in a grand mal seizure. Your blood will run cold when you read what happened:
They found Fairbrother, who had suffered seizures for years, underneath a parked truck, flailing. His medication lay on the ground and Fairbrother, 56, was clawing at the dirt and pulling himself farther under the vehicle. Troopers repeatedly asked Fairbrother to come out from under the pickup, but Fairbrother did not emerge. Troopers dragged him out by his feet and, while he was lying down and seizing, ordered him to put his hands behind his back.
They pulled his left arm behind his back, but when Fairbrother, still shaking, did not respond to an order to move his right arm, Trooper Hugh O'Donnell shot him between the shoulder blades with a Taser stun gun.
"What did I do?" Fairbrother asked, according to court documents.
"That's what we're going to find out," one of the troopers replied.
It goes on and on. What do the good folks at Taser International think about all of this? Well, the company has been riding high for a long time, with legal judgments going its way until recently – the winning streak for the stun-gun manufacturer ended last year when a San Jose, California, jury said Taser did not warn Salinas police that prolonged exposure to the 50K volt shock from the device poses a risk of cardiac arrest.
In one infamous 2008 promotional video for its proof-of-concept TASER-equipped PackBot device, created in partnership with iRobot (the manufacturer of the Roomba vacuum) there wasn't much left to the imagination as TASER International proudly featured an actual demonstration of its weapon of nervous system assault on a big black brother. I sh*t you not.
If you think that was outrageous, imagine how Taser International’s crowd control device will be popular with patience-free rogue police departments.
I'm quite interested in what you have to say — "non-lethal" technology has obviously outpaced common sense. It has led to a sense of complacency in some law enforcement departments and sends the message that communication skills are unnecessary and that all civilians regardless of age, size, or mobility are considered life-threatening adversaries at the drop of a hat. What does the Obama administration, which has found itself thrust into the issue of racial profiling, have to say about the rampant abuse of Tasers on suspects — and people accused of no crime at all — around the country?



19 Comments





Very good articlePersonally, while I agree with your arguments above, I also think that there just isn’t a reason for a police officer to ever carry a taser(or similar electroshock weapon).
If they’re threatened by a deadly weapon (ex: gun), you don’t want them to accidentally pick up a rather fallible, easily defended against, poorly-ranged psuedo-gun substitute.
If they aren’t being threatened by a deadly weapon (ex: a stick), then a tonfa/nightstick/etc. with a small amount of training is far more appropriate than a potentially deadly weapon. You don’t want the police officer to accidentally draw the wrong weapon and possibly kill the person.
The only space I can see for a police officer using a taser (or similar weapon) is when faced by a similar weapon. However, this is making the assumption that A) The wielder isn’t expecting a taser fight (and thus hasn’t bothered to defend themselves), and B) that there’s no risk that the wielder will use their taser improperly, and potentially kill the officer. I think that the cases where A and B are both true is so tiny that one can consider this a negligible case, and thus not worth the weight, expense, or training required.
So I don’t think that a police officer ever should carry a taser (or similar electroshock weapon).
I think that free passes should stopWe all know that there are rogue police DEPARTMENTS out there who give their officers free reign out in the field with no accountability. For those departments, the FBI should be brought in to investigate.
For the rogue police officers, there should be a similar policy in place for tasers as there are for shooting someone. Firing a taser should immediately draw a paid administrative leave long enough to investigate the tasing incident. If this was a one-off thing, they need to face proper disciplinary actions and should be retrained and then heavily supervised to prevent it from happening again. In the case of the cops found in the study, why are they still on the streets?
For TASER Int’l: you guys need to impress upon customers that there is most definitely a potential of someone dying when tased. Maybe departments would then take using this tool more seriously.
For parents calling cops on their unruly kids, take a parenting class! Kids are unruly and messy by nature. If you can’t effectively deal with it, PLEASE consider allowing your child to be adopted by a loving family. But if they are threatening your life and have the means to put action behind it, by all means call the cops and social services.
For minorities, what can I say? My minority status is that I am queer which isn’t as apparent as the color of your skin. I don’t want us to go around in fear of the police but DAMN. When these cases hit the airwaves/print/intertubes, it makes it hard not to feel targeted, doesn’t it? But as I told my son-in-law, I think probably 99% of cops are just doing their jobs and aren’t out to make a point by misuse of power. But like the Roosevelt Institute stated, it is the other 1% giving ALL cops a bad name.
For zimbel, the cops I have seen have their taser either on the other side or at their back. The chances of them drawing the wrong weapon is pretty slim. And I WOULD rather a taser be used as a last resort before using definite lethal force. The problem is to get cops that misuse tasers to consider them as potentially deadly.
Suing sucksI hate it when people sue gun/taser manufacturers for the actions of dumb cops/criminals. Bunch of greedy lawyers and pretend “victims” who want to get rich instead of punishing those actually responsible. Tasers are like heart medications; its a device that saves countless lives if used properly. If an incompetent or sadistic cop uses a taser in an unjust manner, he should lose his badge; but its the cops fault not the tasers. If you ban tasers these cops will just go back to abusing people with clubs.
They deserve to be suedif they fail to disclose the risks associated with the use of their devices. How do you think these incompetent or sadistic cops come to view these not as a tool of 2nd to last resort, but as something they can use in their amory to get people to obey them, even when what they are doing is clearly illegal? If nothing else, maybe TASER Int’l would stop lying about the safety of their products.
TaseringHi!Pam,
I didn’t have to read your article on tasing to wait and make a comment,I’ll go back and read it later.
I have been againist tasing since it first came out.For one,law enforcers already had alternatives then shooting someone with a bullet.
Two,and most of all,tasing is an electrical charge that goes through the body including the brain which no one knows the long term ramifacations of.
Seizure disorder is an electrical charge that occurs within the brain of an individual,trust me I know.
I know they say law enforcement officers have to endure being tased so they would know what it feels like but as I said no one knows the long term effects,not even doctors.
Electroshock therapy was abandonned many years ago and they even brought it back for a shorttime only to abandon it again,knowing it was detrimental to the brain and body.
How officials allow tasers to be used is beyond me.It also shows how little confidence officials have in their law enforcement officers,agencies and the training officers receive.
If I were in a position where I had to choose being tasered or shot in the leg,arm or hand.I’d rather be shot.And what about individuals who may suffer from a seizure disorder or heart condition that authorties aren’t aware?What’s the long term effects on them?Justice must be served but not in-humanly.
If you had to chooseyou would be dead. Cops are not trained to shoot you in the arm or the leg. They are trained to shoot you in the chest with the sole intent of killing you. This is why it is a weapon of last resort.
If you google ECT and bipolar, you will see that it is still in use. I’ve even considered it though I have not done enough research to make an informed decision. Not that I base my decisions on famous people who do what I want to do, but Carrie Fisher and Kitty Dukakis swear by it. And yes, there have been longitudinal studies on its use to relieve some psychiatric disorders. It is not for everyone but it has most assuredly NOT been abandoned. That being said, you are right in that there have been no longitudinal studies done with people who have been tased. For more on ECT: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E… There should be as I would imagine just form common sense that it is a wholly different experience than undergoing an ECT treatment.
?I don’t get that. A taser is not supposed to be 100% safe, or consequence free, its a weapon. As an alternative to the standard three bullets to chest, it is obviously less likely to kill you.
A police officer has no obligation to put himself at risk of physical harm or death to protect the life of a violent criminal. When confronted with a man armed with a knife or heavy blunt object, a police officer should not be forced to risk his/her life in hand to hand combat to make sure the perp isn’t hurt. Without tasers to fall back on, an officer must either use his gun, or risk his life in melee. Banning tasers will result in more dead criminals and more dead cops.
MoratoriumI believe there should be a moratorium on electrocution device use until it can be shown that they have not been used disproportionately on Blacks, that they have not been used against defenseless people who posed no threat, that they are not being used for torture purposes, and that this expensive weapon is more effective (stops people without killing them unintentionally) than a cheaper nightstick under similar circumstances.
In many cases, it would be safer to shoot a suspect in the leg or foot with a traditional gun than to shoot him in the face, chest or neck with an electrocution device.
Although I am sure that police could think of situations in which a potentially lethal electrical chair in the back seat of the cruiser would be helpful. I think there is not enough evidence that police need car-based electric chairs, and there is no evidence that police need or can ever appropriately use waist-mounted electrocution devices.
Certainly, no state that bars capital punishment or that has a moratorium on post-trial death sentences should permit police officers to electrocute and execute members of the public who have never been convicted of a crime.
Doesn’t make senseyou say they can use guns “properly” but shouldn’t be trusted with tasers? And if a cop shoots you, he or she WILL kill you. I swear some people watch too many clint eastwood movies. I’m not denying the fact that some serious rethinking needs to be done on how tasers are deployed. I just want people who claim that “they would rather be shot” to understand that if a cop shoots you, your family will be burying you.
So how did they do itbefore tasers came on the scene? There are very effective ways to subdue a suspect using their nightclub or just certain holds. They are trained in how to use these techniques. No, a police officer should not have to place themselves in jeopardy. But how can you call a 55-year old bible study teacher, a man having a seizure, a deaf person who doesn’t respond to voice commands or unruly brats violent criminals? Guns are for the violent criminals who are posing an immediate threat to either an officer or a citizen. Why should the rest of us be put at risk with a weapon that CAN kill us and needs to be treated as such?
Perhaps I’m wrong, butAt least as I was trained, drawing weapons becomes a reflex; the less thought needed, the better. At least according to my friends from the military, it can get to the point where everything from the draw through the aim is reflex. One more weapon is one more option that means more training, and another reflex, which can get confused in the heat of the moment. Remember, when under threat, your adrenaline is pumping, your vision is narrowing, and whatever weapon you have in your hand is the one you’re very likely to use.
Of course, then the decision point is whether or not you fire. Would you be more likely to fire if you’re trained that the weapon in your hand would most likely kill, or if you’re trained that the weapon in your hand would most likely not kill? I’m inclined to believe that some of the examples in the article above are examples of the later. Others are simply cases of police brutality brought into a technologically novel realm.
Now that said, I think you partially make my point in your 16:14:24 PM EST comment below. “There are very effective ways to subdue a suspect using their nightclub or just certain holds. They are trained in how to use these techniques.” I agree. Most adults are very poorly trained in combat, so a fairly minimal amount of training in subdual can go a long way. I’d far rather have a police officer better trained in, say, nightstick usage than in taser (or simular weapon) usage, at least unless I can see an identified space worth the total costs of the weapon.
To put it another way, are you aware of any evidence that since tasers have started to be used by police officers, that deaths by police shooting people has actually gone down in a statistically significant matter? I’ve yet to see such evidence, but if so, then a space for these weapons would be more convincing.
My error.I was confusing different articles on this subject. Strike “I’m inclined to believe that some of the examples in the article above are examples of the later.“; I don’t see any examples of that in the article above.
“Violent criminal”So much for even pretending not to try and convict even before arrest. After all, with all those “violent criminals” running around, it just wouldn’t be fair to those noble, torture-happy cops to deprive them of one of their only ways to get their rocks off by causing enormous pain to already-restrained subjects (oh, wait, I forgot, anyone who gets tased is a “violent criminal”, with or without a trial) without facing any real consequences.
YepYeah, lets protect rapists and murderers from the evil cops.
Just because some lunatic is going to use a taser on child or paraplegic doesn’t negate all the good tasers do. Go after corrupt cops, not life saving technology.
I love howevery taser piece brings out hero-worshiping lemmings. Too bad if criticizing your heroes makes you feel icky in your tummy. Tax paying citizens have every right to scrutinize the behavior of law enforcement. It’s “protect and serve,” not “trust and obey.” There’s no argument required beyond that.
RightOf course you know that they are all rapists and murderers even before a trial. Let’s make you judge, jury, executioner and god.
You keep making claims that tasers are life saving technology. In that case, you should have no problems providing some examples, some studies, that do not come from taser manufacturers.
TaseringNo,last resort is shooting to kill.Law enforcement shoot and injure most suspects.As for having to shoot,officers can shoot suspects with bean bags or use other means such as pepper spray and so on.Officers are trained to know when a situation warrants gun use.They however don’t appear to know when the use of an electrical device is warranted since they do currently use them.
A suspect armed threatening officers is of course a different matter in which the use of a gun should be used.However,suspects who are merely belligerent do not need to be shot by a gun or electrical device.Law enforcement officials are suppose to be trained for hand to hand combat with a suspect when necessary.Law enforcenment officers encounter more of those type situations then those warranting shooting someone with something that’s why they are equipped with billyclubs.
Someone wrote”Banning tasers will result in more dead criminals and more dead cops.”How would banning tasers result in more dead officers?If their is a situation where weapons are being used an officer better be useing a gun.As for criminals their is only a small percent of them willing to die rather then be arrested.
I would ask those who advocate the use of tasers would they be willing to allow such a device at a lower setting to be used on juvenile delinquent acting in a similar manner at school as belligerent citizens do?Remember they have been known to be used on juvenlies before and would you want them to be used on your child?
Whether shocktreatment is still used or not in the medical profession,the medical profession has been arguing and fighting over the use of it and whether it’s more detrimental to the person then helpful.
Electrical charge to and throughout the body not only effects the nervous system which stops the body from reacting but as I said effects the brain which the medical community really has only scratched the surface of understanding how it works.
If you’d rather be shocked then hit by a billyclub or some other means that’s your choice,as for me I know qualified officers know how to shot a gun and use it to stop a suspect and not kill someone.If they can’t handle or deal with a suspect in a hand to hand situation which occurs more often they aren’t qualified to be an officer in the first place as far as I’m concerned.Officers are suppose to be tuff not copout wimps.
As for you hawke find an officer who will tase you.I’m sure one would be willing to do it to you as many times as you’d like.It would be cheaper then going to a medical professional.
TasingSO your telling me if you were an officer and I or someone else was simply unruly that you wouldn’t have the ablity to subdue a person by hand and have to use a weapon such as a device that could have medical implications that even doctors can’t agree on?You don’t have the knowledge or ability to use pepper spray or a club?If you don’t have the ability to defend yourself either by hand to hand,pepper spray or using a club as I said you shouldn’t be a police officer.
If an officer isn’t suppose to stand in arms way to protect and serve the community he works for why bother giving him a gun,club and pepper spray?Or even have law enforcement patrol the streets?Ordinary citzens can use a taser stopping anyone just as easily as someone wearing a blue uniform and carries a badge.
Let me give you a scenario,a person is unruly and refusing to comply with an officer.Instead of the officer using pepper spray or a club they go straight for the taser using it to subdue the suspect.The suspect,whether guilty of something or not then develops a neurological disorder such as a seizure disorder or something which he never had before tasing.
Now can you prove the taser wasn’t a factor in the suspect developing such a disorder?And should law enforcement and the city or county be required to pay for future medical treatment since they did use a electrical device that can’t be discounted as a contributing factor that some in the medical community would testify that electrical charges to the body is detrimental to the body and brain.
How much of your tax dollars are you willing to part with if courts can’t discount the possiblity and reward an unruly citizen damages all because an officer didn’t use pepper spray,club or some other means they are suppose to be trained to use.
If you are walking and someone comes along and starts hurting you and an officer is their do you expect the officer to stand by because he doesn’t have to get in arms way?Hopefully when he shoots the taser he doesn’t hit the wrong person either.
Show me your proven satistics that tasers can’t cause future medical concerns and perhaps I’ll change my mind.To help test the theory have a person with a pasemaker stand next to a microwave maybe that less harmful then a taser.
If you follow news their have been some officers across the country who have sued the makers of the taser for what it’s done to them as well.
TasingDear Pam,
I went back and read your article as I said I would.The comments I posted before demonstrate that my words aren’t even sufficient enough to the dangers of tasing.
The Vermont man and what happened to him clearly prove that law enforcemnet officers are unable to access a situation clearly before taking action.
The Vermont mans situation really hit to the core for me since I do suffer from the same condition he does.
Law enforcement should have easily been able to see and understand he did not have control of his body.
I wonder if the man was aware of what was being done to him.In my case when I suffer such an episode I don’t even know it til hours later after I become conscious and others tell me I had an episode.
The other incidents you mention in your article demonstrate well why tasers are very dangerous and how those who carry them use them with no regard to a human being.
Now that I have shared my situation with you and others you know why I didn’t have to read your article before making a comment.
If what happened to the Vermont man was to ever happen to me,authorities would pay out the nose for the actions of their law enforcemnet as well as those who did it would no longer be employed,that would be apart of any settlement I would make.
I would advise the Vermont man and the patient in the hospital to do the same as well as all the others.