Here we are, back to the land of Sally Kern, where the hot bigoted wind comes sweepin’ down the plain. The hot air belching from the lips of State Sen. Steve Russell (R-Oklahoma City) is a stench to behold.
State Sen. Steve Russell, R-Oklahoma City, said the newly passed Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act, which extends hate crimes law protections to include actual or perceived gender, sexual orientation, gender identity and disability, oversteps the bounds of the federal government and hinders free speech and religious freedom.
“The federal government should not be creating a special class of people, and that is just what they did when they passed and signed this bill,” Russell said. “All crimes against another person have some level of hate in them, and people can be assured that our laws that protect people against crimes such as murder are sufficient to protect everyone.”
Russell said because the government has decided to intervene on issues of morality, he is worried that religious leaders who speak out against any lifestyle could be imprisoned for their speech. “The law is very vague to begin with,” Russell said. “Sexual orientation is a very vague word that could be extended to extremes like necrophilia.”
…When asked about whether the state of Oklahoma should reject the $5 million in federal funds that the federal government would give to law enforcement agencies to help prosecute hate crimes, Russell said he thought about finding a way to pass his law while taking the money, but said it would be a compromise in the values of his bill.
You’re doin’ fine, Oklahoma!
Oklahoma O.K.
L – A – H – O – M – A
OKLAHOMA!
Yeeow!




State Sen. Steve Russell, R-Oklahoma City, said the newly passed Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act, which extends hate crimes law protections to include actual or perceived gender, sexual orientation, gender identity and disability, oversteps the bounds of the federal government and hinders free speech and religious freedom.
35 Comments


..and here is the latest from GEORGIA.. at least now it is a HATE CRIME.
ah you have it up below. But I feel like posting the Puerto Rico one here too.… possibly we should just send them to this 'persons' office.
He LOOKS Like A Necrophileand he also looks like he still lives with his mother.
It’s interesting,you never hear these bigots talking about repealing hate crimes protection for religion. Apparently they are the only worthy “special class of people”. If hate crimes legislation is unconstitutional, it must be abolished altogether.
I don’t think “Mr. Rogers” Russell will include that in his bill…
Seriously?This is what happens when public funding for mental health care is cut. Instead of being properly medicated and treated, the patients are given a public forum and elected to office.
These people make my brain hurt. Seriously.
And while we’re on the subject of mental health, the fact that these folks are so obsessed with necrophilia and bestiality speaks volumes.
a special class of peopleState Sen. Steve Russell, R-Oklahoma City would be leading the cause to create a special class of people if he had a gay child who had been murdered in the fashion of Jorge Steven Lopez Mercado.
A poster child for the elimination of ‘speech or debate’ immunity
Asshattery also is a very vague word that
couldshould be extended to extremes such as ‘illiterates (and those devoid of math skills; when last I checked, “sexual orientation” is TWO words) elected to public office’ and ‘public officeholders who blatantly lie about legislation’I just moved to the Oklahoma City areaGoddess help me if I’m living in his district.
o_O
Dena
No…He looks like…
There but for a tan…and tie (and sexual orientation???)
Hell – even their suits look alike.
This bozo is grandstandingWhenever a state law conflicts with a federal law, the federal law takes precendence. No exceptions.
And if he’s any kind of competent lawyer and/or legistlator, he knows it.
LOL!LOL OMG the FIRST person I thought he looked like was Charlie Crist too!
But Charlie Crist with a twist of Norman Bates, or Ed Gein.
Oklahoma: Provincetown of Necrophiles?Could we sell this idea?
And a tan
I get so tirred of the LOSER welfare statesnot namiing names, but it rhymes with SCHMOKLAHOMA.
Wish they’d LEAVE the Union.
Lord Crist Almighty!The second coming!
So THAT’S what they mean by “necking!”My, my, what do these people think of in their spare time! Necrophilia? Let me guess, he wants to keep coroners from marrying.
Only compared to F*CKING an OKIE, do dead people seem SEXIER
Why is it always a Rethuglican?Because they were beat as children. It has been scientifically proven that children who are beaten have lower IQs than those who aren’t.
Maybe someone should send him a copy of theAPA’s dictionary so he can look up the phrase sexual orientation.
And also a copy of the APA’s article “Being Gay is Just as Healthyas Being Straight” at http://www.psychologymatters.o…
Nevermind, just email it to him from hereWhat Is Sexual Orientation?
Sexual orientation is an enduring emotional, romantic, sexual, or affectional attraction toward others. It is easily distinguished from other components of sexuality including biological sex, gender identity (the psychological sense of being male or female), and the social gender role (adherence to cultural norms for feminine and masculine behavior).
Sexual orientation exists along a continuum that ranges from exclusive heterosexuality to exclusive homosexuality and includes various forms of bisexuality. Bisexual persons can experience sexual, emotional, and affectional attraction to both their own sex and the opposite sex. Persons with a homosexual orientation are sometimes referred to as gay (both men and women) or as lesbian (women only).
Sexual orientation is different from sexual behavior because it refers to feelings and self-concept. Individuals may or may not express their sexual orientation in their behaviors.
He doesn’t look like a necrophile to me.More like a corpse. Which, politically, is what he ought to become, soon, very soon.
I believeSouth Carolina tried “nullifying” federal laws once upon a time. And if memory serves, it didn’t work out too well for them. But I assume Oklahoma schools don’t teach about anything as unAmerican as the Civil War (always assuming Steve wasn’t hoam skooled).
My letter to Mr. RussellHaving read your statement on the recent passage of the S. 909 which expanded long existing hate crimes law included in Chapter 13 of title 18, United States Code, it seems you are confused. I understand you have lots to do there in OK, and probably don’t have time to read existing federal statutes, let alone every new addition made to existing law, so I’d like to share a few handy resource tools with you.
http://www.thomas.loc.gov is a great resource. A good place to visit before commenting on legislation coming before the house and senate. Here you can read the actual text of legislation being voted on, thus avoiding embarrassing public statements which include glaring factual errors . It also has a handy section that can help supplement the scanty public school education regarding how our system of government works here in the U.S., historical documents , as well as links to a wide variety of resources from the library of congress. The specific law governing hate crimes can be found here – http://thomas.loc.gov/home/gpo… It is relatively brief and easy to read.
Once a bill has been passed by the federal government, a handy place to familiarize yourself with factual information regarding the United States Code is http://www.gpoaccess.gov/uscode/ . This can clear up any questions one might have regarding the actual text of the legal code enacted by the government here in the U.S., again, avoiding unnecessary gaffs which could misinform your constituents as well as undermine your credibility.
Another good basic overview of how things work in the U.S. http://www.schoolhouserock.tv/…
Hope this helps.
Sincerely,
Your Fellow American
Susan L. Jeffers
Same Old Hypocrisy So if he wants to erroneously allege that the bill can be extended to something that if enacted is illegal, how about this …… Was religion defined in the previous hate crimes bill? I don’t think so, so I guess I can interpret that to mean that it allows those who claim to be following their “religion” to be protected in uhh I don’t know human sacrifice, but that’s not what the bill says at all does it? So why would any addition to the hate crimes bill condone illegal acts? It doesn’t it didn’t do it by not defining religion nor does it do it by not defining sexual orientation. GEEZ!
School House Rock FTW!I love this, Susan! It was so very polite and educational too. LOL
run do not walk to the nearest Native American reservationThey at least are covered by Federal Laws.
Sitting in rural Louisiana where White Supremists have a swath right up the middle of the state, just north of Baton Rouge, I fully appreciate living in HELL.
My first thought was…“what an obvious closet case”.
“Very vague term…”Except when it is explicitly defined in the law. Which it is. So, has he:
1. Not read it,
2. Been unable to understand the very plain wording of the bill,
OR
3. Just lied through his damned teeth?
4. All of the ABOVE
Not necessarily…I did read where in the instance where the state punishment is more severe than the federal, it takes priority.
Check your hypothesis.What about Dems who were beaten as children? Independents? Progressives? Readers and contributors on this very blog? Your comment suggests that you were not beaten as a child. How fortunate. There are survivors all around you, if you would only see.
Note: I am a pacifist and disagree with violence against anyone.Does this assclown not realize that by nullifying the law, as if Oklahoma could do that, he has a better chance of doing what he accuses the law of doing? Let’s imagine there is no hate crimes law in Oklahoma. A Christian minister says some anti-gay stuff in church every Sunday, and some gay guys have had enough of it and throw a brick through the nice stained-glass window, and there’s a rainbow flag sticker on it, leaving little doubt as to who did it. But it’s not any different than any other crime, not meant to intimidate the minister into keeping quiet about his views. It was just simple vandalism. Just some kids. What happens when it escalates? Each time is just a discrete incidence of graffiti, a pastor hurt…
Again, I would not agree with LGBT people doing this to Christians. I just think this asshat needs to realize that a law that is good for the goose is good for the ganderqueer.
Same here, without rules making queers look bad, he might pop right out of the closetHopefully someone will out him soon enough, seems to be the standard timeline for these things.
A teaching moment : Oklahoma styleMommy, what’s necrophilia? A creepy guy in a suit is talking about it.