Washington voters have accomplished a national first by ratifying a new law that makes state registered domestic partnerships fully parallel to civil marriage. The provisional election result for Referendum 71 is currently 52.6% to 47.4%. This story is huge and is already getting some well-deserved attention. And remember, we won by a comfortable margin in an off-year election when the likely voter pool is dominated by older, more conservative voters. We know support for domestic partnerships is much higher in the general electorate.
Much is being made of the geographic clustering of counties where the majority of voters have approved R-71 (right, in green). Vote results are dismissed by some folk with a “well of course Puget Sound counties…”. It is true that election results do rather neatly support the stereotype of Washington’s east-west divide. But putting the R-71 results in historical context reveals a deeper story: almost every Washington county shows an increase in pro-equality voting.
The last time Washington voters had the opportunity to ratify a pro-equality law at the polls was in 1997. Initiative to the People 677 proposed an employment non-discrimination law. The ballot title read Shall discrimination based on sexual orientation be prohibited in employment, employment agency, and union membership practices, without requiring employee partner benefits or preferential treatment?.
The measure was rejected 59.7% to 40.3%. Contrary to the current image of the Puget Sound area of Washington as progressive, not one single county – not even Seattle’s home of King County – voted to approve I-677. Contrast that with the current election where the electorate as a whole approved R-71 and majorities in 10 of Washington’s 39 counties have approved R-71. But the truly stunning statistic is that the rate of ballot measure approval increased between 1997 and 2009 in all but one county.

Another mark of progress is the fact that voters in 21 counties approved R-71 by over 40%. Forty percent was the average statewide approval rate for I-677 in 1997. Those 21 counties are: Clallam, Clark, Cowlitz, Grays Harbor, Island, Jefferson, King, Kitsap, Kittitas, Klickitat, Mason, Pacific, Pierce, San Juan, Skagit, Skamania, Snohomish, Thurston, Wahkiakum, Whatcom, Whitman.
As you consider the graph, realize that in contrast to R-71, I-677 was rather narrow in scope. It dealt only with the employment discrimination of individuals. Voting yes on I-677 didn’t ask voters to contemplate the meaning of family; didn’t ask voters to recognize the existence of gay and lesbian parents; didn’t ask voters to find the fiction in school-focused scare tactics. In other words, not only have Washington voters moved towards equality in virtually every county, they’ve shown by their R-71 vote that they’re open to supporting equality much more comprehensively in the law. This is big.Cross-posted at Washblog.



29 Comments



Go for DPsI’ve been thinking, and it may very well be the path ahead. Go for DPs. Everywhere possible, grab DP’s on an equal level with state marriage. The tide is shifting and it’ll only build up as we keep fighting.
People are at least more comfortable with the concept of Domestic Partnerships. Once they get used to that, it’s only a matter of time before marriage slides into place. See: Vermont.
From there? We can hit at the federal level. Assuming we haven’t already barged through it on the way.
Also- Lurleen, thank you SO MUCH for all your hard work here in Washington! You’ve really inspired me!
Thanks Reiuji
Excelsior!
Yes, it is.
And for this to happen in an off-year election, one in which conservative turnout tipped the scales to the right in other states? It’s a minor miracle, and I tip my hat off to you.
And btw…I hope we’ll rise up to the occasion and make you proud if it happens next in Nevada.
hugs Lurleen…this is a big part your VICTORY!
I’m counting on it!
hugs back petey!The win this week was the result of a very smart campaign run by Washington Families Standing Together. But the overall improvement in numbers of “yes” votes between 1997 to now is, imo, the result of people like you and me just coming out and telling our stories to people who care about us. I think that had a lot to do with getting from there to here. Our straight allies joining us in ever growing numbers in being “out” will take us the next step. Every conversation had today is another potential vote next time. And really, it is only via these conversations that we will win votes. Political campaigns are not the right time to try to persuade great numbers of people on our issues. We need to keep building slowly and long-term.
Sheesh, look at that. I really can go on and on can’t I, lol!
If you’re gonna lose ground in a county …what better place than Garfield, the least populous county in the state?
Congrats on this solid win. Yay!
Only the smallest county showed less supportIt looks like Garfield, the least populous county in the entire state, is the only one where support decreased.
I also think it’s remarkable that one of the highest margins of victory (just a fraction under Seattle/King County) came in Jefferson County which has the highest percentage of over 65 residents in the state.
Thanks, Lurleen!I’m still monitoring the situation here. There’s a chance they may be too occupied with the “zygote personhood” initiative to target us… But of course, they often find a way to multitask and Richard Ziser (our version of Larry Stickney) has been making noise about possibly pulling a referendum to repeal SB 283. Hopefully it doesn’t happen, but if it does all of you in WA have inspired me to work my @ss off to defeat them like y’all have up there!
Things are both better and worse than Lurleen saysBetter b/c in 1997 they were voting on employment discrimination protections, which is an easier issue for us than DP. Yet in 2009, we did substantially better on a much more difficult issue. Presumably, if we had been voting on employment discrimination in 2009 in WA, the contrast would be even more dramatic. I think this is the result of people coming out, persuasion, visibility in the media, and 12 years of the grim reaper clearing out the most homophobic age groups in WA.
However, things are also worse b/c the truth is that if the Reject side had been fully funded and professionally managed, with a pollster and a marketing/PR firm like Schubert Flint, we almost certainly would have lost. NOM is probably kicking itself that it only gave $5,000, as opposed to a total in ME that will probably approach or exceed $2 million.
Congrats Lurleen!!This is really great news! The demographics for equality are encouraging! Thanks for doing so much heavy lifting! Who new you could bench press that much!?! WOW
Another Silver LiningThe last ad that Stand For Marriage Maine/NOM ran in Maine stated something along the lines of “we don’t want to deny equality to gays and lesbians, civil unions give them rights, we just want to defend marriage as between a blah, blah, blah”
In essence, they have conceded the civil union battle publicly already. And they know damn well that if they (NOM) starts running anti-civil union commericals we will plaster the Maine ad all over their asses.
graph paper is really light, lol
Here it isI first saw it over at SLOG (thx Dan Savage!)
Slight correctionLooks like it passed in 10 counties according to the graph. You mention it only passing it 8 counties.
Larry Stickney Is Holding On For One More Dayto get his name in the papers.
According to the Seattle Times:
Well Larry, you better do more than hope – I would suggest you pray. But that won’t do you any good because of the remaining 220,019 uncounted ballots you would need to get at least 137,708 of them to win. That’s a whopping 63%. Do that many people even live in eastern Washington? Heck, your strongest base of support, Garfield County, only has 1,500 registered voters.
Pack it up dude – the 21st century is arriving and you are a dinosaur slowly becoming extinct (thank ya’ Jesus).
you’re right – thank you!i’ve fixed the wrong number.
People just don’t want us to get “married”they want that word for themselves and they will go out and forget all the gay and lesbian couples they know, the relatives they have just to preserve that word for themselves. This is a great victory indeed, but the fact that over thirty states have voted against us because of certain phrasing, is disturbing and baffling to me.
Larry hold your breath til you win…do that honey
Have FaithCivil marriage rights are coming. The question is not if, it’s when. The marriage genie is already out of the bottle in 5 states. We will get more with time. And, the US Constitution guarantees due process and full faith and credit- the Supreme Court will uphold this. It’s only a matter of time.
It’s just unfortunate that we have to go through the process. Change takes time.
Too bad there’s no real pollingThis result could be interpreted to mean that:
(1) the electorate isn’t really against our having equal rights, but
(2) they are not buying that the denial of the word “marriage” is the equivalent of “separate but equal” – a phrase originally used to describe the actual physical segregation of African Americans in the South
It would be helpful to know why people vote as they do, so we could better strategize.
Thank you LurleenFor all your hard work. You truly were instrumental in getting this done.
I do want to add that although many ballots have not yet been processed here, Whitman County had been projected have a higher rate of votes to Reject than it seems we do. Credit for that has to go to our straight allies, who really worked their tails off–LGBT folks are a small minority here, even in Pullman; we never could have done so well without them.
Been hanging w/me too much!
I am so damned THRILLED FOR WASHINGTON- congrats and big hugs, fellow Wonder Twin!
To take this a step further, thoughwe would have to show that DP’s do lead to actual discrimination given the fundamental equality that should exist between DPs/civil unions and marriage.
We actually need more information and/or discrimination cases from Jersey. And, possibly, California.
Told that story, over and over. Couple with complete DP registration..Plus Power of Attorney, Power of Attorney for Health. Legal adoption of daughter.One partner dies at home. Sherriff Deputy comes out as 'Coroner' representative, tells grieving surviving partner. Oh, our Sherriff doesn't believe in that law. I am to confiscate all of the deceased belongings (and send them to the family he hasn't seen in 20 years..) including wedding ring! This on the night of the death!So NO THEY ARE NOT THE SAME!
Time to Celebrate this Historic Victory!Come Plan the Referendum 71 Victory Rally
The lgbt and allied communities of Washington state made history this election day. 31 states have tried to win marriage equality on the ballot and 31 states have lost. We became the first state in the country to put legal protections for same-sex couples and the ballot… AND WE WON. Now it’s time to celebrate our history victory and talk about next steps for full lgbt equality.
We also mourn the loss of Question 1 in Maine and want to show solidarity with our brothers and sisters in Maine, as others around the country have shown solidarity with our victory here.
Seattle OUTProtest has called a community organizing meeting to discuss and plan out the Victory Rally and everyone is invited to attend.
Sunday, November 8
4:00 pm
Husky Union Building, 2nd Floor
University of Washington Campus (map below)
Lt. Dan Choi confirmed to speak!
Tentative Referendum 71 Victory Rally
Saturday, November 14
12:00 pm
Location: TBD
This is an idea that gives me hope. A jumping-off place to build upon (if that isn’t a mixed metaphor).
I’m aware of thatWe MUST get that story out there.
That’s my point.