As I’ve mentioned many times before on this blog, I sit in a position as a triple minority commenting on these often dicey political issues. I have to take potshots from some in the LGBT community, who take issue with either the number of pieces I do about race or the content of the posts, and from some in the black community who feel that I’m not black enough or have sold out to The Homosexual Agenda.
Here’s a prime example of denigrating not what I say, but what I am in terms of identity, from a black woman in the comments of Americablog who is incensed about my criticism of the administration’s handling of LGBT issues. She calls racism.
Wow. The racism is flowing here. I am a daily reader of this blog but the way that you guys have attacked our first black President is unfortunate. My god he has been in office for 10 months. Is marriage more important than having a job? Health care?I am getting quite tired of the white gays and half breeded gays slamming Obama after he has only been in office for MONTHS. Go check out the black blogs and you will see that there is a true divide in who supports Obama and who doesn’t.
You see, I can’t possibly be black and hold the views that I do. My “cultural” blackness is erased in her mind by my gayness, plus she’s keeping score by shade of skin, aka colorism. Nice.
Of course I had to laugh at “half breed” on a couple of levels. 1) I’m not biracial, I’m the product of two parents who are black (and neither of them were/are biracial), something that people seem to have a hard time grasping is possible these days.
It’s only been in the last decade or so that people have even raised the question about me, so I attribute it to more biracial people asserting their status than anything else; and 2) If you’re of a certain age, who can forget Cher on top of a horse singing this in 1973:
But note that commenter doesn’t question the President’s blackness, she claims it even though he is a true “half-breed”. This is the level of racial discourse going on out there; it’s polluted by racism from without and within, which shows you why honest, reality-based discussions about race are hard to come by. This faux “half-breed” homo will continue trying to have those discussions.
More below the fold.Bill Maxwell, in a 2003 article in the St. Petersburg Times described the colorism phenomenon quite nicely…
Colorism has a long and ugly history among American blacks, dating back to slavery, when light-skinned blacks were automatically given preferential treatment by plantation owners and their henchmen.Colorism's history is fascinating: Fair-skinned slaves automatically enjoyed plum jobs in the master's house, if they had to work at all. Many traveled throughout the nation and abroad with their masters and their families. They were exposed to the finer things, and many became educated as a result. Their darker-tone peers toiled in the fields. They were the ones who were beaten, burned and hanged, the ones permanently condemned to be the lowest of the low in U.S. society. For them, even learning – reading, 'riting, 'rithmetic – was illegal.
When slavery ended, light-skinned blacks established social organizations that barred darker ex-slaves. Elite blacks of the early 20th century were fair-skinned almost to the person. Even today, most blacks in high positions have fair skin tones, and most blacks who do menial jobs or are in prison are dark.
Maxwell describes a phenomenon that I am well-aware of because my mom, who was fair, experienced it and shared the tale with me –the brown paper bag test.
Her exposure to the "test" occurred in the 1950s, while living in Brooklyn, NY, she was dating a young gentleman, who was brown-skinned. She was invited to a party in the neighborhood and brought her friend to the dance. At the door, the host leaned in to my mother and said that he could not be admitted with her. She was upset and asked to step inside to discuss the matter. The host was uncomfortable that my mom didn't get the "secret signal", but brought her in (while he waited outside), and was told point blank "He doesn't pass the brown paper bag test." He was too dark, and there was to be none of that going on at this party.
Related:
* The White House called LGBTs part of pajama-clad ‘Internet left fringe’ for asking for civil rights
* On Obama’s HRC keynote — plus watching our movement in flux
* Joe Solmonese clarifies the 2017 message delivered in HRC e-blast
* Is HRC telling people to sit hands folded for Obama re: progress until 2017?




82 Comments


“Half breeded”Black people revoking the black card of gays who dare to be critical of the President are so STOO-PID.
Does anyone know how sick and tired I am of bullshit like this by ignorant-ass black people/ Certainly the President should be, does the writer even know the lengths to which Obama was subjected to this his damn self.
Half-breeded? Maybe she meant half-braided?Oh, Pam! You crossed The Line for that blogger.
Not just the Color Line, but the Reverence Line, and The Patience Line.
I have to say, however, that I find illiterate insults (“half-breeded”) a bit easier to stomach since they are another avenue to reveal the ignorance of the person flinging the insult.
I’m not saying you shouldn’t take offense, of course! :-)
LMAO@ “half-braided.”
I have responded to that woman at america blog by the way. And I was nice.
Ignore ignoranceI’ve seen the same amount of mindless vitriol thrown abut when people were assessing Dan Savage’s very inaccurate role of the black vote in the Proposition 8 debacle and also at times when this blog discusses issues of the transgender community.
Unfortunately people get so heated that they forget that they are supposed to be on the same side.
Sometimes you have to ignore ignorance.
Nice video PamThanks for Cher “Half-Breed” video. I do remember this! Seems there are crazies everywhere. Love this blog. Don’t change a thing Pam. I know you want!! Thanks for all of the work you do.
Homophobia is accepted today in AmericaAnd as long as you are hating on gays, you can get away with saying almost anything, and many people do.
I feel for you Pam, and thank you for your contributions.
*I* call racism.Easily and quickly.
I am a halfbreed. And if this particular poster would like to come over to someplace other than here or AmericaBlog, I will share a few thoughts with her.
As someone who is taken to task for pretty much everything from the color of my skin to the color and kind of my visible hair, nothing gets under my skin faster and more deeply than colorism.
All the trans stuff in the world comes a a stellar distance second to it. This woman, whoever she is, not only has nor right to strip you of your heritage (though she has a right to say such), but she’s perpetuating racism itself to use that kind of concept.
And I’m a scary halfbreed, as well — the sort that doesn’t claim one over the others, but claims all of them equally. Because halfbreed’s — like the President — are generally strongly encouraged to take on or the other, and to abandon the rest, and it’s always based on the color of one’s skin and so, in that very real sense, it is, without any question in my mind, just as compelling and horrific a form of racism as any other.
And that’s not even getting to the point where calling you a halfbreed is sorta appropriative of the experience of those of us who are multi-ethnic, and has as part of it a privilege that exists because she is, apparently, whole breeded.
And I’ll be nice and point out only without any further commentary on the subject, that it can’t be an insult.
Because if so, then there’s something bad about me and Obama and many, many more of us that has only to do with the nature of our birth.
Colorism aside…I cringed when I read “Is marriage more important than having a job? Health care?”
Criticism of Obama isn’t about a single issue. As a gay man, I was critical of Obama over a wide range of issues, all if which were supposed to fall under this big umbrella of “change.”
But to address the writer’s question, the marriage issue ought to have been put to rest eons ago and then we could, perhaps, be focused on issues such as health care — the details of which certainly are up for debate, as opposed to fundamental human rights, the details of which should NOT be up for debate, but continue to be.
Since the DU gay purges startedI’ve stopped going to sites, like AmericaBlog, that list DU as “sites we like”. Of course, you can’t go to DU and get any confirmation from the administration of the purges, because the moderators immediately delete any reference to the banned LGBT and ally posters. That gives AmericaBlog some cover because they can claim that as far as they know there have been no purges. It’s just that the number of LGBT and ally posters there has shrunk dramatically over the last few months.
is “half breeded”even a word, in proper english?
those of us that voted for mr. obama (full disclosure: i did, but in truth, only because the alternative was a batshit crazy old man, and an even batshit crazier wannabe cougar, with an eye twitch) with a (not unreasonable) expectation that he wouldn’t be a republican, masquerading as a democrat, can’t really be faulted for being a tad dismayed with him at this point.
unfortunately, what i feared during the primaries (a distinct lack of fire in his belly) has been on prominent display during his first 10 months in office. i didn’t expect him to immediately rush and get everything done, in the first week. however, i had hoped he’d show some true leadership. so far, that’s not been the case.
a leader um, well………………leads. he/she doesn’t stand on the periphery, hoping the job will get done by subordinates.
if my unhappiness with this is “racism”, than i can live with that. had it been hillary clinton, i guess i’d be accused of “sexism”, were the same situation to apply, so i pretty much can’t win either way.
somehow, i’ll dig deep inside me, and find the will to carry on.
Ah, screw it.I went ahead and shared over there.
Sorry, Pam.
This is an issue of super-patriotismWe covered this in my junior year high school English class, actually. My teacher was the debate coach and had little tolerance for super-patriotism. His definition for it, which I’ve found works better than any other, is associating any group that one claims membership in as inherently good just because one has chosen the association.
In practice, this works out to people who blindly proclaim that their heros/groups must be doing the right thing. The people who have proclaimed this have invested too much of their personal identity, and no one ever wants to be thought of as the “bad guy”. (Think about the number of Germans who proclaimed after WWII that they didn’t want the Nazis to run their country.)
Common venues for super-patriotism range from the banal superfandom to the inherent nationalism to statement of belief, such as religion or political party. All are dangerous because they dissociate the need for criticism of a group that one belongs to.
name calling, the last resort of a weak mind.I’m surprised they managed something beyond dootie head. Well at least you know you are getting to them.
GoodCivility is important, even though she was uncivil and rude to Pam.
It is implicitly an insultShe wasn’t merely saying as a point of (false) information that Pam is mixed-race or biracial, she was using a term that is, according to the Oxford English Dictionary “frequently derogatory and often considered offensive.” It wasn’t any compliment about her supposed uniting of different gene pools. She meant it was a slam, though she exposed herself as ignorant of the language (always a minus to me as an author) since the past tense of breed is bred.
Sing it, Pam!You just have to do Cher on your next karaoke night!!!!!!
Or you could rewrite the lyrics of “Torn Between Two Lovers”
to
“Torn between Two Colors.”
Okay, it would be an in-joke, but so what?
it isn’t just name callingI tolerate that all the time. It’s the injection of race into the discussion that wasn’t there before she lobbed the irrelevant but potent bomb in there to derail the criticism of the admin.
AmenAccording to her:
If you’re white and gay, you can’t criticize the Prez.
If you’re half-white and gay, you can’t criticize the Prez.
Is anyone allowed to criticize the Prez???
Lev, sitting here in “sleep separates,” having a lazy morning.
And, thusly…it’s racist and saying there is something bad about being such.
I should also addPam, if you’re interested go to Democratic Underground into the African American issues forum and check if the user name matches one of the usual posters there who frequently refer to the LGBT community as “racist” or “a den of vipers.”
Nope: no one can criticize the PrezToday, in America, any criticism of President Obama somehow “proves” that you are a racist bigot. We have seen this before, I’m sure. Anyone remember when standing up for the freedom of speech and freedom of assembly somehow “proved” that you were a member of the Communist Party, single-mindedly dedicated to overthrowing the US Constitution? Or more recently, when any criticism of President Bush somehow “proved” that you were a traitor who should immediately be put to death for the good of the country?
No Jobs? No Health Care?I admire you tremendously, Pam, for managing to do what few people can do–and it takes energy and guts many folks may not recognize. You stand at the intersection of several marginal groups, and you speak from that intersection with courage, balance, and dignity.
You don’t let those of us who are white and gay get away with our racism. And you shouldn’t. And you keep the feet of the African-American community to the fire about homophobia. What you do is a great gift to several communities.
Here’s what strikes me in the remarks of your detractor: she asks, “Is marriage more important than having a job? Health care?”
And I’d like to point out that those are issues that concern not only people of color, but LGBT people, too. I have no health care coverage because I don’t have a job. And because I live in an area in which there are NO partner benefits in almost any workplace for same-sex partners. My partner’s state-sponsored workplace has statements prohibiting discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation. But it does not provide partner benefits, and we can’t afford them.
Many of us live in places in which there is no legal protection against being fired, denied housing, turned away from hospital visits, SOLELY because we are LGBT. It concerns me that people of color who rightly reject that kind of discrimination when it is based on pigmentation often seem oblivious to the fact that it happens to others based on sexual orientation.
We need to educate ourselves better. Thank you for doing that, even when you receive hostile comments from several sides.
“Liza” continues her racist/colorism drivelA commenter at Pandagon:
Also, don’t feel sorry for me about her comments; this is the kind of BS that derails discussions about political disagreements. And it’s meant to do so. I’m just calling it out for what it is.
Is it possible that Liza is a RedStater on the loose?I say this because I have heard the claim from many conservative, racially incited whites since Jan. 19th: Anyone who criticizes Obama will be accused of being racist.
Yet this is not a claim I’ve heard from any anti-racist white or POC.
I bet anyone here $5 that Liza is a white male early-retired auto worker, Cheetos and PJs to be investigated by the White House Internet Contact Team, playing a prank.
Not to take away from the requirement that we call this out for what it is–a newly opened can of Crazy Talk–if you take out the racial slurs, this person is suggesting “mixed race people were less supportive of Obama than culturally black Americans”. That’s just wrong.
Actually (FINALLY HAVE INTERNET UP- BEEN OUT ALL MORNING…)
Michael Jackson’s “Black or White” popped into my head- can’t find an embeddable version.
The Audacity of Some PeoplePam, this woman, whoever she is, had the audacity to assume you are a “half breed” whatever that means these days, since we are all mixed (myself half Albanian/English and Irish (I pretend the later do not exist because I embrace the slavic and crazy side of my family and revel in the culture of the Balkans)….nonetheless, using “half breed” as a perjorative when in fact we know how many slaves’children became half breeds through Master-slave rape. She is a pathetic human being. But I must say as someone who is “white” that I appreciate your presence in the movment because we need so many more black-identified people in the movement speaking out against the injustice wherever it may be, including in the White House nonpolicies, nonmovement (directed by Rahmbo) toward changing nothing. So Obama may get to sign a bill that stipulate it is a criminal act to attack or kill someone for who they are–huge advance there (excuse my sarcasm) which we have been working on for years, well before Mr. Obama even entered the Senate.
Love you for doing what you do. Stand by your sister and love the Cher “Half Breed” video and photo and your wonderful humor. Keep on kickin’ some ass!
Tanya
Pam’s “blend” is perfecta mundo!Pam your “blend” is perfecta mundo! People like that nut who attacked you are selfish and ignorant of our pain and suffering, bigoted or jealous of your leadership.
Sometimes a cigar is a cigarHeavens. Because all criticism of Obama HERE is rational and without tinge of any racism.
Oh, it’s LIZA!I remember her. She likes to call everyone who disagrees with her “racist”. So welcome to the club.
Speaking as a fellow “Half-Breed” –YOU GO GIRL!!!!!
How sad…That some would rather deflect the issues by turning everything into a race war. It’s disgusting when the Republicans do it by injecting racism into all their “discussions”, and it’s just as disgusting when “Obama supporters” try to shut down debate on the left by accusing us of “racism”. Either way, it’s sad to see racial prejudice getting in the way of honest debate and better understanding.
Exactly!She derailed the criticism of this Administration and distracted us from the task at hand. Let’s not play into this old but effective strategy. We have work to do!! This energy should be redirected ‘towards holding this Administrations feet to the fire.’ Thank you Pam for all the work you do!!!
It coulda been worse, PamShe could have called you
half-breaded, implying you were a parmigiana that hadn’t been properly cooked
or
half-brooded, as in an egg not properly hatched
or
half-branded, meaning cattle not entirely sure where it belongs
At least she kept her insult to the human sphere.
I’m suprised it remained on America blog sounds like Breibart TVThere was a real mental giant woman at Breibart TV who repeatedly called people “inbreeded.”
Sorry you had this garbage spewed at you, the fact it cued up a Cher song, doesn’t erace the TRASH at it’s source.
content of characterRev. Martin Luther King, Jr. dreamed that one day we would judge people by the content of their character, not the color of their skin.
At yesterday’s march the speaker pointed out that when asked who the Martin Luther King of the Queer rights movement is, he said Martin Luther King is our leader.
Rev. King was right to have that dream, and we should all be trying to make that dream a reality today. If we did, we would judge President Obama based on the content of his character. When candidate Obama accepted delegate votes in Florida and Michigan, where he was not on the ballot, that was a clue into the content of his character. When he said he was against marriage equality, there was clue number two. When he said that preachers rights to not perform wedding ceremonies was more important than my right to marry that was the last clue I needed to know the content of his character.
President Obama has shown by his actions (not his promises, not what he has not done but what he has done) by blocking Alcee Hasting from ending funding for Don’t Ask Just Kick the Fags Out & Replace them with Felons & Fascists, and discharging 420 Americans from the armed service, that the content of his character is based on heterosupremacist theocracy.
Pam, the content of your character is stellar, as you fearlessly blog about the truth. The content of the character the ad hominem attacker is evident — unable to argue coherently about the facts that person attacks your relatives.
To be fair…I actually thought that Pam might have been of mixed race based on her picture. Her position on any particular issue was irrelevnt to her potential “mixed heritage.” Now that I know that she’s not mixed…it does not change a damn thing. I think that she’s right on somethings and wrong on others. Anyone who thinks that someone does or should hold a position based solely on their heritage or skin pigmentation is a fool to begin with.
People like yougive me hope that civil rights struggles will be based less on what makes us different and more on what unites us.
In terms of breeding, I wish everyone would get a genetic family tree test done because these often show more mixing than most people assume. Faced with information that contradicts what people think about their own ethnicity and race may open the door a bit more discussion on these issues.
Depressing!For seven years criticizing Bush was “America-hating” and now
we’re “the fringe.”
if you want to see more of the bileSurf into the comments here:
http://www.jackandjillpolitics…
Criticism of the lily white leadership of too many of our orgs, and the usual lack of color at these HRC galas ends up alienating many blacks, and with the criticism, comes charges of black gays being house negroes, even when I have a long record of challenging our orgs and leaders to acknowledge they have a HUGE problem that events like that dinner and the march. Blacks who are disdainful of the LGBT rights movement can point to those and say “it’s all rich white gays” who don’t need rights. I feel sorry for the poor gay brother in the comments there who can’t get a break.
Indeed, sometimes a cigar IS just a cigarAnd sometimes, criticism actually is justifiable, rational and without a tinge of any racism. Only a racist would think otherwise, right?
I’m not sure why…you’re calling it bile? Many of the folks there have a point. It IS largely rich, white, gay men doing most of the whining. The rest of us already know what it means to be a minority and know that rights for minorities takes time. Lets be clear, the biggest critics of the President’s apparent lack of speed have been largely afluent gay white men. They mention Truman and quote MLK, but have no real concept of the LONG history and agonizingly slow process that the Civil Rights movement actually endured. For them its NOW, NOW, NOW! Its their right to compalin, but its also the right of everyone else to roll their eyes at the spoiled usual suspects.
The rest of US non affluent types understand that the President and government are focused on more important issues like holding the economy together or fixing health care. Other things really can wait in the minds of most American and gay/straight POCs.
Unfortunately, the criticism has some meritLook at the history of the gay rights movement in the US, starting around the late 40s. At a time when it was very dangerous to be openly gay, the few people who were willing to stand up and agitate for equality tended to be the people best able to weather the shit-storm of publicity and public “outrage:” older middle class white men and younger upper class white men. For decades, they were the public face of gay activism.
During the 60s and 70s, women working for equality tended to put their energies into passing the ERA and other feminist goals; activists of color fought for Native American and African American equality. There was work across the lines, of course: Bayard Rustin marked with Dr. King and worked for gay rights (among many other issues that were dear to him.) But by and large, the face of the gay rights movement has been white, male, and middle and upper class. For the most part, it has stayed that way, as the videos of the HRC dinner show.
Changing that perception is going to be very tough, as you have no doubt realized.
“…lily white leadership of too many of our orgs, and the usual lack of color at these HRC galas”Get this: I’m white and am so tired of being crucified because of it. All I hear is whining about por ‘ol me and all because of them mean ole’ white folk!
You wanna talk about why there’s so few of you “colored” folk at the gatherings? Let’s talk about that before you start accusing the rest of us. We tire of being persecuted.
@SciFi Geek“I’m not sure why…
you’re calling it bile?”
This is what distinguishes you from thinking adults, who know what a racial slur IS.
I was just goingwith the presumption that they are homophobic and racist. What I was trying to point out is you exhausted their ability to spin lies so they degenerated to inflammatory remarks.
Those who use racist slurslikewise show the LACK of content and character
This is BILE!, dudePeople have tossed these racial slurs (and that’s what they are) at me for at least 37 of my 42 years on this planet. It’s ignorant, it’s bigoted, and it’s racist, period.
And you know what? It hurts….I have a thicker skin about these ignorant ass “blacker than thou” folks than I used to but it still hurts.
And I’m a non-affluent type that thinks Obama is full of shit about gay rights half the time.
Pam, do you really thinkthat black folks would care abt. LGBT rights if they saw black LGBT faces? Because honsetly, I don’t (unless you’re like Jasmyne Cannick and you raise the biggest ruckus abt. white racism)!
Break is over, back to work for me!
Since you brought up “proper” englishLet me make this one correction to your post.
Where you write:
if my unhappiness with this is “racism”, than i can live with that.
It should be:
if my unhappiness with this is “racism”, THEN i can live with that.
I rest my case…I get it from all sides — gay and black, just for speaking the truth. You’re not being persecuted. Naming the demographic that attended is persecution? Joe Solmonese said on CNN yesterday that the people in that gala are the most politically astute LGBTs, so by default, anyone outside of the room is inconsequential and ignorant of politics. That’s hardly building bridges in the class wars. Do you have a problem with that?
does chucking the racist f*cktards back in the swamp and walking across their bloated corpses count as bridge building?Some of this crap is pushing my boundaries of civility
How’s Maine kev?
Hopefully kev has a warm coat and hat; tomorrow is gonna be nasty (think cold wet rain/snow mix) up here.
You have a poor way of making your pointIt is a fact that the leadership of gay and lesbian organizations in the US is overwhelmingly white. It is a fact that many LGBTs of color do not feel represented by such organizations. This leads to a vicious cycle: People of color do not feel welcomed by HRC and such groups, thus do not join, thus do not work to the higher levels, thus the leadership remains light complexioned, thus leading non-whites to feel excluded.
I am not sure where you see anyone blaming you or your race.
Chicago and Detroit knows from cold nasty weatherWatch that freezing rain, that sh*t is treacherous. Those days just stay in and phone bank.
We already…have established your own antipathy for black people (by your own admission), so you don’t have add much beyond that anyway.
I’m sureThat I have a better idea aof what constitutes a racist slur than you could possibly imagine.
That’s becauseyou’ve shown as much prejudice toward black folks as any of the people under discussion.
That’s your own bigotry shining through and is something you should seriously work on.
That said, it certainly helps for people to see others like themselves pushing a particular agenda. Who is a black audience mosr likely to hear…one of the rich white A gays, or an ally like Jullian Bond? the answer should be obvious.
People clearly respond to folks that have walked a mine in their shoes and know their struggles.
and yet HALF BREED escaped your radar…..yeah your antennae is FLAWLESS
I can’t speak for Pam, but I do A lot of antipathy is based in the concept of “other.” When “they” are different — a different race, a different orientation, a different religion, a different language — then “they” don’t matter. It is not until “they” start becoming “we” that things start to change.
I have seen this often, in different contexts. My mother thought very poorly of gay people until she found out that her son was gay. It was not until people like Magic Johnson and Ryan White went public about AIDS that public attitudes towards the disease began to change. Until there are more lesbians and gay men of color willing to stand up within their communities and be open about who they are, lesbian and gay issues will continue to be “other.”
As someone said earlier on another thread:Get down off that cross, Mary–we need the wood.
If you hear ‘whining about mean ole’ white folk’ (which would be Lena’s husband the Swede? or are you attempting to mock someone’s dialect and failing?) when the statement of fact was ‘This organization is headed by white males, and I think that’s affecting our ability to do outreach’…
The issue is between your ears.
DisgustDU has had my disgust for quite some time since they try to silence anyone who doesn’t toe their party line.
I hate youso much for this. Now I have an ear worm.
But what about me?I’m a bisexual fast losing middle-class status white transman and yet I am “whining” about the “apparent” lack of speed of this administration with regard to our issues. Maybe it’s because,
Oh I dunno
his ABILITY to act on our issues with the stroke of a pin and the use of his bully pulpit to get congress to act? Yeah, I think that’s why.
But then, I’m just whining and have no concept how long these things take since I have only been fighting for these things for over 2 decades.
Ahh yes. The politics of patience got the civil rights movement far.
Get thisI’m white too and I DO object to the tokenism on display by many LGBT organizations. I sure as HELL saw it in Louisiana. I see it in Seattle. And we see it at every gathering of HRC.
colored folk? SRSLY?? What is this? The 1950s?
My yearly income is about $7000.I’m sorry I was born white. That clearly means that I don’t count and can’t criticize anyone for ignoring other people’s rights, right?
You clearly don’t know LGBT history if you think that there hasn’t been any move toward civil rights. Not surprising. Most people who think LGBT people should wait another 30 or 40 years think that the LGBT civil rights movement didn’t start until Stonewall.
Can we say N.A.A.C.P.?That aside, it obviously went way over your head.
Reminds me of a bumper stickerI may be driving slow, but I’m ahead of you.
Pizza place up the street got robbed by a black man….…so I’m gonna judge all black men by that.
Not up to usI had a roommate in college. For her, it was the first time rooming with a lesbian. For me, it was my first time rooming with an african-american (I wasn’t nearly as uncomfortable as she was, until she realized I wasn’t going to jump her bones). She was on the phone constantly with her friends and it was all N***** this and n***** that. No way in fucking hell was I going to call her or her friends that, even though we all got along. They had a right to call each other what they will. We in the queer community have the right to call ourselves whatever we want (faggot, queer, dyke, tranny, etc.). For some reason, our hackles are raised when someone OUTSIDE of our community uses this language. Maybe it is because of the CONTEXT of those who have more power using the words to belittle the people who are INSIDE said community.
It really IS all about context. So while the NAACP calls themselves the NAACP, while they have the RIGHT and the HISTORY to do so, I am not going to run around screaming about colored people.
Hope that didn’t go over your head.
And we know that ignorant dumb assshit like this is the major reason why, bitch. Fuck you.
smiles http://www.rismedia.com/wp-con…
“persecuted” ??Um… Jeff, I think you are exaggerating just a tad. A complaint about lack of racial diversity in LGBT leadership is hardly persecution.
You seem to be taking the complaint personally, and I am not sure why. The complaint is not an attack on you.
NOTHING you say goes over my headYou don’t have the REACH.
Just like people who call gays and lesbians homosexual,
The people who currently call African Americans …Coloreds or Negroes….we recognise immediately as a$$wipes who won’t call us what we call OURSELVES, and are trying to be too cute by half.
“I”m not going to live my life being a color” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v…
Good, petey, real good4 days and I already have stories (including a “passagering while black” story) but…at the end of the campaign…I’m taking a break now.
Can’t wait to read your reflectionson integrating Maine. Or at least parts of it.
can’t recall all the details but I think it was on Daily Show 2004They sent a Black correspondent to Iowa, and New Hampshire then Boston for primary results.
He said,” It’s just like CHEERS here, except nobody knows your name, and nobody’s glad you came”
Seems like it might have been Chris Rock?
Fixing health care?Look, I’d be inclined to go a bit easier on Obama if he were actually working towards real health care reform. But he’s done nothing but the trademarked Obama-style “unilateral compromise” in his rush to turn “health care reform” into just another shoveling of public money to the HMOs. He hasn’t just gone back on his gay-rights promises; his healthcare “plan” is more of the same.
>High fives Kevin<NT
Keep at itDo the people who complain about Pam posting items about race or items about issues other than strictly GLBT ones have any idea about how this blog is serving to educate potential allies? By this I mean allies for and from all parts of this blog’s diverse audience.
Heterosexual people with an interest in black issues come here because Pam’s House Blend is one of the most celebrated sites by an independent, black blogger. They have the opportunity to learn about LGBT issues. People with an interest in GLBT issues come here because the Blend is one of the most celebrated sites by an independent, lesbian blogger. They have an opportunity to learn about race issues. People come here to learn about progressives, marijuana advocacy, taser abuse, pit bulls, North Carolina politics, etc., etc. People who are capable of learning and expanding their understanding of the world do just that here at the Blend.
Thank you, Pam, for carving out this corner of the Web and making it a pleasant place to carry on.
half-breededism?sorry to be so late in the game but if white people criticizing Obama is somehow racist, wouldn’t the criticism of a black person such as herself also be racist. Based on her drivel, it seems as though the only gays who can criticize Obama’s stance and lack of action without any hint of racism would be those LGBTs of the half-breed variety.
I’m sorry that woman makes about as much sense as Orly Taitz and the addition that Obama is somehow black instead of mixed because he married a black woman is effing ludicrous.