Former presidential candidate John Edwards and his fall from grace because the “brain” below his belt exceeds the intelligence between his ears, has had a fall from grace as precipitous as any Republican Sexual Hypocrite, quite frankly. In a NYT article on Sunday, the latest series of events shows just how desperate the disgraced U.S. Senator from NC was to hide his affair with “campaign video consultant” Rielle Hunter — and the cascading consequences of lies that did him in.
That portion of the sordid tale has now, of course, resulted in a federal grand jury in Raleigh about whether Edwards may have committed crimes related to campaign finance laws (as in payments to a mistress to clam her up is considered a donation that has to be reported), and that, along with a book that will soon be published by a former aide, are going to force the former John Kerry running mate to answer even to more sleazy charges.
Mr. Edwards is moving toward an abrupt reversal in his public posture; associates said in interviews that he is considering declaring that he is the father of Ms. Hunter’s 19-month-old daughter, something that he once flatly asserted in a television interview was not possible.
Friends and other associates of Mr. Edwards and his wife of 32 years, Elizabeth, say she has resisted the idea of her husband’s claiming paternity. Mrs. Edwards, who is battling cancer, “has yet to be brought around,” said one family friend, who like others spoke about the situation on the condition of anonymity, pointing to the complicated and delicate nature of the issue.
But that’s just the start of it. The list of jaw-dropping acts of political stupidity and bad judgment is outlandish:
* Edwards had wealthy donors give Hunter a place to stay out of the public eye, and a shiny new BMW; Edwards still claims ignorace of the acts of his loaded patrons;
* He made former staffer Andrew Young (who is writing the tell-all) sign a paternity affadavit saying he was the father of Hunter’s child; as a loyal staffer who is married, he was willing at the time to fall on his sword for the campaign;
* Young alleges Edwards asked one supporter if he could find a doctor willing to falsify a DNA test (!)
* Young says he was the one who scheduled and set up the trysts between Edwards and Hunter;
and the drumroll please…Young says:
that Mr. Edwards once calmed an anxious Ms. Hunter by promising her that after his wife died, he would marry her in a rooftop ceremony in New York with an appearance by the Dave Matthews Band.
OK. That is so surreal and disgusting that it’s hard to imagine Young making that up, given what is already out there about John Edwards’ pathological quest to ascend to the White House at the expense of voters, donors and campaign workers who believed in his ideas. More below the fold…
He’s become a pariah:
Shortly after he withdrew from the race in January 2008, Mr. Edwards and his wife were given a huge ovation when they attended a basketball game at the University of North Carolina. But a few months ago, when the couple showed up for dinner at a Chapel Hill restaurant, diners averted their eyes and stared at their plates, according to a person who was there.
At the recent Boston funeral of Senator Edward M. Kennedy, Mrs. Edwards walked several steps ahead of her husband, greeting people exuberantly. Far fewer people approached Mr. Edwards, who appeared ill at ease.
What makes this even more damaging to John Edwards is the fact that he has lied in public about so many aspects of this nonsense multiple times, that any attempts to refute what Young has to say is going to be met by the collective hand.
Elizabeth Edwards is still popular; she’s opened a furniture store in Chapel Hill. How she manages to ride this out is hard to imagine. So many shoes continue to drop. Rielle Hunter is moving to North Carolina, by the way, an indication that she intends to secure rights for her child.
When the scandal first broke (the stories about the affair), many defended Edwards on the grounds that it was a private matter within his marriage that is irrelevant to his campaign for president. While that may be what those who old that opinion want to be so, the reality is that it’s a campaign killer in this country, particularly after the cover-up stories emerged. Some just wanted badly to give him a pass because they couldn’t believe that he could screw over donors, campaign workers and voters.
What makes this all so outrageous for me in the end were John Edwards’s pious statements during the campaign about how “he couldn’t cross that bridge” to support marriage equality blaming of his Baptist upbringing. Here was an attorney knowingly and shamelessly (just as our current President is), conflating religious marriage and civil marriage.
The cherry on top, of course is that he was simultaneously boinking and procreating outside of his sacred marital bond. The disgusting level of hypocrisy and moral bankruptcy required to step out in front of the cameras with a straight face to declare gay and lesbian couples are not worthy of civil marriage because heterosexual relationships have a special legitimate claim based on his bible-based notions is par for the course, just another political lie to tell.
Note to the White House: we have the same beef with using this political lie over and over by people who know better. It’s a more valid statement to say that the issue of marriage equality is a complex issue that will be difficult to resolve until DOMA is repealed and SCOTUS will ultimately the matter.
Note to Edwards: listening to the little brain is what gets our Republican Sexual Hypocrites in trouble all the time, but it’s clearly not a partisan syndrome.



28 Comments





I had so many progressive friends yell at me…For not supporting Edwards in the 2008 primary. I told them that he had made so many flip-flops that I didn’t know if I could trust him. It turns out that I was right.
And btw, why was it that Edwards had such a problem accepting marriage equality but had absolutely no problem violating his own marriage vows? I can’t tell Elizabeth what to do with her husband and his cheatin’ heart, but I’m sure I won’t trust that jerk ever again.
I assumethat the broad outlines of his story are accurate, but that doesn’t mean every detail is true. For instance, did he directly witness Edwards promising Hunter a rooftop wedding, or is that something Hunter told him Edwards promised?
Also, I would assume that Edwards deliberately avoided learning details of what his friends were doing to take care of Hunter. He must have known that she was getting help, but it wouldn’t have been in anyone’s interest to keep him in the loop about all the specifics (amounts of money, car, etc.).
Young’s role has always been one of the aspects of this story that bothered me the most. Getting a staffer (married with kids) to take the fall for your affair is really low.
I have no idea whether Edwards ever considered faking a paternity test, but the bottom line is that you can’t be an advocate against poverty and then publicly deny paternity to your child who was born to a single mother. Give me a break.
Final comment: it intrigues me that Edwards is much more hated than Bill Clinton, whose affair probably cost Gore the election and certainly inspired Gore to choose Lieberman as a running mate (with bad consequences for the Democratic Party as a whole).
Stick a fork in himHE’S DONE.
I didn’t say take every word of Young’s as truthMy point is that Edwards has so damaged his credibility with his own litany of lies and cover ups that his ability to defend himself against Young’s charges is completely shot.
In other words, what he has copped to and has come out of grand jury findings is bad enough; Young’s more salacious charges are merely more grist for the mill.
After all, no one believed the affair was real until the Enquirer caught Edwards visiting baby-mama in a hotel. He was so reckless that he couldn’t stay away from her even when he knew the press was dogging him.
As you said, in any case, his judgment was so poor that we should have been glad he flamed out — Edwards was the one running for POTUS, not Young, and the former candidate was the one taking lots of small donor dollars (along with those big donor buxxx), knowing he was sitting on a political time bomb. That’s cojones.
Ugh….This just gets worse and worse. I was an Edwards supporter in 2004 and am just disturbed by all of this.
Young might be lying about some things, or atleast exaggeratinge…but the fact remains that Edwards lied about ALL of this and STILL ran for President.
That line about his wife’s death was just…there are no words to express my feelings on the type of scum that would say that. The DMB element seemed a bit random.
I agree with thatexcept that many people did suspect the affair was real even before the Enquirer story. It was telling that Young came forward in December 2008 to say he was the father, but then wasn’t listed on the baby’s birth certificate as the father.
meant to sayYoung claimed to be the one having the affair in December 2007 but wasn’t listed on the February 2008 birth certificate.
Yeah, but not in a good way.
Maybe it’s not even that. Maybe it’s just stupidity. Did he really think he could hide this indefinitely?
He’s not a nice personA lot of people may disagree with me, but he is partly to blame for 4 more years of Bush.
FYI-Before you all jump on your soap boxes, check out his history – especially how he made his fortune off of A.I.D.S.
I’m angrier at himBECAUSE of Bill Clinton. I mean its not like Edawrds was unaware of the impact that Clinton’s scandals had on the Democrats. Yet despite knowing that there was this HUGE scandal brewing that involved quite a few people (enough that he should have known it would see the light of day eventually) yet he still ran for President. He saw a sitting president get raked over the coals for this very thing. How did he figure that this would go unnoiticed?
On top of that, I lake many people find it repugnant that he put on this devoted family man with dying wife act. The dog and pony show with Elizabeth, who people genuinely liked and cared about, just made this sooooo much worse than anything Bill did.
As a side note…NONE of these Democratic politicans have any REAL objections to SSM. People need to understand that first and foremost. If they thought that they could get away with it and still get elected they would come out in full suppport.
On this subject, people need to divorce their words form their personal actions. The reality is that their words on this issue have little to do with where they would really stand if the electorate was in support of SSM. Unlike Republicans, Democratic politicians do not derrive much of their ideology from religion.
How was he responsible for four more years of Bush? 2004 was ALL Kerry and his fundamental lack of personality.
there’s nothing to understand because we all know exactly what is going onNONE of these Democratic politicans have any REAL objections to SSM. People need to understand that first and foremost.
We all know this — the issue, as I said above, is that this hypocritical defense is damaging because it reinforces the right-wing frame conflating church and state. None of them had to come out in favor of SSM (though that would have been nice and yes, politically not feasible at this time); they simply needed to explain that even with a division between church and state that it’s a contentious issue in this country that will not be decided by the President, but by SCOTUS. That’s a legitimate answer that doesn’t affirm bigotry.
Pam…get real. The reality is that the GOP loves to paint the Democrats as the godless anthiests who want God out of public life. Plenty of Americans, regardless of their own policy beliefs, have a problem with that.
The moment they hear, separation of church and state from a Democrat, the right throws that meme back out there. Thus Democrats (and more than a few Republicans) tend to feign more piety than they really care about. As long as Americans are easily swayed by a religious argument, politicians are going to play that game.
And yet there are LGBT people who actually believe that Obama or the Clintons, for instance, really don’t support marriage equality.Of course they do! They’re not idiots. They’re not bigots. What they are is politicians who are convinced that to speak the truth to the masses on this issue means losing, not leading. Not even Dumbya gives a damn about marriage equality and he actually IS an idiot!
Thankfully, we’re finally seeing some Democrats speak the truth and come out for marriage equality in the past year. It’s long overdue.
As to Edwards, his hypocrisy on this issue is the one thing about this sordid story we could use to our benefit. It would be an improvement if a politician lies and says that he’s personally against marriage equality, but he’s still bound to uphold the Constitution. Even just a little less playing to worst of the crowd would have been nice in 2008.
if Edwards had listened to Elizabethand voted against the AUMF, he might have won the 2004 primaries as a more electable alternative to Dean, and things could have been very different.
more of the sameI have just viscerally never trusted Edwards. He’s always smelled like an egomaniac and a liar. Edwards showed his mettle in the 2004 presidential election.
1) He opted to not run simultaneously to keep his senate seat when there was no certainty another democrat could win it. Erskine Bowles-D was not a strong enough candidate to defeat Richard Burr-R, and we ended up with the latter, a toe-the-line regressive conservative. Possibly better in the long run though, given what a lying ass Edwards has turned out to be. If he had been serving North Carolinians in the senate when all this came out …
2) Democratic strategists wanted to use anti-gay sentiment to turn conservatives against the Republican ticket in 2004, but didn’t want to totally dis LGBTs and our progressive allies by having Kerry, the ticket lead, be the bad guy. So it fell to Edwards in the VP debate, no doubt with Kerry’s approval. Responding to Cheney’s statements about same-sex marriage (marriage equality), Edwards made sure to point out the fact that Cheney had a lesbian daughter. Ostensibly not to criticize her, but to sympathize with the Cheney family’s struggles. YUCK. But it was actually all about saying, “You’re daughter’s a lesbo!” to make the Republican ticket lose votes. We are just fodder to the Democratic political machine then and now, to be used however it best suits.
So Edwards “heartfelt” come-to-jeebus confession a year ago about his affair turns out to be just more lies and dodging? Quelle surprise.
Kerry didn’t help, but…… uncontested — though obvious, and later proven — election fraud got Cheney “re-”"elected” president in 2004. Kerry won that election as Gore had won the one before that and, in 2004, Edwards was the ONLY thing the Democrats had going for their ticket.
It’s not a big leap of faith to assume that most people in the country cast their votes against Cheney and Bush, rather than for Kerry and Edwards.
Hopefully not lost in this Is his wife, Mrs. Edwards and his children. As many of you remember during the campaign Mrs. Edwards, after the announcement of her relapse of cancer has even appeared here on The Blend voicing her support for Marriage Equality.
As more and more information comes to light, let’s not lose sight of the true victim in all of this. Mrs. Edwards.
(And I know I’m going to get a lot of comments that “she knew” but to put those to rest, I can’t really assume what she did/didn’t know, and regardless this still has to be hard for anyone to go through)
Gossip…Does it really matter what John Edwards does now that he’s no longer a candidate? I’m pretty tired of hearing about it. Sarah Palin is still on the front page of the Huffington Post everyday even though the election is over and she’s no longer even governor! Once someone is no longer either running for office or in office it’s just gossip. You wind up like the Enquirer.
Anything…to give the MSM yet another excuse to avoid beating the drum to (justifiably) hound John Ensign from office and into prison – and to give the MSM yet another flimsy thread of a rationale for saying ‘See, Dems are just as bad…’
This makes no senseSo we’re supposed to take it that they “really” support our right to marry even though they say the opposite every chance they get–and back that with rot like the DOMA brief? What exactly does support mean, in your mind, then? If support does not imply an action, it doesn’t mean a damn thing. Would you believe someone who claims to believe in vegetarianism even though he eats meat three times a day?
And the allegation that you or anyone else knows what they secretly support in their heart of hearts, even though they do everything they can to oppose it, is as unconvincing now as it was during the campaign.
And I am one of those people. What Obama, the Clintons and the rest of the Democrats “support” is themselves and their careers in politics. They have no more conviction for marriage equality than they have for any other issue. If the polls are for it, so are they. If the polls are against it, they start spouting rubbish about “God” and “the mix.” They’d sell their kids to Al Qaeda if they thought it would get them a few votes. Depending on either of the two major parties to advance our push for equality–assuming they “support” us despite abundant evidence to the contrary–is as futile and self-defeating a course of action as any I can think of.
I had supported EdwardsI couldn’t be more disappointed in him.
hey John
STFU, I don’t need the sordid details of your life
she didn’t know the whole storyHe told her he had a one-night stand with Hunter, and he only told her that in the last week of December 2006, AFTER he had already announced his candidacy. She did not know that he resumed the affair during 2007, and she didn’t know about the baby either.
Fuck John Edwards.And the soap opera he rode in on.
Out of line. Just like our formerly beloved champion, A-bian, who’s now a lifer here in prison in Taiwan.
John and A-bian both talked the talk. Unlike A-bian, John will probably be spared the perp walk.
If we had a Feingold, we might’ve listened. You do, and you didn’t.
FYI – 2004 ElectionThe fraud happened in Ohio. Ohio was the swing state that year; and the county that swung the state was where the fraud took place (I’m really not making this crap up). The state official in charge of the voting is a guy named Blackwell. He’s an extreme right wing Republican. (He was one of the speakers at that gathering last weekend.) I want to know how he got away with not investigating the fraud – and I live in Ohio.
And while I’m bitching…it just irritates the hell out of me that he’s a black man fighting against equality!
Co-signBeen reading up on my history.
On gay issues, the Dems have been doing this for a very long time. The Carter Administration, for instance. They’ll say enough to get the money they need.
Give the kid a DNA test…IF it is Edwards, charge him with adultery, File a complaint with the court that he has fathered a child that needs a father, Void his current marriage, Force him to marry the mother of his child.
Give him 100 lashes in the town square.
Stone him and his mistress to death.
They’re the ones who preach that the bible is the one truth they live by. Make them live by it.
(Yes, I’m evil, mean, wicked and nasty. I’m so fed up with hearing this a**holes preach about thier moral high ground only to find out that they’re just on a ricktey ladder)