Alvin got it so right the other day when he highlighted the disingenuous nature of the way bigots fight. And here from Massachusetts is a recent case in point. It would be comical if the ramifications of their actions weren’t so harmful. The Coalition for Marriage and Family* (CMF), which uses the scare tactic of “there’ll be sex predators in your daughter’s bathroom!!!” to fight the Trans rights bill (H 1728), is urging their militant minions in a 9/4/09 email to pester Massachusetts lawmakers with an AP story about a kid who is trying to make a difference and has inadvertently called their bluff.
Summer is winding down and our legislators will return to Beacon Hill next week, where committees could take action on a number of bills-including the Bathroom Bill (H. 1728).Now news out of the state of Vermont reveals a push is on there to force high schools to create genderless bathrooms-regardless of the cost to cities and towns. Vermont advocates of same-sex marriage cite this as an “opportunity to again be the first in the nation,” as they were with the creation of civil unions. Read the Associated Press report on this here.
Yes, do please read the article. It is a heart-rending story about a trans high school student that has the unmitigated nerve to propose policy change in his state to improve the safety and learning atmosphere for other children. Why do we force kids to take civics classes? Certainly not to make them think they should ever exercise the principles of democracy in their own hamlet? Good god, what is the world coming to! Youth these days, I tell you…
Now where was I. Oh yes. This kid made a suggestion to the Civil Rights Commission that solves the “sex predator!!!” fake problem that is CMF’s main rallying cry.
A transgender teenager is lending his voice to a movement in Vermont to require the state’s middle and high schools to offer genderless bathrooms. … Gender-neutral bathrooms can be as simple as what are now considered handicapped accessible bathrooms that are in a single room, he said.
What, problem solved? Can’t have that! If the “sex predators!!!” scare tactic is successfully neutralized, CMF will be forced to scratch for another publicly acceptable way of not having to state their basic thesis, which is of course: “but we just hate queers so we don’t want them to have any rights.”
*The new title adopted by the Mass. Family Institute when the old one got too embarrassing due the mammoth failure of not stopping marriage equality. So what do you do when a smart, civic-minded kid calls your bluff? Well, if you’re CMF and desperate enough, you ignore that a fair solution has been proposed, and change the subject. You ask legislators to ignore the present injustice and advise them to sit on their hands.
I think some fair-minded Bay Staters need to get on the phone to reassure their legislators that a) VT is lucky to have such a bright and public-minded kid working to find meaningful solutions, and b) they have full confidence that MA legislators are quite capable of thinking and acting independently in a timely manner because justice delayed is justice denied.
According to the CMF email writing gizmo, the relevant legislators are Senator Steven Baddour, Representative Gene O’Flaherty, Representative Lewis Evangelidis, Senator Cynthia Creem, Senator Thomas McGee, Representative Daniel Webster, Senator Bruce Tarr, Representative John Fernandes, Representative Christopher Speranzo, Senator Gale Candaras, Senator Jack Hart, Representative James Fagan, Representative Katherine Clark, Representative James Dwyer, Representative Colleen Garry, Representative Danielle Gregoire, Representative Marie St. Fleur
The pre-fab text of their email blitz and the entire CMF email is below, for your reading pleasure.
Text that CMF is using to blitz legislators.
HB 1728 and the push to require genderless bathrooms in VermontAs one of a dozen states that have passed a Bathroom Bill, activists in Vermont have begun the push to require public schools to create gender-neutral restrooms for transgendered students. Please read the Associated Press story on this here:
http://www.google.com/hostedne…
Here in Massachusetts, supporters of H. 1728, the Bathroom Bill, argue that the legislation is needed to address situations pertaining to transgender citizens.
But passage of similar legislation in other states has NOT resolved any issues or provided clarity within the law. In the state of Maine, where transgender legislation has passed, a parental lawsuit was successful in obtaining a verdict that gender neutral bathrooms were not sufficient to uphold the rights of transgendered people.
But in Vermont, activists are pushing in the opposite direction-to obtain a decree that these bathrooms are required, regardless of the cost to municipalities.
The best course of action for Massachusetts is to wait and see how these debates play out in other states, and to study the Massachusetts legislation further, rather than rushing to pass it. Therefore, I urge you to send HB 1728 to study. Thank you.
Here’s the 9/4/2009 email:
Bathroom Bill Update: Another state, another storyTell the Judiciary Committee about the Vermont push for genderless bathrooms
Dear friends,
Summer is winding down and our legislators will return to Beacon Hill next week, where committees could take action on a number of bills-including the Bathroom Bill (H. 1728).
Now news out of the state of Vermont reveals a push is on there to force high schools to create genderless bathrooms-regardless of the cost to cities and towns. Vermont advocates of same-sex marriage cite this as an “opportunity to again be the first in the nation,” as they were with the creation of civil unions. Read the Associated Press report on this here:
http://www.google.com/hostedne…
Throughout the fight on the Massachusetts Bathroom Bill, we’ve asked you to email several pieces of information and news articles to the members of the Judiciary Committee.
When hundreds of voters contact them about a particular news story, the message gets through, and they know they must become at least somewhat familiar with the details of the story. At your urging, legislators often read the facts our opponents conceal from them, and are amazed at the real consequences of the Bathroom Bill legislation.
This happened when we asked you all to contact them about the situation in Maine-so please don’t stop there.
Click on the link below to tell the Jucidiary Committee about the Vermont AP story. The facts are there for our legislators to see, and they will read them at your urging.
Finally, if you see your legislator this Labor Day weekend, remind him about this story, that Massachusetts can’t afford to pay to alter school bathrooms, and that this legislation needs to be defeated. Thank you.
Click the link below to log in and send your message:
http://www.votervoice.net/link…You have received this message because you have subscribed to a mailing list of Coalition for Marriage and Family Inc.. If you do not wish to receive periodic emails from this source, please click below to unsubscribe.
Paid for by The Coalition for Marriage and Family Action
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Related:
* Transgender Rights in Massachusetts – Show your support on July 14



18 Comments





Only…
Only when your daughters go to the bathroom at church.
Again with the pee pee question?
Do these idiots have separate bathrooms in their home too?
What absurd twaddle.
I’ll grant you that there is a problem with Republican Senators in public restrooms…
BTW…
Well, this is a failing on our side. Too many of us don’t understand that:
(1) The christianists don’t actually believe in democracy. Even beyond the heart of Paul Weyrich’s “goo goo” speech, the christianists’ attitude is no different than that of the Taliban. They believe that ‘authority’ is ‘revealed’ and unchallengeable, no matter how much of the populace actually chalenges it. (see: C Street)
(2) Re: “civics classes”, where public school is concerned, they don’t believe in it or any aspect of it (see: the frothing over Obama’s speech)
I believe this is really more of a vision issue.I don’t think most people understand what is meant by the term “genderless bathroom”. I know when I see it the first thing that rushes to my mind is the large multiple stall bathrooms that I used to hate using so much in school. And feeling so relieved when I went in and the whole place was empty. I can’t imagine even as a gay man being a young boy and not freaking out if a woman or girl or a male to female transgender person where to enter at that time. Once I calm down from that horrific nightmarish scenario and I begin to think, I realize that what is being proposed is something similar to what we already have in California. A single use bathroom able to be utilized by either gender and by disabled individuals as well. Not every building has them but they a growing in popularity because they offer an alternative to builders being forced to create two bathroom systems when only one is needed on a location. I think the way to go is to be more descriptive about what is being spoken of, that it is already in use around the country, and that there are cost and construction incentives that would encourage the construction of these units. Sometimes the truth means we don’t have to address the frauds and bullies, it just means we need to explain our vision to those willing to listen.
Exactly rightAmerican Taliban indeed.
It’s hilarious how quick these fundamentalist zealots use fear of sexual attacks by trans people – a situation for which there is not a single example. If there was, they would be referencing it over and over and over.
And yea, they don’t believe in democracy. They believe in majority rule, because they are under the mistaken impression that they are in the majority.
And their level of hypocrisy is pretty staggering. If one tries to suggest an alternative to their complaint of sexual predation by transpeople, they then turn around and make the ludicrous claim that it would be too costly. So they don’t want us to have our own bathrooms, and they don’t want us to use “theirs.” It would be hard to imagine a clearer example of dehumanization than prohibiting other humans from relieving themselves.
good points
thanks Kudo451My first thought was of being horrified to be in the school bathroom when a girl walks in. Then (after reading your posts), I thought about how the bathrooms are set up in a hospital that I sometimes go to (work), they have a sign on the restroom door that has a pic of a male and female (accepted restroom icon). You knock, if no answer, you enter. This makes SOO much sense. Also probably helps keep costs down (cleaning, upkeep) of one or two room as opposed to more with multiple stalls.
just my 2 cents
aj
dumb “jocks”I certainly wouldn’t have a problem with sharing a bathroom with someone who is trans-gender. On general principle, I have no problems with gender-neutral bathrooms. (Funny enough, this was one of the arguments on this pamphlet back around 1975 of why the feminist movement was bad–because if the feminists won, little girls would be forced to go to the bathroom with men.) However one horrible thought did come to mind–the jocks (Jerks) I went to school with coming into the bathroom and harassing the girls.
I certainly see the point, though, and on principle I support it.
I gotta go, gotta go, gotta go NOW!As an intersexed person, in school I grew up with the recurring issue of either being thrown out of the boys room, being harassed or assaulted in the boys room or just being plain barred from entering it by the boys.
When I was in high school a number of the female teachers took pity on me when they found out I wasn’t allowed by the boys to use those facilities. They let me use the teachers single use bathrooms. They took a speical key and it was against school policy to let any student in them. But they let me…
When it was all said and done I had been in the girls locker room like 6 times, the boys? Zero. The boys bathroom? Once (I had food poisoining and had to barf…almost made it. I hit the floor before the barf did. Ahhh memories.) I used the teachers bathroom’s like a few dozen times.
When I went to the mall, the stores my mom took me too most the sales ladies always let me use their staff bathrooms.
Funny world. The haters and the bigots scream so loud about matter they know nothing about.
As for the whole bathroom question? Becasue I have a under sized bladder and really have to go when I have to do I jess piss on ‘em if they get in my way.
I have some issues with a third (gender neutral) restroom.
My experience.
Several years ago, I planned on attending to a local Community College. I pass pretty well but since I am pre-operative (M2F), Administration told me I would need to use the one gender-neutral restroom on campus. This was in a different building, a total of about a quarter-mile away.
I reasoned my fellow students would take notice of that. “Why is pretty (well, I think I am) _ _ _ _ _ making that long hike to do her #1 or #2 when she can do that in the restroom down the hall”?
Administration would not budge (and since this happened in Oklahoma, I really had no recourse), so I decided I did not want to give them my money and be treated like a potential criminal.
As far as in this case (or at any School), a zero-tolerance rule in harassing Trans persons (especially in restroom use) should be put in place. Hell, it should be there already.
Dena
Also in Mass.This happened to someone I know in Massachusetts. They lobbied hard for trangender friendly gender neutral bathrooms and what was supposed to be optional became required. She was told that even post-op women would be required to use them and only them. (She ignored the administration and just used the bathroom. AFAIK there was never any issue and I’ve no idea what people are told today.)
BTW my understanding is the transgender rights bill in Mass is going nowhere.
They’ll come back for us later.Like they will in New Hampshire, now same-sex marriage is legal there.
Just wait and see. And wait, and wait, and wait….
you know, people are actually working very hard for you.try being appreciative instead of pissing on us. if you have a legitimate criticism of the handling of the current bill by anyone in particular, tell us, and tell us why, and tell us what you are doing to improve the situation. otherwise, please take your wet blanket to your own diary.
Well, being the timid soul that I am…I decided to take a pass on your remark. But Lurleen has stiffened my resolve. lol.
Seriously, Zoe, I always have more of a mildly xenophobic take on your constant sarcastic remarks about politics and law in the United States. I do wish that on occasion you would compare and contrast how things work in your country and particular state or territory. Have you reached the promised land in Australia yet?
You learn something new every day!
Speaking as someone working directly on the effort to pass this legislation, I’d be terribly curious to find out where you get that understanding from, because it’s the first I’ve heard of it.
Does “that which cometh from thee”…include their verbal diarrhoea?
Wrong wrong wrong!!!You could not be more wrong. MassEquality, the same organization that protected marriage rights here has been working very very aggressively for the transgender rights bill, as has every glbt organization in the state. MassEquality has always been extremely transgender friendly and has had transgender people involved.
The problem is in the legislature, not in the activist community.
Sen O’LearySenator O’Leary seemed to indicate it was going nowhere.