I still don’t have the energy to blog much for coffeehouse regulars to go live today; fibro is kicking booty still (love how my fingers cramp into a painful curl just when I need to type, bleh). Give special cheers to the hard-working Louise and Lurleen for wiping up the crumbs and perking smooth java over the weekend and on Monday, and java jolt thanks to Autumn and Alvin for the work at the espresso bar providing a strong Blend. Some tidbits from the mailbox:
* Schwarzenegger’s Budget Cuts Force Closure of California AIDS Clearinghouse. That’s the news from a press release from Lorri L. Jean, CEO of the L.A. Gay & Lesbian Center.
A casualty of California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger’s draconian cuts in social service funding, the California AIDS Clearinghouse will close next week. The L.A. Gay & Lesbian Center, which operated the program for more than 15 years, received notification from the state Office of AIDS that all funding for it had been eliminated. The Clearinghouse employs seven people and serves hundreds of non-profit organizations in all of California’s 61 health jurisdictions, including community clinics and HIV/AIDS organizations. Its mission is to develop and share culturally and linguistically appropriate educational materials regarding HIV/AIDS and other STDs with community-based organizations throughout the state. Materials were produced in 14 languages to serve the diverse communities of California. The Clearinghouse also distributes more than 1.5 million condoms each year.
* In the “can’t figure out priorities dept”: the Catholic Diocese of Maine “found” $100K (via Bishop Richard Malone) to put to work to repeal marriage equality in Maine, but apparently God’s priority was to hate on the gays first and closing more churches in the state. Donate for equality.
* Pro-equality ally and Virginia U.S. Congressional candidate Krystal Ball will be on the Randi Rhodes Show today at 4:15 PM ET. on your local station that carries Randi’s show, or on XM Channel 165. You can also see my Netroots Nation interview with Krystal. You can donate to her campaign here.
* Harvey Milk is being inducted into the California Museum’s California Hall of Fame, but the Governator has yet to act on a Harvey Milk Day bill (SB 572). Equality California calls on Schwarzeneggar to sign it this time around.
The Harvey Milk Day bill was originally introduced last year by Sen. Leno, but Governor Schwarzenegger vetoed the measure at the time, claiming Harvey Milk was not well known enough beyond San Francisco. Since that time, however, Harvey Milk has become a focal point of national conversation following the release of the successful biographical film Milk, for which both actor Sean Penn and screenwriter Dustin Lance Black received an Academy Award. In March, Penn joined Equality California’s campaign publicly advocating for the bill while Black testified before a Senate committee on the need to appropriately honor the civil rights leader. There are a few ways people can contact the Governor, who has asked for people to share their opinions to help him make up his mind:- Tweet @schwarzenegger and ask him to pass the bill.
- Call 916-445-2841 and follow the prompts to express support for the Harvey Milk Day bill (SB 572). They won’t have to speak to anyone; all they’ll have to do is press buttons.
- Sign EQCA’s petition at www.eqca.org/harveymilkday.
National Equality March news is below the fold.
National Equality March news
* Mike Signorile has a piece in the Advocate, “Why I’m Marching.” In overcoming his initial skepticism about the march, he’s critical about the way this administration has decided to do “outreach” to the LGBT community. Case in point — the Stonewall 40 WH reception.
It was nice for us to see a president commemorating the Stonewall riots for the first time. But it was an even better event for Obama himself, a great photo op, in the midst of the outcry, showing gay people — dubbed by the media as LGBT “leaders” — applauding him.Leaders? The crowd included an overwhelming number of Democratic Party hacks and donors, Beltway social climbers, careerists (specifically, former gay group heads now looking for jobs), PR flacks, lobbyists, sycophants, and assorted sellouts. The fabulously superficial — including a fashion editor who sits front and center at every New York fashion show — were there too.
But noticeably absent were people the White House sees as troublemakers and who, as a result, weren’t invited to the event. These were people who worked for — and raised money for — candidate Obama but criticized the president in the weeks prior to the reception. I’d argue that there probably wouldn’t have even been a cocktail party if it hadn’t been for these people’s protests. And, to that point, I’d add that the White House is pretty naive if it thinks a little East Room glad-handing is enough to quiet the masses of fed-up gay people.
Ouch. But Mike says a big showing of the grassroots will make it clear to the Obama admin that it won’t be business as usual with communication through gatekeepers.
* David Mixner’s post on the support behind the march is enthusiastic, pragmatic and realistic:
Only less than 1% of the dozens and dozens of calls, emails and Facebook contacts I made said “No.”…This will in essence be a true ‘people’s march’. The March has released an astoundingly low budget of just over $200,000 which means many of you will have to step up to the plate and take personal responsibility. You will have to make your own signs, chartered your own buses, organize your own groups, find your own housing, get your own list of endorsers, etc. There are no paid organizers for this event so you have to stop waiting for your engraved invitation and start organizing.Can’t promise you if there will be 20,000 at this March or 200,000. What I do know is that a lot of very special people are coming. We have become invisible in this administration and so far have received almost nothing. And with that in mind, the community is geared to take a stand.



14 Comments



I’ve checked out Krystal BallShe seems to be a steadfast ally and I like how forthright she is on the issues. It’s good to see someone with a spine with all of the weak and cowardly dems out there who won’t stand up to the reactionary GOP.
I’m not, however, crazy about her stand on nuclear non-proliferation. I support the concept fully and I think it is dangerous to move away from it as she is advocating. She sounds a bit sword-rattling.
That being said, I’d still support her for congress over a GOP congressman any day.
Krystal Ball?What were her parents thinking? She must have been taunted so much in school. Perhaps that’s why she has the “balls” to stand up for what is right. Whatever doesn’t kill you will only make you stronger!! Go Krystal.
“SPECIAL” cheer for Louise and LurleenWhat’s more FAMILY pride than beautiful dancing gay men, dancing to a feminist anthem, lip synced by a transgender performer.
Thanks for all the heavy lifting you two do, and giving relief Pam time to get better.
It’s her married nameI have also checked her out, and am rather underwhelmed. She has no postgraduate work under her belt, and her entire experience with law and policy are listed as spray painting Mom’s school board campaign signs, and a few years of world travel before dropping out of professional life to have a baby. She doesn’t appear to have ever worked full-time in any government capacity, relying instead on vague references to working around the federal court system. Her writing is unprofessional, and her website is peppered with pictures of her infant. It’s a great for someone who is running for PTA president. Not so much a self-proclaimed progressive Congressional candidate.
If Ms. Ball has actual law and policy knowledge, a concrete agenda backed up by hard policy goals, and intelligent answers to issues particular to her state, she needs to put them out there fast. Her website makes her look like an amateur, and the GOP machine is going to eat her alive.
CA AIDS cuts by Shwarznegger….p*ss me off ROYALLYfor G*D DAMN pennies on the MILLIONS of dollars treating HIV infected people, cutting to prevent literature for all these language groups…if it only prevented one kid from UNSAFE sex…it’d still cost less than a lifetime of his/her treatment.
Maria Shriver…..F*CK YOU! too!
Aw, thanks!And THANK YOU to the boss for taking on the Maine story today; I’ve been playing on other topics and ignoring NIMBY!
relief to Pam, and time to get better……no I’m not ripped to the tits, just not typing well
I understand the pros and cons to a National MarchI’m still not overly supportive, or overly against the March, (which I’d never attend.)
There seems to be so much more pressing Statewide oppurtunities, in Maine, in Washington State, in Iowa, that marches in BLUEST states might be more supportive of Progressive politicians, who are FINALLY standing up to Blue Dog cowards and a lackluster White House.
But if you want a DC March, go enjoy yourselves, but if three other DC Marches didn’t change America substantially for LGBTs, don’t get your hearts broke if this smaller, less planned March doesn’t either.
It’s not either/or …it’s both….
Beyond your comments, there is the school of thought that no marches ANYWHERE make any difference these days, but that is beside the larger point.
They have yet to roll details out, but I know for certain that the organizers are planning on offering training in a variety of skills that attendees can take back to their communities better equipped to fight and win those local battles: lobbying, working with local media, fundraising, etc.
Coming so close to specific events such as the vote in Maine and DADT hearings in the Senate, the gathering is another one-stop way to inform, train, empower attendees to positively affect their outcomes.
The option, learned from past mistakes, is to do more AFTER the march with what information and synergies come out of it and not expect it, itself, to effect change.
Her married name is Krystal DariyananiThat’s not a totally insignificant point, I think. I’m not embarrassed to say that when I first saw her name, I thought it might be of a drag queen or porn star. Blame her parents, but that’s just reality.
So which name would you choose to run for Congress and why? A fascinating topic for discussion. And as we’ve seen with B. H. Obama, not something to take lightly.
Most important to me, though, is what Keori points out…no electoral experience, hell, no apparent community experience. Not exactly the springboard one would wish for a run at Congress. Besides, her district is overwhelmingly conservative. My conclusion = she doesn’t have a prayer.
It’d be interesting to know what her motivation is, though. Anyway, she’s young yet. Still plenty of time to pay some dues.
You can actually directly effect the outcomesInstead of heading to DC take all those travel funds and head to Maine to help them win the election on the ground. They have sent out a call for volunteers to join them for a Volunteer Vacation: http://action.protectmaineequa…
I’m inclined to agree with both of youand I also don’t think she will win. I would still vote for her over the GOP incumbent any day though…
We can multi taskSignorile is always right in my book. He has been a force and catalyst for change in the LGBT movement since the 80′s. Everyone is saying we need an MLK or Milk in the movement. I nominate Signorile as the leader. Although I would love to be in Maine, protest during the day and at night eat Maine lobster, I have already made plans to be in D.C. My contribution to National Equality March will help cover the cost of porti potties. (Queerty.com) http://www.queerty.com/the-nat…
When you take a pee, think of me.
Yes, we canThankfully, they will be asking volunteers to do more than protest and eat lobster. Volunteers will be helping to identify supporters and volunteers, and getting the votes to win.
On your other point: I don’t need an appointed leader to do the right thing. I will be the change that I seek.