I'm just speechless. The General took it on.
The fine Real Americans at the Free Republic have found Obama's achilles heel: his Long Dark Staff of White Insecurity.
hoosiermama:
The only other thing that hit me was that Sinclair said BO was not circumcised. When my son was born in a hospital that was done as a matter of routine without even consulting us. Would the same be for Hawaii? OTOH People born at home or in some other cultures are not circumcised.thecodont:
A relative of mine was born (in a hospital) a couple of years after BO's alleged birth date. He was circumcised also (as a matter of routine, not according to any family request).afraidfortherepublic:
My son was born in June of 1961 in a hospital in CA, and the nurses released us because of miscommunication in a day and a half before the circumcision was done. We had to go back to the doctor’s office to have it done a week later, and the doctor was NOT HAPPY. My second son was born in the same hospital 4 years later. I don’t remember them asking me about it. Routine procedure for little boys.hoosiermama:
Wish we had someone to make a phone call to the hospitols in HI and ask if they routinely do circumcism and when that practice started.MHGinTN:
You might want to make that call to a Canadian hospital …MHGinTN:
No…it would have been in Kenya….not Canada.Natural Born 54
I am having a vision of a court room scene. The judge turns to O sitting in the witness chair to his left and says “I am sorry, Mr. President, but I am going to have to ask you to stand and drop trou …..”hoosiermama:
More than likely an exam from a court appointed DR. :~)
Humiliating either way….caught by his own private parts….er something like that.



hoosiermama:
46 Comments



you see, something else straight african-americans and all lgbt’s share:paranoid bigots with their faces in our crotch. whether it’s Black Wang or Wang-Dueling Dudes, some people just obsess on the shape and comportment of other people’s peepees. maybe now Obama will realize that we have common cause?
Not Circumsized?Awesome. Now the Freepers have proof that President Obama is not a Muslim. LOL.
You beat me to it!They also aren’t taking into account that Hawaii has, to this day, a large Asian and Pacific Islander population. I know that circumcision isn’t big in Asian countries, and I’m just going to assume that it’s the same with the native Hawaiians. This sure does give new meaning to “wing nuts”.
it doesn’t get any stupider than thatFirst they accuse Obama of being secretly Muslim, then accuse him of being uncircumcised, as though only Americans get circumcised. Hello? All Muslim boys are circumcised. (Didn’t they see Roots? Obviously not). More Muslims get it than Americans. So let me get this right– their conspiracy theories have now spun out into Obama being an uncircumcised Muslim? LOL — When Occam’s Razor is used on their goofy conspiracy theories, we’ll have a regular slasher flick.
My dream headline would be
My brother’s adopted son……is au natural. His birth father insisted on it when the child was born. Maybe if the freepers weren’t popping out kids left and right for Jesus, they would take a greater interest in each individual child’s birth.
Some men emphatically don’t want the procedures for their son. And how reliable is this source?
There are none so blind as those who will not see.
WTF?Not every man born in the U.S. is circumsized. I can’t believe these people are saying their children had this procedure done without the doctors even consulting them. If this is true, there is a problem. I’d be extremely pissed if someone circumsized my child without my consent.
Regardless, it doesn’t prove a thing.
Circumcised without consent ?These nutjobs have a good lawsuit on their hands if that is true.
I can’t believe that there is any hospital in the US that would perform a circumcision without parental permission.
it doesn’t? give ‘em timeThough you have a point about how difficult it’ll be to get more stupid.
They were probably asked,but they were probably to stupid to understand what circumcision was. A new report recently released in the US found that a significant number of US male teens were not aware if they were or were not circumcised.
That’s worse than being able to locate the Atlantic and Pacific Ocean on a map.
illogical next stop on the tinfoil express… will be the current CDC recommendation on HIV and circumcision.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08…
when do they get to “precious bodily fluids?”Just wondering.
Dicks with dick on their tiny little brainspaging Dr. Freud
paging Dr. Freud
Female circumcision is seen as genital mutilationwhy is it not the same for males? I’ve seen some real circumcision hatchet jobs that look like real genital mutilation. Circumcision should not be a “routine” hospital procedure performed on newborns. The decision to be circumcised should be left up to the child when they are old enough to make the choice, not the parents, doctors or hospital staff.
in a related storyhuffpo has a link to dickipedia with a Michelle Bachman page,
guess she was made an honorary DICK
100% agreed.My uncle was circumcised on the kitchen table when he was 10 because somebody convinced his parents that it would improve hygiene. Can you imagine? He told us this when he was in his late 70s. It clearly was a decision made for him that he never forgave.
Random Factoid…The second “pearl of wisdom” is by someone calling themselves Thecodont – an ironically appropriate name, given that the Thecodonts were a group of reptiles that gave rise to the Crocodilians, Pterosaurs and Dinosaurs. None of them survived the Triassic.
And the irony only gets worse – even the term itself is obsolete: it was a “wastebasket taxon” that grouped together all the archosaurs that weren’t Dinosaurs, Pterosaurs or Crocodilians, irrespective of how they were related to one-another – it’s like classifying ice-cream, curry and champagne as the same type of food because they don’t contain any type of grain.
OMGThe ignorance of these people is surpassed only by their lurid imaginations, which they do not seem to be really aware of… that the president would be humiliated, yes, but more importantly that THEY would be titillated.
If it was left to boys at the age of consent (16yo.)Circumcision would be almost eliminated except in Jewish boys. You ask any 16 yo boy if we can take this scalpel and cut a little skin off their dick….HELL NO!
Growing up CatholicThe Catholic church used to have a feast day called the Feast of the Circumcision (I think they now call it the “octave of Christmas”). It was supposed to commemorate the hacking off of part of Jesus’ you-know-what, and it was a “holy day of obligation”–a day when you had to go to Mass or be condemned to hell forever. We were always puzzled by it. No one in our Catholic grade school–no priest, no nun–was willing to explain to us just what we were celebrating on that day, or why.
The dictionary was no help. Foreskin? What’s that? Check another definition. A flap of skin on the end of the…? WTF? It was years before I finally figured it out–empirically, if you get my drift.
I can’t wait to hear what Holy Mother Church thinks of this latest idiocy.
There is a tradition, recorded in one of the apocrypha, that Jesus’ foreskin was preserved in a jar of precious ointments, supposedly the same jar of ointments Martha (or was it Mary?) used to anoint his sacred feet. So I guess religio-loony fixation on circumcision is nothing new.
day of the sacred schmuck
From another blog
Maybe we could start some Obama penis related rumorssay he doesn’t sign legislations with those photo-op collector pens, he takes the bills out to the Rose Garden and pees his signature, just to show off.
Classic racism. Textbook. It was only a matter of time before they went for his penis.The right-wingers were fascinated by Bill Clinton’s penis, too, but the penis of a black man – even more salacious and naughty and scary and bad. These people are mentally unbalanced.
It’s usually not as traumatic.FGM often involves excision of the clitoris, which is far more traumatic (and damaging in terms of sexual enjoyment) than removal of the foreskin. Even cutting or removal of the clitoral hood (which is normally not what people are referring to when talking about FGM) may not be directly comparable.
(Not that I’m a fan of circumcision — complications from my own circumcision may not have affected function more than usual for the process, but I’ve been left with a convoluted and practically non-Euclidean skin geometry which is almost impossible to keep clean. So much for easier hygiene.)
It continues…White America’s endless fear of and fascination with the big black cock.
Is mental health counseling included in the public healthcare option?
My casual observation on this subjectAnd no smarta** remarks please. I’ve been around the block a few times and have been in situations where things were “out in the open.”
Circumcision seems to be far more prevalent in white U.S. born males than it is among other groups in the U.S. (except of course for Jewish men mentioned above). It also seems to be more prevalent in the Midwest and Northeast, than in the South and Western parts of the country.
It is quite the exception in Europe and Latin America.
Again, no scientific studies to quote, but just what my eyes have shown me.
Seriously?Considering how obsessed with their dingle-dangles teenage boys are, I have to agree with you.
I Wouldn’t Have Minded Seeing It….that is, until he became an asshole!
But I have to admit, regardless of my thoughts of Obama as POTUS: with his facial features, he’s ALMOST as gorgeous as Clifton from That’s My Mama!.
ALMOST!
Clifton is WAY hotter! Or at least WAS hotter.
Blame Dr. SpockIIRC, he was of the opinion that circumcision was good because by having no foreskin, little boys wouldn’t have to pull it back to clean themselves, hence they wouldn’t have to handle themselves so much and learn to masturbate so early.The American white middle-class male obsession with circumcision is based in the fear of talking to your child about sex and fully expecting them to masturbate, and teaching them where and when it isn’t appropriate to do.
The second part to this is the story I recently read online from a daycare worker who witnessed a little boy running out to his mother yelling, “Mom! Mom! I have a PENIS! And it does TRICKS!” The daycare worker’s observation was that far too many men never make it past that stage.
Americans are simultaneously terrified and repulsed by sex, and at the same time fascinated by and obsessed with it. Just look at The Peter.
It happened to meMy twin brother and I were circumcised without our parent’s consent.
Our parents were horrified. Males in my family are not circumcised. It just isn’t done in our culture.
My brother and I were the first male children in our family who were born in a hospital. It was 1960.
My brother’s son is not circumcised, BTW.
I think it reached it’s maximum circumcisions during the Boomer generationMy father and uncles weren’t born in hospitals, so they wouldn’t have been altered. It was nearly universal in my age group, (judging on gym showers and men my age I dated)unless a parent was adament against circumcision, the doctors sold it on the hygene angle. By my nephew’s births circumcision wasn’t pressed on parents nearly as much.
Agreed re: generationMy father was not, so I’m presuming none of his brothers were either.
Why my mother felt I ever had to HAVE this knowledge defies logic, but there it is.
I also know their pet nickname for Dad’s …
Hey, what happened to the screen? Where is the keyboard???Why is it dark in here?
Show the Birther’s wives Obama’s Penisas proof. See if they accept that offer…..
I love your food exampleThanks for the excellent phrasing — that was fun!
And does it standing up tooSo we can tell Pastor Anderson the Prez is a real man who pisseth against the wall….
They’re really not the same thing.“Female circumcision” is often a code word for clitorectomy, which has far more devastating effects on a person’s sexuality than circumcision.
Having said that, however, I’d like to go on record that I am completely against circumcision and genital mutilation in any form. It’s bizarre, barbaric, wildly unnecessary and a violation of the child’s human rights.
OMG The right wingnuts are certianly obsesed with the POTUS’s penis. Maybe they’re going to come out soon?
Gosh, what a bunch of weiners.
Not necessarilyBoth my grandfathers – born 1900 & 1907 were circumsized (as were all my uncles). Both were born at home, delivered by midwives.
I was shocked to find out that circumcision was done around age 5. In one case, at the same time a tonsillectomy was performed.
Apparently, in the early 1900′s no one worried much about how much pain they caused. The uncles were all born in hospitals in the 1930′s. I was born in 1960 and it was pretty much universal. But then this was the Midwest.
I wish I wasn’tI need all the donor tissue I can get for my GRS.
Dena
I wrote a comment on their website…The last time people were worried about circumcision was when the NAZIS EXAMINED JEWS. You people are nutz!
Unfortunately, in my mother’s generationI think that they were told it was a hygiene issue. Yeah, the issue was that mother’s did not want to deal with little boys penises and teach them how to keep themselves clean. American females of my mother’s generation did not want to deal with it.
WTF? Jebus’ Foreskin?How do you get a foreskin from a mythological creature?
In addition to thatThe vaginal entrance is almost completely sewn up, with tiny, tiny opening left for menstrual fluid to come out. This is left sewn up until marriage, which is the reason why the entrance was closed in the first place. To ensure virginity. Ugh.
Oh, oh! AND, as so many of these clitoridectomies/FGMs take place, let’s say, in less than sanitary conditions the knives used are dirty, sometimes even dull… Many of the “patients” suffer from infections following the procedure and quite a few die from the infection and/or the pain.
I have heard of some women retaining enough nerve endings to still experience sexual enjoyment, since the clitoral system is very intricate. But it’s still hit or miss and when this is done, it’s not to make sure the woman has sexual enjoyment later. That’s considered completely unnecessary in that worldview.
Have a mythological rabbi lop it off with a mythological knife?
not stupid; uninformed and actively kept in the dark In a subculture where—
all the boys were routinely circumcised
sexual repression (and silence about anything sexual) was rampant
there was only one Jewish family in this Catholic/Protestant town, so there was no cultural exchange or awareness, especially not about a Bris
the procedure eliminates the need for special attention to hygiene or any discussion about it,
why would we even know what circumcision was? Adults weren’t talking about it. My limited observations in the gym showers seemed to indicate we were all the same. We didn’t know we were missing anything. When I figured out in my high school years—via pornography—that I had been sliced, what grossed me out wasn’t that someone had taken a blade and cut off a part of my dick. It was the idea that some boys somewhere hadn’t been cut. Would I see them in college, funny skin sleeves covering their dick heads? What if I liked some guy and then found out he still had his foreskin? Eeewww! [grin]