crossposted on Holy Bullies and Headless Monsters
PFOX (Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays and Gays), that bastion of ex-gay phoniness has just nominated Family Research Council's Peter Sprigg for an award for “distinguished service in public education.”
PFOX head Regina Griggs said the following:
For the past four years, Mr. Sprigg has served on the school board's Citizens Advisory Committee on Family Life and Human Development. The 15-member Committee consults with professional educators within the public school system in developing and evaluating the student sex education curriculum.
Mr. Sprigg has spoken out in favor of including former homosexuals in the county's “Respect for Differences in Human Sexuality” school lessons. These lessons promote tolerance of homosexuals, lesbians, bisexuals, transgenders, cross-dressers, and the intersexed, yet failed to include ex-gays, which is the only disfavored group within the public school system. Without Sprigg, the ex-gay community and parents would not have a voice in the public schools.
Mr. Sprigg also enabled public school staff to promote a positive learning environment that holds mutual respect for others by participating in PFOX's flyer distribution program. PFOX distributed flyers to every high school student in the Montgomery County public schools urging the elimination of bias and prejudice against former homosexuals and their supporters. Students also received factual information on sexual orientation and resources on alternatives to homosexuality.
How sweet.
Griggs doesn't give the name of the award but based on his past history, nominating Sprigg for any award having to do with the tolerance and the advancement of education is like nominating one of those really bad American Idol rejects for a Grammy.
Isn't Peter Sprigg the SAME GUY who said the following:
” . . . I would much prefer to export homosexuals from the United States than to import them into the United States because we believe that homosexuality is destructive to society.”
And you don't have to take my word for it, isn't that right, Peter:
Also based on some of the papers he has written for the Family Research Council, Sprigg wouldn't know factual information if it came to life and kicked him in the keister.
He helped to write the paper Comparing the Lifestyles of Homosexual Couples to Married Couples and the book Getting It Straight, both of which have a plethora of inaccurate information (including numerous studies taken out context) regarding the lgbt community.
I talk about both the paper and the book and their numerous errors here and here.
At the time in which I wrote the two posts, I inaccurately gave another employee of FRC, Timothy Dailey, sole credit for writing these pieces. As you can see here, Sprigg had a hand in writing these pieces.
The only reason why Sprigg exists on this committee is to undermine anything that would benefit lgbts in a positive manner. He doesn't speak for tolerance and understanding but lies and obstruction.
From what I understand, his appointment was the result of a long and drawn out lawsuit over the school board's sex education program.
Also, there are enough reasonable members of that committee to cancel out any madness he may bring up.
But isn't it alarming that this man who would like to export gays and lesbians from the United States, who has no problem with creating junk science on gays and lesbians is on a committee that is supposed to look after the well-being of children, including those who are gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender?
I don't know what award PFOX nominated Sprigg for but I've got one for him.
But to say what it's called would cause me to “lose my religion.”
Peter Sprigg's “research:”
The Family Research Council continues to use 'outdated' work
Another flawed piece of work courtesy of the Family Research Council
The lies of PFOX:
UPDATE – PFOX answers my question. And someone is still distorting the issue
Another update from yesterday's post: PFOX caught distorting study
UPDATE - The following letter from David S. Fishback, Member, Board of Directors, Metro DC PFLAG and past Chair of the Citizens Advisory Committee (2003-05), gives a very good view of the situation regarding Sprigg's appointment to the committee:
While Peter Sprigg was appointed to the Montgomery County Board of Education's Citizens Advisory Committee on Family Life and Human Development in 2005 as part of the settlement of a court suit seeking to stop the Board from implementing changes in its health education curriculum setting forth accurate information on sexual orientation, the settlement agreement has expired, and the Board was under no further obligation to seat Mr. Sprigg.
Readers should be aware, however, that after the 2005 lawsuit was dropped, the Board started the process over again and, after winning a second lawsuit in 2007-08, implemented curriculum revisions that, in most respects, were even better than the curriculum that was derailed by the temporary restraining order issued by a federal court judge in May 2005. Mr. Sprigg's presence on the Advisory Committee failed to stop the Committee from recommending and the Board from implementing the curriculum improvements.
Mr. Sprigg's presence on the Committee is irrelevant to what PFOX says about
the flyers it distributes: “Mr. Sprigg also enabled public school staff to promote a positive learning environment that holds mutual respect for others by participating in PFOX's flyer distribution program. PFOX distributed flyers to every high school student in the Montgomery County public schools urging the elimination of bias and prejudice against former homosexuals and their supporters. Students also received factual information on sexual orientation and resources on alternatives to homosexuality.” These flyers are distributed pursuant to a quarterly program by which any non-profit group may distribute flyers in the schools. In fact, most of these flyers — which assert nonsense that is contradicted in the curriculum and is contradicted by the information provided to the Guidance Offices — are simply tossed in the trash can by the students. Indeed, Metro DC PFLAG also uses the flyer distribution program to pass out accurate information for students and parents.
It is worth noting that it appears that none of the other 14 members of the Advisory Committee (including members of the Metro DC Chapter of PFLAG and Teachthefacts.org (a grassroots group formed to support comprehensive, accurate sexuality education in Montgomery County), as well as the immediate past and now present Chair and Vice Chair) share Mr. Sprigg's views. Indeed, PFOX conveniently omits from its press release the fact that Mr. Sprigg has been remarkably unsuccessful in convincing his fellow Committee members or the Board of Education or the MCPS staff to follow the fringe views of PFOX and of his employer, the Family Research Council.
The advantage, I suppose, of having Peter Sprigg on the Advisory Committee is that it gives the other members a preview of the right-wing party line. Those members are well aware that they have to examine closely everything he says and examine any “authority” he cites.) Indeed, by having him on the Advisory Committee, the right-wing is deprived of the argument that their views are not even being listened to. What we have done in Montgomery County over the past 6 years is to give Mr. Sprigg and his allies every opportunity to make their case. The rest of us listen, check out their sources, check out what the mainstream medical and mental health professional associations have concluded — and then roundly reject the PFOX/Family Research Council nonsense.
As long as Mr. Sprigg does not engage in the kind of obstructionist tactics that his allies in Montgomery County sought to use in years past, his presence is not a problem. In dealing with public policy, there is no reason not to listen to many sides — as long as no one acts like the shouters at the current Congressional recess town hall meetings. I have debated him on a state-wide news program, and I have never seen him behave in such a manner.



7 Comments



Just rewatching…. Schindler’s list. Need I say more?
How are these guys qualifed for any public service?These people should not be allowed onto any policy-making body, after all, they have proved themselves to be manifestly irrational by their expressed belief in a fantasy concoction of some being in the sky that watches and judges each being 24/7, and has personally empowered them to judge others on its behalf. He thinks we should be exported? I think he should be committed to a mental institution for evaluation and treatment of his delusions. The same applies to any politician who espouses “Intelligent Design.” Such irrational belief should disqualify one from public office.
I exported myself……and now I have full civil rights AND universal healthcare.
If you are an “ex-gay”Doesn’t that mean you are heterosexual? What’s the difference? and why do they need to be mentioned since they are the majority (90%) of the population? Seems like overkill to me.
ex-gays identify as straightwhich SHOULD mean that there’s no issue there at all. but being an ex-gay doesn’t mean that you live your life in peace and quiet, mentioning your spouse and kids in passing the way any normal straight or gay person would. being ex-gay means that you tell everyone you encounter that you are, in fact, ex-gay: that you saw the evils of homosexuality and decided to turn to god. they’re playing a stupid game here. ex-gay isn’t about wanting to be left alone, it’s about wanting to go around bashing others and trying to take away their rights.
being around an ex-gay means having to deal with religious harping and constant gay-bashing. and in the new corporate world that wants to attract the best possible talent, there is no place for the sort of intolerance that being an ex-gay embodies. that’s why the fundies are screaming about wanting to include protections for them, so that they can legally discriminate against whomever they like.
Peter SpriggSays Mr. Sprigg:
” . . . I would much prefer to export homosexuals from the United States than to import them into the United States because we believe that homosexuality is destructive to society.”
Perhaps he has given some thought to exporting Regina Griggs’ son, who happens to be gay. I’m sure she would agree with that!
He has managed to “charm” an otherwise very liberal School Board here in Montgomery County, MD. with his slick demeanor and what looks like an impressive vita. (You know how liberals are when it comes to impressive-looking credentials). He no longer represents PFOX on the Citizens Advisory Committee on Family Lfe…but managed to finagle another appointment as a “citizen”. He has always voted in the minority of 3 (out of 16) on the committee and it is doubtful he will change his voting patterns now that he represents the citizens of Montgomery County. He loves the attention he draws to himself as the “burr under the saddle” of progressive programs in M.C.P.S.
The contradictions in terminologyThis was just a poorly executed stunt.
http://www.tips-q.com/1211208-…