What could there be to report only 3 days into what will be a 2 to 4 week process? A hopeful trend but BIG NOTICE: a hopeful trend does not get you off the hook of preparing for the ballot! Let this just be a puff of fresh air in your ballot preparation sails. Promise? Good! now you may proceed.
A review of the basics:
Here is a summary of the daily tallies:
| Date | Checked | Accepted | Invalid | Duplicates | No Match | Not Found | Missing | % Invalid |
| 31-Jul | 5,646 | 4,991 | 655 | 7 | 41 | 592 | 15 | 11.34 |
| 3-Aug | 5,856 | 5,096 | 760 | 16 | 40 | 682 | 22 | 12.98 |
| 4-Aug | 5,815 | 4,980 | 835 | 22 | 69 | 732 | 12 | 14.36 |
| 5-Aug | 6,140 | 5,268 | 872 | 23 | 71 | 758 | 20 | 14.20 |
| Totals: | 23,457 | 20,335 | 3,122 | 68 | 221 | 2,764 | 69 | |
| Average: | 13.31 |
Duplicates, No Match, Not Found and Missing are subcategories of Invalid, and are defined as: No Match – no match of petition signature with what’s on file; Not Found – not found on voter registration database; Missing – listed on the database as registered voters but missing a signature on the database. The Secretary of State checks back with the counties for signature cards on file for Missing signatures, so some Missing may eventually get shifted back from Invalid to Accepted.
UPDATE: The Secretary of State has created a special Referendum 71 webpage. Starting Wednesday, August 5th, you can find the daily results from the validation process there.
UPDATE 2: David Ammons reports that the Elections Division will be “adding a second shift starting Thursday and hope to wrap up by week after next.” I’ll be updating the numbers as they come in this evening (Wed).
UPDATE 3: ”Shane Hamlin…announced that a second shift of checkers will be brought on, beginning Thursday, so the checking can be accelerated. The day shift will work from 7:30 a.m. to 3 p.m. and the swing shift will work from 3:30 p.m. to 10 p.m. [T]he Elections Division now is hoping to wrap up the full-signature check by sometime the week of August 17. Hamlin also says the daily update will be available on the R-71 homepage…starting mid-day Thursday.”There’s been quite a bit of blogging the past few days about just which number best represents the cushion provided by the 17,112 extra raw signatures that were submitted. Because 17,112 is 14.19% above the target of 120,577 valid signatures, 14% is the figure against which daily invalidation rates are frequently measured. However, as Goldy explains, “the actual maximum invalidation rate beyond which the measure fails to qualify for the ballot, the signature cushion divided by the number of signatures submitted, is 12.43% (17,112/137,689).”. So 12.43% is the golden number against which the daily or cumulative invalid rate should be compared. Consider that the invalid rate after the first three days of sampling was 13%, and that cushion of 12.4% isn’t looking so cushy at the moment.
Here is the humble barometer I’m using. NUmbers valid on 8/4/2009 8/5/2009 only.
| Approved | Invalid | |
| Break point | 120,577 | 17,113 |
| Category total | 20,335 | 3,122 |
| % towards break point | 16.86 | 18.24 |
Of course WE ARE NOT OUT OF THE WOODS YET. There may still be batches of squeaky clean signatures yet awaiting the validation process. Or enough Missing signatures may be “found” and moved into the Accepted category. On the other hand, we should expect to see the frequency of duplicates increase as we expand the known signature universe. So the jury is still out. All I know is that we definitely cannot let ourselves get lazy and lulled by wishful thinking and some early favorable results, but it is nice to chew over something hopeful as we keep to the grindstone to prepare to win at the ballot.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Related:
* Random Numbers
* The Skinny on DP Dissolution Rates in Washington State
Referendum 71 voters will be asked to approve or reject the domestic partnership law.

REFERENDUM 71
Ballot Title
Statement of Subject: The legislature passed Engrossed Second Substitute Senate Bill 5688 concerning rights and responsibilities of state-registered domestic partners [and voters have filed a sufficient referendum petition on this bill].Concise Description: This bill would expand the rights, responsibilities, and obligations accorded state-registered same-sex and senior domestic partners to be equivalent to those of married spouses, except that a domestic partnership is not a marriage.
Should this bill be:
Approved ___
Rejected ___Ballot Measure Summary
Same-sex couples, or any couple that includes one person age sixty-two or older, may register as a domestic partnership with the state. Registered domestic partnerships are not marriages, and marriage is prohibited except between one man and one woman. This bill would expand the rights, responsibilities, and obligations of registered domestic partners and their families to include all rights, responsibilities, and obligations granted by or imposed by state law on married couples and their families.
DONATE TO WASHINGTON FAMILIES STANDING TOGETHER !
PRINT AND DISTRIBUTE HANDOUTS AND PLACARDS !



30 Comments



Using davidhart’s method of projection…Signatures required 120,577
Signatures submitted 137,689
Signatures checked 17,317
Signatures validated 15,067
Acceptance rate 87.00%
Proforma validation 119,799
Margin -778
In other words, as of today the referendum appears to be 778 valid signatures behind. The thing is, there is no way to know how typical the first 3 days of sampling is. The petitions can still move back into the black if the remaining signatures have a better validation rate than those already sampled. Stay tuned, and KEEP WORKING TO ENSURE OUR WIN AT THE BALLOT.
h/t davidhart
Clearly a nailbiterFrom this early data it appears that it is a coin toss whether we will see Ref 71 on the ballot or not.
Thanks for the updates Lureen.
I have to keep my fingers crossed.
Otherwise I’d be chewing my nails down to the quick.
it’s why i keep typinglol!
Oh man…This is going to be a squeaker, isn’t it? And if they keep counting at this rate, it’s going to be, what, 24 days (business days, I assume?) before we know the result?
Thanks for the update!Let’s keep that “valid” percentage going down and tell the Talibanicals to go home!
One of the greater frustrations . . . to all of this is that a number of people are claiming that they were duped into signing the damned things and there is no way to retract a signature.
It would be great to get this killed in verification. Keep in mind that, if this gets on the ballot, it will divert resources from Maine where the religious right is pouring money into the fight.
if they continue at the rateof checking 5000 to 6000 signatures per day, yeah it’ll take them about 4 work weeks to finish up.
Let’s recognize the WA Secretary of StateAs an open government groupie, I just want to say that I really appreciate the extra effort by Washington’s Secretary of State Sam Reed (an old-style Republican) to provide timely public updates on the progress of the signature review. Reed is despised by many in his party because he absolutely refuses to politicize the work of his office. He’s pretty much the only Republican vote I cast anymore.
And thank you, Lurleen, for all your efforts to keep us apprised of the status of R-71.
Lurleen,I just took a look at Secretary Reed’s blog site where David Ammons is posting the information; he indicated that a new website, with the check updates will “live” as of tomorrow (Wednesday.)
Lurleen,I just took a look at Secretary Reed’s blog site where David Ammons is posting the information; he indicated that a new website, with the check updates will “live” as of tomorrow (Wednesday.)
UGH!!!!!!!!!!I hate when my computer runs slow and I double post.
Sorry Lurleen,I just saw the update! My bad!
Proposed Protective OrderDid anyone notice the link to the Proposed Protective Order on the Secretary of State’s website, that Protect Marriage is seeking from the court?
http://wei.secstate.wa.gov/oso…
Protect Marriage Washington is asking the Court to seal all records containing information about petition signers, contributors and to prevent any public disclosure of information about supporters of R71.
Further readingLurleen blogged about that earlier (just click on her name, above, to get a list of all her posts). I also have most of Lurleen’s posts (with Pam’s permission, of course), Joe Mirabella’s and a couple of my own compiled over on my blog.
Can something like what happened in DC work?I am just curious about a possible course of action. If the referendum qualifies, would it be possible to get the courts involved in washinton state? In DC it was deemed that putting the law to recognize outside marriages within city bounds was innapropiate to put to a ballot initiative. Is it possible for the courts to step in an say this vote violates the rights of a minority group and shouldn’t be on the ballot?
I don’t think so.The WASC ruled a few years ago that it’s constitutional to discriminate against a minority by refusing them access to civil marriage. Also, the right to petition the government via referendum is in the state constitution.
point of no return?I wonder if there’s a point where they determine it’s not possible for the petition to qualify (too many invalidated, not enough of those eligible for potential future validation to make up the shortage), and stop the verification process?
They’ll count all of them………….unless they come up with 17,113 invalid signatures
17,113 invalid signaturesAt the rate they’re counting, they could reach that number around day 20 of the count. Unless the number of invalids each day continues to creep up. If people are feeling optimistic we could start a pool to guess which day they’ll reach the stopping point. I’ll take August 25th.
ThanksSusan! Lurleen has been fantastic in providing information on R71. I mentioned it only because the proposed protective order was just posted to the SOS site on Aug. 3 and was aware of the TRO. I think it shows the supporters of R71 are REAL COWARDS, wanting to strip away DP rights from Washingtonians under the cloak of secrecy.
thanks for the updates Lurleen
This is great work, Lurleen.Thanks!
Just a quick update for today…….…..not all the information is available (yet,) but David Ammons from the Secretary of State’s office said has posted that today’s rejected numbers were 14.2% and the cumulative around 13.3%. Also according to David, they will be adding a second shift next week.
I was justupdating the post to say the same thing as you were writing that comment. JINX ya own me a coke! :D
LOL!Nice!
Sure are slow…….……getting the info out tonight, aren’t they?
Actually they’ll count every signature regardlessIn response to a comment I left on the WA SoS blog, David Ammons clarified that they will review every single signature — even if it becomes clear at some point that there are not enough signatures to qualify the referendum. With the addition of the second shift it sounds like we should know by late next week if there are enough valid signatures. So far the trend of invalid signatures increasing slightly each day is very encouraging. Wednesday’s cumulative percentage is right on the break point. Let’s hope the count continues in this direction.
Thanks SPI just went back and saw that post.
Thanks again.
CuriousDo they count the forms in something like the order in which they were filled out, or is it random? It would seem to make sense that the invalid signature rate might increase over time, since the hard core haters are all going to make sure they sign ASAP. I’m going to hope that’s the case and that the invalid signature rate continues to rise!