crossposted on Holy Bullies and Headless Monsters
Last week, it seemed that I had a Paul Cameron fixation.
This week may be shaping up to feature anti-gay figure Peter LaBarbera.
Last night, I talked about how he channeled a Paul Cameron factoid (i.e. lie) about homosexuality being more dangerous than cigarettes.
But what he did today takes the cake. I simply could not pass it by.
LaBarbera is known for going to subcultural leather events, taking pictures of the activities there, and posting them on his webpage in an attempt to generalize about the entire lgbt community.
That's why he is known as “Porno Petey” in some circles.
Far be it from him to disappoint us this year. He has just posted pictures from what is called “Up Your Alley,” a street fair in San Francisco. LaBarbera made a point to post lots of pictures of naked folks and others engaged in lewd acts.
And included is his commentary about those “nasty homosexuals.” This is a supposed acount of acts from a Americans For Truth volunteer who took pictures at the Fair:
As with previous sadistic street fairs, police non-enforcement was so lax that deviant, homosexual sex acts were allowed to go on in the streets as fair attendees passed on by. In his 50-minute stint, Ron photographed two oral sex acts at Up Your Alley – one in which a man “serviced” two men in uniforms, and the other involving two men engaged in fellatio directly in front of a booth. No action by either the police or a private “Folsom Security” staffer was taken against the law-breakers . . .
There is just one problem as I see it. Amidst the pictures is one that stands out – a naked heterosexual couple (don't click on this link if you have a low tolerance for grossness).
So why is this significant? Well to me, it underlines LaBarbera's anti-gay bias.
Look, I am by no means defending how folks behave at these street fairs but as I understand it, this event includes more than gay men walking around nude. As the picture I mentioned demonstrates, there were obviously some heterosexuals there acting unprincipled.
But yet instead of making a possible good point about lewdness in general, LaBarbera's commentary omits the heterosexual couple and goes straight for the gay jugular.
I've never been to one of these events and don't plan to go anytime soon. But fair is fair. And LaBarbera's attempts to attack gays for their behavior while giving heterosexuals a pass for the possible same behavior says more about him than it does about the people whose pictures are posted on his webpage.




29 Comments


For folks who are so horrified……by even the thought of gay sex, it seems these homophobic creeps just can’t get enough of it!
The fairgrounds were cordoned off, and only paying visitors wee allowed in.
If anyone objects to the theme of the fair, or its participants’ attire (or lack thereof) or conduct, then they should try–oh, I dunno…
…NOT GOING THERE, maybe?!?!
That’s all petey could find?Mardi Gras and Spring Break could collect equally lewd pictures of straights. They have awfully convenient moral standards. Networking sites could find 12yo girls exposing their bodies for all their friends to see.
When Republicans have Mark Foley pestering under age Congfressional Pages, Larry Craig working glory holes, Ensign dragging his elderly parents into paying off his Mistress, her husband and even their kids….this seems tame in comparrison.
Indeed. As has been said before…Methinks the laddie doth protest too much.
Yep, I want to know…When they’ll be at South Padre Island or New Orleans policing hetero “lewdness”.
But really, who cares if any of these folks, gay, bi, or straight, are engaging in “lewd” behavior at these fairs? And why the hell should I care what they have to say about the way I live my life when they (Hello, Johnny “Casino” Ensign! David “Hooker Diaper” Vitter!) don’t live up to their own standards!
“The Peter” needs to get a life!Seriously, he needs to stop stalking the people at these street fairs and get his own sex life. Find a partner. Go to Rentboy. Hell, he can pick up a random guy a a bar for all I care (so long as he uses condoms)!
For his own mental health and our personal safety, “The Peter” needs to stop the stalking and start living out his own weird fantasies himself (so long as they’re legal).
First of all, Alvinthat pic was kinda gross.
The other way of looking at it, of course, is that it shows an agenda to police any and all “deviant sexual behavior” regardless of whether it’s gay or straight. I don’t think he’s necessarily giving heterosexuals a pass, though he is saying that us “nasty homosexuals” are corrupting good straight morals.
My name is kevinchi and I am a nasty homosexual and I’ll keep coming back.
Petey ought to be concerned about his children being the exact opposite of repressive parentsHe might unleash kids, who avoid street fairs, and mind their own G*D DAMN BUSINESS.
Where are the pics of cops sodomising a gay man with a taser up his ass?Oh yeah, that was nice family friendly Idaho…..nevermind.
Yes, andI’ll bet the Idaho fellow did NOT consent, unlike the frolicking folk at the Folsom St and Dore Alley fairs.
I’ve beenI attended leading 2 hot girls on leashes, as part of a group from a local S/m club which was predominantly heterosexual.
S/m is a different subculture which mostly considers itself “pansexual” and Porno Petes’ major tactic is to purposely confuse GLBTs with S/m afficiatos to try to build on societies prejudice against S/m.
The best way to call him on it is to point out, as you ghave, the hetero participants and question the behavior of the straights.
That pictureYou would almost think that The Peter has never seen a naked woman before, got confused, and posted it.
It is all about the gayThere are plenty of these kinds of things going on all over the country with about 10 times the number of straight participants.
Perhaps some gay folks should start documenting the perversions of the straight community.
They have:
Naked bike rides
Naked hikes
Naked beaches
Naked music festivals
Sex resorts
Porno conventions
Also, those who have sex in public and walk around nude are EXHIBITIONISTS.
By photographing them and watching them, these people are participating in their deviant sex act. They are giving them what they want.
I don’t know which is worse, the exhibitionists or the people who obviously get off watching them — like Porno Pete.
“…there were obviously some heterosexuals there acting unprincipled.”Okay, I’m not going to his website, thanks, so I didn’t see the pic you linked — but are you saying anyone engaging in consensual public nudity and/or sex at this event is “acting unprincipled” when consensual public nudity and/or sex at this event is accepted and even expected?
Isn’t it the people who supposedly don’t want to be there for the purpose of what the event is about and instead want to ruin it for the actual participants that are “acting unprincipled”?
I happen to have never been to this event or a similar one because it’s not for me. But that doesn’t mean I believe that people who want such an event shouldn’t have one.
Maybe he thought she was transThat would fit his meme: ONLY gay people engage in “deviant” sex. Straight people NEVER engage in s/m, w/s, fisting, scat or anything other than good, vanilla, missionary-style sex. So if this woman was there, she MUST be a “deviant” of some kind, right? And in the fundy mind the only thing worse than an LGB is a T.
speaking of his childreni wonder why the fact that peter’s own kids are being brought to the brink of such depravity isn’t a concern with him, or his viewing audience. peter is basically in the porn business: he publishes nude photos and extremely sexually-graphic, detailed descriptions of highly creative sex acts that most people don’t even think about. is the public really so stupid to believe that he DOESN’T bring his work home?? why are his kids allowed to remain there? considering the frequency and volume with which this sort of “reporting” occurs, i’d bet that his kids have been exposed to it, and probably numerous times.
I think Alvin did the same thing I did in my comment aboveHe was speaking as Porno Pete and his followers.
I wrote:
…these people are participating in their deviant sex act.
I should have used quotation marks:
…these people are participating in their “deviant” sex act.
Alvin probably meant:
…there were obviously some heterosexuals there acting “unprincipled”.
Way to drive traffic to his site.
I’m not sure that’s right.Alvin makes other points about not defending the participants’ behavior and saying outright that the activity there is lewd.
The activity there is lewd and unprincipled — if it were happening in front of minors or unwilling onlookers. But no children are at this event and every adult knows what they’re getting into by attending. So there is no lewdness and no good reason why an event such as this shouldn’t exist.
Alvin explicitly won’t defend the behavior at this fair, but I’m happy to. This is an appropriate venue for this behavior. And there’s nothing wrong with adults behaving like adults with other consenting adults.
I cannot see Petey’s site on court computerscause the filter blocks it as a hate site—way cool!!!!
It could make for a fun parody video –Send a “reporter” and a couple of people with video cameras to Mardi Gras/Spring Break/etc. to report on the lewdness and irresponsibility of the “heterosexual lifestyle”.
Yeah.Porno Pete is blocked as “Extreme” by my employer.
:LaBarbera’s such an idiotHe is such a scream he must a double agent – really pro-gay while pretending to be a right-wing schmuck. Kind of like Lindsay Graham.
you’re not kiddingTry San Francisco’s own Bay to Breakers Race, which is indeed a foot race, but which has nudity that transcends gender or orientation. And beer.
Frankly, anybody who goes nude or seminude in a San Francisco foggy day has a certain valor to them. And, of course, SF always was a bawdy town from 1849 on.
And to think this used to be virgin territory, Pilgrim!
not just that particular laddieThe religious right seems far more obsessed with gay sex than any LGBT person could possibly be.
They also seem obsessed with bestiality, which always comes into their diatribes somewhere. (This is what in California we call “animal husbandry”).
What do they think of in their prayer meetings?!
You’ve got to admitHe is quite comical. Kind of reminds me of Barney Fife, minus the gun (thankfully).
Oh the insanity!
No. You don’t really want the answer to that.
Hmmm
I think that is his sex life.
I do.It sounds kinky.
The sexually repressed are always the KINKIESTI imagine Alan Keyes, Rick Santorum, and Porno Petey in a dank dark dungeon, sharing one pair of testicals between the three. Writing short stories for jack-off books.