UPDATE: Here’s video of Jason’s interview with the senator.
Jason Bellini reports that Sen. Kirsten Gillebrand is scheduling Senate hearings to review Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.
After determining she didn’t have enough votes in support of a temporary suspension of the ban on gays in the military, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand tells The Daily Beast she has secured the commitment of Senate Armed Services Committee to hold hearings on “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” this fall. It would be the first formal re-assessment of the policy since Congress passed it into law in 1993.A statement from the Gillibrand’s office, shared exclusively with The Daily Beast, notes that “265 men and women have been unfairly dismissed from the Armed Forces since President Barack Obama took office.”
Gillibrand’s fast-track proposal for halting DADT, an amendment to the Military Reauthorization Act that would have ordered the Defense secretary to stop investigating gay service members, was never introduced. Even with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid expressing his support, Gillibrand couldn’t gather the 60 votes needed to avoid a filibuster, according to a spokesperson.
“I thought it was a long shot from the very beginning,” says Aubrey Sarvis, executive director the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, an organization fighting for the end of DADT. “Clearly one of the positive things that came out of the Gillibrand amendment was that it served as a catalyst for hearings,” he added.
The House, where repeal has an easier path to passage, held hearings last year. One can only hope that the doyenne of discrimination, Elaine Donnelly, the president of the Center for Military Readiness will make a stellar appearance on the Hill this time around in support of DADT. This WaPo review of Elaine’s embarrassing performance on the Hill last year only scratches the surface of her untethered-from-reality statements she made. We can look forward to moments like this:
Donnelly treated the panel to an extraordinary exhibition of rage. She warned of “transgenders in the military.” She warned that lesbians would take pictures of people in the shower. She spoke ominously of gays spreading “HIV positivity” through the ranks.“We’re talking about real consequences for real people,” Donnelly proclaimed. Her written statement added warnings about “inappropriate passive/aggressive actions common in the homosexual community,” the prospects of “forcible sodomy” and “exotic forms of sexual expression,” and the case of “a group of black lesbians who decided to gang-assault” a fellow soldier.
At the witness table with Donnelly, retired Navy Capt. Joan Darrah, a lesbian, rolled her eyes in disbelief. Retired Marine Staff Sgt. Eric Alva, a gay man who was wounded in Iraq, looked as if he would explode.
……”Like a woman who is stared at, her breasts are stared at,” Donnelly explained. She further explained the “absolutely devastating” effect of homosexuals “introducing erotic factors” and made a comparison to Sen. Larry Craig’s adventure at the Minneapolis airport. She said admitting gays to the military would be “forced cohabitation” and a policy of “relax and enjoy it.”
There was also an audible burst of laughter when Donnelly mentioned the “San Francisco left” and when she expressed her concern over gay men sharing a “cramped submarine” with other soldiers.
Donnelly, btw, has never served in the military, and admits she has no qualifications or expertise on sexuality.
Doyenne of discrimination Donnelly claimed in 2008 that members of The Homosexual Agenda somehow coerced former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General John M. Shalikashvili (who suffered a stroke more than two years ago), into supporting the repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, which he declared in a NYT op ed. Any rethinking of his position must, in Donnelly’s eyes, have been a result of a sinister fag-dyke mind-control effort out there. Look at this flaming crap:
Donnelly notes that Shalikashvili has in the last year or so suffered a debilitating stroke and is, in her words, “struggling to retain his health.” She says it is “really sad” to see someone like the general being used by the homosexual propaganda machine as “the latest tool of a public relations campaign.”
Related:
* The Blend Elaine Donnelly files



19 Comments



Carl LevinSen. Carl Levin (D-MI) is chair of the senate armed services committee. He testified against DADT and for open service of gay soldiers back in 1992. We’re not likely to have another hate-fest a la Sam Nunn. Should also be interesting to hear how McCain handles the subject.
Appropriate Senate Armed Services Committee membersLooks like today is “Repeal DADT” day for me! (Oh, who am I kidding? EVERY day is “Repeal DADT” day in my house.)
A companion bill to HR 1283 would be referred to the Senate Armed Services Committee, with the first stop at the Subcommittee on Personnel. Here are the Caucusing Dems on the Subcommittee, their cloture vote on attaching Hate Crimes to the Defense Authorization Act for FY2010, and their 2008 HRC scorecard records, if applicable. Adding Hate Crimes (S.AMDT.1511) to the Defense Act was a voice vote, so the roll call vote is for cloture only, to bring it to the floor.
Senator Ben Nelson (Subcommittee Chairman, FL), voted yes, score 90
Senator Kennedy (MA), absent, score 100
Senator Lieberman (CT), voted yes, score 75
Senator Akaka (HI), voted yes, score 75
Senator Webb (VA), voted yes, score 85
Senator McCaskill (MO), voted yes, score 85
Senator Hagan (NC), voted yes, freshman (no score)
Senator Begich (AK), voted yes, freshman (no score)
Senator Burris (IL), voted yes, freshman (no score)
Same thing for the GOP:
Senator Graham (Ranking Member) (SC), skipped the vote on hate crimes, score 0
Senator Chambliss (GA), voted no, score 20 (voted to repeal HIV travel ban)
Senator Thune (SD), voted no, score 20 (voted to repeal HIV travel ban)
Senator Martinez (FL), skipped the vote on hate crimes, score 20 (voted to repeal HIV travel ban)
Senator Wicker (MS), voted no, score 0
Senator Vitter (LA), voted no, score 0
Senator Collins (ME), voted yes, score 75
I’ll start lobbying Sen. Akaka’s office. I’ll show him the “Silent Partners” film, and try to get Mazie Hirono and Neil Abercrombie to talk to him about drafting a companion to HR 1283.
Bear in mind the ranking GOP on the Senate Armed Services Committee is John McCain, and he has vowed to fight repeal tooth and nail. His BFF on the Committee is Lindsay Graham.
In related news, here is the list of Senate roll call votes for the 111th Congress. If you scroll down, you can find item 00237 on 22 July, which is the Thune Amendment roll call vote. Item 00235 on 21 July is the Levin Amendment to kill expanded F-22 funding. Item 00234 on 20 July is the Sessions amendment basically adding military status to hate crimes definitions.
LOL, Lurleen, get out of my head!You named the entire committee, I named the Personnel Subcommittee members…together we have an entire working brain!
**terrorist fist-bump**
Thanks for the ongoing hard work on this, Keori!
TheHill.com is reporting that
As you probably know, the first half of that is consistent with statements by House repeal bill lead Patrick Murphy who says other Congress members have said they will vote for repeal but don’t have the cojones to be listed as a cosponsor. WHATEVER it takes.
It also again quoted Senate Armed Services Chair Carl Levin statement from June:
“It requires presidential leadership. This cannot be addressed successfully without that kind of leadership.”
In other words, all roads to repeal begin with the guy who declared in 2007 that “All that is required is leadership.”
Or as the former sign on his desk declared in 1977 when pioneer military ban fighter Leonard Matlovich sat at it:
THE BUCK STOPS HERE – Harry Truman
but it’s so lovely in there!
and for our republican friends on the committee
The “Ever Lovely Miss Lindsay Grahamshould be in favor of repeal. Then, he could come out and still be in the Air Force reserve (colonel). One can only dream….
Detroit News’s Deb Price……just posted an interview with Senator Levin (D-MI)
Back in 1992 when Nunn chaired hearings, he stacked the deck with anti-gay bigots. Something tells me Senator Levin is going to let us hear from the previously silenced military leaders.
oops, here’s the linkDeb Price’s interview with Senator Carl Levin of Michigan
Thanks, Lurleen, but….
…as you know, it’s ultimately up to the President to decide which ACTIVE DUTY military people are allowed to testify. And if the President isn’t convinced to STOP being led around by the nose by those in Jurassic Park who oppose repeal, we’ll never hear any active duty support for repeal.
Last year, Bush Inc. wouldn’t let any active duty military testify at the House DADT subcommittee hearing, apparently, because he didn’t want to risk their inability to defend the policy being revealed.
This is going to be interesting….
I have something to send you, MichaelStand by for something from my yahoo address. It’s not for public consumption, but will bring a smile to your face!! (And if I sent it to Rahm Emanuel, his head would explode in a fine pink mist!)
PS:
While I certainly trust Sen. Levin’s sincerity, he is exhibiting susceptibility to a persistent myth that is an obstacle to repeal and that I’ve addressed here repeatedly.
Some believe that there might be as many as 65,000 gays already in the U.S. services.
Whatever the number, the vast majority of those will NOT immediately come out to their nongay military peers after DADT is repealed.
This is supported both by research of what happened in other countries after they lifted their bans, and the experiences most of us could speak to in the civilian world.
Even in “gay ground zero” San Francisco where I live, even in the various companies I’ve worked for that have had nondiscrimination employment politices, not all civilian gays are out to their nongay coworkers/supervisors/friends/family members.
In the aggressively homophobic military world, we’re not going to suddenly see 65,000 rainbow flags flying on American military bases around the world.
There is no need to “phase in” equal opportunity.
LOL! Looking forward to it….
And, speaking of Rahm, check out one of the latest pieces from the Palm Center:
http://www.palmcenter.org/blog…
I’m sure several of us will be quoting from some of its astounding analysis of media hit cause and effect patterns.
And they are soon going to release a related report called Self-Inflicted Wounds on “Don’t ask, Don’t Tell”: How and Why the Gay Community Took the Pressure off the White House, that, if it names names, is going to blow the shaky lid off of the subject.
here’s how i read it“phase it in, or to do it, either one”. that doesn’t sound like he’s set on one philosophy of implementation. rather, it looks like he wants to be sure to give both approaches a thorough hearing.
Well done, AaronAm I the only one who wonders what the levels of rohypnol were in the champagne at that little White House “placate the gays” soiree? The one that magically marked the end of the visible anger?
Methinks Rahm Emmanuel has been making several backroom deals of his own.
Is it just me?Or does shoving the microphone up Donnelly’s snout come to everyone’s mind watching her testify?
UGH!That’s rude! Leave the rest of us old queens out
I would love love love to see ANYTHING that will make Rahm’s head explode! It totally reminds me of Jon Stewart’s episode where he does the Dobbs-O-Meter. CLASSIC!
Here it is in case you’d like to see it again (or for the first time.) http://www.thedailyshow.com/wa…
It comes about the 6:10 minute mark
Sorry, DaveIt’s personal, to do with my job at the DOD, and so I can’t publicly post it. I will say only this: there is a LOT more support within the ranks, even within the officer corps, for repeal than the media whores, President Separate-But-Equal, or Rahm Emmanuel are willing to admit.
She looks likeshe’s snorting something off of it, especially with that expression. It would explain a lot.
Sorry….…..I should have put an LOL after that. I hope that you didn’t take that too seriously, about the rude part. Sometimes I forget about the whole voice inflection we miss over the internet. Anyway, that is good news to hear.