In a piece by the WaPo's Darryl Fears, A Sanctuary From Hate, you get a good look at the specific struggle that black LGBTs face in the religious black community and by the white gay sphere. The article profiles Bishop Rainey Cheeks of Inner Light Ministries in the Washington D.C.'s H Street area.
For 16 years, it has served as a sanctuary for a small community of black gays and lesbians who say they feel shunned from all directions — by black men and women who give them cutting looks of disapproval, by mainstream black ministers who condemn homosexuality, and by white gays who make them feel unwelcome in subtle ways, such as switching from hip-hop to country music in a club when too many black men hit the dance floor.
At Inner Light, members say they can be themselves. In the pews on a recent Sunday, a woman adoringly placed an arm around the shoulders of her girlfriend. A man with a linebacker's strong build sat near the front wearing mascara. And condoms sat in a basket near the door in case any worshipers wanted to grab some on their way out.
About two thirds of the people in Inner Light's pews are gay or lesbian, and some, but not all, are in the closet when they return to their homes. Rev. Cheeks preaches safe sex and by speaking frankly and providing those condoms, it underscores the tragic explosion of HIV/AIDS in the black community in DC.
Nearly 60 percent of men in the city who contracted HIV through sex with men are black, according to a D.C. government survey released in March. Every minister and deacon at Inner Light Ministries has had a close encounter with the disease. Four of them are HIV-positive, including deacon Ronnie Walker, 54, who said that 20 years ago he had unprotected sex with a partner who never mentioned that he was sick and dying.
Cheeks, 57, contracted HIV in the early '80s, when few people knew much about the strange new infection that was sending so many gay men to their graves. Much to the bishop's chagrin, HIV continues to ravage his city almost three decades later.
The article speaks frankly to the attitude of denial, damnation and self-loathing that leads to unsafe-sex and the epidemic in the community. The story of Ronnie Walker, who is HIV-positive, and cheated repeatedly on his wife over the course of seven years of marriage, beginning on the night of his honeymoon when he slipped out to have sex with his best man.
More below the fold.
Today, after joining Inner Life, he has found affirmation as a black gay man and has a male partner, yet he continues the denial of another critical part of his life — his HIV status. His partner knows, but Walker erases any association with his status in the home by keeping all of his medications elsewhere so that no one will inadvertently see them and learn he's HIV+.
The desire to hide being HIV-positive — not just from visitors but from prospective sexual partners — is powerful and difficult to change. Some men are reluctant to reveal their health status to possible partners for fear of being rejected. Short said he might avoid the subject if he and Walker broke up and he were dating again. It would depend on how I feel,” Short said, adding that he would probably use a condom but that in the heat of the moment, he couldn't guarantee it. “Sex is a very powerful thing.”
Speaking to young gay black men, Rev. Cheeks is taken aback by the level of complacency — a lack of safer-sex practices, and the belief that AIDS is “an everyday disease” that won't touch them — and he is frequently called from these young people who learn they've contracted HIV.
Cheeks said the discussion had driven home the need to start a youth mentoring program at Inner Light. “Most messages . . . to young folk is if you're gay or lesbian, you're going to hell,” he said. “So why take responsibility if you're already condemned?
And the counseling and mentoring is sorely needed because responsibility is not being taken — in DC, if you are a man 20-29 years old who's had sex with another man, 22% are HIV+; if you're 30-39, the number jumps to 40%. This is silence and religious damnation killing the black community, and it's not only in D.C. If there were only a way to clone Rev. Cheeks to take up this education battle.



27 Comments





EXCELLENT! this is wonderful info!
thank you! pam for bringing this to our attention.
i am fwding this to a good friend that has an hiv/aids non-profit org in ATL. ’Some One Cares of ATL’-Ronnie Bass!
maybe you can spotlight him also–He is doing fantastic work for people living with hiv/aids in atl! against all the odds he still helps!
thanks again.
the challenges some of us face are staggeringi am so glad that washington post published this story and that there were people willing to speak with the journalist. people need to know they are not alone, they are not sinners, that there is good reason to love and take care of themselves. bravo to those willing to engage in this needed public conversation.
clarifying the HIV statsPam said
But the article is saying
In DClooking at HIV+ menwho contracted it via sex with menroughly two-thirds are between 20 and 40
If preventive measures were more effective, those numbers should be declining — in an optimal world, 20-somethings would be a much smaller proportion.
that first boldened statementwhen I read it yesterday, I was shocked. I mean I haven’t been to a club in almost 5 years, and when I was there it was in a pretty accepting and open space. But anyway, black lgbts should speak out about this more, because this type of thing is simply wrong and has not right to exist. It can not be allowed to exist.
Well, it looks likeof HIV+ MSM in DC (acronym soup!), 40% are in their 30s and only 22% are in their 20s. While some of that may just be a matter of the amount of sexual history (and number of potential HIV exposures) increasing with age, a lower proportion of younger people in the HIV+ population might be expected if people were learning to be more careful and use protection. We’d need numbers rather than just percentages, though.
just heard a rebroadcast of tavis smiley’s friday radio showwhere he interviewed phill wilson of the black aids institute. it was a case study in avoiding mention of Teh Gay, and both of them kept referring to the problem of the perception that aids is “someone elses problem”. i took this to be a euphemism for “aids is the gay (=white) disease so not my concern”. you could of course interpret what they said to simply mean standard denial people have about anything bad happening to them, but come on. the elephant was so huge in that radio studio i swear tavis sounded like he couldn’t get a lungful of air. of course they never mentioned the major complicating factor of the d.l., and the one time Teh Gay way mentioned by name was tavis expressing concern that the new head of national health appointed by obama was “a white gay man”. but of course neither of them followed up with “it could be a problem because so many brothers are on the dl and can’t/won’t identify with or listen to policy emanating from any office run by someone suffering from the so-called white disease, and we have to address this misperception head-on.” this is further perplexing since apparently phill wilson himself is gay and has a gay men’s program running under the auspices of the institute.
PerplexingI find the cognitive dissonance involved in this really bewildering. It’s like they’re saying “I am not X, even though I engage in behavior Y, therefore I will not take precautions against Y’s potential consequence: Z.”
I remember listening to a radio call-in show where a teenage girl called in. X was “sexually active”, Y was “engaging in intercourse with my boyfriend” and Z was “pregnancy.” The hosts were trying to convince her that she really needed to use some kind of birth control, but she was refusing, because she didn’t want to be the kind of girl who was sexually active.
It’s even more frustrating to me when it’s this sort of internalized homophobia that’s so desperately dangerous. At least the teenage girl from the radio show would have options if she ended up pregnant, but once you have HIV, you have HIV for life. The stats on men who have sex with men but refuse to identify as “gay” are just heartbreaking.
The problem of course…Is that many rank and file white LGBT folks don’t want to hear about the blatant racism that exists in “their” community.
You know, right now there is an article on The Advocate’s website about E Lynn Harris. I have NEVER seen an white gay author of any any calibre get trashed the way he has been on an LGBT site. Not just him, but his audience as well.
There is some SERIOUS race issues flowing though the LGBT community right now. I don’t know if the racists have just gotten bolder…but it seems more obvious now than ever.
Truman Capote, for oneand Gore Vidal is either really really loved or really really hated by the LGBT community.
Camille Paglia would make threeAnd I have seen James Baldwin and Alice Walker get trashed (still) by many homophobes in the black community
You are full of shit, GeekI agree with much of what’s on the Advocate website, actually.
While 54 is entirely too young to die, and I think he should RIP, a self-confessed literary snob like myself who cut my teeth on James Baldwin and the Harlem Renaissance writers long before Harris even came on the scene, Harris was not in that class (nor did Harris ever claim to be, I might add).
I was not impressed with the quality of his writing and I, myself, don’t like Harris’ popularization of the “down low.” (which I had never heard of and I can’t imagine anyone living that way but, then again, I had Baldwin as an example).I am divided as to whether it actually helped or hurt matters.
I do admire the fact that Harris self-published “Invisible Life.”
Well we alreadyknowing that you have some serious issues with black America anyway, and that you reflexively defend white racism for your own dubious reasons. You’re hardly impartial
That said, I’d say that you’re the one that’s full of shit if you think that ANY white LGBT author would be trashed like that by commenters on a site like the advocate. The Advocate wrote an article about his life and death. People used that article as a vehicle to trash black Americans, their reading habits etc. YOU may not like his writing…which is OK, not everyone has to like the same thing. Art is subjective.
But the comments there were about how he and his readers were low class and essentially ignorant. He was not a homophobe and himself highlighted a number of important issues impacting black LGBT America. A published author deserves more respect than what is currently on display there…especially on their death.
I will say again that you will not see any white LGBT author and their audience attaked in a simlar way on that site.
You can defend them all you want….but I’m calling it like I see it.
HOW is this relevant…to the point that I just made and that of the person to which I responded.
It seems that anytime someone mentions this topic…there you are running to their rescue.
Its folks like you that appologize for blatant bigotry that are just as guilty as those that engage in it for perpetuating that same bigotry.
I’ve already named 3 white writersthat I’ve seen completely trashed of LGBT sites. I’ll defend Vidal (but not Capote; Paglia, it depends). And I’ve never ever seen Baldwin trashed on an LGBT site (and I’d better not!).
And I’m not that much of a snob, either. I loved James Earl Hardy’s B-Boy Blues series as well as (gasp!) Donald Goines (granted, Goines was no Chester Himes but he was a damn good writer).
Harris (along with Terry McMillian) was significant in opening up the genre of lighhter fare reading for African Americans. But, I mean, I learned about the DL from the few books of Harris that I read, I couldn’t relate to his characters at all.
Because you continue to implythat the black community and black LGBT sites is soooooooooo pristine and pure and innocent when it comes to trashing authors. In fact, you seem to think that the black community is pristine and pure in every which way possible and that the gay community are serious oppressors of the black community (the gay community doesn’t have that type of power, quite frankly).
Black feminist authors have also been regularly trashed in the black community for years, for example.
Andrew Sullivan makes four, by the way (with good reason, for the most part, though Sullivan has his defenders and I think that Sullivan is a good writer, I don’t like what he writes about.
Balance in all things, dude.
Geek, let’s end this line nowbecause this is thread hijacking. There’s a recent E Lynn Harris thread more appropriate for this discussion.
As someone who’s been POZ since 1985, and about Bishop Cheeks age (56)I’ve seen and heard nearly every kind of men/and a few women living with AIDS and how they behave. I knew some who had two different Gay.com profiles, one which stated HIV+, and another answering status unknown. I would almost daily be confronted by some stupid young GAY.com member trying to find a POZ man to infect them. We’d make sure they were tossed out of the POZ room chat. Nearly daily I’d have someone come in to chat awaiting an HIV test results.
Thank You Bishop Cheeks for the flock you care for. One warning I would state, any youth counseling should be done either by two counselors, and better if they are of opposite sex, just so no charges of inappropriate behaviour is ever charged, or occurs.
This has happened a lot with LGBT youth groups.
Excuse me…my comments were not ABOUT E Lynn Harris. My comments were in relation to the posters comments about the treatment that black Americans deal with in the LGBT community. I merely used the COMMENTS on the E Lynn Harris article as evidence of what black LGBT folks face.
I simply saidthat the E Lynn Harris thread was a more appropriate place for this particular discussion. This thread concerns the very serious issue of a black LGBT affirming pastor and the very serious problem of AIDs in the black community. While much of Harris’ subject matter (as well as the Advocate comments) touches on this subject matter, here is not the place for it, IMO.
I’ve said NO such thing.I’ve said NOTHING about black sites or Black LGBT sites. The very article in question address the fact that black LGBT folk face racism in the LGBT community.
No have I EVER said that the gay community is an opressor of the black community. Not even once.
What I have said is that the LGBT community is NOT inclusive and has serious race issues that it needs to deal with. The very article that Pam posed speaks on this.
Yet every time its mentioned run to the defense of the status quo. In fact…look at your own commentary. You only have something negative to say about black americans. You seem to totally dismiss or forgive the racism.
Reading this piece reminded me of Paul Monette’s essay “My 3 priests”It’s in Monette’s LAST WATCH OF THE NIGHT. Paul railed against Catholic church and the Vatican for a decade, and the abuse he faced as a Gay man in MA with Catholic bashers. But he wrote an essay which speaks of a Buddhist woman teacher, a Jesuit brother, and an Episcopalian Bishop who was coming out, actually came out after the book was sent to be printed. The Jesuit brother raised funds raised by selling Christmas trees to finance his work of caring for children with AIDS, he was one of the first who went into the former USSR countries, that were leaving the AIDS babies untouched and in paint peeling metal cribs, and took them outside into the sunshine and held them. It’s a collection of amazing stories, I recommend. Add Bishop Cheeks to the list as the 4th priest.
E Lynn pioneered DL lit but I don’t think that alone makes him classicThe vibe I have been getting online and in talking with other black gay men is if you don’t think Harris was titan on par with Baldwin then you are racist.
Really?
You can look through my comment history, you know.
this is a good article, I sent it to several of my friendsI continue to have my issues with churches of any sort, but it was refreshing to read about this church.
It was interesting to read that they talk about safe sex in the ministry/outreach.
Thank you!Baldwin is my standard, has always been my standard, and always will be my standard and Harris couldn’t hold a candle to him. Harris always discouraged that comparison himself, with good reason.
I mean, there are a very very few white writers that could hold a candle to Baldwin.
I cried the whole damn daywhen Baldwin died, I mean the whole damn day. And was depressed about it for quite while. I am not doing the same thing over E. Lynn Harris.
I’d have never had the courage to be out and proud and bold about it if it weren’t for Baldwin.
I’ve never seen kev forgive either racism from White LGBTs, or homobigotry from BlacksHe happens to be in the intersection where two strains of hate converge, as does Pam.