I am not sh*tting you, people. The Cambridge cop who arrested Dr. Henry Louis Gates in his own home told the press that he’s not racist, as Gates has charged, because he tried to save the life of Celtics star Reggie Lewis 16 years ago by giving him CPR. I was IMing with Mike Signorile when he dropped the link in from the Boston Herald and I thought he was playing me. Nope.
The Cambridge cop prominent Harvard University professor Henry Louis Gates Jr. claims is a racist gave a dying Reggie Lewis mouth-to-mouth resuscitation in a desperate bid to save the Celtics superstar’s life 16 years ago Monday.“I wasn’t working on Reggie Lewis the basketball star. I wasn’t working on a black man. I was working on another human being,” Sgt. James Crowley, in an exclusive interview with the Herald, said of the forward’s fatal heart attack July 27, 1993, at age 27 during an off-season practice at Brandeis University, where Crowley was a campus police officer.
It’s a date Crowley still can recite by rote – and he still recalls the pain he suffered when people back then questioned whether he had done enough to save the black athlete. “Some people were saying ‘There’s the guy who killed Reggie Lewis’ afterward. I was broken-hearted. I cried for many nights,” he said.
Crowley, 42, said he’s not a racist, despite how some have cast his actions in the Gates case. “Those who know me know I’m not,” he said.
Needless to say, I was laughing so hard at this that I had tears streaming down my face. OK. How many ways is this man’s reasoning absolute jackassery. As a campus police officer who is trained in CPR, did he think he had the option to refuse to give mouth-to-mouth to Lewis? Are we supposed to think he was so heroic that he was willing to touch his mouth to the lips of a black man in front of all those people? Honestly, this only raises some seriously uncomfortable questions about Crowley’s thinking if he’s using this to somehow “prove” he isn’t racist. For instance, Lewis was a superstar, a black man, and, as Crowley observed, a human being. One presumes all human beings are equal and he would be comfortable with giving mouth to mouth to, say, RuPaul, or Halle Berry, or the janitor who sweeps the courts after a game. It’s all good, right? I don’t know what this cop is trying to get at with this tale — to show he’s down with the brown?
The real issue here, and it will likely not be discussed nearly as much as the race angle, is the class angle. Professor Gates, during his angry tête-à-tête with Crowley, tossed down the “don’t you know who I am” card (to be precise, in the report it says Gates told him he had “no idea who he was messing with“). I know that I can’t stand it when people in Gates’s position and station drop that sh*t as a trump card (trust me, I see it first-hand all the time in academia to name one field), so imagine this officer, who clearly is in a different socioeconomic universe than Gates. It’s one thing to be a famous black b-baller dying on the floor, it’s another matter altogether when the other person might be perceived as a spoiled academic who’s looking down at you and verbally abusing you.
Now that is no excuse for Crowley’s incomprehensible arrest of Gates for yelling at him after the prof had already provided two forms of ID to prove who he is and that he lived in the residence, it’s simply another factor that must be considered in this mess — something that will obviously receive less play in the press than race, since class is also a third rail topic much of the time.
What do you think?
Oh, and about the Gates case, Crowley doesn’t offer an apology of any kind.
Though he harbors no “ill feelings toward the professor,” a calm, resolute Crowley said no mea culpa will be forthcoming. “I just have nothing to apologize for,” he said. “It will never happen.”
Irene Monroe, who guest posts every so often on the Blend, also shares her view of Cambridge, its police and how race and class are at play in this incident.
Living while Black in Cambridge
Rev. Irene MonroeNone of us African-American residents of Cambridge are surprised or shocked by the humiliation and harassment Professor Henry Louis Gates, Jr., 58, of Harvard University encountered at the hands of Cambridge police.
My partner, Dr.Thea James, an Emergency Room physician who would drive from home to work was stopped all the time for “driving while black.” And when the Cambridge cops realized she’s a woman, and a lesbian one at that, their unbridled homophobia surfaces. Thea now takes the bus.
My girlfriend’s kids and their friends hang out at the Cambridge’s Galleria Mall like kids do. The Cambridge police in the mall stop my girlfriend’s kids and their friends; one white and two Asians are not, because “shopping while black” is always mistaken as shoplifting.
More below the fold.Irene Monroe continues:
These constant shakedowns of us have been deliberately on the down low to the public because Cambridge, proudly dubbed as “The People’s Republic of Cambridge, is ranked as one of the most liberal cities in America. And with two of the country’s premier institutions of higher learning – Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology- that draw students and scholars from around the world, Cambridge’s showcase of diversity and multiculturalism rivals that of the U.N.Cambridge is also proudly known for a lot of firsts in this country. For example, it was the first city in Massachusetts to issue a legal application for same-sex marriage. It’s the first major city in the country to elect an African American openly gay mayor -Ken Reeves. And Cambridge elected its first African American openly lesbian mayor in the country this year with E. Denise Simmons. Deval Patrick is the first African American governor of Massachusetts.
Cambridge is no doubt a progressive city. However, when you scratch below Cambridge’s surface there is also a liberal racism that is as pernicious, vile, and intolerant as Southern racism. But unlike Southern racism that sees race and tries to keep blacks in their place, liberal racism claims it does not. Ironically, however, Cambridge’s liberal ruling class maintains its racial boundaries not by designated “colored” water fountains, toilets or restaurants, but rather by its zip codes, major street intersections known as squares, like the renown Harvard Square; and residential border areas that are designated numbers, like the notorious Area 4, a predominately black poor and working-class enclave.
It did not matter that the call to police by a white woman, who doesn’t live on the block let alone the area, stating that two African-American men were breaking and entering into one of the expensive homes on a tree-lined street was not only false but actually Gates’s home. The woman’s call was her civic duty in preserving the neighborhood’s integrity. because after all this was happening in the zip code area of 02138, which is Harvard Square.
And it did not matter that once Gates validated his residency to the cop with a legitimate Harvard I.D. that the whole incident should have, at that very moment, ended. But instead the arresting officer called the Harvard University police to once again verify Gates occupancy in his own home.
Also, it did not matter that the suspected robber is a Harvard professor, public intellectual and recipient of the MacArthur Foundation “genius” award. (Some say this incident serves as a cautionary tale to those who want to now define America as being post-racial with the election of Obama.)
What was of great concern for both the white woman who called the police and the arresting office who eventually had to handcuff Gates was the shock and perhaps outrage they experienced seeing this unknown black man in this well-known, high income, and professional area of Cambridge breaking and entering into someone home’s and not in the city’s known and expected troubled spot- Area 4?
Segregation in this city is not only along race lines but also class. And poor working-class whites and white immigrants do not experience the fullness their white skin privilege would abundantly afford them if they too were part of Cambridge’s professional and/or moneyed class.
Area 4 has been labeled a troubled area of Cambridge, an area plagued with all the problems of urban blight and very little resources to ameliorate them. As a densely populated area, its average household income was $34,306 according the 2005 city census. Harvard Square, on the other hand, in the same year its average household income was $79,533.
Area 4 use to house the city’s police station. And white Cambridge police officers assigned to this area unabashedly target and harassingly patrol neighborhood blocks and activities of black male residents- young and old. And their reasons for doing so can easily be attributed to the Cambridge Police Department’s lack of funds in its budget to do cultural sensitivity trainings. But their reason is just as much about this country’s horrific racial legacy between the two groups as it is also about Cambridge’s liberal ruling elite exploiting these tension by their claims to not see race, until of course, an unknown black man appears in their neighborhood
The tension escalated between Gates and Sgt. James Crowley when Gates flipped the script on him. As the person-in-questioned Gates exercised his legal right to also question:
“Is this happening because you’re a white cop and I’m a black man? Is this why this interaction is still taking place? ”
The charges against Gates have been dropped. But many white Cantabrigians chiming in on this incident felt that Gates was being uppity, feeling entitled, and exploiting the race card.
And who would know better about this than them.



Living while Black in Cambridge
52 Comments





Context of the interview?Pam, from what you’ve posted, I don’t see the officer saying “I’m not racist, because I did CPR on Reggie Lewis.”
I see him saying I’m not racist, and also that he worked on Lewis, and the newspaper juxtaposing those in print. They could have easily come at completely different points in the interview.
I’m not saying he’s NOT racist — I’m saying step back and have a healthy dose of reality for how the (print) media works to get people riled up and sell papers and ads.
And of course, it’s certainly possible that he IS saying that. But as someone who’s been in the papers enough to know how they work, don’t believe every quote you read.
I think you’re reading far more into this story from the Boston Herald than you should.
Let’s not focus on this one cop, pleaseSeriously. It lets white people in general off the hook, and we should not be let off that hook. His assumptions about black people are shared by most white people, if not all, at least at some level. As Rev. Monroe eloquently writes, it’s not like this is an isolated incident.
I do agree with you completely about the class issue, but I think you don’t go far enough: white working class people, in general, get particularly incensed about black middle class (and/or rich) people. It violates what they perceive to be the natural order of things (that white people should be on top), and strikes at a deep resentments for white working class folks. As a rule, they are looked down upon by the professional classes, and when the representative of the professional classes is of the “inferior” race — well, damn, that’s just going too damn far.
Race and class definitely intersect in interesting ways here, both in the original incident, and in the reactions to it. I can’t help remarking that so many of us white people who are so upset about how Prof. Gates was treated are part of that liberal intellectual PBS-watching elite — the folks for whom Gates really is a famous guy. We share his class, his academic background, we’ve read his books, and we’ve “gotten to know” that nice man Skip on those intriguing PBS shows. Naturally, we take his side as against that power-hungry faceless cop. Our reactions bear interrogation as well.
the context of what he is saying fitsWhy did he bring up this incident at all if he didn’t find it relevant to use as an example that he isn’t racist? That’s the problem. It has no relevance to the Gates incident if the point of his job was to do CPR on any person who was in the distress Lewis was in 16 years ago.
“Excuse me Mr. Harvard Professor Middle-Aged Black Man in his own home, you are obviously upset and…”“… as an officer of the law, I must warn you if you continue to confront me, I will have to arrest you. Now please calm down. I was just responding to a call of suspected burglary. I will leave now, have a good day.”
Male egos being swung everywhere, mixed with pride, centuries of horrible history, ignorance, disbelief, jet-lag, frustration over malfunctioning objects, indignation and all-out abuse of power on both sides.
BUT, a little psychology to calm an escalating situation would have made this an ironic, bittersweet joke instead of yet another example of the issues with which our country does not know how to deal.
The policeman has been in law enforcement long-enough to know how to deal with tired middle-aged men; you diffuse the situation by calming down, not by punishment through humiliation:
“You’re under arrest. You didn’t do anything wrong, but your saying you didn’t and my having to come out here to be proven wrong deserves one crack of a whip anyway.”
Fault: Cop.
I’m not sure he didIt’s apparently widely known that he was the same cop — remember, all the press is digging into his past now — and I strongly suspect he was asked about it directly by the reporter first.
Look at the bylineThere are _5_ reporters listed on the byline for a very short column. They’re digging.
I made a long post in the earlier threadSo, I’ll keep this (relatively) short.
Sgt. Crowley’s desperate attempt to “prove” he is not a racist just re-affirms my opinion of his lack of good judgment. It’s a dressed-up version of the old “but I have black friends!” defense used by racists ever since racism fell out of fashion. Trying to save a dying black man doesn’t prove he isn’t a racist any more than his interactions with Dr. Gates prove that he is. Other than issuing a personal apology to Dr. Gates, he should keep his mouth shut rather than risk making any more ridiculous statements that only make him look worse.
Of course, an apology will not happen now that Dr. Gates has hinted publicly that he might pursue legal action. Any apology would only be used against Sgt. Crowley in court, as the city’s legal advisor has doubtlessly advised.
Also, what Rev. Monroe describes occurring in Area 4, are examples of racial profiling. What happened to Dr. Gates was not racial profiling. Did Sgt. Crowley stop and question Dr. Gates because of race? No. Did Dr. Gates’ race factor into Sgt. Crowley’s poorly-considered decision to arrest him? Maybe. We don’t know. If we assume it did, we are guilty of judging one man (Sgt. Crowley) by the actions of some members of a group (Cambridge Police).
What happens in Area 4 is a lot more important than what happened to Dr. Gates. Sadly, without the celebrity factor, it will get a lot less attention.
He probably has black friends too…I found it very racist of him to bring that incident up.
and if he had any senseHe should have told the reporter it’s an irrelevant question and point out the reporter’s racism.
Hey, I’m not a racist either.I once let a black coworker use one of my paper clips.
Isn’t it quibbling a bit…to inquire whether it’s technically “profiling” or not? His actions in the situation were clearly based at least in part on race; the neighbor found Prof. Gates to be suspicious at least in part based on his race. Whether it’s called racism or racial profiling or just the inappropriate use of race to draw conclusions about a person’s actions, it really all amounts to the same thing, doesn’t it?
Wow“I’m not a racist! I gave CPR to Reggie Lewis and then cried after he died because I felt I didn’t do enough!”
That’s quite possibly the most pathetic “some of my best friends” defense of all time.
Rev. Monroe is right; there is definitely a class angle. Reggie Lewis, as a black athlete, was well within his “proper” place, and so deserving of CPR. It’s the “black man as minstrel” phenomenon. My former Con Law professor referred to this all the time when discussing race relations. By encouraging black men as entertainment tailored to white America, be that as musicians, athletes, actors, or whatever, it’s keeping them in a place still subservient to whites. Same goes with the service professions such as nursing, food service, or domestic work, industries dominated by women. Black women in service professions are still stuck in the “mammy” role, black men who are athletes or other entertainers stay subservient in the minstrel role. Reggie Lewis didn’t pose a threat to this order at all.
Skip Gates, as a Harvard professor in a nice house in a “white” part of town, did threaten this order. It’s not just a racist cop, it’s a racist cop who was offended that a black man dared to be something other than a white man’s entertainment, and who had risen above his “proper” station.
I’m thinking back on what Kevinchi has said in the past about being teased growing up by other black children for “acting white”, ie, book smart and geeky. I have to wonder if perhaps among the reasons the black cops there didn’t do more to defuse the situation is because they, too, felt deep down that by “acting white,” by being a Harvard professor, Skip Gates deserved a little comeuppance. (I’m sure there was also a very real fear of exacerbating racial problems for themselves within the department by sticking their neck out.) Kevinchi, any thoughts?
This whole incident is disgusting, and I was glad to hear President Obama talk about it last night. Call a spade a spade.
Yes, class definitely played a role herePam, thanks for pointing out the mostly overlooked fact that class definitely played a role in this unfortunate incident. We have both worked with academics who routinely throw out the “do you know who I am” line when encountering mere mortals who are attempting to perform their jobs, so it’s not hard to imagine how an underpaid cop in an Ivy-League town would react to such pompousness/marginalization. The officer also reported that Gates yelled “I’ll talk to your mama outside” when he asked Gates to step outside. The officer’s reaction to these salvos is hardly excusable, but class is certainly a factor to be considered when examining how all of these events led to Gates’s ultimate arrest.
You’re rightBut it’s obvious and increasingly so he doesn’t have any sense or at least hasn’t put it on display so far.
we know it all too well, don’t we?How many academic tantrums over diddly did we see “back in the day?” LOL.
Really?Do you honestly think that’s what he should have said (irrelevant racist question)? Do you think that he’s been media trained? Gates has had the media feeding from his hand for decades — this cop was thrust into the limelight nearly 20 years ago for an instant, and now he’s there again. Gates knows precisely what he is doing every time he opens his mouth in front of a microphone. I doubt this Sgt does.
Do you really think ANYONE in his position — cop basically accused of racism and misfeasance BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE US — could turn around and tell the reporter his question was racist? Hell, the reporter may have asked it in a gushing, fan-boy/girl sort of way.
So what was the question exactly, that would be answered “I wasn’t working on Reggie Lewis the basketball star. I wasn’t working on a black man. I was working on another human being”?
I think it was “What was going through your head when you were doing CPR on Reggie Lewis, the black basketball player?”
And given the context of the whole situation, I think it’s natural for someone to respond the way he did.
Was it the best possible answer? I dunno — it’s gotten people here riled up all to high heaven, so probably not. But I suspect it was an honest answer: he did just see a human being who needed CPR. Perhaps poorly worded, but the truth.
Maybe he is, maybe he isn’t……but this sounds like the kind of dumb explanation an average person gives to the media before the lawyer and spin people get to them.
Pam, any thoughts…Any thoughts on this article?
http://www.bostonherald.com/ne…
I’m not saying I agree with all its points, but the author raises an interesting observation. Valid or not? I’d like your insight.
Of course he gave mouth-to-mouth to a basketball playerWe blacks are SUPPOSED TO BE BASKETBALL PLAYERS!
Not Harvard professors.
How clear is it, really?How were the actions “clearly” based on race? How do you know the neighbor based her suspicions on race, rather than on the fact that there were two men attempting to force their way into a home? Do you think she would not have called police had the men been white? If you do think so, how do you know?
Dr. Gates was contacted by police not because of his race but because he was inside a house where a witness had said two burglars were lurking.
It is not the same thing at all, and calling them the same thing diminishes the damage done by actual racial profiling. It also gives ammunition to people who defend racial profiling, beacause by lumping this incident into that category, the defenders can point out that police have to be able to confront suspects of specific crimes based on witness descriptions or else it will cripple investigation of those crimes.
Maybe Sgt. Crowley arrested Dr. Gates because of race, but I think it just as likely, if not more likely, that Dr. Gates was arrested because he was “big-timing” the sergeant, then threatened to call the chief of police, and then went out to his porch to publicly taunt the sergeant by calling him names in front of the other officers on the scene. It sounds to me like Sgt. Crowley was humiliated, lost his temper, and acted impulsively out of anger. Maybe he would have been slower to anger if Dr. Gates had been white, but we do not have a way to clearly see into his mind and know the truth.
Oh myIn other words, would some black people think that Dr. Gates is “too uppity” and that he got what he deserved?
Yes, I’ve seen and heard a lot of that sentiment about Gates.
I remember when I decided to transfer from community college to a 4 year university a few years back I received quite a bit of that sentiment from some blacks; I was seen as uppity because I applied to some pretty good universities. Due to work obligations and lack of financial aid I had to go to my 3rd choice school, Loyola University (I wanted to go to UC-Santa Cruz). Yes, I received a lot of backlash in the form of accusations of “uppitiness” from some other black people.
I think good points are made
I think that race played a role and class played a role on both sides. There are academics of all colors who play the “don’t you know who I am” card in the same haughty manner as Gates. But only one person in this encounter had a badge and played that trump card. That’s an abuse of power, just as it is when an academic reams out a lowly assistant because “he can.”
That’s why the exploration of class in this story needs more discussion.
The CPR aspect struck a nerveI was a security guard in Minneapolis and the company called in two white suburban EMTs to teach all the staff CPR, and certify us.
I had been diagnosed with HIV probably 3 years earlier, but
I had no paper trail of my diagnosis and wasn’t on meds yet. These women were showing using a mouth shield, and both stated they always carried it when they were in the city, because of AIDS. The clear implication that POC and queers most at risk, all lived in the inner city. I wrote on an evaluation of the class, that these women had better use their mouth shields anywhere they go, because AIDS is just as prevelent in the suburbs.
most likelyIf Dr. Gates had suddenly collapsed with a heart attack during the confrontation with Sgt. Crowley, I would bet my paycheck that Sgt. Crowley would have performed CPR on him too.
Unlike giving savvy, self-serving media interviews, that is something Sgt. Crowley knows how to do.
ThanksYou’re right about the class issue, which is multifaceted indeed, cutting through racial, color, and lots of other boundaries.
Personally, I think they were both being arrogant, stupid jerks, and each one took it too far — first the cop (when he had power), and now Gates (because he has power now — no fear of reprisals, easy access to the media, and the most powerful friend in the world, Obama).
Thank youReverend Monroe and Pam for this post.
What bothered us here last night was the immediate jump, by the media, off of what President Obama said in regards to the health care debate and onto Dr. Gates.
But not Dr. Gates’ arrest and the situation per se (which certainly warrants much more national open discussion), but rather whether or not President Obama should have said that the Cambridge police “acted stupidly”.
We have a long ways to go as a nation, starting with having to re-establish some sort of understanding within MSM of what a newstory IS and ISN’T.
No wonder the blogosphere is kicking ass all over them on a daily basis.
Both possibilities aren’t clear.But I think she would have explained it to herself as what it was if he would have been white. But because he was black, the probability that he could be a criminal was much highter to her.
And for me, the question is also more about whether he didn’t believe him because of his race.
Wouldn’t he do that for a burglar, too?
The 911 tapes will be interestingI fail to understand how the police have a defense at all. Of course a person confronted as a criminal in their own home is going to be irritated if not outraged. Since when does the law require you bow down to police when you are 100% innocent. This is the same as someone being tazered at a traffic stop for questioning the officer. One of the key elements is the officer’s passive-aggressive comment “Thank you for complying with my earlier request. You are under arrest”. If people don’t see that as a blatant egotistical powerplay, then they are blind. I don’t care if Gates flipped off the cop. THAT IS NOT ILLEGAL!!
Rating: 4
Anyone else read this NPR scolding?It is entitled, “Professor Gates, When Confronted By Cops Be Really Polite”.
Sure is a whole lot of Assuming going on in these Gates threadsabout what people were thinking and feeling; less about the facts of this particular case. It’s a Rorschach test for the posters.
If he was adhering to his oath and trainingthen, yes, he would.
Oh, you assume to a lesser extent?
He touched a Black man 16 years ago?The cops first reaction in his own defense is that he touched a Black man 16 years ago? Mind you, he wasn’t a cop at the time. He was an EMT (ambulance attendant). That is like someone saying “I was a firefighter and pulled a Black man out of a burning house so how can I be racist?” WTF?
Think about it. You are involved in a controversial arrest and the first thing that comes to your mind is – oh I remember touching a Black man 16 years ago. That alone says a lot about Officer Crowley.
the writer of this NPR piece is correctI have been saying similiar things and accused of “hating on Gates.”
As a black man, if you are in a situation where the police are involved, that is not the time to make any unneccessary comments. It’s not right and it ain’t fair, but you’ve just got to STFU and do what you gotta do in order to get them to leave. The goal should not be to “show out,” “assert my rights,” or “prove I’m a man,” but to keep the situation from escalating, because the police have the final say so, at least until it gets to court.
After they leave, you can cuss them out, call your attorney, contact the media, etc.
Class is definitely involved in this case, I think both sides overplayed their hands.
Since giving CPR to a black man……he has taught aspiring cops of all colors how to not racially profile.
We’re getting distracted–and by ‘we’ I mean everyone involved–by the racial bias that all Americans carry and sometimes act on. Did the white cop have black friends as a young child? Are some of them still his friends now?
Excuse me, but WTF does that have to do with it? He went out on a break-in call, got up in the guy’s living room, and didn’t take ‘Here’s the proof I live here’ for an answer. Crowley should have said he was sorry for disturbing Gates who was clearly quite tired and frustrated before the cops had arrived, and backed out the front door and down the steps.
I don’t give a damn whether the old guy he arrested was black, brown or purple. The point is, Dr Gates could have been Tasered on his own front porch and fallen over dead because he had the temerity to tell a cop to get the hell out of his house.
That Boston Herald article is right on the money.Here’s another interesting piece of information on Huffington Post:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/…
It doesn’t prove that the cop didn’t act that way because of race.And it doesn’t tell us if there was an abuse of power.
Hmmmm,It could be considered illegal, you do have to cooperate to an extent, and if you do anything that will hold up or delay an investigation, then that is illegal. I’ve heard many reports, I’m sure everyone has, and not much of the events have been similar. So I’m reserving judgement on this one for a while.
Sickening comments from Limbaugh“every time I see this guy on TV I see somebody enraged. I see somebody angry. He’s a liberal, they all are.” – Rush Limbaugh
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/ho…
Uh no.You’re a citizen and a taxpayer. He’s your servant. You are not his servant.
Except of course if you’re black then you’re sxeen as everybody’s servant.
So don’t give me this “goal” crap!
Capiche?
He could have FUCKED a black man 16 years ago –and STILL be just as much of a racist!
Of course not…But it definitely makes the officer look more credible. You cannot just dismiss that fact that he has been teaching officers about racial profiling for five years, as though it never happened. That is a very important piece of information.
Either you’re going to believe that the officer is racist or not. There is absolutely NOTHING he can say or do that will convince people that he isn’t racist if they have already made up their minds.
The cop could have been black……and it still would have been racist. This isn’t about whether the cop is a nice man or not, it’s about a relationship of power, and the systemic nature of police abuse.
“I think that race played a role”Where, specifically? Can you point to any fact at all? From this incident?
After all, as the evidence thus far presented shows, Gates was the only one screaming race from the very beginning of his interaction with the officer.
You’d be hard pressed to find anyone who thinks Gates’ arrest was justified, but that is a far cry from calling this case an example of racial profiling, or even racial bias in policing (neither of which I believe you have explicitly stated). I guess it’s progress that you’re just claiming that “race played a role” even though the facts don’t support that claim.
And it is this kind of worship of police,that enables the police to behave like thugs.
Wow. I just read Irene Monroe’s racist diatribe above.It seems that she’s just using this incident as an excuse to vomit up her rage at the state of race relations in this country. Too bad she picked the wrong case to hang her hat on.
I had no idea she was such a hater. To take just one example:
And she knows all this, how?
What shred of actual evidence does Monroe have in her claim that the white woman who called to report an apparent break-in had racist motivations? As Monroe sarcastically puts it, “The woman’s call was her civic duty in preserving the neighborhood’s integrity…”
What disgusting, racist crap.
“Help, we’re oppressed!”Is there also a version with white privilege instead of Christian supremacy?
Instead of being convinced that there cannot be racism, you could take people who live through it like Irene Monroe more seriously. And I don’t know what I should think about people shouting “[reverse] racism” at minorities …
The thing about people with racial or ethnic prejudices is not that they necessarily want to be racist. They just are.
why?…How about the fact that Gates is black. This entire incident wouldn’t have happened if he wasn’t.
Well said, Fired UpAnd speaking of basketball, it would have been a lovely uplifting tale if Prof Gates and the cop had behaved like a couple of recreational ball players (one black, one white) in a schoolyard pick-up game I once watched a friend play in:
White player was much too aggressive in defense against ball-handling black player. Black player got annoyed and called white player a sexual slur. White player got equally annoyed and called black player a racial slur. The two of them glared at one another for about 30 seconds. Then:
[white player]: Sorry, my bad.
[black player]: No harm, no foul — me too. (I know it’s cliched, but people really do say stuff like this!)
Then the two shared a fist bump and the game went on.
The “because I say so” defense of one’s contentionsmay work in some parts of the online world. The fact that no one, such as yourself, is able to respond to a request to back up their assumptions with facts speaks for itself.
As an example, how do you know that I am demonstrating “white privilege”?