You’ll recall that the first story out about the LGBT fundraiser was in the Advocate, where it was reported that:
The event brought in nearly $1 million, up from about $750,000 last year, according to a Democratic Party source.
This number, not corroborated by anyone at the DNC, was ponied up right quick and many took it to heart that somehow the boycott was an utter failure. However, I soon heard from a very reliable political contact and updated my post to say that there was
something fishy about that $1 Million amount claimed to have been raised for the DNC fundraiser. So we cannot confirm that this is all queer money from this fundraiser.As often done, Andy Tobias as Treasurer of the DNC can apply any of his fundraising efforts or other DNC staff fundraising efforts to whichever event that in order to inflate the success of the particular fundraiser. Many straight stockbrokers (loyal DNC’ers) could have given $30K in the months prior to the fundraiser, and had no clue where his/her money was being applied internally at the DNC. Also there are regular Queer Donors to the DNC that give monthly and annually and this amount was probably added to the tally for the event.
FEC reports will be filed at the end of this month so we will be able to check the DNC amounts for when the $$$ was raised, and who wrote a check from the LGBT community. My inside source says they would be lucky if they actually raised $250,000. Still a lot of money, but no where near the $1,000,000. claimed by the DNC.
Michelangelo Signorile was also wondering about that original figure from an unnamed source, so he tried to get some answers from the DNC. You won’t be surprised at the results so far.
Andy Tobias, the openly gay treasurer of the DNC, was fretting about the event and complaining to people, according to three individuals who’d interacted with him and with whom I spoke in the days before the fundraiser (and I’ve spoken to several others who confirmed this to me after the fundraiser as well). Publicly, DNC officials and hosts like Barney Frank were keeping a stiff upper lip, trying to tamp down the power of the blogs and the influence of all those who dropped out of the fundraiser. But privately, Tobias had pretty much thrown in the towel on the event.…When I contacted the DNC’s LGBT fundraising director, Tom Petrillo, for confirmation of the one million dollar amount, he bumped me up after a day to press office, where Caroline Ciccone took another day to get back to me, only to tell me that the DNC would not confirm the one million dollar amount and said the DNC doesn’t confirm fundraising event figures. But in searching around and looking at the coverage of other fundraisers, I found this story, which, for example, attributes Obama’s bringing in 3 million dollars at an event recently to DNC “officials.” And this one has many details and implies they came from the DNC. At the very least, the DNC doesn’t seem to want to be so distanced from the reporting on the numbers in these stories.
Much more below the fold.
Ooops. Sounds like trouble for that pesky queer dollar count, no? BTW, Mike invited Tom Petrillo to come on his show to discuss the discrepancies, and well, are you surprised that Petrillo declined after the request for info was bumped up to the DNC press office? Mike:
We now need a confirmation of the one million dollar number from the DNC, on the record, with a clear breakdown of where the money comes from. With the absence of that no one should assume this fundraiser did well at all, as all of the evidence — and the statements from Tobias to various people before the fundraiser — points in the opposite direction. People who want to pressure the Democrats should continue to target the DNC fundraisers since it clearly really hit a nerve, to the point where they had to spin something out immediately and go so far with the numbers — like the Iranian ayatollahs — in an attempt to nip any revolution in the bud, even though it’s now raised many more questions.
There are also a number of questions Mike posed that the DNC needs to answer to have any credibility at this point, as we await the FEC report showing donor breakdown (it’s out in mid-July). Feel free to send return responses fundraising appeals from the DNC with these attached:
|




22 Comments


The Important Thing is the Message was DeliveredDNC can spin this anyway they want. The truth is the message was delivered, and there was no way they got $1M from this event. Everyone, including Obama, knows we are pissed off, which is why we are seeing these lame attempts to appease us.
Keep the pressure up.
A Potential Benefit from the Protest?Slightly off-topic, but it may be a sign we are having an impact and the GayTM is not as lucrative as it might be. MSNBC is reporting that the Obama administration will not appeal the judgement in favor of Diane Schroer:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31…
So?Yeah, I suspect they shifted some money around to make the haul seem bigger than it actually was.
So what? It happens with other fundraising events. It’s called posturing to impress the Republicans (who do the same thing) with your fundraising prowess.
So what? Is this a horse you really want to continue beating?
How about dropping this story … and getting on with using blogs, contributions, and every other damned weapon in our arsenal to push POTUS and Congress (R as well as D) toward equal rights.
I agree, the press & spin is ancillaryregardless of what they’re SAYING they made, if they really did make a substantial amount less, that’s the important thing. Politicians listen to money more than anything.
I think this story is important.It’s up to bloggers these days to find real truths as our MSM news is filled with nothing but propaganda. If the DNC is lying, shouldn’t we know about it?
Keep up the good work, Pam.
We also want to knowhow fabulous was the spa?
If you don’t think hitting them in the wallet–BIGTIME–constitutes “pushing them toward equal rights,” what would qualify, in your view?
Did it soothe Barney’s rage?He was out of his mind in the Signorile interview…maybe he needed a good soak…especially after the lousy take at the door…and having to find a way to make it look good.
Poor Barney…can’t even get respect from his community.
If only he wasn’t afraid to stand up to the President. He at least could get credit for having integrity.
If this $1 million take is just smoke and mirrors, the DNC is even WORSE than we thought.
They won’t act on our behalf, even though they campaign to us and say they will be our advocates.
They pass the buck: ask the President, pressure congress, let the court decide.
They lie to us about the effect of our own advocacy in the hope to manipulate us into obedience.
All they’ve gotta do is take action…but they’d rather try to get away with doing nothing.
Keep on this, Pam. Someone has to…there are far too many sheepish LGBTs that just don’t get it…and I don’t know why…they are even sicker than the DNC. We can’t let the ones that are fooled by the Party be the ones to torpedo our own fierce advocacy.
It reminds me of an episode of Seinfeldwhere he works into his comedy routine a bit about having a friend (George) who puts in way more work into trying to get unemployment than actually finding & keeping a job would take.
They are spending way more time & effort trying to project a false image of being supportive of & supported by lgbt citizens than it would take to just be supportive of us & in turn get support from us.
Thanks for that,I have been firing them back as fast as they come. especially before June 30… more ammo is always good.
I Can’t Say but, Did You Hear???South Carolina First Lady Jenny Sanford is blaming gay marriage for her failed marriage to Gov. Mark Sanford.
And to think, I felt sorry for this southern belle????
No more.
From Inside the DNC. . .Someone I talked with in he DNC told me a similar story. Check out it in my PHB post:
http://www.pamshouseblend.com/…
Various ThoughtsFirst, thank you , Pam and Michelangelo, for continuing to follow-up on this story. Our community owes you both a great deal of gratitude for your work. Second, having been involved in several challenges to authority over the years, I am not surprised to read the information you have gathered. One of the ways that oppressors maintain their power is by creating disinformation that will increase the likelihood of the oppressed giving up. One of the most popular of these is to imply that those who are challenging them are only an isolated few, while the vast majority of others support the oppressor. This is, of course, a variation on that theme. I hope people will remember it as they continue to challenge the Obama administration, as it will be used again and again in an attempt to disempower us.
Source?
Agreed x1000They wouldn’t be trying to say “Look, one million dollars NO REALLY IT IS” if the message hadn’t come through loud and clear.
it’s satireNot factual. http://thediscust.com/?p=547
Read the disclaimer:
http://thediscust.com/?page_id=2
Not for realApparently Jenny’s remarks were fabricated by a satirical site:
http://thediscust.com/?p=547
More info here:
http://thenewcivilrightsmoveme…
The Advocate is in bed with Obamaas they participated in pushing the million dollar haul story
Frank is a lousy interviewbecause he expects the LGBT community to kow tow…he is used to getting his own way and adulation from us in exchange for very little in return.
That day is over.
He is enamoured of his power inside of the beltway; he never tires of telling us all that we don’t uderstand how politics are done.
How politics is or is not done s defined by how he politicians are willing to play.
“he never tires of telling us all that we don’t uderstand how politics are done. “You’re right, of course. But the problem–and I can’t imagine Frank grasping it–is that we understand perfectly well how politics are done. And we’re had enough.
Plus they just put out an article 2 days agothat listed ‘good gay blogs,’ and I was surprised that PHB was not on it. Seemed like they were pushing ones that are not questioning authority.
Bottom line:blogs that question authority make their corporate advertisers unhappy.