Larry Stickney is the director of the anti-LGBT Washington Values Alliance, and he’s trolling for dollars.  The question is, after you read his resume and grade his recent homework, would you give him your money?

The only two campaigns he has managed, FAILED.  His resume states:

Larry also served as campaign manager during [John] Koster’s 2000 Congressional bid…In 1999, he managed the Initiative 694 measure to ban partial-birth abortion.

Koster lost to the pro-LGBT Democrat Rick Larsen (D-WA02), who still holds the congressional seat almost 10 years later.  And Washington voters roundly rejected Larry’s anti-choice initiative.  I’m really scratching my head – who puts failures on their resume?  And who gives money to people who put failures on their resume?

Maybe Larry’s abysmal track record helps to explain his incomprehensible decision to waste $$$ airing t.v. ads aimed at, I kid you not, solidly pro-equality legislators.  Did he really think these bullying ads would change the votes of senators who have sponsored and/or voted for every DP bill to date?  By his own admission, “These ads have cost us a lot of money and we will need more if we want them to continue!”  Lord. Have. Mercy.  Either Larry is really as dim as his choice of resume highlights suggests, or he’s got a buddy in the business he likes to float cash to.

In his recent fund raising letter, Larry says We are earning your confidence and trust.  I’m wondering just how he figures that.

How Senators targeted by Larry’s t.v. ads have vote on the DP bills.
Senator SB 5336 in 2007 HB 3104 in 2008 SB 5688 in 2009
Brandland yes yes yes
Hobbs sponsor sponsor sponsor
Berkey yes sponsor yes
Kauffman yes sponsor sponsor
Kilmer yes sponsor sponsor
Pflug excused yes yes
Marr yes sponsor yes
King N/A yes yes

Incidentally, several of the senators targeted by Larry’s expensive t.v. ads responded via the press.  The articles also contain quotes from Gary & Larry, despite their contention that the press is ignoring them.

The ads are a poor attempt at using fear to justify bigotry. It’s a typical tactic, but it won’t work,” [Senator Steve Hobbs (D-Lake Stevens)], a sponsor of the bill, said Monday night.

“I did not fight for freedom in Iraq, only to come home and deny basic human rights to my fellow citizens. This legislation is not about the erosion of marriage. It’s about equality and fairness,” he said.

[Jean Berkey (D-Everett)] voted for the bill.

“I understand this is a contentious issue, but domestic partners should be treated the same as married couples. They deserve equal respect under the law. This bill acknowledges the growing recognition of the importance of equality for all,” she said earlier Tuesday.

The Bellingham paper reported:

[Senator Dale] Brandland…simply wasn’t a swing vote on the issue. And he was aware that the bill’s sponsor, Sen. Ed Murray, D-Seattle, fully intended the legislation to be “everything but marriage,” as the proposal had been dubbed.

“I guess from my perspective, I’ve come to the conclusion that people are born gay. I don’t think this is something that they just pick up along the way,” the former Whatcom County sheriff said. “Once I came up with that kind of conclusion, it wasn’t difficult for me to understand that gay people are going to develop feelings for people of the same sex and will want to get into meaningful relationships.

“I thought it was inappropriate to deny them some of the basic rights that relationship entails.”